Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 33, 2011, Pages 13852-13857

  Krajbich, Ian ^a   Rangel, Antonio ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DIFFUSION; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FIXATION, OCULAR; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 80052015081     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1101328108     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Rangel A., Camerer C., Montague P.R. (2008) A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:545-556.
2. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. (2007) The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:535-574.
3. Bogacz R. (2007) Optimal decision-making theories: Linking neurobiology with behaviour. Trends Cogn Sci 11:118-125.
4. Smith P.L., Ratcliff R. (2004) Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci 27:161-168.
5. Ditterich J. (2010) A comparison between mechanisms of multi-alternative perceptual decision making: Ability to explain human behavior, predictions for neurophysiology, and relationship with decision theory. Front Neurosci 4:184.
6. Ratcliff R., Smith P.L. (2004) A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychol Rev 111:333-367.
7. Heekeren H.R., Marrett S., Ungerleider L.G. (2008) The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:467-479.
8. Romo R., Salinas E. (2003) Flutter discrimination: Neural codes, perception, memory and decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:203-218.
9. Usher M., McClelland J.L. (2001) The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev 108:550-592.
10. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. (2001) Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends Cogn Sci 5:10-16.
11. Ditterich J. (2006) Evidence for time-variant decision making. Eur J Neurosci 24:3628-3641.
12. Ditterich J., Mazurek M.E., Shadlen M.N. (2003) Microstimulation of visual cortex affects the speed of perceptual decisions. Nat Neurosci 6:891-898.
13. Hanks T.D., Ditterich J., Shadlen M.N. (2006) Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task. Nat Neurosci 9:682-689.
14. Huk A.C., Shadlen M.N. (2005) Neural activity in macaque parietal cortex reflects temporal integration of visual motion signals during perceptual decision making. J Neurosci 25:10420-10436.
15. Mazurek M.E., Roitman J.D., Ditterich J., Shadlen M.N. (2003) A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. Cereb Cortex 13:1257-1269.
16. Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T. (1996) Motion perception: Seeing and deciding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:628-633.
17. Milosavljevic M., Malmaud J., Huth A., Koch C., Rangel A. (2010) The drift diffusion model can account for the accuracy and reaction time of value-based choices under high and low time pressure. Judgm Decis Mak 5:437-449.
18. Krajbich I., Armel C., Rangel A. (2010) Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nat Neurosci 13:1292-1298.
19. Philiastides M.G., Biele G., Heekeren H.R. (2010) A mechanistic account of value computation in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:9430-9435.
20. Basten U., Biele G., Heekeren H.R., Fiebach C.J. (2010) How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:21767-21772.
21. Bogacz R., Brown E., Moehlis J., Holmes P., Cohen J.D. (2006) The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol Rev 113:700-765.
22. Ratcliff R. (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol Rev 85:59-108.
23. Ratcliff R. (2002) A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychon Bull Rev 9:278-291.
24. Ratcliff R., Rouder J.N. (2000) A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:127-140.
25. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. (1997) A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychol Rev 104:319-343.
26. McKeeff T.J., Tong F. (2007) The timing of perceptual decisions for ambiguous face stimuli in the human ventral visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 17:669-678.
27. Leite F.P., Ratcliff R. (2010) Modeling reaction time and accuracy of multiple-alternative decisions. Atten Percept Psychophys 72:246-273.
28. Domenech P., Dreher J.C. (2010) Decision threshold modulation in the human brain. J Neurosci 30:14305-14317.
29. Wald A., Wolfowitz J. (1948) Optimum character of the sequential probability ration test. Ann Math Stat 19:326-339.
30. Niwa M., Ditterich J. (2008) Perceptual decisions between multiple directions of visual motion. J Neurosci 28:4435-4445.
31. Bogacz R., Usher M., Zhang J., McClelland J.L. (2007) Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: Multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:1655-1670.
32. Bogacz R., Gurney K. (2007) The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Comput 19:442-477.
33. McMillen T., Holmes P. (2006) The dynamics of choice among multiple alternatives. J Math Psychol 50:30-57.
34. Churchland A.K., Kiani R., Shadlen M.N. (2008) Decision-making with multiple alternatives. Nat Neurosci 11:693-702.
35. Dragalin V.P., Tartakovsky A.G., Veeravalli V.V. (1999) Multihypothesis sequential probability ratio tests - part I: Asymptotic optimality. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 45:2448-2461.
36. Armel C., Rangel A. (2008) Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention. Judgm Decis Mak 3:396-403.
37. Shimojo S., Simion C., Shimojo E., Scheier C. (2003) Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nat Neurosci 6:1317-1322.
38. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. (2008) The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput 20:873-922.
39. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. (2002) Banburismus and the brain: Decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron 36:299-308.
40. Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T. (2001) Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 86:1916-1936.
41. Roitman J.D., Shadlen M.N. (2002) Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. J Neurosci 22:9475-9489.
42. Cisek P., Puskas G.A., El-Murr S. (2009) Decisions in changing conditions: The urgency-gating model. J Neurosci 29:11560-11571.