Research-practice interactions as reported in recent design studies: Still promising, still hazy

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 967-986

  Ormel, Bart J B ^a   Pareja Roblin, Natalie N ^a,b   McKenney, Susan E ^a,c   Voogt, Joke M ^a   Pieters, Jules M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design research; Research and development; Research practice gap

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870390018     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-012-9261-6     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(2), 16-25.
2. Barab S. A., Dodge T., & Gee J. P. (2009). The worked example: Invitational scholarship in service of an emerging field. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April.
3. Barab, S., Dodge, T., Thomas, M., Jackson, C., & Tuzun, H. (2007). Our designs and the social agendas they carry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 263-305.
4. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
5. *Barnes, T., Powell, E., Chaffin, A., & Lipford, H. (2008). Game2Learn: Improving the motivation of CS1 students. Paper presented at the Proceedings-3rd International Conference on Game Development in Computer Science Education, GDCSE 2008.
6. *Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50-73.
7. Bauer, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). The educational research-practice interface revisited: A scripting perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 221-236.
8. *Birchfield, D., & Megowan-Romanowicz, C. (2009). Earth science learning in SMALLab: A design experiment for mixed reality. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 403-421.
9. Bradley, B. A., & Reinking, D. (2010). Enhancing research and practice in early childhood through formative and design experiments. Early Child Development and Care,. doi: 10. 1080/03004430903357894.
10. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
11. Burkhardt, H. (2006). From design research to large-scale impact: Engineering research in education. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research. London: Routledge.
12. Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3-14.
13. *Casotti, G., Rieser-Danner, L., & Knabb, M. T. (2008). Successful implementation of inquiry-based physiology laboratories in undergraduate major and nonmajor courses. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(4), 286-296.
14. *Cheung, W. M. (2009). Effects of hierarchical versus sequential structuring of teaching content on creativity in Chinese writing. Instructional Science, 1-23.
15. *Choi, I., & Lee, K. (2009). Designing and implementing a case-based learning environment for enhancing ill-structured problem solving: Classroom management problems for prospective teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 99-129.
16. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
17. Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? A commentary on Collins, Joseph, and Bielaczyc; diSessa and Cobb; and Fishman, Marx, Blumenthal, Krajcik, and Soloway in the JLS special issue on design-based research. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 105-114.
18. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
19. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
20. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-122.
21. *Flannery, B. L., & Pragman, C. H. (2008). Working towards empirically-based continuous improvements in service learning. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 465-479.
22. Glaser, R. (1976). Components of a psychology instruction: Towards a science of design. Review of Educational Research, 46(1), 1-24.
23. *Gu, X., Zhang, B., Lin, X., & Song, X. (2009). Evaluating online solutions for experiential support of distance learning by teachers in China. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 114-125.
24. *Hadjerrouit, S. (2008). Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study. Informatics in Education, 7(2), 181-210.
25. *Hickey, D. T., Ingram-Goble, A. A., & Jameson, E. M. (2009). Designing assessments and assessing designs in virtual educational environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 187-208.
26. Kelly, A. E. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-4.
27. Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 115-128.
28. Kim, H., & Hannafin, M. (2008). Grounded design of web-enhanced case-based activity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 161-179.
29. Lagemann, E. C. (2002). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. *Lamberg, T. D., & Middleton, J. A. (2009). Design research perspectives on transitioning from individual microgenetic interviews to a whole-class teaching experiment. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 233-245.
31. McKenney, S. (2001). Computer based support for science education materials developers in Africa: Exploring potentials. Enschede: University of Twente.
32. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routeldge.
33. McKenney, S. & Reeves, T. (in press). Educational design research. In M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. London: Springer.
34. Oh, E., & Reeves, T. (2010). The implications of the differences between design research and instructional systems design for educational technology researchers and practitioners. Educational Media International, 47, 263-275.
35. Orrill, C. H., Hannafin, M. J., & Glazer, E. R. (2003). Research on and research with emerging technologies revisited: The role of disciplined inquiry in the study of technology innovation. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Raval, H., McKenney, S., & Pieters, J. (2012). A needs and context analysis for teacher learning in an Indian NGO. International Journal of Training and Development, 16(1), 23-38.
37. Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from the technology perspective. In J. V. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 86-109). London: Routledge.
38. Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16, 97-116.
39. Reeves, T. C., McKenney, S., & Herrington, J. (2010). Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research. In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future: Proceedings of the 27th ASCILITE Conference (pp. 787-794). Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland. http://ascilite. org. au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Reeves-full. pdf.
40. Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2008). Formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.
41. Sandoval, W. A. (2004). Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 213-223.
42. *Schwarz, C. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers' knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720-744.
43. Shavelson, R., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(25), 25-28.
44. *So, H. J., Seow, P., & Looi, C. K. (2009). Location matters: Leveraging knowledge building with mobile devices and Web 2. 0 technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 367-382.
45. Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteurs quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.
46. *Swain, J., & Swan, M. (2009). Teachers' attempts to integrate research-based principles into the teaching of numeracy with post-16 learners. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 14(1), 75-92.
47. *Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., Shechtman, N., Kaput, J., & Hopkins, B. (2008). Scaling up innovative technology-based mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 248-286.
48. Thomas, M. K., Barab, S. A., & Tuzun, H. (2009). Developing critical implementations of technology-rich innovations: A cross-case study of the implementation of Quest Atlantis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(2), 125-153.
49. *Tiberghien, A., Vince, J., & Gaidioz, P. (2009). Design-based research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2275-2314.
50. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1-14). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
51. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
52. *van Rens, L., van der Schee, J., & Pilot, A. (2009). Teaching molecular diffusion using an inquiry approach: Diffusion activities in a secondary school inquiry-learning community. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(12), 1437-1441.
53. Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36, 299.
54. Verloop, N., van Driel, J. H., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441-461.
55. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
56. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhances learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.
57. *Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44.