Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism

Psychological Review

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 84-100

  Kruglanski, Arie W ^a   Pierro, Antonio ^b,c   Mannetti, Lucia ^b,c   De Grada, Eraldo ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Group centrism; Need for closure; Shared reality

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; PERCEPTION; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VISION;

COGNITION; CUES; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; PERCEPTUAL CLOSURE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33244472810     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84     Document Type: Review

References (141)

1. Adorno, E., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row.
2. Asch, S. E. (1955, November). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-55.
3. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9, Whole No. 416).
4. Back, K. (1951). Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 9-23.
5. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6. Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Group beliefs: A conception for analyzing group structure, processes, and behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Bar-Tal, D. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society: Social psychological analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Berkowitz, L. (2003). Affect, aggression, and antisocial behavior. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 804-823). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Berry, J. W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation. In J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 201-234). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
10. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-68.
11. Berry, J. W., & Kim, U. (1988). Acculturation and mental health. In P. R. Dasen, J. W. Berry, & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Health and cross-cultural psychology: Towards applications (pp. 207-236). London: Sage.
12. Blumer, H. (1956). Sociological analyses and the "variable". American Sociological Review, 21, 683-690.
13. Boudreau, L. A., Baron, R., & Oliver, P. V. (1992). Effects of expected communication target expertise and timing of set on trait use in person description. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 447-452.
14. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
15. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
16. Caporael, L. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1991). The quest for human nature: Social and scientific issues in evolutionary psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 47(3), 1-9.
17. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.). (1968). Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
18. Centers, R. (1949). The psychology of social classes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
20. DeDreu, C. K. V., & Koole, S. L. (1997). [Motivated use of heuristics in negotiation]. Unpublished raw data.
21. DeDreu, C. K. V., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348-362.
22. De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346-365.
23. Deutsch, M. (1968). The effects of cooperation and competition upon group process. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed., pp. 461-482). New York: Harper & Row.
24. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
25. DeVos, G. (1975). Ethnic pluralism: Conflict and accommodation. In G. DeVos & L. Romanucci-Ross (Eds.), Ethnic identity (pp. 1-34). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
26. Dijksterhuis, A. P., Van Knippenberg, A. D., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schaper, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 254-270.
27. Donà, G., & Berry, J. W. (1994). Acculturation attitudes and acculturative stress of Central American refugees. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 57-70.
28. Durkheim, É. (1898). Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives [Individual and collective representations]. Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 6, 273-302.
29. Ellis, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1992). Self as an epistemic authority: Effects on experiential and instructional learning. Social Cognition, 10, 357-375.
30. Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. New York: Praeger.
31. Federico, C., Golec, A., & Dial, J. (2005). The relationship between need for closure and support for military action against Iraq: Moderating effects of national attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 621-632.
32. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
33. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
34. Festinger, L. (1983). The human legacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
35. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36. Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. New York: Humanities Press.
37. Ford, T. E., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 950-962.
38. Frenkel-Brunswick, E. (1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18, 108-143.
39. Freund, T., Kruglanski, A., & Schpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy: Effects of the need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 479-487.
40. Gibbon, E. (1952). Decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittanica Press.
41. Golec, A. (2001, July). Need for cognitive closure and political conservatism: Studies on the nature of the relationship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
42. Golec, A. (2002a). Need for cognitive closure and political conservatism: Studies on the nature of the relationship. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 4, 5-13.
43. Golec, A. (2002b). Zaangazowanie polityczne a zwiazek potrzeby domkniecia poznawczego I conserwatyzmu politycznego [Political engagement and the relation between need for closure and political conservatism]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne 2, 43-60.
44. Golec, A., Federico, C, Cislak, A., & Dial, J. (2005). Need for closure, national attachment, and attitudes toward international conflict: Distinguishing the roles of patriotism and nationalism. In S. P. Serge (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 33, pp. 231-251). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science.
45. Grieve, P. G., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and inter-group discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 926-940.
46. Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 28-84). New York: Guilford Press.
47. Hart, P. T. (1994). Groupthink in government: A study of small groups and policy failure. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48. Heaton, A. W., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1991). Person perception by introverts and extroverts under time pressure: Need for closure effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 161-165.
49. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50. Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223-255.
51. Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
52. Hogg, M. A., & Grieve, P. G. (1999). Social identity theory and crisis of confidence in social psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 79-93.
53. Hogg, M. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35; pp. 1-52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
54. Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations: Remaking of world order. New York: Touchstone.
55. Isenberg, D. J. (1981). Some effects of time-pressure on vertical structure and decision making accuracy in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 119-134.
56. Jacobs, R. C., & Campbell, D. T. (1961). The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 649-658.
57. Jamieson, D. W., & Zanna, M. P. (1989). Need for structure in attitude formation and expression. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 383-406). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
59. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd rev. ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
60. Jetten, J., Hogg, M. A., & Mullin, B. A. (2000). Ingroup variability and motivation to reduce subjective uncertainty. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4, 184-198.
61. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003a). Exceptions that prove the rule: Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383-393.
62. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003b). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
63. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Simon, L. (1999). Effects of epistemic motivation on conservatism, intolerance and other system-justifying attitudes. In L. I. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 91-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Kelley, H. H. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 410-414). New York: Henry Holt.
65. Kelly, J., & McGrath, J. E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395-407.
66. Kemmelmeier, M. (1997). Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 787-789.
67. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception. New York: Guilford Press.
68. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 142-182). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
69. Killian, L. M. (1964). Social movements. In R. E. L. Faris (Ed.), Handbook of modern sociology (pp. 426-455). Chicago: Rand McNally.
70. Kosic, A. (1998). Adattamento degli immigrati in relazione al loro bisogno di chiusura cognitiva e alle loro strategie di coping [Immigrants' adaptation in relation with need for cognitive closure and coping strategies]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy.
71. Kosic, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2004). Social cognition of immigrants' acculturation: Effects of the need for closure and the reference group at entry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 1-18.
72. Kossowska, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24, 501-518.
73. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum Press.
74. Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed-mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.
75. Kruglanski, A. W., Atash, M. N., De Grada, E., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Webster, D. M. (1997). Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: Comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the Need for Closure Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1005-1016.
76. Kruglanski, A., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and un-freezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
77. Kruglanski, A. W., Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Sharvit, K., Bar, R., et al. (2005). Says who? Epistemic authority effects in social judgment. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 346-392). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
78. Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2002). When similarity breeds content: Need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 648-662.
79. Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83-109.
80. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212-225.
81. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
82. Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resis tance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.
83. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
84. Le Bon, G. (1968). The crowd: A study of the popular mind (2nd ed.). Dunwoodoy, GA: Norman S. Berg. (Original work published 1895)
85. Levine, J. M., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Shared reality and social influence in groups and organizations. In F. Butera & G. Mugny (Eds.), Social influence in social reality (pp. 33-52). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
86. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2002). Group reactions to loyalty and disloyalty. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Group cohesion, trust, and solidarity: Vol. 19. Advances in group processes, (pp. 203-228). Oxford, England: Elsevier/Elsevier Science.
87. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2003). Newcomer innovation in work teams. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 202-224). New York: Oxford University Press.
88. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. In G. W. Lewin (Ed.), Selected papers on group dynamics (pp. 84-102). New York: Harper.
89. Lewin, K. (1965). Group decision and social change. In H. Proshansky & B. Seidenberg (Eds.), Basic studies in social psychology (pp. 423-436). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
90. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.
91. Livi, S. (2003). Il bisogno di chiusura cognitiva e la transmissione delle norme nei piccoli gruppi [The need for cognitive closure and norm-transmission in small groups]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy.
92. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1991). Self-esteem and intergroup comparisons: Toward a theory of collective self-esteem. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 211-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
93. Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Taris, T., & Bezinovic, P. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the Need for Cognitive Closure Scale: Comparing its structure in Croatia, Italy, the USA and the Netherlands. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 139-156.
94. Marx, K. (1867). Das kapital: Kritik der poliltischen oekonomie [The capital: Critique of political economy]. Hamburg, Germany: Otto Meissner.
95. Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
96. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-69). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
97. Newcomb, T. M. (1950). Social psychology. New York: Dryden Press.
98. Newcomb, T. M. (1951). Social psychological theory. In J. H. Rohrer & M. Sherif (Eds.), Social psychology at the crossroads (pp. 331-349). New York: Harper.
99. Olmstead, M. S. (1959). The small group. New York: Random House.
100. Pepitone, A. (1981). The normative basis of aggression. Recherches de Psychologie, 3, 3-17.
101. Pierro, A., Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., van Knippenberg, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of need for cognitive closure. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 503-516.
102. Pierro, A., De Grada, E., & Livi, S. (2004). Emergenza della leadership nell'interazione di gruppo: Effetti della pressione temporale e dell'ampiezza del gruppo [Emergence of leadership in group interaction: Effects of temporal pressure and group size]. In A. Pierro (Ed.), Potere e Leadership: Teorie, metodi e applicazioni (pp. 121-144). Rome, Italy: Carocci.
103. Pierro, A., De Grada, E., Mannetti, L., Livi, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). Bisogno di chiusura cognitive e risposta a violazioni normative di carattere quotidiano. [Need for closure and response to normative violations of everyday nature]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 1, 129-140.
104. Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., De Grada, E., Livi, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2003). Autocracy bias in informal groups under need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 405-417.
105. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books
106. Popper, K. R. (1974). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
107. Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1999). Motivated search for common ground: Need for closure effects on audience design in interpersonal communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1101-1114.
108. Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). Motivated closed mindedness and the emergence of culture. In M. Schaller & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 101-121). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
109. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
110. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
111. Rubini, M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1997). Brief encounters ending in estrangement: Motivated language use and interpersonal rapport in the question-answer paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1047-1060.
112. Sanford, R. N., Adorno, E., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., & Levinson, D. J. (1950). The measurement of implicit antidemocratic trends. In E. Adorno, E. Frenkel-Brunswick, D. J. Levinson, & R. N. Sanford (Eds.), The authoritarian personality (pp. 222-279). New York: Harper & Row.
113. Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 623-645.
114. Saroglou, V. (2002). Beyond dogmatism: The need for closure as related to religion. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 5(2), 183-194.
115. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
116. Scheidlinger, S. (1952). Psychoanalysis and group behavior. New York: Norton.
117. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-30). London: Wiley.
118. Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1998). Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 383-393.
119. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Row.
120. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1964). Reference groups. New York: Harper & Row.
121. Smelser, N. J. (1962). Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.
122. Smelser, N. J. (1998). The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences. American Sociological Review, 63, 1-16.
123. Smith, M. (1945). Social situation, social behavior, social group. Psychological Review, 52, 224-229.
124. Sorrentino, R. M., & Short, J. C. (1986). Uncertainty orientation, motivation and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundation of social behavior (pp. 379-403). New York: Guilford Press.
125. Tajfel, H. (1972). La categorization sociale [Social categorization]. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la Psychologie Sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272-302). Paris: Larousse.
126. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
127. Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.)., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331-376). New York: Academic Press.
128. Thompson, E. P., Roman, R. J., Moscovitz, G. B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 447-489.
129. Thompson, M., Naccarato, M., Parker, K., & Moskowitz, G. (1993). The development and validation of the Personal Need for Structure (PNS) and Personal Fear of Invalidity (PFI) measures. Unpublished manuscript.
130. Toynbee, A. (1961). The disintegration of civilizations. In T. Parsons, E. Shils, K. Naegele, & J. R. Pitts (Eds.), Theories of society (pp. 1355-1364). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
131. Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
132. Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. (1957). Collective behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
133. van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 245-297.
134. van Knippenberg, D., Lossie, N., & Wilke, H. (1994). In-group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 289-300.
135. Van Oudenhoven, J. P., Prins, K. S., & Buunk, B. P. (1998). Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 995-1013.
136. Webster, D. M. (1993a). Groups under the influence: Need for closure effects on information sharing in decision making groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park.
137. Webster, D. M. (1993b). Motivated augmentation and reduction of the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 261-271.
138. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
139. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1998). Cognitive and social consequences of the need for cognitive closure. European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 133-161.
140. Webster, D. M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 181-195.
141. Webster-Nelson, D. M., Klein, C. F., & Irvin, J. E. (2003). Motivational antecedents of empathy: Inhibiting effects of fatigue. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 37-50.