Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 141, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 423-428

  Shenhav, Amitai ^a   Rand, David G ^a   Greene, Joshua D ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Atheism; Reasoning; Reflection; Religion; Religiosity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; INTUITION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBLEM SOLVING; RELIGION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; INTUITION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBLEM SOLVING; RELIGION AND PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 84866485947     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025391     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2005). Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(7), 1227-1236.
2. Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2007). Religious people and paranormal believers: Alike or gifferent? Journal of Individual Differences, 28(1), 1-9.
3. Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4. Bering, J. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 453-462. doi:10.1017/S0140525X06009101
5. Bering, J. M. (2011). The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. New York, NY: Norton.
6. Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes' baby. New York, NY: Basic.
7. Bloom, P. (2005, December). Is God an accident? Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/12/is-god-an-accident/4425
8. Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147-151. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x
9. Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic.
10. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/ 1745691610393980
11. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
12. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131
13. Costa, P. T., & Mcrae, R. R. (1992). NEO Personality Inventory-Revised professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14. Dennett, D. C. (1989). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864-886. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
16. Evans, J.S.B.T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
17. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25-42. doi:10.1257/089533005775196732
18. Gervais, W. M., & Henrich, J. (2010). The Zeus problem: Why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 383-389. doi:10.1163/156853710X531249
19. Gervais, W. M., Willard, A., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (in press). The cultural transmission of faith: Why natural intuitions and memory biases are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion.
20. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007, February 2). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619. doi:10.1126/science.1134475
21. Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Henrich, J. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation, and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 244-260. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005
23. Horton, J., Rand, D. G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399-425.
24. Inzlicht, M., Mcgregor, I., Hirsh, J. B., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20, 385-392. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02305.x
25. Inzlicht, M., & Tullett, A. M. (2010). Reflecting on God: Religious primes can reduce neurophysiological response to errors. Psychological Science, 21, 1184-1190. doi:10.1177/0956797610375451
26. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720. doi:10.1037/ 0003-066X.58.9.697
27. Kass, J., Friedman, R., Leserman, J., Zuttermeister, P., & Benson, H. (1991). Health outcomes and a new index of spiritual experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 203-211. doi:10.2307/ 1387214
28. Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children "intuitive theists"? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295-301.
29. Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111, 138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.001
30. Layman, G., & Carmines, E. (1997). Cultural conflict in American politics: Religious traditionalism, postmaterialism, and U.S. political behavior. The Journal of Politics, 59, 751-777. doi:10.2307/2998636
31. Lupfer, M., Tolliver, D., & Jackson, M. (1996). Explaining life-altering occurrences: A test of the 'God-of-the-gaps' hypothesis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 379-391. doi:10.2307/1386413
32. Macpherson, R., & Stanovich, K. E. (2007). Cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, and instructional set as predictors of critical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 115-127. doi:10.1016/ j.lindif.2007.05.003
33. Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., Srivastava, S., Cohen, A. B., & Miller, D. T. (in press). The association of religiosity and political conservatism: The role of political engagement. Political Psychology.
34. Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872. doi:10.1016/ j.jesp.2009.03.009
35. Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768-774. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>0.CO;2-1
36. Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2008). U.S. Religious Landscape Survey: Religious beliefs and practices. Diverse and politically relevant. Washington, DC: Author.
37. Preston, J., & Epley, N. (2005). Explanations versus applications: The explanatory power of valuable beliefs. Psychological Science, 16, 826.
38. Preston, J., & Epley, N. (2009). Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 238-241. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.013
39. Shipley, W. C. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
40. Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Rational and irrational thought: The thinking that IQ tests miss. Scientific American Mind, 20, 34-39. doi:10.1038/ scientificamericanmind1109-34
41. Stanovich, K. E., Toplak, M., & West, R. (2008). The development of rational thought: A taxonomy of heuristics and biases. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 36, 251-286. doi:10.1016/S0065-2407(08)00006-2
42. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161-188. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.161
43. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672-695. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672
44. Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (in press). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition.
45. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219-232. doi:10.1177/ 1745691610369336
46. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
47. Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin's cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48. Zuckerman, P. (2007). Atheism: Contemporary rates and patterns. In M. Martin (Ed.), Cambridge companion to atheism (pp. 47-68). Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge Press. doi:10.1017/ CCOL0521842700.004