From design experiments to formative interventions

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 598-628

  Engeström, Yrjö ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

agency; contradiction; design experiment; double stimulation; formative intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053584459     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: 14617447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354311419252     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bannan-Ritland B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32, 21–24.
2. Barab S.A. Kirshner D. (2001). Guest editors’ introduction: Rethinking methodology in the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 5–15.
3. Bateson G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.
4. Brown A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–168.
5. Cobb P. Confrey J. diSessa A. Lehrer R. Schauble L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9–13.
6. Collins A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In Scanlon E. O'shea T. (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
7. Collins A. Joseph D. Bielaczyc K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15–42.
8. Davydov V.V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9. Engeström Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
10. Engeström Y. (1989). The cultural-historical theory of activity and the study of political repression. International Journal of Mental Health, 17 (4), 29–41.
11. Engeström Y. (2000). From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In Luff P. Hindmarsh J. Heath C. (Eds.), Workplace studies (pp. 150–166). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Engeström Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14 (1), 133–156.
13. Engeström Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice (pp. 47–77). Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
14. Engeström Y. (2007a). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning. Management Learning, 38, 271–275.
15. Engeström Y. (2007b). Putting Vygotsky to work: The Change Laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In Daniels H. Cole M. Wertsch J.V. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Engeström Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Engeström Y. (2009a). From learning environments and implementation to activity systems and expansive learning. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 17–33.
18. Engeström Y. (2009b). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In Sannino A. Daniels H. Gutiérrez K.D. (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Engeström Y. Engeström R. Kerosuo H. (2003). The discursive construction of collaborative care. Applied Linguistics, 24, 286–315.
20. Engeström Y. Engeström R. Suntio A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In Wells G. Claxton G. (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 211–224). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
21. Engeström Y. Kerosuo H. Kajamaa A. (2007). Beyond discontinuity: Expansive organizational learning remembered. Management Learning, 38, 319–336.
22. Engeström Y. Lompscher J. Rückriem G. (Eds.). (2005). Putting activity theory to work: Contributions from developmental work research. Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
23. Engeström Y. Pasanen A. Toiviainen H. Haavisto V. (2005). Expansive learning as collaborative concept formation at work. In Yamazumi K. Engeström Y. Daniels H. (Eds.), New learning challenges: Going beyond the industrial age system of school and work. Kansai, Japan: Kansai University Press.
24. Engeström Y. Sannino A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 368–387.
25. Engeström Y. Virkkunen J. Helle M. Pihlaja J. Poikela R. (1996). The Change Laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1 (2), 10–17.
26. Eskola A. (1999). Laws, logics, and human activity. In Engeström Y. Miettinen R. Punamåki R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 107–114). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hall R. Greeno J.G. (2008). Conceptual learning. In Good T. (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (pp. 212–221). London, UK: Sage.
28. Hutchins E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577.
29. Il–enkov E.V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays in its history and theory. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
30. Il–enkov E.V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's “Capital”. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
31. Kelly A.E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 115–128.
32. Kelly A.E. Lesh R.A. Baek J.Y. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Kindred J.B. (1999). “8/18/97 Bite Me”: Resistance in learning and work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 196–221.
34. Leont–ev A.N. (1932). The development of voluntary attention in the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 40, 52–81.
35. Leont–ev A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Leont–ev A.N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
37. Long N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
38. Maxwell J.A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–11.
39. Melucci A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Middleton J. Gorard S. Taylor C. Bannan-Ritland B. (2008). The “compleat” design experiment: From soup to nuts. In Kelly A.E. Lesh R.A. Baek J.Y. (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 21–46). New York, NY: Routledge.
41. Midgley G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York, NY: Kluwer.
42. O–Donnell C.L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.
43. Olson D.R. (2004). The triumph of hope over experience in the search for “what works”: A response to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 33, 24–26.
44. Sannino A. (2008). From talk to action: Experiencing interlocution in developmental interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15, 234–257.
45. Sannino A. (2010). Teachers’ talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 838–844.
46. Schwartz D.L. Chang J. Martin L. (2008). Instrumentation and innovation in design experiments: Taking the turn towards efficiency. In Kelly A.E. Lesh R.A. Baek J.Y. (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 47–67). New York, NY: Routledge.
47. Terås M. (2007). Intercultural learning and hybridity in the Culture Laboratory. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
48. van den Akker J. Gravemeijer K. McKenny S. Nieveen N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. London, UK: Routledge.
49. van der Veer R. Valsiner J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
50. von Hippel E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. von Hippel E. Tyre M.J. (1995). How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Research Policy, 24, 1–12.
52. Victor B. Boynton A.C. (1998). Invented here: Maximizing your organization's internal growth and profitability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
53. Vygotsky L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The psychology of higher mental functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Vygotsky L.S. (1987). Lectures on psychology. In The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 289–358). New York, NY: Plenum.
55. Vygotsky L.S. (1997a). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 223–343). New York, NY: Plenum.
56. Vygotsky L.S. (1997b). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 1–251). New York, NY: Plenum.
57. Vygotsky L.S. (1997c). The instrumental method in psychology. In The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 85–89). New York, NY: Plenum.
58. Vygotsky L.S. (1999). Tool and sign in the development of the child. In The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 6. Scientific legacy (pp. 1–68). New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
59. Zinchenko V.P. (1985). Vygotsky's ideas about units for the analysis of mind. In Wertsch J.V. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 94–118). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.