Sustainability as process: Community education and expansive collaborative activity

Educational Policy

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 710-732

  Nocon, Honorine D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b University of California ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural historical activity theory; Sustainability of educational innovations; University community collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 7544240186     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904804269181     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Bellamy, R. K. E. (1997). Designing educational technology: Computer-mediated change. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 123-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
3. Brown, K., & Cole, M. (2000). Socially-shared cognition: System design and the organization of collaborative research. In D. H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 197-214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
4. Cole, M. (1995). Cultural-historical psychology: A meso-genetic approach. In L. Martin, K. Nelson, & E. Tobach (Eds.), Sociocultural psychology (pp. 168-204). UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Cole, M. (2001, June). Sustaining model systems of educational activity: Designing for the long haul. Paper presented at the Symposium Honoring the Work of Ann Brown, University of California, Berkeley.
7. Cuban, L. (2001, May). Answering tough questions about sustainability. Paper presented at the First Virtual Conference on Sustainability of Local Systemic Change. Retrieved July 26, 2003, from http://sustainability.terc.edu/indix.cfm.keynote/paper
8. Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1938)
9. Edens, K., Shirley, J., & Toner, T. (2001). Sustaining a professional development school partnership: Hearing the voices, heeding the voices. Action in Teacher Education, 23(3), 27-32.
10. Engeström, R. (1995). Voice as communicative action. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2, 192-214.
11. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
12. Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working, and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
13. Engeström, Y. (1996). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & I. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64-103). UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Engeström, Y.(1999a). Expansive visibilization. of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63-93.
15. Engeström, Y. (1999b). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.) Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Fullan, M. (200 la). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Fullan, (2001b). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College.
18. Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Current activity for the future: The Zo-ped. In B. Roggoff & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Children's learning in the "zone of proximal development": New directions for child development (Vol. 23, pp. 45-63). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1987). New technologies, basic skills and the underside of education: What's to be done? In J. A. Langer (Ed.), Language, literacy, and culture: Issue of society and schooling (pp. 110-131). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Gutierrez, K. D., & Stone, L. D. (2000). Synchronie and diachronic dimensions of social practice: An emerging methodology for cultural-historical perspectives on literacy learning. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 150-164). UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 693-700.
22. Hedegaard, M. (1990). The zone of proximal development as basis for instruction. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education (pp. 349-371). UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Holland, D., & Reeves, J. R. (1996). Activity theory and the view from somewhere: Team perspectives on the intellectual work of programming. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 257-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 89-121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Kuutti, K. (1997). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (LCHC). (1982). A model system for the study of learning difficulties. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4, 39-66.
27. Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (LCHC). (1983). Culture and cognitive development. In P. Mussen (Series Ed.) & W. Kessen (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: History, theory, and methods (Vol. 1, pp. 298-356). New York: John Wiley.
28. Nicolopoulou, A., & Cole, M. (1993). The Fifth Dimension, its play world, and its instructional contexts: The generation and transmission of shared knowledge in the culture of collaborative learning. In N.Minnick & E. Forman (Eds.), The institutional and social context of mind: New directions in Vygotskian theory and research (pp. 283-314). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Nocon, H. (2000). Developing hybridized social capital: Communication, coalition, and volunteering in non-traditional communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
30. Nocon, H., Nilsson, M., & Cole, M. (in press). Spiders, firesouls, and little fingers: Necessary magic in university-community collaboration. Anthropology and Education Quarterly.
31. O'Neil, J. (2000). Fads and fireflies: The difficulties of sustaining change. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 6-9.
32. Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. UC Links Statewide Office. (1998). University-community links to higher learning (Annual report for 1997-1998). Berkeley: UC Link Statewide Office, University of California Office of the President
35. UC Links Statewide Office. (2001). University-community links to higher learning (Annual report for 2000-2001). Berkeley: UC Links Statewide Office, University of California Office of the President.
36. Vásquez, O. A. (1993). A look at language as a resource: Lessons from La Clase Mágica. In M. B. Arias & U. Casanova (Eds.), Bilingual education: Politics, practice and research (pp. 199-223). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Vásquez, O. A. (1994). The magic of La Clase Mágica: Enhancing the learning potential of bilingual children. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 17(2), 120-128.
38. Vásquez, O. A. (2003). La Clase Mágica. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum.
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.