Identifying Motivation and Interpersonal Performance Using Peer Evaluations

Military Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 73-88

  Zazanis, Michelle M ^a   Zaccaro, Stephen J ^b   Kilcullen, Robert N ^a  

^a US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012283885     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327876MP1302_01     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amir, Y., Kovarsky, Y., & Sharan, S. (1970). Peer nominations as a predictor of multistage promotions in a ramified organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 462-469.
2. Borman, W. C. (1974). The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 105-124.
3. Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168-177.
4. Downey, R. G., Medland, F. F., & Yates, L. G. (1976). Evaluation of a peer rating system for predicting subsequent promotion of senior military officers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 206-209.
5. Dugan, R. D. (1953). Comparison of evaluation of B-29 crews in training and in combat. American Psychologist, 8, 343-344.
6. Gordon, L. V., & Medland, F. F. (1964). The cross group stability of peer ratings of leadership potential. Personnel Psychology, 18, 173-178.
7. Green, P. E. (1978). Analyzing multivariate data. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
8. Hollander, E. P. (1956). Interpersonal exposure time as a determinant of the predictive utility of peer ratings. Psychological Reports, 2, 445-448.
9. Hollander, E. P. (1957). The reliability of peer nominations under various conditions of administration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 85-90.
10. Klimoski, R. J., & London, M. (1974). Role of the rater in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 445-451.
11. Knapp, D. J., & Campbell, J. P. (1993). Building a joint-service classification research roadmap: Criterion-related issues (Rep. No. AFMC AL/HR-TP-1993-0028). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Human Resources Directorate Manpower and Personnel Research Division.
12. Kraut, A. I. (1975). Prediction of managerial success by peer and training staff ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 14-19.
13. Love, K. G. (1981). Comparison of peer assessment methods: Reliability, validity, friendship bias, and user reaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 451-457.
14. Mayfield, E. C. (1970). Management selection: Buddy nominations revisited. Personnel Psychology, 23, 377-391.
15. Mumford, M. M. (1983). Social comparison theory and the evaluation of peer evaluations: A review and some applied implications. Personnel Psychology, 36, 867-881.
16. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. O'Connor, W. F., & Berkshire, J. R. (1958). Comparison of the pre-flight OLQ grade and the leadership peer rating as predictors of training failure (Rep. No. 58-16). Pensacola, FL: U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine.
18. Oppler, S. H., Peterson, N. G., & McCloy, R. A. (1994, April). A comparison of peer supervisor ratings as criteria for the validation of predictors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.
19. Orpen, C. (1983). Peer ratings as predictors of managerial performance. Psychological Studies, 28, 78-80.
20. Reynolds, H. H. (1966). Efficacy of sociometric ratings in predicting leadership success. Psychological Reports, 19, 35-40.
21. Rothstein, H. R. (1990). Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 322-327.
22. Russell, T. L., Crafts, J. L., Tagliareni, F. A., McCloy, R. A., & Barkley, P. (1996). Job analysis of Special Forces jobs (ARI Research Note 96-76). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
23. Russell, T. L., Rohrback, M. R., Nee, M. T., Crafts, J. L., Peterson, N. G., & Mael, F. A. (1995). Development of a roadmap for Special Forces selection and classification research (ARI Tech. Rep. No. 1033). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
24. Schumacher, J. E., Scogin, F., Howland, K., & McGee, J. (1992). The relation of peer assessment to future law enforcement performance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 286-293.
25. Shore, T. H., Shore, L. M., & Thornton, G. C. (1992). Construct validity of self-and peer evaluations of performance dimensions in an assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 42-54.
26. Wherry, R. J., & Fryer, D. H. (1949). Buddy ratings: Popularity contest or leadership criteria? Personnel Psychology, 2, 147-159.
27. Williams, S. B., & Leavitt, H. J. (1947). Group opinion as a predictor of military leadership. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 283-291.
28. Willingham, W. W. (1959). On deriving standard scores for peer nominations with subgroups of unequal size. Psychological Reports, 5, 397-403.