Work group diversity

Annual Review of Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue , 2007, Pages 515-541

  Van Knippenberg, Daan ^a   Schippers, Michaéla C ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Group composition; Group performance; Organizational behavior; Team effectiveness; Teams

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; COOPERATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EMPLOYMENT; GROUP PROCESS; GROUP STRUCTURE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EMPLOYMENT; GROUP PROCESSES; GROUP STRUCTURE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT TEAMS; LEADERSHIP;

EID: 33847023534     PISSN: 00664308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. Bantel K, Jackson S. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the team make a difference? Strateg. Manage. J. 10:107-24
2. Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK. 1998. Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:377-91
3. Barry B, Stewart GL. 1997. Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:62-78
4. Barsade SG, Ward AJ, Turner JDF, Sonnenfeld JA. 2000. To your heart's content: a model of affective diversity in top management teams. Admin. Sci. Q. 45:802-36
5. Bayazit M, Mannix EA. 2003. Should I stay or should I go? Predicting team members' intent to remain in the team. Small Group Res. 34:290-321
6. Berscheid E, Reis HT. 1998. Attraction and close relationships. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. DT Gilbert, ST Fiske, G Lindzey, pp. 193-281. New York: McGraw-Hill
7. Beyer JM, Chattopadhyay P, George E, Click WH, Ogilvie DT, Pugliese D. 1997. The selective perception of managers revisited. Acad. Manage. J. 40:716-37
8. Bhappu AD, Griffith TL, Northcraft GB. 1997. Media effects and communication bias in diverse groups. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 70:199-205
9. Blau PM. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press
10. Bowers CA, Pharmer JA, Salas E. 2000. When member homogeneity is needed in work teams. a meta-analysis. Small Group Res. 31:305-27
11. Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W. 2004. Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Acad. Manage. J. 47:795-817
12. Brewer MB. 1979. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: a cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychol. Bull. 86:307-24
13. Brewer MB. 1995. Managing diversity: the role of social identities. In Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace, ed. S Jackson, MN Ruderman, pp. 47-68. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
14. Brewer MB, Brown RJ. 1998. Intergroup relations. In Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. DT Gilbert, ST Fiske, pp. 554-94. Boston: McGraw-Hill
15. Brief AP, Umphress EE, Dietz J, Butz RM, Burrows J, Scholten L. 2005. Community matters: realistic group conflict theory and the impact of diversity. Acad. Manage. J. 48:830-44
16. Brodbeck F. 2003. Contradiction as an inhibitor and facilitator of group performance. Presented at Eur. Cong. Work Organ. Psychol., Lisbon
17. Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM. 2002. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: process and performance effects. Acad. Manage. J. 45:87593
18. Byrne D. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic
19. Cannon M, Edmondson A. 2001. Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 22:161-77
20. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S. 1993. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In Individualand Group Decision Making: Current Directions, ed. NJ Castellan, pp. 221-46. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
21. Chaiken S, Trope Y. 1999. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford
22. Chan D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:234-46
23. Chatman JA, Flynn FJ. 2001. The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Acad. Manage. J. 44:956-74
24. Chatman JA, O'Reilly CA. 2004. Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Acad. Manage. J. 47:193-208
25. Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Barsade SG, Neale MA. 1998. Being different yet feeling similar: the influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Q. 43:749-80
26. Catman JA, Spataro SE. 2005. Using self-categorization theory to understand relational demography-based variations in people's responsiveness to organizational culture. Acad. Manage. J. 48:321-31
27. Chattopadhyay P. 1999. Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: the influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Manage. J. 42:273-87
28. Chattopadhyay P, George E. 2001. Examining the effects of work externalization through the lens of social identity theory. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:781-88
29. Chattopadhyay P, George E, Lawrence SA. 2004b. Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction. J.Appl Psychol. 89:892-900
30. Chattopadhyay P, Glick WH, Miller CG, Huber GP. 1999. Determinants of executive beliefs: comparing functional conditioning and social influence. Strateg. Manage. J. 20:763-89
31. Chattopadhyay P, Tluchowska M, George E. 2004a. Identifying the ingroup: a closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Acad. Manage. Rev. 29:180-202
32. Chen CC, Eastman W. 1997. Toward a civic culture for multicultural organizations. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 33:454-70
33. Colquitt JA, Noe RA, Jackson CL. 2002. Justice in teams: antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Pers. Psychol. 55:83-109
34. Costa PTJ, McCrae RR. 1992. The NEO-PI-R: Revised Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Odessa, FL: Assess. Resourc.
35. Cox T, Lobel S, McLeod P. 1991. Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Acad. Manage. J. 34:827-47
36. Crisp RJ, Ensari N, Hewstone M, Miller NW. 2002. A dual-route model of crossed categorization effects. In European Review of Social Psychology, ed. W Stroebe, M Hewstone, pp. 35-74. Hove, UK/Philadelphia, PA: Psychol. Press
37. Dahlin KB, Weingart LR, Hinds PJ. 2005. Team diversity and information use. Acad. Manage. J. 48:1107-23
38. De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR. 2003. Task and relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis.J. Appl. Psychol. 88:741-49
39. Earley PC, Mosakowski E. 2000. Creating hybrid team cultures: an empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Manage. J. 43:26-49
40. Ely RJ. 2004. A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs, and performance. J. Organ. Behav. 25:755-80
41. Ely RJ, Thomas DA. 2001. Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Q. 46:229-73
42. Epitropaki O, Martin R. 1999. The impact of relational demography on the quality of leader-member exchanges and employees' work attitudes and well-being. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 72:237-40
43. Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF. 2000. Reducing Intergroup Bias. The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychol. Press
44. George JM. 1990. Personality, affect and behavior in groups. J. Appl. Psychol. 75:107-16
45. Gibson C, Vermeulen F. 2003. A healthy divide: subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Q. 48:202-39
46. Guzzo RA, Dickson MW. 1996. Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 47:307-38
47. Harrison DA, Klein KJ. 2006. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Manage, Rev. In press
48. Harrison DA, Price KH, Bell MP. 1998. Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Manage. J. 41:96-107
49. Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT. 2002. Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Manage. J. 45:1029-45
50. Harrison DA, Sin HS. 2005. What is diversity and how should it be measured? In Handbook of Workplace Diversity, ed. AM Konrad, P Prasad, JK Pringle, pp. 191-216. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
51. Hinsz VB, Tindale RS, Vollrath DA. 1997. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychol. Bull. 121:43-64
52. Hoffman LR, Maier NRF. 1961. Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 62:401-7
53. Homan AC, van Knippenberg D. 2 003. The beneficial effects of cross-categorizing informational and demographical diversity in groups. Presented at Eur. Cong. Work Organ, Psychol., Lisbon
54. Homan AC, van Knippenberg D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW. 2004. Managing group diversity beliefs to increase performance in diverse teams: Promoting diversity helps! Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol., Chicago, IL
55. Hostager TJ, De Meuse KP. 2002. Assessing the complexity of diversity perceptions: breadth, depth, and balance. J. Bus. Psychol. 17:189-206
56. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D. 2005. Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56:517-43
57. Jackson SE. 1992. Team composition in organizational settings: issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. In Group Process and Productivity, ed. S Worchel, W Wood, JA Simpson, pp. 136-80. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
58. Jackson SE, Joshi A. 2004. Diversity in social context: a multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. J. Organ. Behav. 25:675-702
59. Jackson SE, Joshi A, Erhardt NL. 2003. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J. Manage. 29:801-30
60. Jehn KA, Bezrukova K. 2004. A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance. J. Organ. Behav. 25:703-29
61. Jehn KA, Chadwick C, Thatcher S. 1997. To agree or not to agree: the effects of value congruence, member diversity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. Int. J. Confl. Manage. 8:287-305
62. Jehn KA, Mannix EA. 2001. The dynamic structure of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Manage. J. 44:2338-51
63. Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA. 1999. Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Q. 44:741-63
64. Joshi A, Liao H, Jackson SE. 2005. Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay. Acad. Manage. J. In press
65. Keller RT. 2001. Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Acad. Manage. J. 44:547-59
66. Kerr NL, Tindale RS. 2004. Group performance and decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:623-55
67. Klein KJ, Conn AB, Smith DB, Sorra JS. 2001. Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:3-16
68. Klein KJ, Lim BC, Saltz JL, Mayer DM. 2004. How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Acad. Manage. J. 47:952-63
69. Knight D, Pearce CL, Smith KG, Olian JD, Sims HP, et al. 1999. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strateg. Manage. J. 20:445-65
70. Kossek EE, Zonia SC. 1993. Assessing diversity climate: a field study of reactions to employer efforts to promote diversity. J. Organ. Behav. 14:61-81
71. Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS. 2003. Work groups and teams in organizations. In Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, ed. WC Borman, DR Ilgen, RJ Klimoski, pp. 333-75. London: Wiley
72. Lau DC, Murnighan JK. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23:325-40
73. Lau DC, Murnighan JK. 2005. Interactions within groups and subgroups: the effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Manage. J. 48:645-59
74. Li J, Hambrick DC. 2005. Factional groups: a new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Manage. J. 48:794-813
75. Lovelace K, Shapiro DL, Weingart LR. 2001. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective. Acad. Manage. J. 44:779-93
76. Martins LL, Milliken FJ, Wiesenfeld BM, Salgado SR. 2003. Racioethnic diversity and group members' experiences: the role of the racioethnic diversity of the organizational context. Group Organ. Manage. 28:75-106
77. Mathieu JE, Heffher TS, Goodwin GF, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E. 2005. Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons.}. Organ. Behav. 26:37-56
78. Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ. 1998. At the margins: a distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Acad. Manage. J. 41:441-52
79. Milliken FJ, Martins LL. 1996. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Manage. Rev. 21:402-33
80. Mohammed S, Angell LC. 2003. Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Group Res. 34:651-77
81. Mohammed S, Angell LC. 2004. Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. J. Organ. Bebav. 25:1015-39
82. Mohammed S, Ringseis E. 2001. Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: the role of inputs, processes, and outcomes. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 85:310-35
83. Mor Barak ME, Cherin DA, Berkman S. 1998. Organizational and personal dimensions of diversity climate: ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 31:82-104
84. Mullen B, Copper G. 1994. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration. Psychol. Bull. 115:210-27
85. Murnighan JK, Conlon DE. 1991. The dynamics of intense work groups: a study of British string quartets. Admin. Sci. Q. 36:165-86
86. Neuman GA, Wagner SH, Christiansen ND. 1999. The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group Organ. Manage. 24:28-45
87. Neuman GA, Wright J. 1999. Team effectiveness: beyond skills and cognitive ability. J. Appl. Psychol. 84:376-89
88. Oakes PJ, Haslam SA, Turner JC. 1994. Stereotyping and Social Reality. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Sci.
89. O'Reilly CA, Caldwell DF, Barnett WP. 1989. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Q. 34:21-37
90. Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR. 1999. Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Q. 44:1-28
91. Pettigrew TF. 1998. Intergroup contact theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49:65-85
92. Phillips KW. 2003. The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: the importance of congruence. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29:3-13
93. Phillips KW, Loyd DL. 2006. When surface and deep-level diversity collide: the effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 99:143-60
94. Phillips KW, Mannix EA, Neale MA, Gruenfeld DH. 2004. Diverse groups and information sharing: the effects of congruent ties. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40:497-510
95. Phillips KW, Northcraft GB, Neale MA. 2006. Surface-level diversity and information sharing: When does deep-level diversity help? Group Process. Intergroup Relat. In press
96. Polzer JT, Milton LP, Swann WBJ. 2002. Capitalizing on diversity: interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Q. 47:296-324
97. Priem RL, Lyon DW, Dess GG. 1999. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. J. Manage. 25:935-53
98. Randel AE. 2002. Identity salience: a moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict. J. Organ. Behav. 23:749-66
99. Randel AE, Jaussi KS. 2003. Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Acad. Manage. J. 46:763-74
100. Reagans R, Zuckerman EW. 2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Set. 12:502-17
101. Reagans R, Zuckerman EW, McEvily B. 2004. How to make the team: Social networks versus demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Q. 49:101-33
102. Rentsch JR, Hall RJ. 1994. Members of great teams think alike: a model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. In Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, ed. MM Beyerlein, DA Johnson, pp. 223-61. Stamford, CT: JAI
103. Richard O, McMilkn A, Chadwick K, Dwyer S. 2003. Employing an innovation strategy in radically diverse workforce. Group Organ. Manage. 28:107-26
104. Richard OC, Barnett T, Dwyer S, Chadwick K. 2004. Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Acad. Manage. J. 47:255-66
105. Roberson L, Kulik CT, Pepper MB. 2001. Designing effective diversity training: Influence of group composition and trainee experience. J. Organ. Behav. 22:871-85
106. Sacco JM, Schmitt N. 2005. A dynamic multilevel model of demographic diversity and misfit effects. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:203-31
107. Sawyer JE, Houlette MA, Yeagley EL. 2006. Decision performance and diversity structure: comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 99:1-15
108. Schippers MC, Den Hartog DN, Koopman P. 2006. Reflexivity in teams: a measure and correlates. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. In press
109. Schippers MC, Den Hartog DN, Koopman PL, WienkJA. 2003. Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. J. Organ. Behav. 24:779-802
110. Schneider B, Salvaggio AN, Subirais M. 2002. Climate strength: a new direction for climate research. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:220-29
111. Schneider B, Smith DB, Taylor S, Fleenor J. 1998. Personality and organizations: a test of the homogeneity of personality hypothesis. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:462-70
112. Schneider SK, Northcraft GB. 1999. Three social dilemmas of workforce diversity in organizations: a social identity perspective. Hunt. Relat. 52:1445-67
113. Simons T, Pelled LH, Smith KA. 1999. Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Manage. J. 42:662-73
114. Sarenson JB. 2002. The use and misuse of the coefficient of variation in organizational demography research. Social. Meth. Res. 30:475-91
115. Sproull L, Kiesler S. 1986. Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Manage. So. 32:1492-512
116. Strauss JP, Connerley ML, Ammermann PA. 2003. The "threat hypothesis," personality, and attitudes toward diversity. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 39:32-52
117. Swann WB, Polzer JT, Seyle DC, Ko SJ. 2004. Finding value in diversity: verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Acad. Manage. Rev. 29:9-27
118. Swann WBJ, Kwan VSY, Polzer JT, Milton LP. 2003. Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: the role of individuation and self-verification. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29:1396-406
119. Tajfel H, Turner JC. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. S Worchel, W Austin, pp. 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall
120. Teachman JD. 1980. Analysis of population diversity. Social. Meth. Res. 8:341-62
121. Thatcher SMB, Jehn KA, Zanutto E. 2003. Cracks in diversity research: the effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decis. Negot. 12:217-41
122. Tindale RS, Smith CM, Thomas LS, Filkins J, Sheffey S. 1996. Shared representations and asymmetric social influence in small groups. In Understanding Group Behavior: Consensual Action by Small Groups, ed. E Witte, JH Davis, pp. 81-83. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
123. Totterdell P. 2000. Catching moods and hitting runs: mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:848-59
124. Totterdell P, Kellett S, Teuchmann K, Briner RB. 1998. Evidence of mood linkage in work groups. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 74:1504-15
125. Triandis HC, Kurowski LL, Gelfand MJ. 1994. Workplace diversity. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 4, ed. HC Triandis, MD Dunnette, LM Hough, pp. 769-827. Palo Alto, CA: Consult. Psychol. Press. 2nd ed.
126. Tsui AS, Egan TD, O'Reilly CA. 1992. Being different: relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Q. 37:549-79
127. Tsui AS, O'Reilly CA. 1989. Beyond simple demographic effects: the importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Acad. Manage. J. 32:402-23
128. Tsui AS, Porter LW, Egan TD. 2002. When both similarities and dissimilarities matter: extending the concept of relational demography. Hum. Relat. 55:899-929
129. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
130. Van der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS. 2005. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: the importance of collective team identification. Acad. Manage. J. 48:532-47
131. Van der Vegt GS, Janssen O. 2003. Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. J. Manage. 29:29-51
132. van Ginkel WP, van Knippenberg D. 2003. The role of shared mental models for informational diversity in group decision-making. Presented at Eur. Assoc. Exp. Soc. Psychol. Small Group Meet, on Small Group Decision Making: Motiv. Cogn., Amsterdam
133. van Knippenberg D. 1999. Social identity and persuasion: reconsidering the role of group membership. In Social Identity and Social Cognition, ed. D Abrams, MA Hogg, pp. 315-31. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Sci.
134. van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Roman AC. 2004. Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:100822
135. van Knippenberg D, Haslam SA. 2003. Realizing the diversity dividend: exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology, and reality. In Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory far Organizational Practice, ed. SA Haslam, D van Knippenberg, MJ Platow, N Ellemers, pp. 61-77. New York/Hove: Psychol. Press
136. van Knippenberg D, Haslam SA, Platow MJ. 2003. Work group diversity and work group identification: diversity as an aspect of group identity. Presented at 11th Eur. Congr. Work Organ. Psychol., Lisbon
137. van Knippenberg D, van Ginkel WP, Homan AC, Kooij-de Bode HJM. 2005. Diversity mind sets: a new focus in diversity research. Presented at 12th Eur. Congr. Work Organ. Psychol., Istanbul
138. Van Vianen AEM, De Dreu CKW. 2001. Personality in teams: its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 10:97-120
139. Wageman R. 1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Q. 40:140-80
140. Wagner GW, Pfeffer J, O'Reilly CA. 1984. Organizational demography and turnover. Admin. Sci. Q. 29:74-92
141. Watson W, Johnson L, Merritt D. 1998. Team orientation, self-orientation, and diversity in task groups: their connection to team performance over time. Group Organ. Manage. 23:161-88
142. Watson W, Kumar K, Michaelson L. 1993. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Manage. J. 36:590-602
143. Webber SS, Donahue LM. 2001. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. J. Manage. 27:141-62
144. Weingart L. 1997. How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group process. Res. Organ. Behav. 19:189-39
145. West MA. 1996. Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: a conceptual integration. In Handbook of Work Group Psychology, ed. MA West, pp. 555-79. Chichester, UK: Wiley
146. West MA. 2002. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: an integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 51:355-87
147. Williams HM, Meân LJ. 2004. Measuring gender composition in work groups: a comparison of existing models. Organ. Res. Methods 7:456-74
148. Williams KY, O'Reilly CA. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Bebav. 20:77-140