Fast but not intuitive, slow but not reflective: Decision conflict drives reaction times in social dilemmas

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 144, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 951-966

  Evans, Anthony M ^a   Dillon, Kyle D ^b   Rand, David G ^c  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Dual process theories; Reaction times; Social dilemmas

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFLICT; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTUITION; MALE; MOTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTUITION; MALE; MOTIVATION; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84942543964     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000107     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Akrami, N., Hedlund, L. E., & Ekehammar, B. (2007). Personality scale response latencies as self-schema indicators: The inverted-U effect revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 611-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.005
2. Ariely, D., & Norton, M. I. (2011). From thinking too little to thinking too much: A continuum of decision making. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 39-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.90
3. Austin, E. J. (2009). A reaction time study of responses to trait and ability emotional intelligence test items. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 381-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.025
4. Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1014
5. Baron, J., Gürçay, B., Moore, A. B., & Starcke, K. (2012). Use of a Rasch model to predict response times to utilitarian moral dilemmas. Synthese, 189, 107-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0121-z
6. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027
7. Betsch, T., Fiedler, K., & Brinkmann, J. (1998). Behavioral routines in decision making: The effects of novelty in task presentation and time pressure on routine maintenance and deviation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 861-878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<861::AID-EJSP899>3.0.CO;2-D
8. Brandt, M. J., Evans, A. M., & Crawford, J. T. (2015). The unthinking or confident extremist? Political extremists are more likely to reject experimenter-generated anchors than moderates. Psychological Science, 26, 189-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614559730
9. Brown, S. D., Marley, A. A. J., Donkin, C., & Heathcote, A. (2008). An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification. Psychological Review, 115, 396-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.396
10. Buodo, G., Sarlo, M., & Palomba, D. (2002). Attentional resources measured by reaction times highlight differences within pleasant and unpleasant, high arousing stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 123-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1019886501965
11. Cappelen, A. W., Nielsen, U. H., Tungodden, B., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2014). Fairness is intuitive. [Discussion paper online]. Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen. Retrieved from http://engerom.ku.dk/ansatte/?pure=en%2Fpublications%2Ffairness-isintuitive%28959da3bc-9643-446d-86d9-7299860d7abb%29%2Fexport.html
12. Caprarom, V., & Cococcioni G. (2015). Social setting, intuition, and experience in lab experiments interact to shape cooperative decisionmaking. Retrieved from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/282/1811/20150237
13. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14. Cone, J., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Time pressure increases cooperation in competitively framed social dilemmas. PLoS ONE, 9, e115756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115756
15. Cornelissen, G., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2011). Are social value orientations expressed automatically? Decision making in the dictator game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1080-1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405996
16. Crean, J. P., de Wit, H., & Richards, J. B. (2000). Reward discounting as a measure of impulsive behavior in a psychiatric outpatient population. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 8, 155-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.8.2.155
17. Crockett, M. J., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Siegel, J. Z., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA of the United States of America, 111, 17320-17325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408988111
18. Dal Bó, P. (2005). Cooperation under the shadow of the future: Experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. The American Economic Review, 95, 1591-1604.
19. De Dreu, C. K. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 280-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00022-0
20. Dehue, F. M., McClintock, C. G., & Liebrand, W. B. (1993). Social value related response latencies: Unobtrusive evidence for individual differences in information processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 273-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420230305
21. Diederich, A. (2003). Decision making under conflict: Decision time as a measure of conflict strength. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 167-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196481
22. Ersner-Hershfield, H., Wimmer, G. E., & Knutson, B. (2009). Saving for the future self: Neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 85-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn042
23. Evans, A. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2009). The psychology (and economics) of trust. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1003-1017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00232.x
24. Evans, A. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2011). Elements of trust: Risk and perspective-taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 171-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.007
25. Evans, A. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2014). Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 90-103.
26. Evans, A. M., & Revelle, W. (2008). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1585-1593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011
27. Evans, J. S. B. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 321-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546780601008825
28. Evans, J. S. B., & Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 382-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546780542000005
29. Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., Nicklisch, A., & Dickert, S. (2013). Social Value Orientation and information search in social dilemmas: An eye-tracking analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 272-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.002
30. Fishbach, A., & Shah, J. Y. (2006). Self-control in action: Implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 820-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.820
31. Fong, C. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1016-1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22798182
32. Frank, M. J., Samanta, J., Moustafa, A. A., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). Hold your horses: Impulsivity, deep brain stimulation, and medication in Parkinsonism. Science, 318, 1309-1312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1146157
33. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
34. Garbarino, E. C., & Edell, J. A. (1997). Cognitive effort, affect, and choice. The Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 147-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209500
35. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36. Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
37. Halevy, N., & Chou, E. Y. (2014). How decisions happen: Focal points and blind spots in interdependent decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 398-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035351
38. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39. Hertel, G., Neuhof, J., Theuer, T., & Kerr, N. L. (2000). Mood effects on cooperation in small groups: Does positive mood simply lead to more cooperation? Cognition and Emotion, 14, 441-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026999300402754
40. Hofmann, W., Wisneski, D. C., Brandt, M. J., & Skitka, L. J. (2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345, 1340-1343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1251560
41. Hong, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2010). Feeling mixed but not torn: The moderating role of construal level in mixed emotions appeals. The Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 456-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/653492
42. Jackson, P. L., Brunet, E., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2006). Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain. Neuropsychologia, 44, 752-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.015
43. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
44. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
45. Kemps, E., Tiggemann, M., Martin, R., & Elliott, M. (2013). Implicit approach-avoidance associations for craved food cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, 30-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031626
46. Keren, G., & Schul, Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 533-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01164.x
47. Kieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Cognitive conflict in social dilemmas: An analysis of response dynamics. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 510-522.
48. Kim, S., & Lee, D. (2011). Prefrontal cortex and impulsive decision making. Biological Psychiatry, 69, 1140-1146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.005
49. Kirchsteiger, G., Rigotti, L., & Rustichini, A. (2006). Your morals might be your moods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 59, 155-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.07.004
50. Klauer, K. C. (2014). Random-walk and diffusion models. In J. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp. 139-152). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
51. Kleiman, T., & Hassin, R. R. (2011). Non-conscious goal conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 521-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.007
52. Knapp, A., & Clark, M. S. (1991). Some detrimental effects of negative mood on individuals' ability to solve resource dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 678-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167291176011
53. Krajbich, I., Bartling, B., Hare, T., & Fehr, E. (2015). Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference. Nature Communications, 6, 7455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8455
54. Krajbich, I., Oud, B., & Fehr, E. (2014). Benefits of neuroeconomic modeling: New policy interventions and predictors of preference. The American Economic Review, 104, 501-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.501
55. Krajbich, I., & Rangel, A. (2011). Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in valuebased decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA of the United States of America, 108, 13852-13857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101328108
56. Krueger, J. I. (2003). Return of the ego-Self-referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 585-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.585
57. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7
58. Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020762
59. Kuiper, N. A. (1981). Convergent evidence for the self as a prototype: The "inverted-U RT effect" for self and other judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 438-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616728173012
60. Liebrand, W. B., & McClintock, C. G. (1988). The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation. European Journal of Personality, 2, 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410020304
61. Lohse, J., Goeschl, T., & Diederich, J. (2014). Giving is a question of time: Response times and contributions to a real world public good. University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, 566, 1-20.
62. Lotito, G., Migheli, M., & Ortona, G. (2013). Is cooperation instinctive? Evidence from the response times in a public goods game. Journal of Bioeconomics, 15, 123-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10818-012-9141-5
63. Lotz, S. (2015). Spontaneous Giving under structural inequality: Intuition promotes cooperation in asymmetric social dilemmas. PLoS ONE10, 7, e0131562.
64. Lount, R. B., Jr. (2010). The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 420-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017344
65. Ma, Y., Liu, Y., Rand, D. G., Heatherton, T. F., & Han, S. (2015). Opposing oxytocin effects on intergroup cooperative behavior in intuitive and reflective minds. Neuropsychopharmacology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.87
66. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63
67. Marsh, A. A., Ambady, N., & Kleck, R. E. (2005). The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach-and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion, 5, 119-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.119
68. Mignault, A., Bhaumik, A., & Chaudhuri, A. (2009). Can anchor models explain inverted-U effects in facial judgments? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 803-824. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.108.3.803-824
69. Mignault, A., Marley, A. A. J., & Chaudhuri, A. (2008). Inverted-U effects generalize to the judgment of subjective properties of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1274-1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.7.1274
70. Monahan, J. S., & Lockhead, G. R. (1977). Identification of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 94-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.106.1.94
71. Nielsen, U. H., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2014). Second thoughts on free riding. Economics Letters, 122, 136-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.11.021
72. Palmer, B., Nasman, V. T., & Wilson, G. F. (1994). Task decision difficulty: Effects on ERPs in a same-different letter classification task. Biological Psychology, 38, 199-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(94)90039-6
73. Parks, C. D., Joireman, J., & Van Lange, P. A. (2013). Cooperation, trust, and antagonism: How public goods are promoted. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 119-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100612474436
74. Peysakhovich, A., Nowak, M. A., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Humans display a 'cooperative phenotype' that is domain general and temporally stable. Nature Communications, 5, 4939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5939
75. Peysakhovich, A., & Rand, D. G. (in press). Habits of virtue: Creating norms of cooperation and defection in the laboratory. Management Science.
76. Pillutla, M. M., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, K. J. (2003). Attributions of trust and the calculus of reciprocity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 448-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00015-5
77. Piovesan, M., & Wengström, E. (2009). Fast or fair? A study of response times. Economics Letters, 105, 193-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.07.017
78. Polezzi, D., Daum, I., Rubaltelli, E., Lotto, L., Civai, C., Sartori, G., & Rumiati, R. (2008). Mentalizing in economic decision-making. Behavioural Brain Research, 190, 218-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.003
79. Rand, D. G., Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2009). Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science, 325, 1272-1275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1177418
80. Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., & Dreber, A. (2015). It's the thought that counts: The role of intentions in noisy repeated games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 481-499.
81. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489, 427-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11467
82. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Rand et al. reply. Nature, 498, E2-E3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12195
83. Rand, D. G., & Kraft-Todd, G. T. (2014). Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00300
84. Rand, D. G., Newman, G. E., & Wurzbacher, O. (2015). Social context and the dynamics of cooperative choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 159-166.
85. Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 413-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003
86. Rand, D. G., Peysakhovich, A., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Newman, G. E., Wurzbacher, O., Nowak, M. A., & Greene, J. D. (2014). Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Communications, 5, 3677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4677
87. Ratcliff, R. (1985). Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. Psychological Review, 92, 212-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.212
88. Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333-367.
89. Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., . Funder, D. C. (2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677-718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037250
90. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 1064-1082. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103
91. Roch, S. G., Lane, J. A., Samuelson, C. D., Allison, S. T., & Dent, J. L. (2000). Cognitive load and the equality heuristic: A two-stage model of resource overconsumption in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 185-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2915
92. Rubinstein, A. (2013). Response time and decision making: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 540-551.
93. Rubinstein, A. (2007). Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: A study of response times. The Economic Journal, 117, 1243-1259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02081.x
94. Schulz, J. F., Fischbacher, U., Thöni, C., & Utikal, V. (2014). Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 77-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.08.007
95. Shalvi, S., Eldar, O., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2012). Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psychological Science, 23, 1264-1270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443835
96. Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025391
97. Sherbino, J., Dore, K. L., Wood, T. J., Young, M. E., Gaissmaier, W., Kreuger, S., & Norman, G. R. (2012). The relationship between response time and diagnostic accuracy. Academic Medicine, 87, 785-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253acbd
98. Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological, 13, 238-241.
99. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
100. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435
101. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672
102. Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119, 454-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.018
103. Tamir, D. I., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013). Anchoring and adjustment during social inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 151-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028232
104. Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
105. Tinghög, G., Andersson, D., Bonn, C., Böttiger, H., Josephson, C., Lundgren, G., . Johannesson, M. (2013). Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature, 498, E1-E2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12194
106. Tyebjee, T. T. (1979). Response time, conflict, and involvement in brand choice. The Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 295-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208770
107. Van Lange, P. A. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337
108. Van Lange, P. A., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003
109. Van 't Veer, A. E., Stel, M., & van Beest, I. (2014). Limited capacity to lie: Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 199-206.
110. Wisneski, D. C., Lytle, B. L., & Skitka, L. J. (2009). Gut reactions: Moral conviction, religiosity, and trust in authority. Psychological Science, 20, 1059-1063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02406.x
111. Wong, R. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma. Psychological Science, 16, 429-434.
112. Wright, P. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0037186
113. Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N., Li, Y., Shinada, M., Hashimoto, H., Horita, Y., . Simunovic, D. (2013). Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 260-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.002
114. Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013). Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 466-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721413492764
115. Zur, H. B., & Breznitz, S. J. (1981). The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychologica, 47, 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(81)90001-9