Systematic Review of Design-Based Research Progress: Is a Little Knowledge a Dangerous Thing?

Educational Researcher

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 97-100

  McKenney, Susan ^a,b   Reeves, Thomas C ^c  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

program evaluation; research utilization; validity reliability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875359569     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12463781     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Anderson T.,Shattuck J.Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?.Educational Researcher. 2012;41 (1): 16-25.
2. Barab S.,Gresalfi M.,Ingram-Goble A.Transformational play: Using games to position person, content and context.Educational Researcher. 2010;39 (7): 525-536.
3. Bereiter C.Design research for sustained innovation.Cognitive Studies, Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society. 2002;9 (3): 321-327.
4. Clarke J.,Dede C.Design for scalability: A case study of the river city curriculum.Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2009;18 (4): 353-365.
5. Cobb P.,Confrey J.,diSessa A.,Lehrer R.,Schauble L.Design experiments in educational research.Educational Researcher. 2003;32 (1): 9-13.
6. Cooper H.Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. 2009). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:.
7. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry.Educational Researcher. 2003;32 (1): 5-8.
8. Edelson D.Design research: What we learn when we engage in design.The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2002;11 (1): 105-121.
9. Ejersbo L.,Engelhardt R.,Frølunde L.,Hanghøj T.,Magnussen R.,Misfeldt M.The handbook of design research methods in education. Kelly A.Lesh R.Baek J., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008:149-163.
10. Evans J.,Benefield P.Systematic reviews of educational research.British Educational Research Journal. 2000;27 (5): 527-541.
11. Hahs-Vaughn D. L.,Onwuegbuzie A. J.Quality of abstracts in articles submitted to a scholarly journal: A mixed methods case study of the journal Research in the Schools.Library & Information Science Research. 2010;32 (1): 53-61.
12. Hammersley M.On "systematic" reviews of research literatures: A "narrative" response to Evans and Benefield.British Educational Research Journal. 2001;27 (5): 543-554.
13. Kali Y.Handbook of design research methods in education. Kelly A.Lesh R.Baek J., ed. London: Routledge; 2008:423-438.
14. Handbook of design research methods in education. Kelly A.Lesh R.Baek J., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2008:.
15. Leeman Y.,Wardekker W.Redesigning vocational education: The possibilities of design-based research.Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2011;43 (3): 313-331.
16. Linn M. C.Designing the Knowledge Integration Environment.International Journal of Science Education. 2000;22 (8): 781-796.
17. McKenney S.,Reeves T. C.Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge; 2012:.
18. McKenney S.,Reeves T.Handbook of research on educational communications & technology. Spector M.Merrill M.Elen J.Bischop M., ed. London: Springer; in press:.
19. Nind M.Conducting systematic review in education: a reflexive narrative.London Review of Education. 2006;4 (2): 183-195.
20. Ormel B.,Pareja Roblin N.,McKenney S.,Voogt J.,Pieters J.Research-practice interactions as reported in recent design research studies: Still promising, still hazy.Educational Technology Research & Development. in press;:.
21. Phillips D.,Dolle J.Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends. Sixteen essays in honor of Erik de Corte. Verschaffel L.Dochy F.Boekaerts M.Vosniadou S., ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2006:277-292.
22. Reeves T. C.Educational design research. Akker J. V.Gravemeijer K.McKenney S.Nieveen N., ed. London: Routledge; 2006:86-109.
23. Reinking D.,Bradley B.Formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2008:.
24. Roschelle J.,Bakia M.,Toyama Y.,Patton C.Eight issues for learning scientists about education and the economy.Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2011;20 (1): 3-49.
25. Stokes D.Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1997:.
26. Swan M.The impact of task-based professional development on teachers' practices and beliefs: A design research study.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 2007;10 (4-6): 217-237.
27. Togia A.,Tsigilis N.Impact factor and education journals: A critical examination andanalysis.International Journal of Educational Research. 2006;45 (6): 362-379.
28. van den Akker J.Design approaches and tools in education and training. van den Akker J.Branch R.Gustafson K.Nieveen N.Plomp T., ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999:1-14.
29. Design approaches and tools in education and training. van den Akker J.Branch R.Gustafson K.Nieveen N.Plomp T., ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999:.
30. Educational design research. van den Akker J.Gravemeijer K.McKenney S.Nieveen N., ed. London: Routledge; 2006:.
31. Wang F.,Hannafin M.Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development. 2005;53 (4): 5-23.
32. Wong L-H.,Boticki I.,Sun J.,Looi C-K.Improving the scaffolds of a mobile-assisted Chinese character forming game via a design-based research cycle.Computers in Human Behavior. 2011;27:1783-1793.