The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 121, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 43-64

  Hinsz, Verlin B ^a   Vollrath, David A ^b   Tindale, R Scott ^c  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTH BEND   (United States)

^c LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COGNITION; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECALL; REVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; MENTAL RECALL; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 0030638756     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43     Document Type: Article

References (247)

1. Allen, V. L., & Wilder, D. A. (1980). Impact of group consensus and social support on stimulus meaning: Mediation of conformity by cognitive restructuring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1116-1124.
2. Ancona, D. G. (1990). Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 334-365.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.
4. Argote, L. (1993). Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system and environmental components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 31-52.
5. Argote, L., Devadas, R., & Melone, N. (1990). The base-rate fallacy: Contrasting processes and outcomes of group and individual judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 296-310.
6. Argote, L., Insko, C. A., Yovetich, N., & Romero, A. A. (1995). Group learning curves: The effects of turnover and task complexity on group performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 512-529.
7. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1-70.
9. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1-40.
10. Barr, S. H., & Conlon, E. J. (1994). Effects of distribution of feedback in work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 641-655.
11. Bazerman, M. H. (1990). Judgment in managerial decision making (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
12. Bazerman, M. H., Mannix, E. A., & Thompson, L. L. (1988). Groups as mixed-motive negotiations. Advances in Group Processes, 5, 195-216.
13. Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345-381.
14. Bettenhausen, K., & Murnighan, J. K. (1985). The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 350-372.
15. Bettenhausen, K. L., & Murnighan, J. K. (1991). The development of an intragroup norm and the effects of interpersonal and structural challenges. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 20-35.
16. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Bormann, E. G. (1986). Symbolic convergence theory and communication in group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 219-236). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Bottger, P. C., & Yetton, P. W. (1987). Improving group performance by training in individual problem solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 651-657.
19. Brandstätter, H. (1978). Social emotions in discussion groups. In H. Brandstätter, J. H. Davis, & H. Schuler (Eds.), Dynamics of group decisions (pp. 93-111). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Brandstätter, H., & Hoggatt, A. C. (1982). The influence of social emotions on bargaining outcomes in a bilateral monopoly game. In H. Brandstätter, J. H. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 279-294). London: Academic Press.
21. Brehmer, B. (1976). Social judgment theory and the analysis of interpersonal conflict. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 985-1003.
22. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
23. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
25. Chalos, P., & Pickard, S. (1985). Information choice and cue use: An experiment in group information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 634-641.
26. Clark, N. K., & Stephenson, G. M. (1989), Group remembering. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 357-391). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Collins, B. E., & Guetzkow, H. (1964). A social psychology of group processes for decision-making. New York: Wiley.
28. Cragan, J. F., & Wright, D. W. (1990). Small group communication research of the 1980s: A synthesis and critique. Communication Studies, 41, 212-236.
29. Davis, J. H. (1969). Group performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
31. Davis, J. H. (1980). Group decision and procedural justice. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (pp. 157-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Davis, J. H. (1982). Social interaction as a combinatorial process in group decision. In H. Brandstätter, J. H. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 27-58). London: Academic Press.
33. Davis, J. H. (1984). Order in the courtroom. In D. J. Muller, D. G. Blackman, & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Psychology and law (pp. 251-265). London: Wiley.
34. Davis, J. H. (1992). Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples, 1950-1990. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 3-38.
35. Davis, J. H. (1996). Group decision making and quantitative judgments: A consensus model. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 35-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Davis, J. H., Holt, R. W., Spitzer, C. E., & Stasser, G. (1981). The effects of consensus requirements and multiple decisions on mock juror verdict preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 1-17.
37. Davis, J. H., Kameda, T., Parks, C., Stasson, M., & Zimmerman, S. (1989). Some social mechanics of group decision making: The distribution of opinion, polling sequence, and implications for consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57, 1000-1012.
38. Davis, J. H., Kerr, N., Sussmann, M., & Rissman, A. K. (1974). Social decision schemes under risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 248-271.
39. Davis, J. H., Stasser, G., Spitzer, C. E., & Holt, R. W. (1976). Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1177-1187.
40. Davis, J. H., Stasson, M. F., Parks, C. D., Hulbert, L., Kameda, T., Zimmerman, S. K., & Ono, K. (1993). Quantitative decisions by groups and individuals: Voting procedures and monetary awards by mock civil juries. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 326-346.
41. Davis, J. H., Tindale, R. S., Nagao, D. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Robertson, B. (1984). Order effects in multiple decisions by groups: A demonstration with mock juries and trial procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1003-1012.
42. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
43. Dawes, R. M., van der Kragt, A. J. C., & Orbell, J. M. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimental manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68, 83-97.
44. Deiner, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (1st ed., pp. 209-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
46. Doise, W. (1969). Intergroup relations and polarization of individual and collective judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 136-143.
47. Doise, W. (1978). Group and individuals: Explanations in social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
48. Einhorn, H. G., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53-88.
49. Einhorn, H. J., Hogarth, R. M., & Klempner, E. (1977). Quality of group judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 158-172.
50. Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, M. (1994). Small group decision making (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
51. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
52. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
53. Filkins, J., Tindale, R. S., & Sheffey, S. (1991, May). Perceptions of group decision processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
54. Fiske, S. T., & Goodwin, S. A. (1994). Social cognition research and small group research, a West Side Story or . . .. Small Group Research, 25, 147-171.
55. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
56. Forsyth, D. R., & Schlenker, B. R. (1977). Attributing the causes of group performance: Effects of performance quality, task importance, and future testing. Journal of Personality, 45, 220-236.
57. Fuhriman, A., & Burlingame, G. M. (1994). Measuring small group process: A methodological application of chaos theory. Small Group Research, 25, 502-519.
58. Galegher, J., Kraut R. E., & Egido, C. (1990). Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Geen, R. (1973). Effects of being observed on short- and long-term recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 395-398.
60. Geen, R. (1989). Alternative conceptions of social facilitation? In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65-97.
62. Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974.
63. Gruenfeld, D. H. (1995). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U. S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 5-20.
64. Gruenfeld, D. H., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Sociocognition in work groups: The evolution of group integrative complexity and its relation to task performance. Small Group Research, 24, 383-405.
65. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
66. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
67. Harmon, J., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1990). Social judgment analysis and small group decision making: Cognitive feedback effects on individual and collective performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 34-54.
68. Hartwick, J., & Nagao, D. H. (1990). Social facilitation effects in recognition memory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 193-210.
69. Hartwick, J., Sheppard, B. H., & Davis, J. H. (1982). Group remembering: Research and implications. In R. A. Guzzo (Ed.), Improving group decision making in organizations (pp. 41-72). New York: Academic Press.
70. Hastie, R. (1986). Experimental evidence on group accuracy. In B. Grofman & G. Owen (Eds.), Decision research (Vol. 2, pp. 129-157). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
71. Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (1991). Cognitive and social processes in decision making. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 308-327). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
72. Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Miller, N. (Eds.). (1992). Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
74. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517-539.
75. Hinsz, V. B. (1981). Persuasive arguments, group polarization, and choice shifts. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Psychology.
76. Hinsz, V. B. (1989, June). A continuous response decision scheme model of group decisions. Paper presented at the Groups, Networks, and Organizations Conference, Nags Head, NC.
77. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718.
78. Hinsz, V. B. (1991). Individual versus group goal decision making: Social comparison in goals for individual task performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 987-1003.
79. Hinsz, V. B. (1992). Social influences on the goal choices of group members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1297-1317.
80. Hinsz, V. B. (1994, June). Stimulated recall in dyadic memory performance. Paper presented at the 17th Interdisciplinary Conference on Groups, Networks, and Organizations, Highland Beach, FL.
81. Hinsz, V. B. (1995a). Group and individual decision making for task performance goals: Processes in the establishment of goals in groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 353-370.
82. Hinsz, V. B. (1995b). Mental models of groups as social systems: Considerations of specification and assessment. Small Group Research, 26, 200-233.
83. Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1984). Persuasive arguments theory, group polarization, and choice shifts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 260-268:
84. Hinsz, V. B., Vollrath, D. A., Nagao, D. H., & Davis, J. H. (1988). Comparing the structure of individual and small group perceptions. International Journal of Small Group Research, 4, 159-168.
85. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1990). The role of communication in group decision-making efficacy. Small Group Research, 21, 190-204.
86. Hirokawa, R. Y., & Poole, M. S. (1986). Communication and group decision making. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
87. Hofer, C., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul, MN: West.
88. Hoppe, R. A. (1962). Memorizing by individuals and groups: A test of the pooling-of-ability model. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 64-67.
89. Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283-307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
90. Ickes, W., & Gonzalez, R. (1994). "Social" cognition and social cognition: From the subjective to the intersubjective. Small Group Research, 25, 294-315.
91. Innami, I. (1994). The quality of group decisions, group verbal behavior, and intervention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 409-430.
92. Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (1987). Categorization, competition, and collectivity. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 213-251.
93. Jackson, S. E. (1992). Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 138-173). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
94. Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
95. Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 296-312.
96. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
97. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
98. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
99. Kameda, T. (1991). Procedural influence in small-group decision making: Deliberation style and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 245-256.
100. Kameda, T., & Davis, J. H. (1990). The function of the reference point in individual and group risk decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 55-76.
101. Kameda, T., & Sugimori, S. (1993). Psychological entrapment in group decision making: An assigned decision rule and a groupthink perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 282-292.
102. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition [Monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-690.
103. Kaplan, M. F. (1987). The influencing process in group decision making. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 189-213.
104. Kaplan, M. F., & Jendrek, M. P. (1992, March). Induced verdict- and evidence-driven deliberation styles affect extent but not form of influence in mock juries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, San Diego, CA.
105. Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, C. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306-313.
106. Kaplan, M. F., Schaefer, E. G., & Zinkiewicz, L. (1994). Member preferences for discussion content in anticipated group decisions: Effects of type of issue and group interactive goal. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 489-508.
107. Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R. (1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 542-571.
108. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
109. Kelley, H. H. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 410-414). New York: Holt.
110. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
111. Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
112. Kerr, N. L. (1992). Issue importance and group decision making. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 68-88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
113. Kerr, N. L., & Kaufman-Gilliland, C. M. (1994). Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 513-529.
114. Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J., & Kramer, G. P. (1996). "When are N heads better (or worse) than one?": Biased judgment in individuals and groups. In J. H. Davis & E. H. Witte (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 105-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
115. Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35, 37-50.
116. Kirchler, E., & Davis, J. H. (1986). The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 83-91.
117. Klein, G. A. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. Advances in Man-Machine System Research, 5, 47-92.
118. 2 Research, Washington, DC.
119. Kleinman, D. L., Luh, P. B., Pattipati, K. R., & Serafty, D. (1992). Mathematical models of team performance: A distributed decision-making approach. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 177-217). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
120. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
121. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
122. Lachman, R., Lachman, J. L., & Butterfield, E. C. (1979). Cognitive psychology and information processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
123. Larson, J. R., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
124. Larson, J. R., Jr., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). The discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446-461.
125. Latane, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
126. Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes in cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
127. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
128. Laughlin, P. R., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1995). A theory of collective induction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 94-107.
129. Laughlin, P. R., & Shippy, T. (1983). Collective induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 94-100.
130. Laughlin, P. R., & Sweeney, J. D. (1977). Individual-to-group and group-to-individual transfer in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 246-254.
131. Laughlin, P. R., VanderStoep, S. W., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1991). Collective versus individual induction: Recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 50-67.
132. Leary, M. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (1987). Attributions of responsibility for collective endeavors. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 167-188). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
133. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
134. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1991). Cognitive integration in work groups. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 257-279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
135. Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
136. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating effects of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.
137. Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1990). Alternative information-processing models and their implications for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 15, 9-28.
138. Lorge, I., Fox, D., Davitz, J., & Brenner, M. (1958). A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 337-372.
139. Lorge, I., & Solomon, H. (1962). Group and individual behavior in free-recall verbal learning. In H. Criswell, H. Solomon, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in small group processes (pp. 221-231). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
140. MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21-33.
141. Mackie, D. M., & Goethals, G. R. (1987). Individual and group goals. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 144-167.
142. Maier, N. R. F. (1970). Problem solving and creativity in individuals and groups. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
143. Martell, R. F., & Borg, M. R. (1993). A comparison of the behavioral rating accuracy of groups and individuals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 43-50.
144. Massaro, D. W., & Cowan, N. (1993). Information processing models: Microscopes of the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 383-425.
145. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
146. McGrath, J. E. (1993, October). The social psychology of groups: That once and future field. Paper presented at the Society for Experimental Social Psychology Pre-Conference on Small Groups, Santa Barbara, CA.
147. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
148. Meudell, P. R., Hitch, G. J., & Kirby, P. (1992). Are two heads better than one? Experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 525-543.
149. Miller, C. E. (1989). The social psychological effects of group decision rules. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 327-355). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
150. Milliken, F. J., & Vollrath, D. A. (1991). Strategic decision-making tasks and group effectiveness: Insights from theory and research on small group performance. Human Relations, 44, 1229-1253.
151. Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
152. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). Problem identification by groups. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 17-47). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
153. Moussavi, F., & Evans, D. A. (1993). Emergence of organizational attributions: The role of shared cognitive schema. Journal of Management, 19, 79-95.
154. Mullen, B. (1983). Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 295-322.
155. Mullen, B. (1987). Self-attention theory: The effects of group composition on the individual. In B. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 125-146). New York: Springer-Verlag.
156. Mullen, B. (1991). Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 297-323.
157. Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 602-627.
158. Nadler, D. A. (1979). The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 309-338.
159. Nagao, D. H., Tindale, R. S., Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1985, August). Individual and group biases in information processing. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
160. Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.
161. Neale, M. A., Bazerman, M. H., Northcraft, G. B., & Alperson, C. (1986). "Choice shift" effects in group decisions: A decision bias perspective. International Journal of Small Group Research, 2, 33-42.
162. Neidert, G. P., & Linder, D. E. (1990). Avoiding social traps: Some conditions that maintain adherence to restricted consumption. Social Behavior, 5, 261-284.
163. Neisser, U. (1982). Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. New York: Freeman.
164. Nemeth, C. J. (1985). Dissent, group process, and creativity: The contributions of minority influence. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 57-75.
165. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
166. Nemeth, C. J. (1992). Minority dissent as a stimulant to group performance. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 95-111). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
167. Nemeth, C., Mayseless, O., Sherman, J., & Brown, Y. (1990). Exposure to dissent and recall of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 429-437.
168. O'Leary, A. M. (1991, April). Motivation in groups: A control theory model. Paper presented at the 6th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
169. Ono, K., & Davis, J. H. (1988). Individual judgment and group interaction: A variable perspective approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 211-232.
170. Orasanu, J. M. (1993). Decision-making in the cockpit. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 137-172). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
171. Paese, P. W., Bieser, M., & Tubbs, M. (1993). Framing effects and choice shifts in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 149-165.
172. Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (1980). The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 81-92.
173. Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., Williams, K. D., & Latane, B. (1977). The effects of group size on cognitive effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 579-582.
174. Pious, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
175. Poole, M. S., & Doelger, J. A. (1986). Developmental processes in group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 35-61). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
176. Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1986). A structurational approach to theory-building in group decision-making research. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 237-264). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
177. Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1989). Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 87-109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
178. Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1994). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145-163.
179. Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1995). On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 511-524.
180. Rentsch, J. R. (1993, August). Predicting team effectiveness from teamwork schema similarity. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.
181. Rentsch, J. R., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Members of great teams think alike: A model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 1, 223-261.
182. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
183. Robinson, S., & Weldon, E. (1993). Redback seeking in groups: A theoretical perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 71-86.
184. Rohrbaugh, J. (1979). Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the Delphi technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 73-92.
185. Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 272-288.
186. Ross, M. (1981). Self-centered biases in attributions of responsibility: Antecedents and consequences. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 305-321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
187. Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349-363.
188. Rugs, D., & Kaplan, M. F. (1993). Effectiveness of informational and normative influences in group decision making depends on group interactive goal. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 147-158.
189. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward and understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-30). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
190. Samuelson, C. D., & Allison, S. T. (1994). Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource-sharing tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 1-27.
191. Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45, 109-119.
192. Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27, 5-60.
193. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension. New York: Harper.
194. Shiflett, S. (1979). Toward a general model of small group productivity. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 67-79.
195. Siegel, A. E., & Siegel, S. (1957). Reference groups, membership groups, and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 360-365.
196. Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making (pp. 5-27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
197. Smith, C. M., Tindale, R. S., & Dugoni, B. L. (1996). Minority and majority influence in freely interacting groups: Qualitative versus quantitative differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 137-149.
198. Smoke, W. H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1962). On the reliability of group judgments and decisions. In J. H. Crisswell, H. Solomon, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in small group processes (pp. 322-333). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
199. Sniezek, J. A. (1992). Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 124-155.
200. Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 1-28.
201. Sniezek, J. A., May, D. R., & Sawyer, J. E. (1990). Social uncertainty and interdependence: A study of resource allocation decisions in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 155-180.
202. Sorkin, R. D., & Dai, H. (1994). Signal detection analysis of the ideal group. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 1-13.
203. Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 393-422.
204. Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussions. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 48-67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
205. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
206. Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychol-ogy, 31, 244-265.
207. Stasser, G., & Taylor, L. A. (1991). Speaking turns in face-to-face discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 675-684..
208. Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
209. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
210. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
211. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1989, October 13). Understanding behavior in escalation situations. Science, 246, 216-220.
212. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
213. Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619-628.
214. Streufert, S., & Nogami, G. (1992). Cognitive complexity and team decision making. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 127-151). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
215. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
216. Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 297-332.
217. Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-502.
218. Thibaut, J. W., & Strickland, L. H. (1956). Psychological set and social conformity. Journal of Personality, 25, 115-129.
219. Tindale, R. S. (1989). Group vs individual information processing: The effects of outcome feedback on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 454-473.
220. Tindale, R. S. (1993). Decision errors made by individuals and groups. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 109-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
221. Tindale, R. S., & Davis, J. H. (1983). Group decision making and jury verdicts. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 9-37). London: Wiley.
222. Tindale, R. S., Kulik, C. T., & Scott, L. A. (1991). Individual and group feedback and performance: An attributional perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 41-62.
223. Tindale, R. S., & Sheffey, S. (1992, June). Optimal task assignment and group memory. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Nags Head Conference on Groups, Networks, and Organizations, Highland Beach, FL.
224. Tindale, R. S., Sheffey, S., & Scott, L. A. (1993). Framing and group decision making: Do cognitive changes parallel preference changes? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 470-485.
225. Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Thomas, L. S., Filkins, J., & Sheffey, S. (1996). Shared representations and asymmetric social influence processes in small groups. In J. H. Davis & E. Witte (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 81-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
226. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 233-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
227. Upshaw, H. S. (1969). The personal reference scale: An approach to social judgment. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 315-371.
228. Vollrath, D. A., Sheppard, B. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Memory performance by decision-making groups and individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 289-300.
229. Von Cranach, M., Ochsenbein, G., & Valach, L. (1986). The group as a self-active system: Outline of a theory of group action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 193-229.
230. Walsh, J. P., Henderson, C. M., & Deighton, J. (1988). Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 194-216.
231. Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16, 57-91.
232. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
233. Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.
234. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.
235. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
236. Weldon, E., & Gargano, G. M. (1985). Cognitive effort in additive task groups: The effects of shared responsibility on the quality of multiattribute judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 348-361.
237. Whyte, G. (1993). Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 430-455.
238. Wickens, C. D., & Flach, J. M. (1988). Information processing. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 111-155). San Diego: Academic Press.
239. Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Group contact and self-focused attention. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 189-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
240. Wilder, D. A., & Shapiro, P. (1989). Effects of anxiety on impression formation in a group context: An anxiety-assimilation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 481-499.
241. Wilson, M., & Canter, D. (1993). Shared concepts in group decision making: A model for decisions based on qualitative data. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 159-172.
242. Wolf, S. (1987). Majority and minority influence: A social impact analysis. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 207-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
243. Wood, W. (1987). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 53-71.
244. Yarmey, D. A. (1992). The effects of dyadic discussion on earwitness recall. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 251-263.
245. Zajonc, R. B. (1962). A note on group judgments and group size. Human Relations, 15, 177-180.
246. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Compresence. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 35-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
247. Zajonc, R. B., & Smoke, W. (1959). Redundancy in task assignments and group performance. Psychometrika, 24, 361-370.