Emerging forms of formative intervention research in education

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 97-117

  Penuel, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899488330     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2014.884137     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2004). On sustainability of project innovations as systemic change. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 1-25.
2. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41, 16-25.
3. Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning (2nd ed.). London, UK: Blackwell.
4. Bang, M., Curley, L., Kessel, A., Marin, A., & Suzokovich, E. (2012, April). Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as indigenous land. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia.
5. Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94, 1008-1026.
6. Bang, M., Medin, D., Washinawatok, K., & Chapman, S. (2010). Innovations in culturally based science education through partnerships and community. In M. S. Khine & M. I. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers, and collaboration in education (pp. 569-592). New York, NY: Springer.
7. Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87, 454-467.
8. Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1-14.
9. Barab, S. A., Thomas, M. K., Dodge, T., Squire, K., & Newell, M. (2004). Critical design ethnography: Designing for change. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35, 254-268.
10. Benson, L., Harkavy, I., & Puckett, J. (2007). Dewey's dream: Universities and democracies in an age of education reform. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
11. Bereiter, C. (2002). Design research for sustained innovation. Cognitive Studies, Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9, 321-327.
12. Bielaczyc, K. (2013). Informing design research: Learning from teachers' designs of social infrastructure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 258-311.
13. Bronkhorst, L. H., Meijer, P., Koster, B., Akkerman, S. F., & Vermunt, J. D. (2013). Consequential research designs in research on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 90-99.
14. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
15. Cobb, P. A. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307-333). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Cobb, P. A. (2002). Reasoning with tools and inscriptions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 187-215.
17. Cobb, P. A., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9-13.
18. Cobb, P. A., & Jackson, K. (2011). Toward an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13, 6-33.
19. Cobb, P. A., & Jackson, K. (2012). Analyzing educational policies: A learning design perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 487-521.
20. Cobb, P. A., McClain, K., & Gravenmeijer, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 1-78.
21. Cobb, P. A., McClain, K., Laumberg, T. S., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers' instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13-24.
22. Cobb, P. A.,&Smith, T. (2008). District development as a means of improving mathematics teaching and learning at scale. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Volume 3. Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 231-254). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
23. Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers' social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 203-235.
24. Coburn, C. E., Russell, J. L., Kaufman, J. H., & Stein, M. K. (2012). Supporting sustainability: Teachers' advice networks and ambitious instructional reform. American Journal of Education, 119, 137-182.
25. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (2006). Cultural-historical approaches to designing for development. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook on sociocultural psychology (pp. 484-507). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27. Cole, M., & Gajdamashko, N. (2009). The concept of development in cultural-historical activity theory: Vertical and horizontal. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303-328). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
29. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15-42.
30. Davydov, V. V. (1988). Problems of developmental teaching: The experience of theoretical and experimental research. Soviet Education, 30, 8-10.
31. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5-8.
32. diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. A. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 77-103.
33. Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. London, UK: Springer.
34. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
35. Engeström, Y. (1996). Development as breaking away and opening up: A challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 126-132.
36. Engeström, Y. (1998). Reorganizing the motivational sphere of classroom culture: An activity-theoretical analysis of planning in a teacher team. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 76-103). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Engeström, Y. (1999a). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63-93.
38. Engeström, Y. (1999b). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39. Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
40. Engeström, Y. (2008a, July). From design experiments to formative interventions. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
41. Engeström, Y. (2008b). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Engeström, Y. (2009). From learning environments and implementation to activity systems and expansive learning. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 17-33.
43. Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21, 598-628.
44. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Keruoso, H. (2003). The discursive construction of collaborative care. Applied Linguistics, 24, 286-315.
45. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). From paralyzing myths to expansive action: Building computersupported knowledge work into the curriculum from below. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 211-224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Engeström, Y., Pasanen, A., Toivainen, H., & Haavisto, V. (2005). Expansive learning as collaborative concept formation at work. In K. Yamazumi, Y. Engeström, & H. Daniels (Eds.), New learning challenges: Going beyond the industrial age system of school and work (pp. 47-77). Osaka, Japan: Kansai University Press.
47. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1-24.
48. Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). Change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1, 10-17.
49. Fishman, B. J., & Krajcik, J. (2003). What does it mean to create sustainable science curriculum innovations? A commentary. Science Education, 87, 564-573.
50. Fishman, B. J., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., & Cheng, B. H. (Eds.). (in press). Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
51. Gal'perin, P. Y. 1966). Kucheniui ob interiorizatsii [Toward the theory of interiorization]. Voprosky Psikhologii, 6, 20-29.
52. Goldman, S., & Booker, A. (2009). Making math a definition of the situation: Families as sites for mathematical practices. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 40, 369-387.
53. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. E. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17-51). New York, NY: Routledge.
54. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148-164.
55. Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejada, C. (2000). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 286-303.
56. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 100-117.
57. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 307-331.
58. Jackson, K., & Cobb, P. (in press). Coordinating professional development across contexts and role group. In M. Evans (Ed.), Teacher education and pedagogy: Theory, policy and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59. Jurow, A. S., Hall, R.,&Ma, J. Y. (2008). Expanding the disciplinary expertise of a middle school mathematics classroom: Re-contextualizing student models in conversations with visiting specialists. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 338-380.
60. Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 113-128.
61. Kelly, A. E., Baek, J. Y., Lesh, R. A., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2008). Enabling innovations in education and systematizing their impact. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 3-18). New York, NY: Routledge.
62. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
63. Kozulin, A. (2004). Vygotsky's theory in the classroom: Introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 3-7.
64. Lave, J., & McDermott, R. P. (2002). Estranged labor learning. Outlines, 1, 19-48.
65. Lehrer, R. (2012). A learning progression emerges in a trading zone of professional community and identity. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
66. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2012). Seeding evolutionary thinking by engaging children in modeling its foundations. Science Education, 96, 701-724.
67. Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96, 1071-1105.
68. Matusov, E. (2011). An ecological model of inter-institutional sustainability of an after-school program: The La Red Magica community-university partnership in Delaware. Outlines, 1, 19-45.
69. McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of design-based research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing. Educational Researcher, 42, 97-100.
70. Millen, D. R. (2000). Rapid ethnography: Time deepening strategies for HCI field research. In Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 280-286). New York, NY: ACM Press.
71. Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C.W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 675-698.
72. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
73. Nicolopoulou, A., & Cole, M. (1993). The Fifth Dimension, its play-world, and its institutional context: Generation and transmission of shared knowledge in the culture of collaborative learning. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Context for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 283-314). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
74. Nocon, H. D. (2004). Sustainability as process: Community education and expansive collaborative activity. Educational Policy, 18, 710-732.
75. Ormel, B. J. B., Roblin, N. N. P., McKenney, S. E., Voogt, J. M., & Pieters, J. M. (2012). Research-practice interactions as reported in recent design studies: Still promising, still hazy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 967-986.
76. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331-337.
77. Penuel, W. R., Kim, D. Y., Michalchik, V., Lewis, S., Means, B., Murphy, R.,... Allen, J. E. (2001). Using technology to enhance connections between home and school: A research synthesis. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
78. Penuel,W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). The WHIRL co-design process: Participant experiences. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2, 51-74.
79. Penuel, W. R., & Yarnall, L. (2005). Designing handheld software to support classroom assessment: An analysis of conditions for teacher adoption. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(5). Available from http://www.jtla.org.
80. Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. A. (2004). Connecting research and practice using formative and design experiments. In N. K. Duke & M. H. Mallete (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 149-169). New York, NY: Guilford.
81. Resnick, L. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2006). From individual learning to organizational designs for learning. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosinadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends. Sixteen essays in honor of Erik de Corte (pp. 257-274). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
82. Romberg, T. A. (1997). The influence of programs from other countries on the school mathematics reform curricula in the United States. American Journal of Education, 106, 127-147.
83. Roschelle, J., DiGiano, C., Koutlis, M., Repenning, A., Jackiw, N., & Suthers, D. (1999). Developing educational software components. IEEE Computer, 32, 50-59.
84. Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. D. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1, 145-168.
85. Roschelle, J., Shechtman, N., Tatar, D., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S.,... Gallagher, L. P. (2010). Integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancing middle school mathematics: Three large-scale studies. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 833-878.
86. Rose, W. L. (1999). Rehearsal for reconstruction: The Port Royal Experiment. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
87. Roth, W.-M. (2007). "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186-232.
88. Rowan, B. (2002). The ecology of school improvement: Notes on the school improvement industry in the United States. Journal of Educational Change, 3, 283-314.
89. Sandoval, W. A. (2004). Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39, 213-223.
90. Sandoval, W. A. (2013). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 18-36.
91. Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39, 199-201.
92. Sannino, A. (2010a). Breaking out of a professional abstraction: The pupil as materialized object for trainee teachers. In V. Ellis, A. Edwards, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Cultural-historical perspectives on teacher education and development: Learning teaching (pp. 146-159). London, UK: Routledge.
93. Sannino, A. (2010b). Teachers' talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 838-844.
94. Sannino, A. (2011). Activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory. Theory & Psychology, 21, 571-597.
95. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D.,... Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632-654.
96. Sherrer, J., Israel, N., & Resnick, L. B. (2013). Beyond classrooms: Scaling and sustaining instructional innovations. In B. J. Fishman,W. R. Penuel, A.-R. Allen, & B. H. Cheng (Eds.), Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook (pp. 426-442). New York, NY: Teachers College Record.
97. Songer, N. B. (2007). Rethinking sustainability of curricular innovations: Notes from urban Detroit. In B. Schneider & S.-K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale up in education: Issues in practice (pp. 165-182). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
98. Spillane, J. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 141-179.
99. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-307). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
100. Stein, M. K., & Coburn, C. E. (2008). Architectures for learning: A comparative analysis of two urban school districts. American Journal of Education, 114, 583-626.
101. Supovitz, J. A. (2007). The case for district-based reform: Leading, building, and sustaining school improvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
102. Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., Shechtman, N., Kaput, J., & Hopkins, B. (2008). Scaling up innovative technologybased mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 248-286.
103. Virkkunen, J., & Tenhunen, E. (2010). Finding a concept that integrates specialists' know-how-The case of special school for handicapped and neurologically ill children. Actio-International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 3, 1-23.
104. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
105. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology, including the volume Thinking and speech (R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton, Eds., N. Minick, Trans.). New York, NY: Plenum.
106. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meanings, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
107. White, B., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118.
108. Wiser, M., Smith, C. L., & Doubler, S. (2012). Learning progressions as tools for curriculum development: Lessons from the Inquiry Project. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 359-404). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
109. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Socio-mathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.
110. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Wheatley, G., & Merkel, G. (1990). The importance of social interaction in children's construction of mathematical knowledge. In T. J. Cooney (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s (pp. 12-21). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
111. Yamazumi, K. (2009). Expansive agency in multi-activity collaboration. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 212-227). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
112. Yarnall, L., Shechtman, N., & Penuel, W. R. (2006). Using handheld computers to support improved classroom assessment in science: Results from a field trial. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 142-158.