Time pressure increases cooperation in competitively framed social dilemmas

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Cone, Jeremy ^a   Rand, David G ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPETITION; COMPETITIVE FRAMING; COMPETITIVELY FRAMED SOCIAL DILEMMA; CONTEXTUAL FRAMING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTUITION; MALE; MENTAL COMPLIANCE; MOTIVATION; NORM COMPLIANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PUBLIC GOODS GAME; RECREATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; TIME; TIME CONSTRAINT; TIME DELAY; TIME PRESSURE; GAME; HUMAN RELATION; TIME MANAGEMENT;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GAME THEORY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MOTIVATION; TIME MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84938405000     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115756     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol 7: 1-16.
2. Trivers R (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35-57.
3. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211: 1390-1396.
4. Fudenberg D, Maskin ES (1990) Evolution and cooperation in noisy repeated games. American Economic Review 80: 274-279.
5. Nowak MA, May RM (1992) Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359: 826-829.
6. Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1992) Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature 355: 250-253
7. Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck HJ (2002) Reputation helps solve the 'tragedy of the commons'. Nature 415: 424-426.
8. Bowles S, Gintis H (2003) Origins of human cooperation. Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation: 429-443.
9. Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S, Richerson PJ (2003) The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 3531-3535.
10. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, et al. (2005) "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and brain science 28: 795-855.
11. Bartlett MY, DeSteno D (2006) Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior: Helping When It Costs You. Psychological Science 17: 319-325.
12. Rockenbach B, Milinski M (2006) The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Nature 444: 718-723.
13. Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314: 1560-1563.
14. Herrmann B, Thoni C, Gächter S (2008) Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319: 1362-1367.
15. Fu F, Hauert C, Nowak MA, Wang L (2008) Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks. Physical Review E 78: 026117.
16. Cushman F, Macindoe O (2009) The coevolution of punishment and prosociality among learning agents.
17. Helbing D, Szolnoki A, Perc M, Szabó G (2010) Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions. PLOS Comput Biol 6: e1000758.
18. Perc M, Szolnoki A (2010) Coevolutionary games-A mini review. Biosystems 99: 109-125.
19. Sigmund K (2010) The calculus of selfishness. Princeton: Princeton Univ Press.
20. Rand DG, Arbesman S, Christakis NA (2011) Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 19193-19198.
21. Apicella CL, Marlowe FW, Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2012) Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481: 497-501.
22. Fu F, Tarnita CE, Christakis NA, Wang L, Rand DG, et al. (2012) Evolution of in-group favoritism. Sci Rep 2: 460.
23. Manapat ML, Nowak MA, Rand DG (2012) Information, irrationality and the evolution of trust. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.
24. Rand DG, Nowak MA (2013) Human Cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 413-425.
25. Crockett MJ (2013) Models of morality. Trends in cognitive sciences 17: 363-366.
26. Yoeli E, Hoffman M, Rand DG, Nowak MA (2013) Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 10424-10429.
27. Hauser OP, Rand DG, Peysakhovich A, Nowak MA (2014) Cooperating with the future. Nature 511: 220-223.
28. Jordan JJ, Peysakhovich A, Rand DG (In press,) Why we cooperate. In, : Decety J, Wheatley T, editors., The Moral Brain: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Piff P, Stancato D, Cote S, Mendoza-Denton R, Keltner D (2012) Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 4086-4091.
30. Jin Q, Wang L, Xia C-Y, Wang Z (2014) Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Interdependent Networked Game. Sci Rep 4.
31. Boccaletti S, Bianconi G, Criado R, del Genio CI, Gómez-Gardeñes J, et al. (2014) The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks. Physics Reports 544: 1-122.
32. Rand DG, Nowak MA, Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2014) Static Network Structure Can Stabilize Human Cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
33. Sloman SA (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119: 3.
34. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
35. Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 58: 697-720.
36. Frederick S (2005) Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 25-42.
37. Stanovich KE, West RF (1998) Individual Differences in Rational Thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127: 161-188.
38. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24: 167-202.
39. Chaiken S, Trope Y (1999) Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
40. Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA (2012) Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489: 427-430.
41. Rand DG, Peysakhovich A, Kraft-Todd GT, Newman GE, Wurzbacher O, et al. (2014) Social Heuristics Shape Intuitive Cooperation. Nature Communications 5: 3677.
42. Rand DG, Kraft-Todd GT (2014) Reflection Does Not Undermine Self-Interested Prosociality. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 8: 300.
43. Rand DG, Newman GE, Wurzbacher O (2014) Social context and the dynamics of cooperative choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making: doi: 10.1002/bdm.1837.
44. Schulz JF, Fischbacher U, Thöni C, Utikal V (2014) Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load. Journal of Economic Psychology 41: 77-87.
45. Cornelissen G, Dewitte S, Warlop L (2011) Are Social Value Orientations Expressed Automatically? Decision Making in the Dictator Game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37: 1080-1090.
46. Roch SG, Lane JAS, Samuelson CD, Allison ST, Dent JL (2000) Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83: 185-212.
47. Kovarik J (2009) Giving it now or later: Altruism and discounting. Economics Letters 102: 152-154.
48. Dreber A, Fudenberg D, Levine DK, Rand DG (2014) Altruism and Self-Control. Available at SSRN.
49. Ruff CC, Ugazio G, Fehr E (2013) Changing Social Norm Compliance with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation. Science 342: 482-484.
50. Tinghög G, Andersson D, Bonn C, Böttiger H, Josephson C, et al. (2013) Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature 497: E1-E2.
51. Verkoeijen PPJL, Bouwmeester S (2014) Does Intuition Cause Cooperation? PLOS ONE 9: e96654.
52. Hauge KE, Brekke KA, Johansson L-O, Johansson-Stenman O, Svedsäter H (2014) Keeping others in our mind or in our heart? Distribution games under cognitive load. University of Gothenburg Working Papers in Economics.
53. Kinnunen SP, Windmann S (2013) Dual-processing altruism. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 1-8.
54. Piovesan M, Wengström E (2009) Fast or fair? A study of response times. Economics Letters 105: 193-196.
55. Fiedler S, Glöckner A, Nicklisch A, Dickert S (2013) Social Value Orientation and information search in social dilemmas: An eye-tracking analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 120: 272-284.
56. Rubinstein A (2007) Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: a study of response times. The Economic Journal 117: 1243-1259.
57. Rubinstein A (2013) Response time and decision making: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making 8: 540-551.
58. Cappelen AW, Nielsen UH, Tungodden B, Tyran JR, Wengström E (2014) Fairness is intuitive. Available: http://ssrncom/abstract52430774.
59. Evans AM, Dillon KD, Rand DG (2014) Reaction Times and Reflection in Social Dilemmas: Extreme Responses are Fast, But Not Intuitive. Available: http://ssrncom/abstract52436750.
60. Balliet D, Joireman J (2010) Ego depletion reduces proselfs' concern with the well-being of others. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 13: 227-239.
61. DeWall CN, Baumeister RF, Gailliot MT, Maner JK (2008) Depletion Makes the Heart Grow Less Helpful: Helping as a Function of Self-Regulatory Energy and Genetic Relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34: 1653-1662.
62. Xu H, Bègue L, Bushman BJ (2012) Too fatigued to care: Ego depletion, guilt, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48: 1183-1186.
63. Halali E, Bereby-Meyer Y, Ockenfels A (2013) Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers. Frontiers in human neuroscience 7: 240.
64. Engel C, Rand DG (2014) What does "clean" really mean? The implicit framing of decontextualized experiments. Economics Letters 122: 386-389.
65. Peysakhovich A, Rand DG (2013) Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory. Available: http://ssrncom/abstract52294242.
66. Righetti F, Finkenauer C, Finkel EJ (2013) Low Self-Control Promotes the Willingness to Sacrifice in Close Relationships. Psychological Science.
67. Rand DG, Epstein ZG (2014) Risking Your Life Without a Second Thought: Intuitive Decision-Making and Extreme Altruism. PLOS ONE 9: e109687.
68. Rand DG, Kraft-Todd GT, Gruber J (2014) Positive Emotion and (Dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior. Available: http://ssrncom/abstract52429787.
69. Kieslich PJ, Hilbig BE (2014) Cognitive conflict in social dilemmas: An analysis of response dynamics. Judgment and Decision Making 9: 510-522.
70. Bowles S, Gintis H (2002) Prosocial emotions. In:, Durlauf LBaSN, editor., The Economy as a Evolving Complex System 3. pp., 339-364.
71. Chudek M, Henrich J (2011) Culture gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in cognitive sciences 15: 218-226.
72. Van Lange PA, De Bruin E, Otten W, Joireman JA (1997) Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of personality and social psychology 73: 733.
73. Kiyonari T, Tanida S, Yamagishi T (2000) Social exchange and reciprocity: confusion or a heuristic? Evolution and Human Behavior 21: 411-427.
74. Yamagishi T (2007) The social exchange heuristic: A psychological mechanism that makes a system of generalized exchange self-sustaining. In: Radford M, Ohnuma S, Yamagishi T, editors. Cultural and ecological foundation of the mind. Sapporo: Hokkaido University Press. pp. 11-37.
75. Delton AW, Krasnow MM, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2011) Evolution of direct reciprocity under uncertainty can explain human generosity in one-shot encounters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 13335-13340.
76. Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90: 980-994.
77. Liberman V, Samuels SM, Ross L (2004) The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner's Dilemma Game Moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 1175-1185.
78. Rand DG, Greene JD, Nowak MA (2013) Rand et al. reply. Nature 497: E2-E3.
79. Amir O, Rand DG, Gal YK (2012) Economic Games on the Internet: The Effect of $1 Stakes. PLOS ONE 7: e31461.
80. Horton JJ, Rand DG, Zeckhauser RJ (2011) The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market. Experimental Economics 14: 399-425.
81. Rand DG (2012) The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of theoretical biology 299: 172-179.
82. Buhrmester MD, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 3-5.
83. Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making 5: 411-419.