Performance evaluation in work settings

Annual Review of Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue , 1998, Pages 141-168

  Arvey, R D ^a   Murphy, K R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Appraisal; Evaluation; Performance; Review; Utility

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; WORK;

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; HUMANS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WORK;

EID: 0031608211     PISSN: 00664308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.141     Document Type: Article

References (149)

1. Anderson N, Herriot P, eds. 1994. Assessment and Selection in Organizations: Methods and Practice for Recruitment and Appraisal. New York. Wiley
2. Antonioni D. 1994. The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Pers. Psychol. 47:349-56
3. Arvey RD. 1986. General ability in employment: a discussion. J. Vocat. Behav 29: 415-20
4. Arvey RD, Renz G, Watson T. 1997. Individual differences in emotionality as predictors of job performance In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, ed. GR Ferris, KM Rowland, Vol. 15. Greenwich, CT: JAI. In press
5. Arvey RD, Sackett PR. 1993. Fairness in selection: current developments and perspectives. See Schmitt et al 1993, pp. 171-202
6. Austin JT, Villanova P. 1992. The criterion problem: 1917-1992. J Appl. Psychol. 77(6):836-74
7. Banks CG, Murphy KR. 1985. Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal. Pers. Psychol. 38(2): 335-45
8. y and the implications for utility analysis. J Appl. Psychol. 77(3): 227-33
9. Bernardin HJ, Beatty RW. 1984 Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work Boston: Kent
10. Bernardin HJ, Hennessey HW Jr, Peyrefitte J. 1995. Age, racial, and gender bias as a function of criterion specificity: a test of expert testimony. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 5(1):63-77
11. Bobko P, Colella A. 1994. Employee reactions to performance standards: a review and research propositions. Pers. Psychol. 47(1): 1-29
12. Bobko P, Karren R, Kerkar SP. 1987. Systematic research needs for understanding supervisory-based estimates of SDy in utility analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 40(1):69-95
13. Bornmer WH, Johnson JL, Rich GA, Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB. 1995. On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 48(3): 587-605
14. Borman WC, Brush DH. 1993. More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements. Hum. Perform. 6(1):1-21
15. Borman WC, Hanson M, Hedge J. 1997. Personnel selection. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48: 299-337
16. Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. See Schmitt et al 1993, pp. 71-98
17. Borman WC, White LA, Dorsey DW. 1995. Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 80(1):168-77
18. Boudreau JW. 1991. Utility analysis for decisions in human resource management. See Dunnette & Hough 1991, pp. 621-745
19. Boudreau JW, Sturman MC, Judge TA. 1994. Utility analysis: What are the black boxes, and do they affect decisions? See Anderson & Herriot 1994, pp. 77-96
20. Bretz RD, Milkovich GT, Read W. 1992. The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: concerns, directions, and implications. J. Manage. 18(2):321-52
21. Brief AP, Motowidlo SJ. 1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Acad. Manage. Rev. 10:710-25
22. Brogden HE. 1949. When testing pays off. Pers. Psychol. 2:171-83
23. Campbell JP, Gasser MB, Oswald FL. 1996. The substantive nature of job performance variability. In Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations, ed. KR Murphy, pp. 258-99. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
24. Campbell JP, McCloy RA, Oppler SH, Sager CE. 1993. A theory of performance. See Schmitt et al 1993, pp. 35-70
25. Cardy RL, Dobbins GH. 1994. Performance Appraisal: Alternative Perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: Southwest
26. Cascio WF. 1991. Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations. Boston: Kent. 3rd ed.
27. Cascio WF. 1993. Assessing the utility of selection decisions: theoretical and practical considerations. See Schmitt et al 1993, pp. 310-40
28. Cascio WF. 1995. Whither industrial and organizational psychology in a changing world of work? Am. Psychol. 50(11): 928-39
29. Cascio WF, Bernardin HJ. 1984. Implications of performance appraisal litigation for personnel decisions. Pers. Psychol. 34(2): 211-26
30. Cesare SJ, Blankenship MH, Giuannetto PW. 1994. A dual focus of Sdy estimations: a test of the linearity assumption and multivariate application. Hum. Perform. 7(4): 235-55
31. Chemers MM, Oskamp S, Costanzo MA, eds. 1995. Diversity in Organizations: New Perspectives for a Changing Workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
32. Church AH. 1995 Performance appraisal: practical tools or effective measures. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 33(2):57-64
33. Cleveland JN, Murphy KR. 1992. Analyzing performance appraisal as goal-directed behavior. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, ed. GR Ferris, KM Rowland, 10:121-85. Greenwich, CT: JAI
34. Conway JM. 1996. Analysis and design of multitrait-multirater performance appraisal studies. J. Manage 22(1):139-62
35. Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC. 1965. Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press. 2nd ed.
36. Day DV, Silverman SB. 1989. Personality and job performance: evidence of incremental validity. Pers Psychol. 42(1):25-36
37. Day DV, Sulsky LM. 1995. Effects of frame-of-reference training and information configuration on memory organization and rating accuracy. J. Appl Psychol. 80(1): 158-67
38. De Corte W. 1994. Utility analysis for the one-cohort selection-retention decision with a probationary period. J. Appl. Psychol. 79(3):402-11
39. De Corte W. 1996. Recruitment and retention decisions that maximize the utility of a probationary selection to obtain a fixed quota of successful selectees. Pers. Psychol. 49(2):399-428
40. DeNisi AS. 1997. A Cognitive Approach to Performance Appraisal: A Program of Research London: Routledge. In press
41. DeNisi AS, Peters LH. 1996. Organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field. J. Appl. Psychol. 81(6). 717-37
42. Dickinson TL. 1993. Attitudes about performance appraisal. In Personnel Selection and Assessment: Individual and Organizational Perspectives, ed. H Schuler, JL Farr, M Smith, pp. 141-62. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
43. DuBois CL, Sackett PR, Zedeck S, Fogli L. 1993. Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria: definitional issues, prediction, and white-black differences. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(2): 205-11
44. Dunnette MD, Hough LM, eds. 1991. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2. Palo Alto, CA: Consult. Psychol. Press. 2nd ed.
45. Dunnette MD, Hough LM, eds. 1992. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 3. Palo Alto, CA: Consult. Psychol. Press. 2nd ed.
46. Feild HS, Holley WH. 1982. The relationship of performance appraisal system characteristics to verdicts in selected employment discrimination cases. Acad. Manage. J. 25(2):392-406
47. Feldman JM. 1981. Beyond attribution theory: cognitive processes in performance appraisal. J Appl. Psychol. 66(2):127-48
48. Ferris GR, Judge TA, Rowland KM, Fitzgibbons DE. 1994. Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: test of a model. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 58:101-35
49. Fletcher C. 1994. Performance appraisal in context: organizational changes and their impact on practice. See Anderson & Herriot 1994, pp. 41-55
50. Fletcher C. 1995. New directions for performance appraisal: some findings and observations. Int J. Select. Assess. 3(3):191-201
51. Folger R, Konovsky MA, Cropanzano R. 1992. A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. In Research in Organizational Behavior, ed. BM Staw, LL Cummings, 14:129-77. Greenwich, CT: JAI
52. Ford JK, Kraiger K, Schechtman SL. 1986. Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: a meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychol. Bull 99(3):330-37
53. Ganzach Y. 1995. Negativity (and positivity) in performance evaluation: three field studies. J. Appl. Psychol. 80(4):491-99
54. George RA, Brief AP. 1992. Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychol. Bull. 112(2):310-29
55. Gerhart B, Milkovich GT. 1992. Employee compensation: research and practice. See Dunnette & Hough 1992, pp. 481-569
56. Gottfredson LS. 1991. The evaluation of alternative measures of job performance. In. Performance Assessment for the Workplace, Tech. Issues, ed. AK Wigdor, BF Green Jr, 2:75-126. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Sci.
57. Guion RM, Gibson WM. 1988. Personnel selection and placement Annu. Rev. Psychol. 37:349-74
58. Guzzo RA, Dickson MW. 1996. Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annu Rev. Psychol. 47:307-38
59. Harris MM, Smith DE, Champagne D. 1995. A field study of performance appraisal purpose: research-versus administrative-based ratings Pers. Psychol. 48(1): 151-60
60. Harrison DA, Shaffer MA. 1994. Comparative examinations of self-reports and perceived absenteeism norms: wading through Lake Wobegon, J. Appl. Psychol. 79(2):240-51
61. Hedge JW, Borman WC. 1995. Changing conceptions and practices in performance appraisal. In The Changing Nature of Work, ed. A Howard, pp. 451-81. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
62. Hofmann DA, Jacobs R, Baratta JE. 1993. Dynamic criteria and the measurement of change. J Appl. Psychol 78(2). 194-204
63. Hunt S. 1996. Generic work behavior: an investigation into the dimensions of entry-level. hourly job performance. Pers. Psychol. 49(1):51-83
64. Ilgen DR, Barnes-Farrell JL, McKellin DB. 1993. Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 54(3):321-68
65. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR. 1991. The structure of work: job design and roles. See Dunnette & Hough 1991, pp. 165-207
66. Jackson SE, Ruderman MN. 1995. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
67. Johns G. 1994. How often were you absent? A review of the use of self-reported absence data. J. Appl. Psychol. 79(4):574-91
68. Jourden FJ, Heath C. 1996. The evaluation gap in performance perceptions: illusory perceptions of groups and individuals. J. Appl. Psychol. 81(4):369-79
69. Judiesch MK, Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. 1993. Has the problem of judgment in utility analysis been solved? J. Appl. Psychol. 78(6):903-11
70. Judiesch MK, Schmidt FL, Mount MK. 1992. Estimates of the dollar value of employee output in utility analyses: an empirical test of two theories. J. Appl. Psychol. 77(3): 234-50
71. Kane JS. 1994. A model of volitional rating behavior. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 4(3):83-310
72. Kinicki AJ, Hom PW, Trost MR, Wade KJ. 1995. Effects of category prototypes on performance-rating accuracy. J Appl. Psychol 80(3):354-70
73. Klaas BS, McClendon JA. 1996. To lead, lag, or match: estimating the financial impact of pay level policies. Pers. Psychol. 49(1): 121-41
74. Kleiman LS, Durham RS. 1981. Performance appraisal, promotion, and the courts: a critical review. Pers. Psychol. 34(1): 103-21
75. Kraiger K, Ford JK. 1985. A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. J. Appl Psychol. 70(1):56-65
76. Kulick CT, Ambrose ML. 1993. Category-based and feature-based processes in performance appraisal: integrating visual and computerized sources of performance data. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(5):821-30
77. Lance CE, LaPointe JA, Stewart AM. 1994. A test of the context dependency of three causal models of halo rater error. J. Appl. Psychol. 79(3).332-40
78. Landy FJ, Farr JL. 1980. Performance rating. Psychol. Bull. 87(1):72-107
79. Landy FJ, Farr JL. 1983. The Measurement of Work Performance. Methods, Theory, and Applications. New York: Academic
80. Landy FJ, Shankster LJ, Kohler SS. 1994. Personnel selection and placement. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 45:261-96
81. Latham GP, Skarlicki D, Irvine D, Siegel JP. 1993. The increasing importance of performance appraisals to employee effectiveness in organizational settings in North America. Int. Rev. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 8:87-132
82. Latham GP, Whyte G. 1994. The futility of utility analysis. Pers. Psychol. 47(10): 31-46
83. Law KS, Myors B. 1993. Cutoff scores that maximize the total utility of a selection program: Comment on Martin and Raju's (1992) procedure. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(5): 736-40
84. Lawler EE III. 1990. Strategic Pay. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
85. Lawler EE III, Jenkins GD Jr. 1992. Strategic reward systems. See Dunnette & Hough 1992, pp. 1009-55
86. London M, Smither JW. 1995. Can multisource feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance-related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research. Pers. Psychol. 48(4):803-39
87. Macan TH, Highhouse S. 1994. Communicating the utility of human resource activities: a survey of I/O and HR professionals. J. Bus. Psychol. 8(4):425-36
88. Martell RF, Borg MR. 1993. A comparison of the behavioral rating accuracy of groups and individuals. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(1): 43-50
89. Martin SL, Raju NS. 1992. Determining cutoff scores that optimize utility: a recognition of recruiting costs. J. Appl. Psychol. 77(1): 15-23
90. Maurer TJ, Palmer JK, Ashe DK. 1993. Diaries, checklists, evaluations and contrast effects in measurement of behavior. J. Appl Psychol. 78(2):226-31
91. McCloy RA, Campbell JP, Cudeck R. 1994. A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. J. Appl. Psychol. 79(4): 493-505
92. McEvoy GM, Cascio WF. 1989. Cumulative evidence of the relationship between employee age and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 74(1):11-17
93. McHenry JJ, Hough LM, Toquam JL, Hanson MA, Ashworth S. 1990. Project A validity results: the relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Pers. Psychol. 43(2):335-55
94. McIntyre MD, James LR. 1995. The inconsistency with which raters weight and combine information across targets. Hum. Perform. 8(2):95-111
95. McIntyre RM, Salas E. 1995. Measuring and managing for team performance: emerging principles from complex environments. In Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, ed. R Guzzo, E Salas, pp. 9-45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
96. Mero NP, Motowidlo SJ. 1995. Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and the favorability of performance ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 80(4):517-24
97. Motowidlo SJ, Van Scotter JR. 1994. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 79(4):475-80
98. Murphy KR. 1986. When your top choice turns you down: Effect of rejected offers on the utility of selection tests. Psychol. Bull. 99(1):133-38
99. Murphy KR, Cleveland JN. 1991. Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
100. Murphy KR, Cleveland JN. 1995. Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational and Goal-Based Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
101. Murphy KR, Jako RA, Anhalt RL. 1993. Nature and consequences of halo error: a critical analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(2): 218-25
102. Murphy K, Shiarella A. 1996. Estimating the validity and utility of selection test batteries in relation to multi-attribute criteria. Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol., 11th, San Diego
103. Nilsen D, Campbell DP. 1993. Self-observer rating discrepancies: Once an overrater, always an overrater? Hum. Resour. Manage. 32(2/3):265-81
104. Oppler SH, Campbell JP, Pulakos ED, Borman WC. 1992. Three approaches to the investigation of subgroup bias in performance measurement: review, results, and conclusions. J. Appl. Psychol. 77(2): 201-17
105. Organ DW. 1988. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington, MA: Lexington
106. Prendergast C, Topel RH. 1996. Favoritism in organizations. J. Polit. Econ. 104(5): 958-78
107. Pulakos ED, Schmitt N, Chan D. 1996. Models of job performance ratings: an examination of ratee race, ratee gender, and rater level effects. Hum. Perform. 9:103-19
108. Pulakos ED, White LA, Oppler SH, Borman WC. 1989. Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings. J. Appl. Psychol 74(5):770-80
109. Raju NS, Burke MJ, Maurer TJ. 1995. A note on direct range restriction corrections in utility analysis. Pers. Psychol. 48(1): 143-49
110. Raju NS, Burke MJ, Normand J. 1990. A new approach for utility analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 75(1):3-12
111. Raju NS, Burke MJ, Normand J, Lezotte DV. 1993. What would be if what is wasn't? Rejoinder to Judiesch, Schmidt, and Hunter (1993). J. Appl. Psychol. 78(6): 912-16
112. Robbins TL, DeNisi AS. 1994. A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in performance appraisal J. Appl Psychol 79(3): 341-53
113. y in complex situations. J. Bus. Psychol. 8(4):437-54
114. Rothstein MG, Paunonen SV, Rush JC, King GA. 1994. Personality and cognitive ability predictors of performance in graduate business school. J. Educ. Psychol. 86(4): 516-30
115. Ryan AM, Daum D, Bauman T, Grisez M, Mattimore K, et al. 1995. Direct, indirect, and controlled observation and rating accuracy. J. Appl. Psychol. 80(6):664-70
116. Saavedra R, Kwun SK. 1993. Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(3):450-62
117. Sackett PR, DuBois CL. 1991. Rater-ratee race effects on performance evaluation: challenging meta-analytic conclusions. J. Appl. Psychol. 76(6):873-77
118. Sackett PR, Zedeck S, Fogli L. 1988. Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 73(3):482-86
119. Sanchez JI, De La Torre P. 1996. A second look at the relationship between rating and behavioral accuracy in performance appraisal. J. Appl. Psychol. 81(1):3-10
120. Schmidt FL. 1993. Personnel psychology at the cutting edge. See Schmitt et al 1993, pp. 497-515
121. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE, McKenzie RC, Muldrow TW. 1979. Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. J. Appl. Psychol. 64(6):609-26
122. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE, Pearlman K. 1981. Task differences as moderators of aptitude test validity in selection: a red herring J. Appl. Psychol 66(5):166-85
123. Schmitt N, Borman WC, Associates, eds. 1993. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
124. Schrader BW, Steiner DD 1996. Common comparison standards: an approach to improving agreement between self and supervisory performance ratings. J Appl. Psychol. 81(6):813-20
125. Stamoulis DT, Hauenstein NMA. 1993. Rater training and rating accuracy: training for dimensional accuracy versus training for ratee differentiation. J Appl. Psychol. 78(6):994-1003
126. Stone BM, Turner KL, Wiggins VL, Looper LT. 1996, Measuring airman job performance using occupational survey data. Mil. Psychol. 8(3):143-60
127. Sumer HC, Knight PA. 1996. Assimilation and contrast effects in performance ratings: effects of rating the previous performance on rating subsequent performance. J. Appl. Psychol 81(4):436-42
128. Taylor MS, Tracy KB, Renard MK, Harrison JK, Carroll SJ. 1995. Due process in performance appraisal. a quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Adm. Sci. Q. 40: 495-523
129. Tornow WW. 1993. Perceptions or reality? Is multi-perspective measurement a means or an end? Hum. Resour Manage. 32: 2211-29
130. Vance RJ, Colella A. 1990. The utility of utility analysis. Hum Perform. 3(2):123-39
131. Vance RJ, MacCallum RC, Coovert MD, Hedge JW. 1988. Construct validity of multiple job performance measures using confirmatory factor analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 73(1):74-80
132. Van Scotter JR, Motowidlo SJ. 1996. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. J Appl Psychol. 81(5):525-31
133. Van Velsor E, Taylor S, Leslie JB. 1993. An examination of the relationships among self-perception accuracy, self-awareness, gender, and leader effectiveness. Hum. Resour. Manage. 32(2&3):249-63
134. Varma A, DeNisi AS, Peters LH. 1996. Interpersonal affect and performance appraisal: a field study. Pers. Psychol. 49(2):341-60
135. Viswesvaran C. 1996. Modeling job performance: Is there a general factor? Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol., 11th. San Diego
136. Viswesvaran C, Ones DS, Schmidt FL. 1996. Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 81(5):557-74
137. Waldman DA. 1994a. Contributions of total quality management to the theory of work performance. Acad. Manage. Rev. 19, 510-36
138. Waldman DA. 1994b. Designing performance management systems for total quality implementation. J. Organ. Change 7(2): 31-44
139. Waldman DA, Avolio BJ. 1986. A meta-analysis of age differences in job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 71(1):33-38
140. Waldman DA, Spangler WD. 1989. Putting together the pieces: a closer look at the determinants of job performance. Hum Perform. 2(1):29-59
141. Werner JM. 1994. Dimensions that make a difference: examining the impact of in-role and extrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 79(1):98-107
142. Wigdor AK, Green BF Jr, eds. 1991. Performance Assessment for the Workplace, Vols. 1, 2. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Sci.
143. Woehr DJ. 1994. Understanding frame-of-reference training: the impact of training on the recall of performance information. J Appl. Psychol. 79(4):525-34
144. Woehr DJ, Feldman J. 1993. Processing objective and question order effects on the causal relation between memory and judgment in performance appraisal: the tip of the iceberg. J. Appl. Psychol 78(2): 232-41
145. Woehr DJ, Huffcutt AI. 1994. Rater training for performance appraisal: a quantitative review. J. Occup. Organ Psychol. 67: 189-205
146. Woehr DJ, Roch SG. 1996. Context effects in performance evaluation: the impact of ratee sex and performance level on performance ratings and behavioral recall. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 66(1):31-41
147. Yammarino FJ, Atwater LE. 1993. Understanding self-perception accuracy: implications for human resource management. Hum. Resour. Manage. 32(2&3):231-48
148. Yang H, Sackett PR, Arvey RD. 1996. Statistical power and cost in training evaluation: some new considerations. Pers. Psychol. 49(3):651-68
149. Yu J, Murphy KR. 1993. Modesty bias in self-ratings of performance: a test of the culrural relativity hypothesis. Pers. Psychol. 46(2):357-63