Reasoning with tools and inscriptions

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 11, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 187-215

  Cobb, Paul ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036086117     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls11,2-3n_3     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2. Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. American Mathematical Monthly, 104, 801-823.
3. Cobb, P. (1998). Theorizing about mathematical conversations and learning from practice. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 46-48.
4. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical learning: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 5-44.
5. Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. In D. K. S. Carver (Ed.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress (pp. 455-478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (in press). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction.
7. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113-164.
8. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, G. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573-602.
9. Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Dörfler, W. (1993). Computer use and views of the mind. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology (pp. 159-186). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. Gee, J. P. (1997). Thinking, learning, and reading: The situated sociocultural mind. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 235-260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
13. Gravemeijer, K. E. P. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-β.
14. Gravemeijer, K. (1997). Solving word problems: A case of modelling? Learning and Instruction, 7, 389-397.
15. Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 155-177.
16. Greeno, J. G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 170-218.
17. Harel, G., & Confrey, J. (1994). The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
18. Kaput, J. J. (1994). The representational roles of technology in connecting mathematics with authentic experience. In R. Biehle, R. W. Scholz, R. Strasser, & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Diadactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 379-397). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
19. Kitcher, P. (1984). The nature of mathematical knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A selection. London: Tavistock.
21. Latour, B. (1993). La clef de Berlin et autre leçons d'un amateur de Sciences [The key to Berlin and other lessons of a science lover], Paris: Editions La Découverte.
22. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. McClain, K., Cobb, P., & Oravemeijer, K. (2000). Supporting students' ways of reasoning about data. In M. Burke (Ed.), Learning mathematics for a new century (2001 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 174-187). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24. McGatha, M. (2000). Instructional design in the context of classroom-based research: Documenting the learning of a research team as it engaged in a mathematics design experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
25. McGatha, M., Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (1999, April). An analysis of students' statistical understandings. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
26. Meira, L. (1995). The microevolution of mathematical representations in children's activity. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 269-313.
27. Meira, L. (1998). Making sense of instructional devices: The emergence of transparency in mathematical activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 121-142.
28. Minick, N. (1987). The development of Vygotsky's thought: An introduction. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of Vygotsky, L.S. (Vol. 1, pp. 17-38). New York: Plenum.
29. Much, N. C., & Shweder, R. A. (1978). Speaking of rules: The analysis of culture in breach. New Directions for Child Development, 2, 19-39.
30. Nemirovsky, R. C., & Monk, S. (2000). If you look at it the other way... In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 177-221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Roth, W. M. (1996). Where is the context in contextual word problems? Mathematical practices and products in grade 8, students' answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 487-527.
33. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Making mathematics and making pasta: From cookbook procedures to really cooking. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 299-320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34. Schutz, A. (1962). The problems of social reality. Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
35. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
36. Sfard, A. (2000). On reform movement and the limits of mathematical discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 157-189.
37. Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In D. B. Aichele (Ed.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics: 1994 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 79-92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
38. Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1996). Talking about rates conceptually. Part II: Mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 2-24.
39. Toulmin, S. (1969). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. van Oers, B. (1996). Learning mathematics as meaningful activity. In P. Nesher, L. Steffe, P. Cobb, G. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 91-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. van Oers, B. (2000). The appropriation of mathematical symbols: A psychosemiotic approach to mathematical learning. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 133-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London: Routledge.
44. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.