Conjecture Mapping: An Approach to Systematic Educational Design Research

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 18-36

  Sandoval, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886081468     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2013.778204     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bannan-Ritland, B. 2003. The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32 (1): 21 - 24.
2. Barab, S. A. 2004. Design-based research: Clarifying the terms [Special issue]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1)
3. Barab, S. A. 2006. " Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the learning sciences ". In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, Edited by: Sawyer, R. K. 153 - 172. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bell, P. 2004. On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39 (4): 243 - 253.
5. Bereiter, C. 2002. Design research for sustained innovation. Cognitive Studies, Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9 (3): 321 - 327.
6. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 2006. " Education for the knowledge age: Design-centered models of teaching and instruction ". In Handbook of educational psychology, 2nd, Edited by: Alexander, P. A. and Winne, P. H. 695 - 713. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bielaczyc, K. 2006. Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15: 301 - 329.
8. Brown, A. L. 1992. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2: 141 - 178.
9. Brown, K. and Cole, M. 2002. " Cultural historical activity theory and the expansion of opportunities for learning after school ". In Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education, Edited by: Wells, G. and Claxton, G. 225 - 238. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
10. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R. and Schauble, L. 2003. Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1): 9 - 13.
11. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. 1992. The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27 (3): 291 - 315.
12. Collins, A. 1992. " Toward a design science of education ". In New directions in educational technology, Edited by: Scanlon, E. and O'Shea, T. 15 - 22. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
13. Collins, A., Joseph, D. and Bielaczyc, K. 2004. Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13: 15 - 42.
14. Confrey, J. 2006. " The evolution of design studies as methodology ". In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, Edited by: Sawyer, R. K. 135 - 151. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. Cronbach, L. J. 1975. Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30 (2): 116 - 127.
16. Dai, D. Y., ed. 2012. Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings, London, England: Routledge.
17. Dede, C. 2004. If design-based research is the answer, what is the question?. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13: 105 - 114.
18. Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R. and Sherin, B. L. 2010. Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19: 3 - 53.
19. Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32 (1): 5 - 8.
20. diSessa, A. A. and Cobb, P. 2004. Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13: 77 - 103.
21. Edelson, D. C. 2002. Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11: 105 - 121.
22. Engeström, Y. 2008. " From design experiments to formative interventions ". In International perspectives in the learning sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2008, Edited by: Kirschner, P., Prins, F., Jonker, V. and Kanselaar, G. 3 - 24. Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of Learning Sciences.
23. Erickson, F. 1982. " Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structures in lessons ". In Communicating in the classroom, Edited by: Wilkinson, L. C. 153 - 181. New York, NY: Academic Press.
24. Feyerabend, P. 1993. Against method, 3rd, New York, NY: Verso. (Original work published 1975.
25. Gravemeijer, K. and Cobb, P. 2006. " Design research from a learning design perspective ". In Educational design research, Edited by: Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. and Nieveen, N. 17 - 51. London, England: Routledge.
26. Jordan, B. and Henderson, A. 1995. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4: 39 - 103.
27. Kali, Y. 2006. Collaborative knowledge building using the design principles database. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1 (2): 187 - 201.
28. Kelly, A. E. (Ed.). 2003. The role of design in educational research [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 32 (1)
29. Kelly, A. E. 2004. Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological?. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13: 115 - 128.
30. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A. and Baek, J. Y., eds. 2008. Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching, New York, NY: Routledge.
31. Levin, J. R. and O'Donnell, A. M. 1999. What to do about educational research's credibility gaps?. Issues in Education, 5 (2): 177 - 229.
32. Maxwell, J. A. 2004. Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33 (2): 3 - 11.
33. Middleton, J., Gorard, S., Taylor, C. and Bannan-Ritland, B. 2008. " The "compleat" design experiment: From soup to nuts ". In Handbook of design research methods in education, Edited by: Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A. and Baek, J. Y. 21 - 46. New York, NY: Routledge.
34. National Research Council. 2002. Scientific research in education, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
35. O'Neill, D. K. 2012. Designs that fly: What the history of aeronautics tells us about the future of design-based research in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35 (2): 119 - 140.
36. Ormel, B. J. B., Roblin, N. N. P., McKenney, S., Voogt, J. M. and Pieters, J. M. 2012. Research-practice interactions as reported in recent design studies: Still promising, still hazy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60: 967 - 986.
37. Phillips, D. C. and Dolle, J. R. 2006. " From Plato to Brown and beyond: Theory, practice, and the promise of design experiments ". In Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends: Sixteen essays in honour of Erik DeCorte, Edited by: Verschaffel, L., Dochy, F., Boekaerts, M. and Vosniadou, S. 277 - 293. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
38. Pickering, A. 1995. The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. Ryu, S. and Sandoval, W. A. 2012. Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96: 488 - 526.
40. Salomon, G. 1996. " Studying novel learning environments as patterns of change ". In International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments, Edited by: Vosniadou, S., De Corte, E., Glaser, R. and Mandl, H. 363 - 377. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Sandoval, W. A. 2004. Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39 (4): 213 - 223.
42. Sandoval, W. A. in press. " Educational design research in the 21st century ". In Handbook of design in educational technology, Edited by: Luckin, R., Puntambekar, S., Goodyear, P., Grabowski, B. L., Underwood, J. and Winters, N. London, England: Routledge.
43. Sandoval, W. A. and Bell, P. (Eds.). 2004. Design-based research methods for studying learning in context [Special issue]. Educational Psychologist, 39 (4)
44. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. 1993. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3: 265 - 283.
45. Schoenfeld, A. H. 2006. " Design experiments ". In Handbook of complementary methods in education research, Edited by: Green, J., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P. B. 193 - 206. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
46. Schwartz, D. L., Chang, J. and Martin, T. 2008. " Instrumentation and innovation in design experiments: Taking the turn towards efficiency ". In Handbook of design research methods in education, Edited by: Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A. and Baek, J. Y. 47 - 67. New York, NY: Routledge.
47. Scott, T., Cole, M. and Engel, M. 1992. Computers and education: A cultural constructivist perspective. Review of Research in Education, 18: 191 - 251.
48. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L. and Feuer, M. J. 2003. On the science of educational design studies. Educational Researcher, 32 (1): 25 - 28.
49. Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
50. Tabak, I. 2004. Reconstructing context: Negotiating the tension between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educational Psychologist, 39 (4): 225 - 233.
51. Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. and Nieveen, N., eds. 2006. Educational design research, London, England: Routledge.
52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Walker, D. 2006. " Toward productive design studies ". In Educational design research, Edited by: Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. and Nieveen, N. 8 - 13. London, England: Routledge.
54. White, B. Y. 1993. ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10 (1): 1 - 100.
55. Zhang, J. 2012. " Designing adaptive collaboration structures for advancing the community's knowledge ". In Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings, Edited by: Dai, D. Y. 201 - 224. London, England: Routledge.