Cognitive conflict in social dilemmas: An analysis of response dynamics

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 510-522

  Kieslich, Pascal J ^a   Hilbig, Benjamin E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b University of Koblenz Landau ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive conflict; Cooperation; Honesty Humility; Intuition; Mouse tracking; Personality; Response dynamics; Social dilemma

Indexed keywords

EID: 84913591054     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Ackermann, K. A., Fleiß, J., & Murphy, R. O. (in press). Reciprocity as an individual difference. Journal of Conflict Resolution.
2. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
3. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345.
4. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139–152.
5. Baron, J. (2010). Looking at individual subjects in research on judgment and decision making (or anything). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42(1), 1–11.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator– mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
7. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package (Version 1.1-7). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
8. Betsch, T., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Intuition in judgment and decision making: Extensive thinking without effort. Psychological Inquiry, 21(4), 279–294.
9. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.
10. Dawes, R.M., & Messick, D.M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 111–116.
11. Dehue, F. M. J., McClintock, C. G., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1993). Social value related response latencies: Unobtrusive evidence for individual differences in information processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 273–293.
12. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 95–109.
13. Dshemuchadse, M., Scherbaum, S., & Goschke, T. (2013). How decisions emerge: Action dynamics in intertemporal decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 93–100.
14. Evans, A. M., Dillon, K. D., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Reaction times and reflection in social dilemmas: Extreme responses are fast, but not intuitive. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2436750
15. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
16. Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., Nicklisch, A., & Dickert, S. (2013). Social value orientation and information search in social dilemmas: An eye-tracking analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 272–284.
17. Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2009). Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1183–1188.
18. Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-timemental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 226–241.
19. Freeman, J. B., Dale, R., & Farmer, T. A. (2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 59.
20. Gächter, S. (2004). Behavioral game theory. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 485-503). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
21. Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Surrogates for theories. Theory & Psychology, 8(2), 195–204.
22. Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. New York, NY: Viking Press.
23. Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. (2010). Beyond dualprocess models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(1), 1–25.
24. Hehman, E., Stolier, R. M., & Freeman, J. B. (in press). Advanced mouse-tracking analytic techniques for enhancing psychological science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
25. Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 529–539.
26. Hilbig, B. E., Scholl, S. G., & Pohl, R. F. (2010). Think or blink - is the recognition heuristic an “intuitive" strategy? Judgment and Decision Making, 5(4), 300–309.
27. Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 516–519.
28. Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., & Heydasch, T. (2012). Personality, punishment and public goods: Strategic shifts towards cooperation as a matter of dispositional Honesty-Humility. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 245–254.
29. Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Leist, F., & Heydasch, T. (2013). It takes two: Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 598–603.
30. Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), 335–354.
32. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.
33. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
34. Keren, G., & Schul, Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(6), 533–550.
35. Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.
36. Koop, G. J. (2013). An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(5), 527–539.
37. Koop, G. J., & Johnson, J. G. (2011). Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 750-758.
38. Koop, G. J., & Johnson, J. G. (2013). The response dynamics of preferential choice. Cognitive Psychology, 67(4), 151–185.
39. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-8). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
40. Liebrand, W. B. G., & McClintock, C. G. (1988). The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation. European Journal of Personality, 2(3), 217–230.
41. Lotito, G., Migheli, M., & Ortona, G. (2013). Is cooperation instinctive? Evidence from the response times in a public goods game. Journal of Bioeconomics, 15(2), 123–133.
42. Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Open- Sesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324.
43. McKinstry, C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19(1), 22–24.
44. Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Musch, J. (2011). Defection in the dark? A randomized-response investigation of cooperativeness in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 638-644.
45. Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2014). Faktorenstruktur, psychometrische Eigenschaften und Messinvarianz der deutschsprachigen Version des 60- Item HEXACO Persönlichkeitsinventars [Factor structure, psychometric properties, and measurement invariance of the German-language version of the 60-item HEXACO Personality Inventory]. Diagnostica, 60(2), 86–97.
46. Nielsen, U. H., Tyran, J.-R., & Wengström, E. (2014). Second thoughts on free riding. Economics Letters, 122(2), 136–139.
47. Piovesan, M., & Wengström, E. (2009). Fast or fair? A study of response times. Economics Letters, 105(2), 193–196.
48. R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.Rproject.org/
49. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430.
50. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Rand et al. reply. Nature, 498(7452), E2-E3.
51. Rand, D. G., & Kraft-Todd, G. T. (2014). Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 300.
52. Rand, D. G., Kraft-Todd, G. T., & Gruber, J. (2014). Positive emotion and (dis)inhibition interact to predict cooperative behavior. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2429787
53. Rand, D. G., Newman, G. E., & Wurzbacher, O. M. (in press). Social context and the dynamics of cooperative choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
54. Rand, D. G., Peysakhovich, A., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Newman, G. E., Wurzbacher, O., Nowak, M. A., et al. (2014). Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Communications, 5, 3677.
55. Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner’s Dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
56. Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1966). The game of chicken. American Behavioral Scientist, 10(3), 10–28.
57. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., et al. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082.
58. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
59. Seligman, M. E. P., & Kahana, M. (2009). Unpacking intuition: A conjecture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 399-402.
60. Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207-222.
61. Singmann, H. (2014). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package (Version 0.9-109). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
62. Spivey, M. J. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63. Spivey, M. J., & Dale, R. (2006). Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 207-211.
64. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(29), 10393-10398.
65. Tinghög, G., Andersson, D., Bonn, C., Böttiger, H., Josephson, C., Lundgren, G., et al. (2013). Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature, 498(7452), E1-E2.
66. Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J. A., Parks, C. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 125-141.
67. Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Bouwmeester, S. (2014). Does intuition cause cooperation? PLos ONE, 9(5), e96654.
68. Vlaev, I., & Chater, N. (2006). Game relativity: How context influences strategic decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 131–149.
69. Wojnowicz, M. T., Ferguson, M. J., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2009). The self-organization of explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1428–1435.
70. Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013). Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 466–470.
71. Zettler, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Heydasch, T. (2013). Two sides of one coin: Honesty-Humility and situational factors mutually shape social dilemma decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(4), 286–295.