360° ratings: An analysis of assumptions and a research agenda for evaluating their validity

Human Resource Management Review

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 299-315

  Borman, Walter C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031227401     PISSN: 10534822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-4822(97)90010-3     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams-Webber J.R. Personal Construct Theory: Concepts and Applications. 1979;John Wiley and Sons, New York.
2. Berry N.H., Nelson P.D., McNally M.S. A Note on Supervisory Ratings. Personnel Psychology. 19:1966;423-426.
3. Borman W.C. The Rating of Individuals in Organizations: An Alternate Approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 12:1974;105-124.
4. Borman W.C. Personal Constructs, Performance Schemata, and 'Folk Theories' of Subordinate Effectiveness: Explorations in an Army Officer Sample. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 40:1987;307-322.
5. Borman W.C., Mendel R.M., Lammlein S.E., Rosse R.L. Development and Validation of a Test Battery to Predict the Job Performance of Transmission and Distribution Personnel at Florida Power and Light. Personal Construct Theory: Concepts and Applications. 1981;Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Minneapolis.
6. Borman W.C., Pulakos E.D. Army-Wide Data Analyses and Results. In Development and Field Test Report for the Army-Wide Rating Scales and the Rater Orientation and Training Program. 1986;. Submitted to the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA.
7. Borman W.C., Toquam J.L., Rosse R.L. Development and Validation of an Inventory Battery to Predict Navy and Marine Corps Recruiter Performance. Institute Report #22. 1978;Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Minneapolis.
8. Borman W.C., White L.A., Dorsey D.W. Effects of Ratee Task Performance and Interpersonal Factors on Supervisor and Peer Performance Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology. 80:1995;168-177.
9. Bracken D.W. Multisource (360-degree) Feedback: Surveys for Individual and Organizational Development. Kraut A.I. Organizational Surveys. 1996;117-147 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
10. Buckner D.N. The Predictability of Ratings as a Function of Interrater Agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology. 43:1959;60-64.
11. Campbell J.P. An Overview of the Army Selection and Classification Project. Project A Personnel Psychology. 43:1990;231-239.
12. Campbell J.P., Dunnette M.D., Lawler E.E., Weick K.E. Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness. 1970;McGraw Hill, New York.
13. Church A.H., Bracken D.W. Advancing the State of the Art of 360° Feedback: Guest Editors' Comments on the Research and Practice of Multirater Assessment Methods. Group and Organization Management. 22:1997;149-161.
14. Dunnette M.D. My Hammer or Your Hammer? Human Resource Management. 32:1993;373-384.
15. Einhorn H.J. Expert Measurement and Mechanical Combination. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 7:1972;86-106.
16. Gunderson E.K.E., Nelson P.D. Criterion Measures for Extremely Isolated Groups. Personnel Psychology. 19:1966;67-82.
17. Harris M.M., Schaubroeck J. A Meta-Analysis of Self-Supervisor, Self-Peer, and Peer-Supervisor Ratings. Personnel Psychology. 41:1988;43-62.
18. Hazucha J.F., Hezlett S.A., Schneider R.J. The Impact of 360° Feedback on Management Skills Development. Human Resource Management. 32:1993;325-351.
19. Hollander E.P. Peer Nominations on Leadership as a Predictor of the Pass-Fail Criterion in Naval Air Training. Journal of Applied Psychology. 38:1954;150-153.
20. Kane J.S., Lawler E.E. Methods of Peer Assessment. Psychological Bulletin. 85:1978;555-586.
21. Kelly G.A. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. 1955;Norton, New York.
22. Klimoski R.J., London M. Role of the Rater in Performance Appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology. 59:1974;445-451.
23. London M., Beatty R.W. 360° Feedback as a Competitive Advantage. Human Resource Management. 32:1993;353-372.
24. Oppler S.H., Sager C.E. Relationships among Rated Dimensions of Training Performance: Assessing Consistency across Organizational Levels. 1992;. Paper presented at the 100th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
25. Oppler S.H. Pulakos E.D. Borman W.C. "Comparing the Influences of Ratee Characteristics on Peer and Supervisor Ratings." (forthcoming).
26. Pulakos E.D., Borman W.C. Development and Field Test of Army-Wide Rating Scales and the Rater Orientation and Training Program. Tech. Rep. No. 716. 1986;U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA.
27. Pulakos E.D., Schmitt N., Chan D. Models of Job Performance Ratings: An Examination of Ratee Race, Ratee Gender, and Rater Level Effects. Human Performance. 9:1996;103-119.
28. Tornow W.W. Perspectives or Reality: Is Multi-Perspective Measurement a Means or an End? Human Resource Management. 32:1993;221-229.
29. Tsui A.S. A Role Set Analysis of Managerial Reputation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 34:1984;64-96.
30. Tsui A.S., Ohlott P. Multiple Assessment of Managerial Effectiveness: Interrater Agreement and Consensus in Effectiveness Models. Personnel Psychology. 41:1988;779-803.
31. Williams S.B., Leavitt H.J. Group Opinion as a Predictor of Military Leadership. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 11:1947;283-291.
32. Zedeck S., Baker H.T. Nursing Performance as Measured by Behavioral Expectation Scales: A Multitrait-Multirater Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 7:1972;457-466.
33. Zedeck S., Imparato N., Krausz M., Oleno T. Development of Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales as a Function of Organizational Level. Journal of Applied Psychology. 59:1974;249-252.