Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 307-331

  Hmelo Silver, Cindy E ^a,b   Marathe, Surabhi ^a   Liu, Lei ^a  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547479237     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508400701413401     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (n.d.). AAAS Project 2061 biology textbooks evaluation. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from http://www.project2061.org/publications/textbook/hsbio/report/default.htm
2. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamson, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 421-441.
3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Chi, M. T. H. (2000, April). Misunderstanding emergent processes as causal. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
5. Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 161-199.
6. Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
7. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
8. Collins, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993). Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies to guide inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28, 25-42.
9. Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2005, April). Designing for complex system understanding in the high school biology classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.
10. Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., & Spiro, R. J. (2001). Learners' (mis)understanding of important and difficult concepts. In K. D. Forbus & P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), Smart machines in education: The coming revolution in educational technology (pp. 349-375). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
11. Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., Spiro, R. J., & Dawson-Saunders, B. K. (1992). Knowledge application and transfer for complex tasks in ill-structured domains: Implications for instruction and testing in biomedicine. In D. Evans & V. L. Patel (Eds.), Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice (pp. 213-244). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R., & Coulson, R. L. (1989). The nature of conceptual understanding in biomedicine: The deep structure of complex ideas and the development of misconceptions. In D. Evans & V. Patel (Eds.), Cognitive science in medicine: Biomedical modeling (pp. 113-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. ( 1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1231-1256.
14. Gellert, E. (1962). Children's conception of the structure and function of the human body. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 65, 193-405.
15. Goel, A. K., Gomez de Silva Garza, A., Grue, N., Murdock, J. W., Recker, M. M., & Govinderaj, T. (1996). Towards designing learning environments: I. Exploring how devices work. In C. Fraisson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 493-501). New York: Springer.
16. Goldstone, R. L., & Sakamoto, Y. (2003). The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 414-466.
17. Graesser, A. C. (1999, April). How do adults comprehend the mechanisms of everyday devices? Texts, illustrations and breakdown scenarios. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
18. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247-298.
19. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Azevedo, R. A. (2006). Understanding complex systems: Some core challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 53-61.
20. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Pfeffer, M. G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28, 127-138.
21. Jacobson, M. J. (2001). Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6(2), 1-9.
22. Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 11-34.
23. Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 12, 101-138.
24. Liu, L., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Marathe, M. (2005, April). Function before form: An alternative approach to learning about complex systems. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
25. Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D., & Medin, D. L. (2000). Tall is typical: Central tendency, ideal dimensions and graded category structure among tree experts and novices. Memory and Cognition, 28, 41-50.
26. Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., & Coley, J. D. (1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology, 32, 49-96.
27. Medin, D. L., Ross, N., Atran, S., Cox, D., Coley, J., Proffitt, J. B., et al. (2006). Folk biology of fresh-water fish. Cognition, 99, 237-273.
28. Mintzes, J. J., Trowbridge, J. E., Arnaudin, M. W., & Wandersee, J. H. (1991). Children's biology: Studies on conceptual development in the life sciences. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 179-202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Narayanan, N. H., & Hegarty, M. (1998). On designing comprehensible interactive hypermedia manuals. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 48, 267-301.
30. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. Norman, G. R., Trott, A. D., Brooks, L. R., & Smith, E. K. (1994). Cognitive differences in clinical reasoning related to postgraduate training. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 6, 114-120.
32. Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J. (1991). The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Towards a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Penner, D. E. (2001). Complexity, emergence, and synthetic models in science education. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science (pp. 177-208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Perkins, D. N., & Grotzer, T. A. (2000, April). Models and moves: Focusing on dimensions of causal complexity to achieve deeper scientific understanding. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
35. Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (1998). Models of conceptual understanding in human respiration and strategies for instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
36. Resnick, M., & Wilensky, U. (1998). Diving into complexity: Developing probabilistic decentralized thinking through role-playing activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 153-172.
37. Sabelli, N. H. (2006). Complexity, technology, science, and education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 5-9.
38. Schunn, C. D., & Anderson, J. R. (1999). The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23, 337-370.
39. Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9-40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Smith, M. U. (1990). Knowledge structures and the nature of expertise in classical genetics. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 287-302.
41. Strevens, M. (2005). How are the sciences of complex systems possible? Philosophy of Science, 72, 531-556.
42. Weld, D. S. (1983). Explaining complex engineered devices. Boston: Bolt Beranek and Newman.
43. Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 3-19.
44. Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319-346.
45. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87.
46. Wood-Robinson, C. (1995). Children's biological ideas: Knowledge about ecology, inheritance, and evolution. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research informing practice (pp. 111-131). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.