Group performance

Group Performance

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-275

  Nijstad, Bernard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917145147     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203872901     Document Type: Book

References (448)

1. Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2. Aiello, J., & Kolb, K. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339-353.
3. Aiello, J. R., & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring and work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 537-548.
4. Aldag, R. J., & Fuller, S. R. (1993). Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 533-552.
5. Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 26-37.
6. Allport, F. (1920). The influence of the group upon association and thought. Experimental Psychology, 3, 159-182.
7. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Amiot, C. E., Terry, D. J., & Callan, V. J. (2007). Status, equity and social identification during an intergroup merger: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 557-577.
10. Ancona, D. G., & Bresman, H. (2006). Begging, borrowing, and building on ideas from the outside to create pulsed innovation inside teams. In L. L. Thompson & H. S. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 183-198). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1988). Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Group and Organization Studies, 13, 468-494.
12. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
13. Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181.
14. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA:Carnegie.
15. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35.
17. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and submission to group pressure: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (9) (whole no. 417).
18. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parson, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 444-476). New York: The Free Press.
20. Bales, R. F., & Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small decisionmaking groups. In T. Parson & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization, and interaction process (pp. 259-306). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
21. Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decisionmaking:A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-179.
22. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
23. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 1-40). Ontario, Canada: Elsevier.
24. Baron, R. S. (2005). So right it's wrong:Groupthink and the ubiquitous nature of polarized group decision making. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 219-253). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
25. Baron, R. S., Moore, D. L., & Sanders, G. S. (1978). Distraction as a source of drive in social facilitation research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 816-824.
26. Baron, R. S., Vandello, J. A., & Brunsman, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 915-927.
27. Bartis, S., Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1988). Evaluation and performance: A two-edged knife. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 242-251.
28. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
29. Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
30. Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 9-32.
31. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990a). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Passmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 4, pp. 231-272). Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
32. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990b). Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
33. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207-218.
34. Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 610-620.
35. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
36. Beattie, G. W., & Barnard, P. J. (1979). The temporal structure of natural telephone conversations. Linguistics, 17, 213-230.
37. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2005). Conflict's consequences: Effects of social motives on postnegotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 358-374.
38. Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes. In A. Inkeles, N. J. Smelser, & R. Turner (Eds.), Annual review of sociology (pp. 479-508). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
39. Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host-resistance, and mortality: 9-year follow-up-study of Alameda residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 186-204.
40. Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., pp. 193-281). New York:McGraw-Hill.
41. Bettencourt, B. A., Brewer, M. B., Croak, M. R., & Miller, N. (1992). Cooperation and the reduction of intergroup bias:The role of reward structure and social orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 301-319.
42. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Salomon, K. (1999). Social ``facilitation'' as a challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 68-77.
43. Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1998). Cross training and team performance. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 299-311). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
44. Boen, F., Vanbeselaere, N., Brebels, L., Huybens, W., & Millet, K. (2007). Postmerger identification as a function of pre-merger identification, relative representation, and premerger status. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 380-389.
45. Bond, C. F. (1982). Social facilitation: A self-presentational view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1042-1050.
46. Bond, C. F., Jr., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265-292.
47. Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of a child's tie to his mother. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 39, 350-373.
48. Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15, 633-644.
49. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
50. Brickner, M. A., Harkins, S. G., & Ostrom, T. M. (1986). Effects of personal involvement: Thought-provoking implications for social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 763-769.
51. Brown, R. (1974). Further comment on the risky shift. American Psychologist, 29, 468-470.
52. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Jr., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52, 657-677.
53. Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 288-307.
54. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York:Harper & Row.
55. Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 315-332.
56. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
57. Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080.
58. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
59. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1990). Cognitive psychology and team training:Shared mental models in complex systems. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Miami, FL.
60. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1990). Cognitive psychology and team training: Shared mental models in complex systems. Human Factors Society Bulletin, 33, 1-4.
61. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217-1234.
63. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
64. Chaiken, S., & Stangor, S. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 575-630.
65. Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R. B., Parrish, R. N., & Weeks, G. D. (1972). Studies in interactive communication: The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem-solving. Human Factors, 14, 487-509.
66. Chemers, M. M. (2000). Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 27-43.
67. Chen, S. C. (1937). Social modification of the activity of ants in nest-building. Physiological Zoology, 10, 420-436.
68. Chirumbolo, A., Livi, S., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions. European Journal of Personality, 18, 265-278.
69. Choi, H. S., & Levine, J. M. (2004). Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 273-280.
70. Choi, H. S., & Thompson, L. (2005). Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 121-132.
71. Cini, M. A., Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1993). Group staffing levels and responses to prospective and new members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 723-734.
72. Cohen, S., & Bailey, D. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
73. Collaros, P. A., & Anderson, L. R. (1969). Effect of perceived expertise upon creativity members of brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 159-163.
74. Cooper, W. H., Gallupe, R. B., Pollard, S., & Cadsby, J. (1998). Some liberating effects of anonymous electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 147-178.
75. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853-863.
76. Cottrell, N. B. (1972). Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 185-236). New York: Holt.
77. Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 245-250.
78. Cramton, C. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in dispersed collaboration. Organizational Science, 12, 346-371.
79. Dabbs, J. M., Jr., & Ruback, R. B. (1987). Dimensions of group process: Amount and structure of vocal interaction. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 123-169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
80. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
81. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
82. De Dreu, C. K. W., De Vries, N. K., Franssen, H., & Altink, W. M. M. (2000). Minority dissent in organizations:Factors influencing the willingness to dissent. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2451-2466.
83. De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22-49.
84. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 741-749.
85. Dennis, A. R., George, J. E, Jessup, L. M., Nunamaker, J. F., & Vogel, D. (1988). Information technology to support electronic meetings. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 12, 591-624.
86. Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9, 256-274.
87. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.
88. Dennis, A. R., & Williams, M. L. (2003). Electronic brainstorming: Theory, research, and future directions. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 160-178). New York: Oxford University Press.
89. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152.
90. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
91. DeRosa, D. M., Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1549-1581.
92. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
93. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
94. Dobbins, G. H., Long, W. S., Dedrick, E. J., & Clemons, T. C. (1990). The role of self-monitoring and gender on leader emergence: A laboratory and field study. Journal of Management, 16, 609-618.
95. Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A., O'Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod, S., & Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face and video mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 105-125.
96. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of ``we'': Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 296-330). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
97. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validizic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the benefit of recategorization: Evaluations, selfdisclosure, and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 401-442.
98. Driskell, J. E., & Mullen, B. (1990). Status, expectations, and behaviour: A metaanalytic review and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 541-553.
99. Driskell, J. E., Radtke, P. H., & Salas, E. (2003). Virtual teams: The effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 7, 297-323.
100. Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722-735.
101. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
102. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
103. Edwards, B. D., Day, E. A., Arthur, W., Jr., & Bell, S. T. (2006). Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 727-736.
104. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290-292.
105. Esser, J. K. (1998). Alive and well after 25 years: A review of groupthink research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 116-141.
106. Esser, J. K., & Lindoerfer, J. L. (1989). Groupthink and the space shuttle Challenger accident: Toward a quantitative analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 167-177.
107. Everett, J. J., Smith, R. E., & Williams, K. D. (1992). Effects of team cohesion and identifiability on social loafing in relay swimming performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 311-324.
108. Faure, C. (2004). Beyond brainstorming:Effects of different group procedures on selection of ideas and satisfaction with the process. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 13-34.
109. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
110. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
111. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
112. Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 149-190). New York: Academic Press.
113. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
114. Flowers, M. (1977). A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 288-299.
115. Fodor, E. M., & Smith, T. (1982). The power motive as an influence on group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 178-185.
116. Freese, L., & Cohen, B. P. (1973). Eliminating status generalization. Sociometry, 36, 177-193.
117. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia:Psychology Press.
118. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J. A., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., et al. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias:Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 388-402.
119. Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137-142.
120. Gallupe, R. B., Cooper, W. H., Grisé, M., & Bastianutti, L. M. (1994). Blocking electronic brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 77-86.
121. Gates, M. F., & Allee, W. C. (1933). Conditioned behavior of isolated and groups of cockroaches on a simple maze. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 15, 331-358.
122. George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
123. Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality:The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451-495.
124. Giessner, S. R., & Mummendey, A. (2008). United we win, divided we fail? Effects of cognitive representations and performance feedback on merging groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 412-435.
125. Giessner, S. R., Viki, G. T., Otten, S., Terry, D. J., & Taöuber, S. (2006). The challenge of merging: Merger patterns, premerger status, and merger support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 339-352.
126. Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974.
127. Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1997). The impact of information in small group choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 132-140.
128. Goncalo, J. A., & Staw, B. M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96-109.
129. Gordon, J. (1992). Work teams: How far have they come? Training, Oct., 59-65.
130. Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322-339.
131. Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265-287.
132. Groff, B. D., Baron, R. S., & Moore, D. L. (1983). Distraction, attentional conflict, and drivelike behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 359-380.
133. Guerin, B. (1983). Social facilitation and social monitoring: A test of three models. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 203-214.
134. Guerin, B. (1986). Mere presence effects in humans: A review. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 38-77.
135. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. L. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
136. Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A., & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1100.
137. Halpin, A. W., & Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement (pp. 39-51). Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.
138. Hambley, L. A., O'Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. B. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 1-20.
139. Harkins, S. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-18.
140. Harkins, S. G., & Jackson, J. M. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457-465.
141. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.
142. Hastie, R., & Kameda, T. (2005). The robust beauty of the majority rule. Psychological Review, 112, 494-508.
143. Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
144. Hertel, G., Deter, C., & Konradt, U. (2003). Motivation gains in computermediated work groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2080-2105.
145. Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical work. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.
146. Hertel, G., Kerr, N. L., & Messé, L. A. (2000). Motivation gains in performance groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Koöhler effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 580-601.
147. Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1-28.
148. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Ingroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
149. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
150. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences:International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
151. Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
152. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single process uncertainty reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg and D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173-190). New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
153. Hogg, M. A., Martin, R., Epitropaki, O., Mankad, A., Svensson, A., & Weeden, K. (2005). Effective leadership in salient groups: Revisiting leader-member exchange theory from the perspective of social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 991-1004.
154. Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity:Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189-1199.
155. Homma, M., Tajima, K., & Hayashi, M. (1995). The effects of misperception of performance in brainstorming groups. Japanese Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34, 221-231.
156. Hsu, F. L. K. (1970). Americans and Chinese. New York: Doubleday.
157. Huguet, P., Galvaing, M. P., Monteil, J. M., & Dumas, F. (1999). Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1011-1025.
158. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From I-P-O models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
159. Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371-384.
160. Innes, J. M., & Young, R. F. (1975). The effect of presence of an audience, evaluation apprehension, and objective self awareness on learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 35-42.
161. Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization:A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1141-1151.
162. Jackson, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks:Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 937-942.
163. James, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1994). Dispositional group loyalty and individual action for the benefit of an ingroup: Experimental and correlational evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 179-205.
164. James, K., & Greenberg, J. (1989). In-group salience, intergroup comparison, and individual performance and selfesteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 604-616.
165. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
166. Janis, I. L. (1982). Victims of groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
167. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.
168. Jehn, K. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness:An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value based intragroup conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238.
169. Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
170. Jehn, K., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-762.
171. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765-780.
172. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755-768.
173. Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36-51.
174. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
175. Kameda, T., Ohtsubo, Y., & Takezawa, M. (1997). Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence: An illustration in a group decision-making context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 296-309.
176. Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 187-213.
177. Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 46-71.
178. Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus information influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306-313.
179. Karakowsky, L., & Siegel, J. P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620-631.
180. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
181. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 156-168.
182. Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547-555.
183. Kelly, J. R., & Loving, T. (2004). Time pressure and group performance:Exploring underlying processes in the attentional focus model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 185-198.
184. Kent, R. L., & Moss, S. E. (1994). Effects of sex and gender role on leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1335-1346.
185. Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
186. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1981). Ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 224-231.
187. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
188. Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J., & Kramer, G. P. (1996). Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 687-719.
189. Kerr, N. L., Messé, L. A., Seok, D. H., Sambolec, E. J., Lount, R. B., & Park, E. S. (2007). Psychological mechanisms underlying the Koöhler motivation gain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 828-841.
190. Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-655.
191. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
192. Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computermediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-toterminal discussion. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104.
193. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 175-192.
194. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds., 2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
195. Klinger, E. (1969). Feedback effects and social facilitation of vigilance performance: Mere coaction versus potential evaluation. Psychonomic Science, 14, 161-162.
196. Koöhler, O. (1926). Kraftleistungen bei Einzel und Gruppenarbeit [Physical performance in individual and group situations]. Industrielle Psychotechnik, 3, 274-282.
197. Koöhler, O. (1927). Ueber den Gruppenwirkungsgrad der menschlichen Koerperarbeit und die Bedingungen optimaler Kollektivkraftreaktion [On group efficiency of physical labor and the conditions of optimal collective performance]. Industrielle Psychotechnik, 4, 209-226.
198. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
199. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. (1990). Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. In J. Galegher & R. Kraut (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of group work (pp. 111-145). Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
200. Kraut, R. E., Galegher, J., & Egido, C. (1988). Relationships and tasks in scientific collaboration. Human- Computer Interaction, 3, 31-58.
201. Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., & Ng, Z. W. (2005). Egocentrism over email: Can we communicate as well as we think? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 925-936.
202. Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L, & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113, 84-100.
203. Lamm, H., & Myers, D. G. (1978). Groupinduced polarization of attitudes and behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 147-195). New York:Academic Press.
204. Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
205. Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). Individual and group goal setting in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1579-1596.
206. Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 175-184.
207. Larson, J. R., Christensen, C., Abbott, A. S., & Franz, T. M. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decisionmaking teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330.
208. Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Franz, T. M. (1998). Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decisionmaking groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 482-495.
209. Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decisionmaking groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446-461.
210. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
211. Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
212. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines:the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325-340.
213. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Interactions with groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 645-659.
214. Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination process of cooperative problem solving groups at verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
215. Laughlin, P. R. (1999). Collective induction: Twelve postulates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 50-69.
216. Laughlin, P. R., & Adamopoulos, J. A. (1980). Social combination processes and individual learning for six-person cooperative groups on an intellective task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 941-947.
217. Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Altermatt, T. W. (1998). Collective versus individual induction with single multiple hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1481-1489.
218. Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Miner, A. G. (2002). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letter-tonumbers problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 605-620.
219. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
220. Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L. (2006). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letter-tonumbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 644-651.
221. Laughlin, P. R., Kerr, N. L., Davis, J. H., Halff, H. M., & Marciniak, K. A. (1975). Group size, member ability, and social decision schemes on an intellective task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 522-535.
222. Laughlin, P. R., Kerr, N. L., Munch, M. M., & Haggarty, C. A. (1976). Social decision schemes of the same fourperson groups on two different intellective tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 80-88.
223. Laughlin, P. R., & McGlynn, R. P. (1986). Collective induction: Mutual group and individual influence by exchange of hypotheses and evidence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 567-589.
224. Laughlin P. R., & Shippy, T. A. (1983). Collective induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 94-100.
225. Laughlin, P. R., VanderStoep, S. W., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1991). Collective versus individual induction:Recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 50-67.
226. Laughlin, P. R., Zander, M. L., Knievel, E. M., & Tan, K. T. (2003). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letter-to-numbers problems:Informative equations and effective strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 684-694.
227. Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., and Benson, G. S. (2001) Organizing for high performance: The CEO report on employee involvement, TQM, reengineering, and knowledge management in Fortune 1000 Companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
228. Lawler, E. E., III, Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E., Jr. (1995). Creating high performance organizations: Practices and results of employee involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
229. Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.
230. Leary, M. R. (1983). A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371-375.
231. Leary, M. R. (2004). Introduction to behavioural research methods (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
232. Levine, J. M. (1989). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
233. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
234. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 305-336). London: Wiley.
235. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper and Row.
236. Lewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change and performance:Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 159-178.
237. Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794-813.
238. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.
239. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 129-140.
240. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.
241. Lim, B. C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance:A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403-418.
242. Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 610-621.
243. Lodewijkx, H. F. M., & Syroit, J. E. M. M. (1997). Severity of initiation revisited:Does severity of initiation increase the attractiveness of real groups? European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 275-300.
244. Lord, R. G., De Vader, C. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410.
245. Lorge, I., Fox, D., Davitz, J., & Brenner, M. (1958). A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 337-371.
246. Lount, R. B., & Phillips, K. W. (2007). Working harder with the out-group. The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 214-224.
247. Lount, R. B., Park, E. S., Kerr, N. L., Messé, L. A., & Seok, D. H. (2008). Evaluation concerns and the Koöhler effect: The impact of physical presence on motivation gains. Small Group Research, 39, 795-812.
248. MacCoun, R. J. (1990). The emergence of extralegal bias during jury deliberation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 303-314.
249. MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21-33.
250. Mackie, D. M. (1986). Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 720-728.
251. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
252. Marks, K. L., & Mirvis, P. (1985). Merger syndrome: Stress and uncertainty. Mergers and Acquisitions, 20, 50-55.
253. Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, C. S., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3-13.
254. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The ``black sheep effect'':Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
255. Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805-835.
256. Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
257. McCann, J. E., & Gilkey, R. (1988). Creating and managing successful mergers and acquisitions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
258. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
259. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
260. McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it:Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718.
261. Messé, L. A., Hertel, G., Kerr, N. L., Lount, R. B., & Park, E. S. (2002). Knowledge of partner's ability as a moderator of group motivation gains: An exploration of the Koöhler discrepancy effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 935-946.
262. Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity:Innovation through collaboration (pp. 32-62). New York: Oxford University Press.
263. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads:Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
264. Moorhead, G., & Montanari, J. R. (1986). An empirical investigation of the groupthink phenomenon. Human Relations, 39, 399-410.
265. Moreland, R. L. (1987). The formation of small groups. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 80-110). Newbury Park, CA: JAI Press.
266. Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
267. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press.
268. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). Problem identification by groups. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 17-47). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
269. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
270. Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-380.
271. Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-135.
272. Mottola, G. R., Bachman, B. A., Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1997). How groups merge: The effects of merger integration patterns on anticipated commitment to the merged organization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1335-1358.
273. Mullen, B., Anthony, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, E. (1994). Group cohesion and quality of decision-making: An integration test of the groupthink hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25, 189-204.
274. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
275. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 65, 219-225.
276. Munkes, J., & Diehl, M. (2003). Matching or competition? Performance comparison in an idea generation task. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 305-320.
277. Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups:A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165-186.
278. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
279. Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority and minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 277-282.
280. Nemeth, C. J., & Nemeth-Brown, B. (2003). Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity for group creativity. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity:Innovation through collaboration (pp. 63-84). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
281. Nemeth, C. J., & Ormiston, M. (2007). Creative idea generation: Harmony versus stimulation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 524-535.
282. Newcomb, T. M. (1956). The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist, 11, 575-586.
283. Nijstad, B. A. (1995). Het geheel groter dan de som der delen? Productiviteitswinst in brainstormgroepen [The whole larger than the sum of the parts? Productivity gains in brainstorming groups]. Unpublished master's thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
284. Nijstad, B. A., & Paulus, P. B. (2003). Group creativity: common themes and future directions. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity:Innovation through collaboration (pp. 326-339). New York: Oxford University Press.
285. Nijstad, B. A., Rietzschel, E. F., & Stroebe, W. (2005). Four principles of group creativity. In L. Thompson & H. S. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 161-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
286. Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186-213.
287. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups. Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 535-544.
288. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 531-548.
289. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2006). The illusion of group productivity: A reduction of failures explanation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 31-48.
290. Nijstad, B. A., Van Vianen, A. E. M., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2004). Persistence in brainstorming:Exploring stop rules in same-sex groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 195-206.
291. Nunamaker, J. F., Applegate, L. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1988). Computeraided deliberation: Model management and group decision support. Journal of Operations Research, 36, 826-848.
292. O'Connaill, B., Whittaker, S., & Wilbur, S. (1993). Conversations over videoconferences:An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 389-428.
293. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
294. Orbell, J., & Dawes, R. (1981). Social dilemmas. In G. M. Stephenson & J. M. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (pp. 37-65). New York:Wiley.
295. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner's.
296. Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination (2nd ed.). New York: Scribner's.
297. Ouwerkerk, J. W., de Gilder, D., & de Vries, N. K. (2000). When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1550-1559.
298. Park, W. W. (2000). A comprehensive empirical investigation of the relationships among variables of the groupthink model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 873-887.
299. Parker, K. (1988). Speaking turns in small group interaction: A context-sensitive event sequence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 965-971.
300. Parnes, S. J., & Meadow, A. (1959). Effects of ``brainstorming'' instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 171-176.
301. Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.
302. Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming:The illusion of productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78-89.
303. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Ortega, A. H. (1995). Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 249-265.
304. Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
305. Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76-87.
306. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
307. Pemberton, M. B., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (1996). Memory for and experience of differential competitive behavior of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 953-966.
308. Pessin, J. (1933). The comparative effects of social and mechanical stimulation on memorizing. American Journal of Psychology, 48, 263-270.
309. Peters, L. H., Hartke, D. D., & Pohlmann, J. T. (1985). Fiedler's contingency theory of leadership: An application of the meta-analysis procedures of Schmidt and Hunter. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 274-285.
310. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
311. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
312. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Ahearne, M. (1997). Moderating effects of goal acceptance on the relationship between group cohesiveness and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 974-983.
313. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
314. Postmes, T. R., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computermediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715.
315. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication:The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243-1254.
316. Pruitt, D. G. (1971). Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 339-360.
317. Pugh, M., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-groups:Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746-762.
318. Rabbie, J. M., & Horowitz, M. (1969). Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 269-277.
319. Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident (Rogers Commission). (1986). Washington, DC. Retrieved February 27, 2009, from http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/genindex.htm
320. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Social status and group structure. In M. A. Hogg & S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 352-375). Oxford: Blackwell.
321. Ridley, M. (1996). The origins of virtue. London: Viking.
322. Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 244-251.
323. Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2007). Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 933-946.
324. Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (in press). Idea selection after individual brainstorming: Choosing between originality and impact. British Journal of Psychology.
325. Ringelmann, M. (1913). Recherches sur les moteurs animés: Travail de l'homme. Annales de l'Insitut National Agronomique, 12, 1-40.
326. Rusbult, C. E., & Farrell, D. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 429-438.
327. Rutter, D. T., & Stephenson, G. M. (1977). The role of visual communication in social interaction. Current Anthropology, 20, 124-125.
328. Saavedra, R. P., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne. L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
329. Sanders, G. S., & Baron, R. S. (1975). The motivation effects of distraction on task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 956-963.
330. Sanders, G. S., & Baron, R. S. (1977). Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 303-314.
331. Sanders, G. S., Baron, R. S., & Moore, D. L. (1978). Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 291-303.
332. Sanna, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory:Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 774-786.
333. Sanna, L. J., & Parks, C. D. (1997). Group research trends in social and organizational psychology: What happened to intragroup research? Psychological Science, 8, 261-267.
334. Sanna, L. J., & Shotland, R. L. (1990). Valence of anticipated evaluation and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 82-92.
335. Sawyer, J. E., Houlette, M. A., & Yeagley, E. L. (2006). Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 1-15.
336. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity:The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
337. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
338. Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1020-1030.
339. Scholten, L., Van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 539-552.
340. Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080-1093.
341. Seta, J. J. (1982). The impact of comparison processes on coactors' task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 281-291.
342. Shaw, M. E. (1932). A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. American Journal of Psychology, 44, 491-504.
343. Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67-81.
344. Shepperd, J. A., & Taylor, K. M. (1999). Social loafing and expectancy-value theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1147-1158.
345. Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27 (187), 1-60.
346. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.
347. Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation. London: Routledge and Kegan.
348. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK:University Book Exchange, University of Oklahoma.
349. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1969). Social psychology. New York: Harper and Row.
350. Simonton, D. K. (2004). Group artistic creativity: Creative clusters and cinematic success in feature films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1494-1520.
351. Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small groups. American Sociological Review, 20, 300-310.
352. Smith, B. N., Kerr, N. A., Markus, M. J., & Stasson, M. F. (2001). Individual differences in social loafing: Need for cognition as a motivator in collective performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, 150-158.
353. Smith, S. (1985). Groupthink and the hostage rescue mission. British Journal of Political Science, 15, 117-123.
354. Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32, 132-157.
355. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). Deindividuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
356. Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 393-422.
357. Stasser, G. (1999). A primer of social decision theory: Models of group influence, competitive model-testing, and prospective modeling. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 3-20.
358. Stasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In L. Thompson & J. Levine (Eds.), Shared knowledge in organizations (pp. 49-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
359. Stasser, G., & Birchmeier, Z. (2003). Group creativity and collective choice. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 85-109). New York: Oxford University Press.
360. Stasser, G., Kerr, N. L., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 279-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
361. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
362. Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
363. Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussion of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
364. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
365. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
366. Stasser, G., & Vaughan, S. I. (1996). Models of participation during face-to-face unstructured discussion. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 165-192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
367. Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information:The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 102-116.
368. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
369. Stephan, F. F., & Mishler, E. G. (1952). The distribution of participation in small groups: An exponential approximation. American Sociological Review, 17, 598-608.
370. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
371. Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619-628.
372. Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 81, 26-43.
373. Stoner, J. A. F. (1961). A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk. Unpublished master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
374. Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 767-783.
375. Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
376. Stroebe, W., & Diehl, M. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 271-303). London: Wiley.
377. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1992). The illusion of group effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 643-650.
378. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1996). Social compensation and the Koehler effect: Toward a theoretical explanation of motivation gains in group productivity. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 37-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
379. Stroebe, W., & Frey, B. S. (1982). Selfinterest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 121-137.
380. Strube, M. J., Miles, M. E., & Finch, W. H. (1981). The social facilitation of a simple task: Field tests of alternative explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 701-707.
381. Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context:Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685-718.
382. Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315-330.
383. Taggar, S., Hackett, R., & Saha, S. (1999). Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 52, 899-926.
384. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
385. Tajfel, H. (1982). Instrumentality, identity, and social comparisons. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 483-507). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
386. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
387. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA:Brooks/Cole.
388. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
389. Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgement. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101-114.
390. Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 23-47.
391. Terry, D. J. (2003). A social identity perspective on organizational mergers:The role of group status, permeability, and similarity. In M. J. Platow, N. Ellemers, A. S. Haslam, & D. van Knippenberg (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 223-240). New York:Psychology Press.
392. Tetlock, P. E. (1979). Identifying victims of groupthink from public statements of decision makers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1314-1324.
393. Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. S., McGuire, C., Chang, S., & Feld, P. (1992). Assessing political group dynamics: A test of the groupthink model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 318-326.
394. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York:Wiley.
395. Tindale, R. S. (1993). Decision errors made by individuals and groups. In N. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 109-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
396. Todd, A. R., Seok, D., Kerr, N. L., & Messé, L. A. (2006). Social compensation: Fact or social comparison artifact? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 431-442.
397. Travis, L. E. (1925). The effect of a small audience upon eye-hand coordination. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 29, 142-146.
398. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
399. Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
400. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
401. Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small group development reconsidered. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.
402. Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup behavior (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
403. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A selfcategorization theory. Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
404. Turner, M. E., Pratkanis, A. R., Probasco, P., & Leve, C. (1992). Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 781-796.
405. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment in uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
406. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning:The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
407. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computerbased groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467.
408. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker J. F., Jr. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computermediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 2, 49-73.
409. Van der Kleij, R. (2007). Overcoming distance in virtual teams: Effects of communication media, experience, and time pressure on distributed teamwork. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
410. Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M., & Van de Vliert, E. (2000). Affective responses to intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of Management, 26, 633-655.
411. Van der Vegt, G. S., & Van de Vliert, E. (2002). Intragroup interdependence and effectiveness: Review and proposed directions for theory and practice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 50-67.
412. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
413. Van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., Monden, L., & de Lima, F. (2002). Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 233-252.
414. Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-541.
415. Van Leeuwen, E., Van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 679-690.
416. Vickery, C. M., Clark, T. D., & Carlson, J. R. (1999). Virtual positions: An examination of structure and performance in ad hoc workgroups. Information Systems Journal, 9, 291-312.
417. Volpe, C. E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Spector, P. (1996). The impact of cross-training on team functioning: An empirical examination. Human Factors, 38, 87-100.
418. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
419. Vroom, V., & Yetton, P. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh, PA:University of Pittsburgh Press.
420. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
421. Weber, B., & Hertel, G. (2007). Motivation gains of inferior members: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 973-993.
422. Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141-162.
423. Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York:Springer-Verlag.
424. West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In: M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 309-333). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
425. Wheelan, S. A. (1994). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
426. Wheelan, S. A., Davidson, B., & Tilin, F. (2003). Group development across time:Reality or illusion? Small Group Research, 34, 223-245.
427. Wilder, D. A., & Allen, V. L. (1977). Social comparison, self-evaluation, and conformity to the group. In J. M. Suls, & R. L. Miller (Eds.). Social comparison processes. Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 187-208). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing.
428. Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Gaertner, L. (2002). Intragroup social influence and intergroup competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 975-992.
429. Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698-722.
430. Williams, E. (1975). Medium or message:Communications medium as a determinant of interpersonal evaluation. Sociometry, 38, 119-130.
431. Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.
432. Williams, K. D. (2001). Ostracism: The power of silence. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
433. Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762.
434. Williams, K. D., Harkins, S., & Latané, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303-311.
435. Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570-580.
436. Williams, K., & O'Reilly, C. (1998). The complexity of diversity: A review of forty years of research. In D. Gruenfeld & M. Neale (Eds.), Research on managing in groups and teams (Vol. 20, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
437. Wilson, J. M., Straus, S. G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computermediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 16-33.
438. Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371-377.
439. Witte, E. H. (1989). Koöhler rediscovered:The anti-Ringelmann effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 147-154.
440. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978.
441. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytical review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
442. Zaccaro, S. (1984). Social loafing: The role of task attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 99-106.
443. Zaccaro, S. J., & Lowe, C. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 547-558.
444. Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 451-483.
445. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
446. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Compresence of group influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 35-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
447. Zajonc, R. B., & Sales, S. M. (1966). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 160-168.
448. Ziller, R. C. (1965). Toward a theory of open and closed groups. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 164-182.