The situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 677-718

  Rauthmann, John F ^a   Gallardo Pujol, David ^b   Guillaume, Esther M ^c   Todd, Elysia ^c   Nav, Christopher S ^d   Sherman, Ryne A ^e   Ziegler, Matthias ^a   Jones, Ashley Bell ^c   Funder, David C ^e  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Riverside situational Q Sort (RSQ); Situation characteristics; Situational Eight DIAMONDS; Situational taxonomy; Situations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PERSONALITY; Q-SORT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84918779234     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0037250     Document Type: Article

References (208)

1. Argyle, M., Furnham, A., Graham, J. A. (1981). Social situations. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511558283
2. Asendorpf, J. B. (2009). Personality: Traits and situations. In P. J. Corr G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 43-53). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511596544.006
3. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907
4. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340-345. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878
5. Barker, R. G. (1963). On the nature of the environment. Journal of Social Issues, 19, 17-38. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1963.tb00456.x
6. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Barker, R. G. (1987). Prospecting in environmental psychology: Oskaloosa revisited. In D. Stokols I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1413-1432). New York, NY: Wiley.
8. Barker, R. G., Wright, H. F. (1951). One boy's day. New York, NY: Harper Row.
9. Barker, R. G., Wright, H. F. (1955). Midwest and its children. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
10. Battistich, V. A., Thompson, E. G. (1980). Students' perceptions of the college milieu: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 74-82. doi:10.1177/014616728061011
11. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
12. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
13. Bem, D. J. (1983). Further deja vu in the search for cross-situational consistency: A response to Mischel and Peake. Psychological Review, 90, 390-393. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.390
14. Bem, D. J., Funder, D. C. (1978). Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations. Psychological Review, 85, 485-501. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.6.485
15. Benet, V., Waller, N. G. (1995). The 'Big Seven' model of personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 701-718.
16. Benet-Martínez, V., Donnellan, M. B., Fleeson, W., Fraley, R. C., Gosling, D., Ling, L. A.,. Funder, D. C. (in press). Six visions for the future of personality psychology. In M. L. Cooper R. J. Larsen (Eds.), Handbook of personality processes and individual differences. Washington, DC: APA Press.
17. Benet-Martínez, V., Waller, N. G. (1997). Further evidence for the cross-cultural generality of the "Big Seven" model: Imported and indigenous Spanish personality constructs. Journal of Personality, 65, 567-598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00327.x
18. Bernard, L. C., Mills, M. E., Swenson, L., Walsh, R. P. (2005). An evolutionary theory of human motivation. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 129-184. doi:10.3200/MONO.131.2.129-184
19. Block, J. (1978). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (Original work published 1961)
20. Block, J. (2008). The Q-sort in character appraisal: Encoding subjective impressions of persons quantitatively. doi:10.1037/11748-000
21. Block, J. (2010). The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2-25. doi:10.1080/10478401003596626
22. Block, J., Block, J. (1981). Studying situational dimensions: A grand perspective and some limited empiricism. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 85-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Borkenau, P., Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645
24. Borkenau, P., Liebler, A. (1993a). Consensus and self- other agreement for trait inferences from minimal information. Journal of Personality, 61, 477-496. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00779.x
25. Borkenau, P., Liebler, A. (1993b). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546-553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.546
26. Brown, S. R., Danielson, S., van Exel, J. (2014). Overly ambitious critics and the Medici effect: A reply to Kampen and Tamás. Quality Quantity. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0007-x
27. Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychology experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
30. Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214-1221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1214
31. Cantor, N., Mischel, W., Schwartz, J. (1982). A prototype analysis of psychological situations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 45-77. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90004-4
32. Champagne, B. M., Pervin, L. A. (1987). The relation of perceived situation similarity to perceived behavior similarity: Implications for social learning theory. European Journal of Personality, 1, 79-91. doi:10.1002/per.2410010203
33. Chemero, A. (2001). What we perceive when we perceive affordances. Ecological Psychology, 13, 111-116. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1302_3
34. Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15, 181-195. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
35. Chulef, A., Read, S. J., Walsh, D. A. (2001). A hierarchical taxonomy of human goals. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 191-232. doi:10.1023/A: 1012225223418
36. Cohen, J. (1968). Weighed kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-220. doi:10.1037/h0026256
37. Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092-1122. doi:10.1037/a0021212
38. Cooper, W. H., Withey, M. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62-72. doi:10.1177/1088868308329378
39. Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
40. Craik, K. H. (1971). The assessment of places. In P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 40-62). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books
41. Craik, K. H. (1981). Environmental assessment and situational analysis. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 37-48). New York, NY: Academic Press.
42. Cramer, A. O. J., van der Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H.,. Borsboom, D. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can't like parties if you don't like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414-431. doi:10.1002/per.1866
43. de Raad, B. (2004). Situations that matter to personality. In A. Eliasz, S. E. Hampson, B. de Raad (Eds.), Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 179-204). Hove, England: Routledge.
44. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
45. Duff, K. J., Newman, L. S. (1997). Individual differences in the spontaneous construal of behavior: Idiocentricism and the automatization of the trait inference process. Social Cognition, 15, 217-241. doi:10.1521/soco.1997.15.3.217
46. Eaton, L. G., Funder, D. C. (2000). California Q-Sort and Riverside Behavioral Q-Sort prototypes of the five factors of personality. Unpublished manuscript.
47. Eckes, T. (1995). Features of situations: A two-mode clustering study of situation prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 366-374. doi:10.1177/0146167295214007
48. Edwards, J. A., Templeton, A. (2005). The structure of perceived qualities of situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 705-723. doi:10.1002/ejsp.271
49. Ekehammar, B. (1974). Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1026-1048.
50. Endler, N. S. (1981). Situational aspects of interactional psychology. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 361-373). London, England: Erlbaum.
51. Endler, N. S. (1993). Personality: An interactional perspective. In P. J. Hettema I. J. Deary (Eds.), Foundations of personality (pp. 251-268). doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1660-2_21
52. Endler, N. S., Hunt, J. M., Rosenstein, A. J. (1962). An S-R inventory of anxiousness. Psychological monographs, 76(17, Whole No. 536), 1-33.
53. Endsley, M. R. (1995a). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 65-84. doi:10.1518/001872095 779049499
54. Endsley, M. R. (1995b). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32-64. doi:10.1518/001872095779049543
55. Fast, L. A., Funder, D. C. (2008). Personality as manifest in word use: Correlations with self-report, acquaintance-report, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 334-346. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.334
56. Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011
57. Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825-862. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x
58. Fleeson, W., Noftle, E. E. (2008a). The end of the person-situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1667-1684. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00122.x
59. Fleeson, W., Noftle, E. E. (2008b). Where does personality have its influence? A supermatrix of consistency concepts. Journal of Personality, 76, 1355-1386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00525.x
60. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York, NY: Wiley.
61. Forgas, J. P. (1976). The perception of social episodes: Categorical and dimensional representations in two different social milieus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 199-209. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.199
62. Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., Zuroff, D. C. (2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 531-545. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.531
63. Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., Zuroff, D. C. (2009). The interpersonal signature. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.023
64. Frederiksen, N. (1972). Toward a taxonomy of situations. American Psychologist, 27, 114-123. doi:10.1037/h0032705
65. Frederiksen, N., Jensen, O., Beaton, A. (1972). Prediction of organisational behaviour. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
66. Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
67. Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197-221. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.197
68. Funder, D. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21-34. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.003
69. Funder, D. C. (2007). Beyond just-so stories towards a psychology of situations: Evolutionary accounts of individual differences require independent assessment of personality and situational variables. European Journal of Personality, 21, 599-601.
70. Funder, D. C. (2008). Persons, situations and person-situation interactions. In O. P. John, R. Robins, L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality (3rd ed., pp. 568-580). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
71. Funder, D. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120-126. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.041
72. Funder, D. C., Furr, R. M., Colvin, C. R. (2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451-489. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00103
73. Funder, D. C., Guillaume, E., Kumagai, S., Kawamoto, S., Sato, T. (2012). The person-situation debate and the assessment of situations. Japanese Journal of Personality, 21, 1-11.
74. Funder, D. C., Ozer, D. J. (1983). Behavior as a function of the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 107-112. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.107
75. Furr, R. M. (2009). Personality psychology as a truly behavioral science. European Journal of Personality, 23, 369-401. doi:10.1002/per.724
76. Furr, R. M. (2010). The double-entry intraclass correlation as an index of profile similarity: Meaning, problems, and alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 1-15. doi:10.1080/00223890903379134
77. Furr, R. M., Funder, D. C. (2004). Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variable-centered, and personcentered approaches. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 421-447. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2003.10.001
78. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
80. Gifford, R., Hine, D. W. (1994). The role of verbal behavior in the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 115-132. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1994.1010
81. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
82. Goldberg, L. R. (2006). Doing it all bass-ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 347-358. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.01.001
83. Gorsuch, R. L. (2008). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1983)
84. Grice, J. W. (2001). Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6, 430-450. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.430
85. Guillaume, E., Funder, D. (2012). Summary of the International Situations Project. Retrieved from http://rap.ucr.edu/ISP.html
86. Hacker, W. (1981). Perception and reaction to work situations: Some implications of an action control approach. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 113-134). London, England: Erlbaum.
87. Hall, J., Andrzejewski, S., Murphy, N., Mast, M. S., Feinstein, B. (2008). Accuracy of judging others' traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1476-1489. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.013
88. Harré, R., Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal powers: A theory of natural necessity. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
89. Hogan, R. (2009). Much ado about nothing: The person-situation debate. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 249. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.022
90. Hogan, R., Harkness, A. R., Lubinski, D. (2000). Personality and individual differences. In K. K. Pawlik M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.), International handbook of psychology (pp. 283-304). doi:10.4135/9781848608399.n16
91. James, L. R., Sells, S. B. (1981). Psychological climate: Theoretical perspectives and empirical research. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situation: An interactional perspective (pp. 275-295). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. John, O. P., Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
93. Johnson, J. A. (1999). Persons in situations: Distinguishing new wine from old wine in new bottles [Comment in the Special Issue: Personality and Situations]. European Journal of Personality, 13, 443-453. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<443::AID-PER358>3.0.CO;2-9
94. Jones, A. B. (2014). Examining the factor structure of the Riverside Situational Q-sort (Unpublished master's thesis). Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton.
95. Kampen, J., Tamás, P. (2013, November 9). Overly ambitious: Contributions and current status of Q methodology. Quality and Quantity. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9944-z
96. Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
97. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
98. Kenny, D. A. (2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 265-280. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_3
99. Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the Big Five. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 245-258. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.245
100. Kenny, D. A., Mohr, C. D., Levesque, M. J. (2001). A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 128-141. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.128
101. Kenrick, D. T., Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.23
102. Kenrick, D. T., McCreath, H. E., Govern, J., King, R., Bordin, J. (1990). Person- environment intersections: Everyday settings and common trait dimensions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 685-698. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.685
103. Kiers, H. A. L., van Mechelen, I. (2001). Three-way component analysis: Principles and illustrative application. Psychological Methods, 6, 84-110. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.1.84
104. King, G. A., Sorrentino, R. M. (1983). Psychological dimensions of goal-oriented interpersonal situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 140-162. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.140
105. Krahé, B. (1990). Situation cognition and coherence in personality: An individual-centered approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
106. Krause, M. S. (1970). Use of social situations for research purposes. American Psychologist, 25, 748-753. doi:10.1037/h0029822
107. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Guay, R. P. (2011). Person- environment fit. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), American Psychological Association handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
108. Krull, D. S., Dill, J. C. (1996). On thinking first and responding fast: Flexibility in social inference processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 949-959. doi:10.1177/0146167296229008
109. Küfner, A. C. P., Back, M. D., Nestler, S., Egloff, B. (2010). Tell me a story and I will tell you who you are! Lens model analyses of personality and creative writing. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 427-435. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.003
110. Landis, J. R., Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. doi:10.2307/2529310
111. Lee, K., Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
112. Lee, K., Ashton, M. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001-1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x
113. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. doi:10.1037/10019-000
114. Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the field at a given time. Psychological Review, 50, 292-310. doi:10.1037/h0062738
115. Lewin, K. (1946). Behavior and development as a function of the total situation. In L. Carmichael (Ed.), Manual of child psychology (pp. 791-844). doi:10.1037/10756-016
116. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper.
117. Lupfer, M. B., Clark, L. F., Hutcherson, H. W. (1990). Impact of context on spontaneous trait and situation attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 239-249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.239
118. Magnusson, D. (1971). An analysis of situational dimensions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32, 851-867. doi:10.2466/pms.1971.32.3.851
119. Magnusson, D. (1974). The individual in the situation: Some studies on individual's perception of situations. Studia Psychologica, 16, 124-132.
120. Magnusson, D. (1976). The person and the situation in an interactional model of behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 17, 253-271. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1976.tb00239.x
121. Magnusson, D. (1978). On the psychological situation. Report from the Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm, No. 544.
122. Magnusson, D. (1981a). Problems in environmental analyses-An introduction. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 3-8). New York, NY: Academic Press.
123. Magnusson, D. (1981b). Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
124. Magnusson, D. (1981c). Wanted: A psychology of situations. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 9-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
125. Magnusson, D., Endler, N. S. (1977). Interactional psychology: Present status and future prospects. In D. Magnusson N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads (pp. 3-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erl
126. Markey, P. M., Markey, C. N., Tinsley, B. J. (2004). Children's behavioral manifestations of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 423-432. doi:10.1177/0146167203261886
127. Mehl, M. R., Robbins, M. L. (2012). Naturalistic observation sampling: The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR). In M. R. Mehl T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 124-143). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
128. Miller, G. F. (2007). Reconciling evolutionary psychology and ecological psychology: How to perceive fitness affordances. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 546-555.
129. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.
130. Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the cross-rods: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
131. Mischel, W. (2009). From Personality and Assessment (1968) to personality science, 2009. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 282-290. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.037
132. Mischel, W., Peake, P. K. (1983). Some facets of consistency: Replies to Epstein, Funder, and Bem. Psychological Review, 90, 394-402. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.394
133. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
134. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. (1999). Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The Cognitive Affective Personality System (CAPS). In L. A. Pervin O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 197-218). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
135. Moos, R. H. (1973). Conceptualizations of human environments. American Psychologist, 28, 652-665. doi:10.1037/h0035722
136. Morse, P., Neel, R., Todd, E., Funder, D. C. (2014). Renovating situation taxonomies: Exploring the construction and content of fundamental motive situation types. Manuscript submitted for publication.
137. Moskowitz, D. S., Zuroff, D. C. (2005). Assessing interpersonal perceptions using the interpersonal grid. Psychological Assessment, 17, 218-230.
138. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
139. Nascimento-Schulze, C. M. (1981). Towards situational classification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 149-159. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420110203
140. Nathans, L. L., Oswald, F. L., Nimon, K. (2012). Interpreting multiple regression: A guidebook of variable importance. Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, 9, 1-19.
141. Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622-631. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622
142. Nimon, K., Oswald, F. L. (2013). Understanding the results of multiple linear regression: Beyond standardized regression coefficients. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 650-674. doi:10.1177/1094428113493929
143. Nimon, K., Roberts, J. K. (2012). yhat: Interpreting regression effects (R package Version 1.0-5) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=yhat
144. Nystedt, L. (1972a). A modified lens model: A study of the interaction between an individual and the ecology. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 479-498. doi:10.2466/pms.1972.34.2.479
145. Nystedt, L. (1972b). Predictive accuracy and utilization of cues: Study of the interaction between an individual's cognitive organization and ecological structure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 171-180. doi: 10.2466/pms.1972.34.1.171
146. Nystedt, L. (1981). A model for studying the interaction between the objective situation and a person's construction of the situation. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 375-391). New York, NY: Academic Press.
147. Paulhus, D. L., Williams, K. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
148. Penke, L., Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113-1135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
149. Pervin, L. A. (1976). A free-response description approach to the analysis of person-situation interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 465-474. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.465
150. Pervin, L. A. (1978). Definitions, measurements, and classifications of stimuli, situations, and environments. Human Ecology, 6, 71-105. doi: 10.1007/BF00888567
151. Pervin, L. A. (1981). The relation of situations to behavior. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations (pp. 343-360). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
152. Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Asendorpf, J. B. (2009). The ability to judge the romantic interest of others. Psychological Science, 20, 22-26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02248.x
153. Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Zhuang, J., Penke, L., Asendorpf, J. B. (2012). Judging romantic interest of others from thin slices is a cross-cultural ability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 547-550. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.02.001
154. Price, R. H. (1974). A taxonomic classification of behaviours and situations and the problem of behavior-environment congruence. Human Relations, 27, 567-585. doi:10.1177/001872677402700603
155. Price, R. H., Blashfield, R. K. (1975). Explorations in the taxonomy of behavioral settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 3, 335-351. doi:10.1007/BF00880776
156. Quattrone, G. A. (1982). Overattribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 593-607. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.593
157. Rammstedt, B., John, O. P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit [Short-version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Development and validation of an economic inventory to assess the five factors of personality]. Diagnostica, 51, 195-206. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195
158. Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). You say the party is dull, I say it is lively: A componential approach to how situations are perceived to disentangle perceiver, situation, and perceiver ± situation variance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 519-528. doi:10.1177/1948550611427609
159. Rauthmann, J. F. (2013). Effects of supplementary and complementary personality-situation fit on personality processes. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 6, 41-63.
160. Rauthmann, J. F. (2014). Structuring situational information: A road map of the many pathways to different situational taxonomies. Review article submitted for publication.
161. Rauthmann, J. F., Sherman, R. A. (2014). Studying the experience and change of situations: A network modeling approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.
162. R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
163. Read, S. J., Monroe, B. M., Brownstein, A. L., Yang, Y., Chopra, G., Miller, L. C. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117, 61-92. doi:10.1037/a0018131
164. Reis, H. T. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 311-329. doi:10.1177/1088868308321721
165. Revelle, W. (2013). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research: R package Version 1.3.2. Retrieved from http://personalityproject. org/r, http://personality-project.org/r/psych-manual.pdf
166. Rommetveit, R. (1981). On meanings of situations and social control of such meaning in human communication. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 151-168). New York, NY: Academic Press.
167. Rosenthal, R., Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166-169. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.166
168. Ross, L., Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
169. Rotter, J. B. (1981). The psychological situation in social-learning theory. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 169-178). New York, NY: Academic Press.
170. Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 2-14. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_1
171. Russell, J. A., Ward, L. M., Pratt, G. (1981). Affective quality attributed to environments: A factor analytic study. Environment and Behavior, 13, 259-288. doi:10.1177/0013916581133001
172. Saucier, G. (1997). Effect of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296-1312. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1296
173. Saucier, G., Bel-Bahar, T., Fernandez, C. (2007). What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? Defining basic domains of situation variables. Journal of Personality, 75, 479-504. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00446.x
174. Seibold, D. R., McPhee, R. D. (1979). Commonality analysis: A method for decomposing explained variance in multiple regression analysis. Human Communication Research, 5, 355-365. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00649.x
175. Serfass, D. G., Sherman, R. A. (2013). Personality and the perceptions of situations from the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 708-718. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.007
176. Sherman, R. A. (2014). multicon: An R package for the analysis of multivariate constructs (R Package Version 1.1) [Computer software]. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=multicon
177. Sherman, R. A., Funder, D. C. (2009). Evaluating correlations in studies of personality and behavior: Beyond the number of significant findings to be expected by chance. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1053-1063. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.05.010
178. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., Funder, D. C. (2009). The apparent objectivity of behavior is illusory. European Journal of Personality, 23, 430-433.
179. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. N., Funder, D. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330-343. doi:10.1037/a0019796
180. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., Funder, D. C. (2012). Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.006
181. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., Funder, D. C. (2013). Situational construal is related to personality and gender. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.008
182. Shiffman, S., Stone, A., Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415
183. Shrauger, J. S., Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549-573. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.549
184. Srivastava, S. (2010). The five-factor model describes the structure of social perceptions. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 69-75.
185. Stebbins, R. A. (1967). A theory of the definition of the situation. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 4, 148-164. doi:10.1111/j.1755-618X.1967.tb01209.x
186. Stebbins, R. A. (1969). Studying the definition of the situation: Theory and field research strategies. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 6, 193-211. doi:10.1111/j.1755-618X.1969.tb02309.x
187. Stoffregen, T. A. (2000a). Affordances and events. Ecological Psychology, 12, 1-28. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_1
188. Stoffregen, T. A. (2000b). Affordances and events: Theory and research. Ecological Psychology, 12, 93-107. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_11
189. Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animalenvironment system. Ecological Psychology, 15, 115-134. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_2
190. Stoffregen, T. A. (2004). Breadth and limits of the affordance concept. Ecological Psychology, 16, 79-85. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1601_11
191. Swann, W. B., Jr. (1984). The quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review, 91, 457-477. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.4.457
192. Swann, W. B., Seyle, C. (2005). Personality psychology's comeback and its emerging symbiosis with social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 155-165. doi:10.1177/0146167204271591
193. Tausczik, Y. R., Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24-54. doi:10.1177/0261927X09351676
194. Tellegen, A., Waller, N. G. (1987). Reexamining basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Paper presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY.
195. Ten Berge, M. A., de Raad, B. (1999). Taxonomies of situations from a trait psychological perspective: A review. European Journal of Personality, 13, 337-360. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13: 5<337::AID-PER363>3.0.CO;2-F
196. Ten Berge, M. A., de Raad, B. (2001). The construction of a joint taxonomy of traits and situations. European Journal of Personality, 15, 253-276. doi:10.1002/per.410
197. Ten Berge, M. A., de Raad, B. (2002). The structure of situations from a personality perspective. European Journal of Personality, 16, 81-102. doi:10.1002/per.435
198. Todd, E., Funder, D. C. (2012, January). Personality correlates of unique perceptions of brief film situations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego, CA.
199. Van Heck, G. L. (1984). The construction of a general taxonomy of situations. In H. Bonarius, G. L. Van Heck, N. Smid (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Theoretical and empirical developments (pp. 149-164). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
200. Van Heck, G. L. (1989). Situation concepts: Definitions and classification. In P. J. Hettema (Ed.), Personality and environment: Assessment of human adaptation (pp. 53-69). Oxford, England: Wiley.
201. Wagerman, S. A., Funder, D. C. (2009). Situations. In P. J. Corr G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 27-42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
202. Waller, N. G. (1999). Evaluating the structure of personality. In C. R. Cloninger (Ed.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 155-197). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
203. Waller, N. (2007). A general method for computing hierarchical component structures by Goldberg's bass-ackwards method. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 745-752. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.005
204. White, P. A. (1989). A theory of causal processing. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 431-454. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02334.x
205. Wicker, A. W. (1984). An introduction to ecological psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1979)
206. Wicker, A. W. (1992). Making sense of environments. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, R. H. Price (Eds.), Person- environment psychology: Models and perspectives (pp. 157-192). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
207. Yang, Y., Read, S. J., Miller, L. (2006). A taxonomy of situations from Chinese idioms: Goal processes as a central organizing principle. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 750-778. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.007
208. Yang, Y., Read, S. J., Miller, L. (2009). The concept of situations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1018-1037. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00236.x