Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 280-295

  De Dreu, Carsten K W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041703348     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00022-0     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Bazerman, M., & Neale, M. (1983). Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to dispute resolution effectiveness. In M. H. Bazerman, & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiations in organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2. Carnevale, P. J. D., & Lawler, E. J. (1986). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 636-659.
3. Carnevale, P. J., O'Connor, K. M., & McCusker, C. (1993). Time pressure in negotiation and mediation. In O. Svenson, & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 117-127). New York: Plenum Press.
4. Carnevale, P. J. D., & Pruitt, D. G. (1992). Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 531-582.
5. Carroll, J. S., & Payne, J. W. (1991). An information processing approach to two-party negotiation. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 3, 3-34.
6. Chu, P. C., & Spires, E. E. (2001). Does time constraint on users negate the efficacy of decision support systems? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 226-249.
7. De Dreu, C. K. W., Giebels, E., & Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: Disruptive effects of punitive capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 408-422.
8. De Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S., & Oldersma, F. L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348-362.
9. De Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S., & Steinel, W. (2000a). Unfixing the fixed-pie: A motivated information processing of integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 975-987.
10. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). Impact of social value orientation on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.
11. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000b). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytical review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889-905.
12. De Dreu, C. K. W., Yzerbyt, V., & Leyens, J.-Ph. (1995). Dilution of stereotype-based cooperation in mixed-motive interdependence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 575-593.
13. De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346-365.
14. Druckman, D. (1994). Determinants of compromising behavior in negotiation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 507-556.
15. Dijker, A. J., & Koomen, W. (1996). Stereotyping and attitudinal effects under time pressure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 61-74.
16. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Freund, T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Shpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy: Effects of need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin., 11, 479-487.
18. Friedman, R. A. (1994). Front stage, back stage: The dramatic structure of labor negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
20. Gelfand, M. J., & Christakopoulou, S. (1999). Culture and negotiator cognition: Judgment accuracy and negotiation processes in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 248-269.
21. Gelfand, M. J., & Realo, A. (1999). Individualism-collectivism and accountability in intergroup negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 721-736.
22. Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
23. Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
24. Harinck, F., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2000). Assumed conflict in negotiation: The importance of interests, facts and values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 359-382.
25. Heaton, A. W., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1991). Person perception by introverts and extraverts under time pressure. Effects of need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 161-165.
26. Hull, J. G., Tedlie, J. C., & Lehn, D. A. (1992). Moderator variables in personality research: The problem of controlling plausible alternatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 115-117.
27. Kelley, H. H., Beckman, L. L., & Fischer, C. S. (1976). Negotiating the division of a reward under incomplete information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 361-398.
28. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & A. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
29. Kerstholt, J. H. (1994). The effect of time pressure on decision-making behaviour in a dynamic task environment. Acta Psychologica, 86, 89-104.
30. Komorita, S. S., & Barnes, M. (1969). Effects of pressures to reach agreement in bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 245-252.
31. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). The psychology of being "right": The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395-409.
32. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereo-typing, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
33. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing and "freezing". Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
34. Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). The manager as negotiator: Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. New York: Free Press.
35. Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, J. W., & Minton, J. W. (2000). Negotiation. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
36. Maule, A. J. (1994). A componential investigation of the relation between structural modeling and cognitive accounts of human judgment. Acta Psyhologica, 87, 199-216.
37. Mayseless, O., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1987). What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 162-183.
38. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 57, 426-441.
39. Morris, M. W., Larrick, R. P., & Su, S. K. (1999). Misperceiving negotiation counterparts: When situationally determined bargaining behaviors are attributed to personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 52-67.
40. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Rationality and cognition in negotiation. New York: Free Press.
41. Neuberg, S., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-444.
42. Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84-97.
43. Paese, P. W., & Gilin, D. A. (2000). When an adversary is caught telling the truth: Reciprocal cooperation versus self-interest in distributive bargaining. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 79-90.
44. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552.
45. Pinkley, R. L., Griffith, T. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1995). "Fixed Pie" al Mode: Information availability, information processing, and the negotiation of suboptimal agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 101-112.
46. Pruitt, D. G. (1998). Social conflict. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, (fourth ed, pp. 89-150). New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. London: Open University Press.
48. Pruitt, D. G., & Drews, J. L. (1969). The effect of time pressure, time elapsed, and the opponent's concession rate on behavior in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 43-60.
49. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363-392.
50. Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621-633.
51. Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
52. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Smith, J. F., Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R. (1982). A cost-benefit mechanism for selecting problem-solving strategies: Some extensions and empirical tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
54. Smith, L. L., Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1982). Matching and mismatching: The effect of own limit, other's toughness, and time pressure on concession rate in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 876-883.
55. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Stuhlmacher, A. F., Gillespie, T. R., & Champagne, M. V. (1998). The impact of time pressure in negotiation: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 97-116.
57. Thompson, L. L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 82-90.
58. Thompson, L. L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98-123.
59. Ury, W. (1991). Getting past no: Negotiating with difficult people. New York: Bantam Books.
60. Verplanken, B. (1993b). Need for cognition and external information search: Responses to time pressure during decision-making.
61. Webster, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
62. Weingart, L. R., Bennett, R. J., & Brett, J. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504-517.
63. Weingart, L. R., Hyder, E., & Prietula, M. J. (1996). Knowledge matters: The effect of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcome. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1205-1217.
64. Wright, P. L. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressure, distractions, and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.
65. Yukl, G. A. (1974). Effects of situational variables and opponent concessions on a bargainer's perception, aspirations, and concessions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 227-236.
66. Yukl, G. A., Malone, M. P., Hayslip, B., & Pamin, T. A. (1976). The effects of time pressure and issue settlement order on integrative bargaining. Sociometry, 39, 277-281.