Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 22-49

  De Dreu, Carsten K W ^a   Nijstad, Bernard A ^a   Van Knippenberg, Daan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dual process models; Group decision making; Information processing; Interdependency theory; Motivation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTIVATION; REVIEW;

DECISION MAKING; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MENTAL PROCESSES; MOTIVATION;

EID: 42149176923     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1088868307304092     Document Type: Article

References (217)

1. Abelson, R.P. (1986). Beliefs are like possessions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 16, 223-250.
2. Aldag, R., & Fuller, S.R. (1993). Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 535-552.
3. Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1-70.
4. Baer, M., & Oldham, G.R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963-970.
5. Baker, S., & Petty, R. (1994). Majority and minority influence: source-position imbalance as a determinant message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
6. Bales, R.F. (1958). Task roles and social roles in problem solving groups. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 437-447). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7. Barsade, S.G., Ward, A.J., Turner, J.D.F., & Sonnenfeld, J.A. (2000). To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802-836.
8. Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
9. Baumeister, R.F., Smart, L., & Boden, J.M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5-33.
10. Bechtoldt, M.N., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Nijstad, B.A. (2007). The impact of epistemic and social motivation on creative performance in groups. Manuscript in preparation, University of Amsterdam.
11. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2002). Integrative and distributive negotiation in small groups: Effects of task structure, decision rule, and social motive. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 227-252.
12. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2005). Conflict's consequences: Effects of social motives on postnegotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 358-374.
13. Beersma, B., De Dreu, C.K.W., Dalenberg, S., & Vogelaar, L. (2007, July). Need for structure and team adaptation in dynamic distributed decision making. Paper presented at the 2nd INGroup conference, East Lansing, MI.
14. Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J.R., Humphrey, S.E., Moon, H., Conlon, D.E., & Ilgen, D.R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 572-590.
15. Beggan, J.K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perceptions: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 229-237.
16. Ben-Yoav, O., & Pruitt, D. (1984). Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 323-335.
17. Boles, T., Croson, R., & Murnighan, J.K. (2000). Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 235-259.
18. Bowman, J.M., & Wittenbaum, G.M. (2004). Effects of time pressure and informational access on hidden profile solution in decision-making groups. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University.
19. Brockner, J., & Rubin, J.Z. (1985). Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A social psychological analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical unshared information in decision-making groups: The effect of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 35-56.
21. Burnham, T., McCabe, K., & Smith, V.L. (2000). Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43, 57-73.
22. Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 315-332.
23. Camac, C. (1992). Information preferences in a two-person social dilemma. In W. Liebrand, D. Messick, & H. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 147-161). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
24. Camacho, L.M., & Paulus, P.B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080.
25. Caporael, L.R., Dawes, R.M., Orbell, J.M., & Van der Kragt, A.J. (1989). Selfishenss examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behavorial and Brain Sciences, 12, 683-739.
26. Carnevale, P.J.D. (1995). Property, culture, and negotiation. In R. Kramer & D. Messick (Eds.), Negotiation as a social process: New trends in theory and research (pp. 309-323). London: Sage.
27. Carnevale, P.J.D., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2006). Motive: The negotiator's raison d'etre. In L. L. Thompson & J. M. Brett (Eds.), The social psychology of negotiation (pp. 55-76). New York: Psychology Press.
28. Carnevale, P.J.D., & Lawler, E.J. (1986). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 636-659.
29. Carnevale, P.J.D., & Probst, T.M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1300-1309.
30. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
32. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
33. Chirumbolo, A., Livi, S., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2004). Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions. European Journal of Personality, 18, 265-278.
34. Colquitt, J.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Ilgen, D.R., LePine, J.A., & Sheppard, L. (2002). Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: The moderating effect of openness to experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 402-410.
35. Davis, J.H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
36. Davis, J.H., Laughlin, P.R., & Komorita, S.S. (1976). The social psychology of small groups: Cooperative and mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 501-541.
37. De Dreu, C.K.W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 280-295.
38. De Dreu, C.K.W. (2006). Rational self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: A critical appraisal and extension of Meglino and Korsgaard (2004). Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1245-1252.
39. De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007). Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 628-638.
40. De Dreu, C.K.W., Beersma, B., Stroebe, K., & Euwema, M.C. (2006). Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 927-943.
41. De Dreu, C.K.W., & Boles, T. (1998). Share and share alike or Winner take all? The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 253-276.
42. De Dreu, C.K.W., & Carnevale, P.J.D. (2003). Motivational bases for information processing and strategic choice in conflict and negotiation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 235-291). New York: Academic Press.
43. De Dreu, C.K.W., & De Vries, N.K. (1996). Differential processing and attitude change following majority and minority arguments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 77-90.
44. De Dreu, C.K.W., Koole, S., & Oldersma, F.L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348-362.
45. De Dreu, C.K.W., Koole, S., & Steinel, W. (2000). Unfixing the fixed-pie: A motivated information-processing account of integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 975-987.
46. De Dreu, C.K.W., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to constructive conflict management: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 345-357.
47. De Dreu, C.K.W., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (1995). Impact of social value orientation on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.
48. De Dreu, C.K.W., Weingart, L.R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytical review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889-905.
49. De Dreu, C.K.W., & West, M.A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191-1201.
50. De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A.W., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346-365.
51. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 199-231.
52. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
53. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Towards the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
54. Dugosh, K.L., Paulus, P.B., Roland, E.J., & Yang, H.C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722-735.
55. Fiske, S.T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S.L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford.
56. Forgas, J.P., & George, J.M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 3-34.
57. Fraidin, S.N. (2004). When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 102-113.
58. Gagne, F.M., & Lydon, J.E. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 322-338.
59. Galinsky, A.D., & Kray, L.J. (2004). From thinking about what might have been to sharing what we know: The effects of counterfactual mind-sets on information sharing in groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 606-618.
60. George, J.M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
61. Giebels, E., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2000). Interdependence in negotiation: Impact of exit options and social motives on distributive and integrative negotiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 255-272.
62. Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974.
63. Goncalo, J.A., & Staw, B.M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96-109.
64. Graziano, W.G., Jensen-Campbell, L.A., & Hair, E.C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
65. Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322-339.
66. Gruenfeld, D.H., Thomas-Hunt, M.C., & Kim, P.H. (1998). Cognitive flexibility, communication strategy, and integrative complexity in groups: Public versus private reactions to majority and minority status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 202-226.
67. Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
68. Harari, O., & Graham, W.K. (1975). Tasks and task consequences as factors in individual and group brainstorming. Journal of Social Psychology, 95, 61-65.
69. Hastie, R., Penrod, S.D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Hertel, G., Kerr, N.L., & Mess, L.A. (2000). Motivation gains in performance groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Kohler effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 580-601.
71. Higgins, E.T., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2000). Motivation sciences: Social and personality perspectives. New York: Psychology Press.
72. Hinsz, V.B., Tindale, R.S., & Vollrath, D.A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
73. Hodson, G., & Sorrentino, R.M. (1997). Groupthink and uncertainty orientation: Personality differences in reactivity to the group situation. Group Dynamics, 1, 144-155.
74. Hofstee, W.K.B., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L.R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
75. Hollingshead, A.B. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1080-1089.
76. Hulbert, L.G., Correa da Silva, M.L., & Adegboyega, G. (2001). Cooperation in social dilemmas and allocentrism: A social values approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 641-658.
77. Ickes, W., & Gonzalez, R. ( 1994 )." Social" cognition and social cognition: From the subjective to the intersubjective. Small Group Research, 25, 294-315.
78. Isenberg, D.J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1141-1151.
79. Janis, I.L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free Press.
80. Johnston, J.H., Driskell, J.E., & Salas, E. (1997). Vigilant and hypervigilant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 614-622.
81. Jost, J.T., Napier, J., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S., Palfai, T.P., & Ostafin, B. (in press). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
82. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
83. Kaplan, M.F., & Miller, C.E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306-313.
84. Kelley, H.H., & Stahelski, A.J. (1970). Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66-91.
85. Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J.W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley.
86. Kelly, J.R. (2006, January). Affect and information processing in groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Palm Springs, CA.
87. Kelly, J.R., & Karau, S.J. (1999). Group decision making: The effects of initial preferences and time pressure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1342-1354.
88. Kelly, J.R., & Loving, T.J. (2003). Time pressure and group performance: Exploring underlying processes in the attentional focus model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 185-198.
89. Kerr, N.L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
90. Kerr, N.L., & Tindale, R.S. (2003). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 2201-2232.
91. Kerr, N.L., MacCoun, R.J., & Kramer, G.P. (1998). Bias in judgment comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 687-719.
92. Komorita, S.S., & Parks, C.D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183-207.
93. Kooij-de Bode, H.J.M., & van Knippenberg, D. (2006). Good effects of bad feelings: Negative affect and group decision making. Unpublished manuscript, Rotterdam School of Management.
94. Kramer, R., Pommerenke, P., & Newton, E. (1993). The social context of negotiation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 633-654.
95. Kruglanski, A.W. (1989). The psychology of being "right": The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395-409.
96. Kruglanski, A.W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
97. Kruglanski, A.W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group centrism. Psychological Review, 113, 84-100.
98. Kruglanski, A.W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Erb, H-P., & Chun, W.Y. (2007). On the parameters of human judgment. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 255-303). New York: Academic Press.
99. Kruglanski, A.W., Thompson, E.P., & Spiegel, S. (1999). Separate or equal? Bimodal notions of persuasion and a single-process "unimodel." In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 293-313). New York: Guilford.
100. Kruglanski, A.W., & Webster, D.M. (1991). Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212-225.
101. Kruglanski, A.W., & Webster, D.M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
102. Kruglanski, A.W., Webster, D.M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.
103. Larson, J.R., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
104. Larson, J.R., Christensen, C., Abbott, A., & Franz, T. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision making teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330.
105. Larson, J.R., Foster-Fishman, P.G., & Keys, C.B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446-461.
106. Laughlin, P.R., & Ellis, A.L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 173-189.
107. Laughlin, P.R., Hatch, E.C., Silver, J.S., & Boh, L. (2006). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 644-651.
108. Laughlin, P., VanderStoep, S., & Hollingshead, A. (1991). Collective versus individual induction: Recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 50-67.
109. Leary, M.R., Twenge, J.M., & Quinlivan, E. (2006). Interpersonal rejection as determinant of anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 111-132.
110. LePine, J.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Ilgen, D.R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803-811.
111. Lerner, J.S., & Tetlock, P.E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
112. Levine, J.M. (1999). Transforming individuals into groups: Some hall-marks of the SDS approach to small group research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 21-27.
113. Levine, J.M., & Kerr, N.L. (2007). Inclusion and exclusion: Implications for group processes. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of basic principles in social psychology (2 nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
114. Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (1998). Small groups. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & H. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 415-469). New York: McGraw-Hill.
115. Liebrand, W.B., Jansen, R.W., Rijken, V.M., & Suhre, C.J. (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perceptions of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.
116. Maini, S.M. (1973). Personality and cognitive differences between an original and a non-original group. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 555-563.
117. Mayseless, O., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1987). What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivation on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 162-183.
118. McClelland, D.C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
119. McClintock, C. (1977). Social motives in settings of outcome interdependence. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations: Social psychological perspective (pp. 49-77). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
120. McClintock, C.G. (1972). Social motivation-A set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17, 438-454.
121. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1997). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
122. McGrath, J.E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7-27.
123. Messick, D.M., & McClintock, C. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
124. Michaelson, L.K., Watson, W.E., & Black, R.H. (1989). A realistic test of individual versus group decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 834-839.
125. Miller, D.T., & Holmes, J.G. (1975). The role of situational restrictiveness on self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and empirical extension of Kelley and Stahelski's triangle hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 661-673.
126. Munkes, J., & Diehl, M. (2003). Matching or competition? Performance comparison processes in an idea generation task. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 305-320.
127. Murnighan, J.K. (1978). Models of coalition behavior: Game theoretic, social psychological, and political perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1130-1153.
128. Murnighan, J.K., Babcock, L., Thompson, L.L., & Pillutla, M. (1999). The information dilemma in negotiations: Effects of experience, incentives, and integrative potential. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 313-339.
129. Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
130. Nemeth, C., & Kwan, J. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 277-282.
131. Nemeth, C., & Kwan, J. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and the detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 788-799.
132. Neuberg, S., Judice, T.N., & West, S. (1997). What the need for closure scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1396-1412.
133. Neuberg, S.L., & Newsom, J. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113-131.
134. Nijstad, B.A., & Kaps, S. (2006). Taking the easy way out: Preference diversity and decision refusal in groups. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
135. Nijstad, B.A., & Paulus, P.B. (2003). Group creativity: Common themes and future directions. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 326-339). New York: Oxford University Press.
136. Nijstad, B.A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H.F.M. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 535-544.
137. O'Connor, K.M., & Carnevale, P.J. (1997). A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: Misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 504-515.
138. Paulus, P.B., Dugosh, K.L., Dzindolet, M.T., Coskun, H., & Putman, V.L. (2002). Social and cognitive influences in group brainstorming: Predicting production gains and losses. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 299-325.
139. Paulus, P., & Dzindolet, M.T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.
140. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., & Johnson, E.J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 534-552.
141. Peterson, R.S., & Nemeth, C.J. (1996). Focus versus flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 14-23.
142. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
143. Pierro, A., Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2005). Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of need for cognitive closure. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 503-516.
144. Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., De Grada, E., Livi, S., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2003). Autocracy bias in informal groups under need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 405-417.
145. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
146. Probst, T., Carnevale, P.J., & Triandis, H.C. (1999). Cultural values in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 171-191.
147. Pruitt, D.G. (1998). Social conflict. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4 th ed., pp. 89-150). New York: McGraw-Hill.
148. Rietzschel, E.F., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Nijstad, B.A. (2007). Need for structure and creative performance: The moderating role of Fear of Invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 855-866.
149. Rusbult, C.E., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (1996). Interdependence processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 564-596). New York: Guilford.
150. Rusbult, C.E., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375.
151. Sanders, G.S., & Baron, R.S. (1977). Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 303-314.
152. Schei, V., Rognes, J.K., & Mykland, S. (1996). Thinking deeply may sometimes help: Cognitive motivation and role effects in negotiation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 73-90.
153. Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
154. Scholten, L. (2007). Motivation matters: Motivated information processing in group and individual decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
155. Scholten, L., van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B.A., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 539-552.
156. Schulz, P.W., & Searleman, A. (1998). Personal need for structure, the Einstellung task, and the effects of stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 305-310.
157. Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F.C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080-1093.
158. Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Luthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655-669.
159. Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 563-586.
160. Schwartz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford.
161. Schweitzer, M.E., & Croson, R. (1999). Curtailing deception: The impact of direct questions on lies and omissions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 225-248.
162. Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933-958.
163. Shestowsky, D., Wegener, D.T., & Fabrigar, L.R. (1998). Need for cognition and interpersonal influence: Individual differences in impact on dyadic decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1317-1328.
164. Smeesters, D., Warlop, L., Van Avermaet, E., Corneille, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2003). Do not prime hawks with doves: The interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 972-987.
165. Smith, C.M., Tindale, R., & Dugoni, B.L. (1996). Minority and majority influence in freely interacting groups: Qualitative versus quantitative differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 137-150.
166. Smith, E.R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
167. Sosik, J.J., Kahai, S.S., & Avolio, B.J. (1998). Leadership style anonymity, and creativity in group decision support systems: The mediating role of optimal flow. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 227-256.
168. Stasser, G., & Birchmeier, Z. (2003). Group creativity and collective choice. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 85-109). New York: Oxford University Press.
169. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of shared and unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
170. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
171. Stasson, M.F., Kameda, T., & Davis, J.H. (1997). A model of agenda influences on group decisions. Group Dynamics, 1, 316-323.
172. Staw, B.M., & Ross, J. (1989, October 13). Understanding behavior in escalation situations. Science, 246, 216-220.
173. Steinel, W., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 419-434.
174. Steiner, I. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
175. Stewart, D.D., & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619-628.
176. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1992). The illusion of group effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 643-650.
177. Ten Velden, F.S., Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007 a). Heterogeneous social motives in negotiating groups: The moderating effects of decision rule and interest position. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 259-268.
178. Ten Velden, F.S., Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007 b). It takes one to tango: How the distribution of epistemic motives among negotiators affects their joint performance. Manuscript under review.
179. Tenbrunsel, A.E. (1998). Misrepresentation and expectations of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: The role of incentives and temptation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 330-339.
180. Tetlock, P.E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331-376). New York: Academic Press.
181. Tetlock, P.E. (2000). Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both the disease and the cure depend on the politics of the beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 293-326.
182. Tetlock, P.E., Peterson, R., McGuire, C., Chang, S., & Feld, P. (1992). Assessing political group dynamics: A test of the groupthink model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 403-425.
183. Tindale, R.S., & Kameda, T. (2000). "Social sharedness" as a unifying theme for information processing in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 123-140.
184. Tindale, R.S., & Larson, J.R. (1992). Assembly bonus effect or typical group performance? A comment of Michaelsen, Watson, and Black (1989). Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 102-105.
185. Tschan, F., Semmer, N.K., Gautschi, D., Hunziker, P., Spychiger, M., & Marsch, S.U. (2006). Leading to recovery: Group performance and coordinative activities in medical emergency driven groups. Human Performance, 19, 277-304.
186. Utz, S. (2004). Self-activation is a two-edged sword: The effects of I primes on cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 769-776.
187. Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Wilke, H.A.M. (2005). Do-no-harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 609-617.
188. van Ginkel, W.P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2006, August). The effect of group leaders' task representations on information processing in groups with distributed information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.
189. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2003). The need for structure and the spontaneous use of complex and simple cognitive structures. Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 559-568.
190. Van Kleef, G.A., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2002). Social value orientation and impression formation: A test of two competing hypotheses about information search in negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 59-77.
191. Van Kleef, G.A., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2004). The interpersonal effects of emotion in negotiation: A motivated information processing approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 510-528.
192. van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 25-37.
193. van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Homan, A.C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
194. van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M.C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-541.
195. van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., van Kleef, G.A., & Damen, F. (in press). Leadership, affect, and emotions. In N. Ashkanashy & C. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to emotions in organizations. Sydney, Australia: Edgar Eldar.
196. Van Lange, P.A.M. (1992). Confidence in expectations: A test of the triangle hypothesis. European Journal of Personality, 6, 371-379.
197. Van Lange, P.A.M., & Kuhlman, D.M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
198. Van Vugt, M., & De Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587-599.
199. Von Cranach, M., Ochsenbein, G., & Valach, L. (1986). The group as a self-active system: Outline of a theory of group action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 193-229.
200. Vroom, V.H., & Jago, A.G. (1978). On the validity of the Vroom-Yetton model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 151-162.
201. Vroom, V.H., & Yetton, P.W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
202. Weber, J.M., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D.M. (2004). A conceptual reviw of decision making in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 281-307.
203. Weber, J.M., & Murnighan, J.K. (2006). Suckers no more: Consistent contributors can solve the cooperation problem. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto.
204. Webster, D., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
205. Weiner, B. (1995). Inferences of responsibility and social motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press.
206. Weingart, L.R., Bennett, R.J., & Brett, J.M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504-517.
207. West, M.A., & Anderson, N. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680-693.
208. Winquist, J.R., & Larson, J.R., Jr. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371-377.
209. Wittenbaum, G.M., & Bowman, J.M. (2004). A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 169-184.
210. Wittenbaum, G.M., Bowman, J.M., & Hollingshead, A.B. (2003, November). Strategic information sharing in mixed-motive decision making groups. Paper presented at the National Communication Association, Miami, FL.
211. Wittenbaum, G.M., Hollingshead, A.B., & Botero, I.C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286-310.
212. Wittenbaum, G.M., Hubbell, A.P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978.
213. Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J.E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297-310.
214. Wong, R.Y., & Hong, Y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma. Psychological Science, 16, 429-434.
215. Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
216. Zaccaro, S.J., Gualtieri, J., & Minionis, D. (1995). Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal urgency. Military Psychology, 7, 77-93.
217. Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.