Personnel Selection and the Competitive Advantage of Firms

International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 153-195

  Ployhart, Robert E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

KSAOs, in predicting, explaining, or controlling variation in outcomes; KSAOs, with strategic RBT on human capital, unit level from KSAOs; Personnel selection and competitive advantage of firms; Personnel selection research, as job performance and turnover; Predictor KSAOs and predictor method distinction; Predictor methods, assessment for heterogeneous operationalizations; RBT, strong approach in understanding why firms differ; SJT structure role on validity, validation practices tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883325381     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118311141.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (165)

1. Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Pierce, C. A. (2010). Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 648-80.
2. Aguinis, H., & Smith, M. A. (2007). Understanding the impact of test validity and bias on selection errors and adverse impact in human resource selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 165-99.
3. Anderson, N. (2005). Relationships between practice and research in personnel selection: Does the left hand know what the right is doing? In A. Evers, N. R. Anderson, & O. Smit-Voskuyl (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection (pp. 1-24). Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Anderson, N., Herriot, P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The practitioner-researcher divide in industrial, work and organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 391-441.
5. Arthur, W. Jr., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125-53.
6. Arthur, W., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435-42.
7. Barney, J.B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32, 1231-41.
8. Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
9. Barney, J.B. (2002). Strategic management: From informed conversation to academic discipline. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 53-57.
10. Barney, J.B., & Wright, P. M. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37, 31-46.
11. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
12. Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & DeGrassi, S.W. (2009). What you see may not be what you get: A meta-analysis of the relationship between self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1394-411.
13. Bauer, T.N., & Truxillo,D. M. (2006). Applicant reaction to situational judgment tests: Research and related practical issues. In J. A. Weekley & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational Judgment Tests: Theory, Measurement and Application (pp. 233-52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital (3rd edn). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15. Bell, B. S., Wiechmann, D., & Ryan, A. M. (2006). Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 455-66.
16. Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G.V. (1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 478-94.
17. Bliese, P.D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S.W. J. Kozlowski, (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 349-81). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Bobko, P., Roth, P. L., & Potosky, D. (1999). Derivation and implications of a metaanalysis matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 52, 561-89.
19. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
20. Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the strength of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203-21.
21. Bühner, M., König, C., Pick, M., & Krumm, S. (2006). Working memory dimensions as differential predictors of the speed and error aspect of multitasking performance. Human Performance, 19(3), 253-75.
22. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
23. Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Cascio,W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1062-81.
25. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-46.
26. Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2011). Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital based competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1429-43.
27. Collins, C. J. (2007). The interactive effects of recruitment practices and product awareness on job seekers' employer knowledge and application behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 180-90.
28. Coward,W. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1990). Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 297-300.
29. Crook, T. R., Todd, S.Y., Combs, J.G.,Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen, D. J. Jr. (2011). Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443-56.
30. De Corte, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2006). Predicting adverse impact and mean criterion performance in multi-stage selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 523-37.
31. De Corte, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Combining predictors to achieve optimal trade-offs between selection quality and adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1380-93.
32. De Corte, W., Sackett, P., & Lievens, F. (in press). Designing pareto-optimal selection systems: Formalizing the decisions required for selection system development. Journal of Applied Psychology.
33. Dean, M. A., Roth, P. L., & Bobko, P. (2008). Ethnic and gender subgroup differences in assessment center ratings: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 685- 91.
34. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-11.
35. Edwards, B., & Arthur, W. (2007). An examination of factors contributing to a reduction in race-based subgroup differences on a constructed response paper-and-pencil test of scholastic achievement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 794-801.
36. Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Connelly, B. S. (2007). Personality assessment across selection and development contexts: Insights into response distortion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 386-95.
37. Engle, R.W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23.
38. Finch,D. M., Edwards, B.D., &Wallace, J. C. (2009). Multiple hurdles selection strategies: Simulating the effects on adverse impact and predictive efficiency for various predictor combinations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 318-40.
39. Foldes, H. J., Duehr, E. E., & Ones, D. S. (2008). Group differences in personality: Meta-analysis comparing five U.S. racial groups. Personnel Psychology, 61, 579-616.
40. Gibbons, A. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2009). Dimension consistency as an individual difference: A new (old) perspective on the assessment center construct validity debate. Journal of Management, 35, 1154-80.
41. Grubb, W. L., III & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The fakability of Bar-On's Emotional Quotient Inventory Short Form: Catch me if you can. Human Performance, 20, 43-59.
42. Guion, R. M. (2011). Assessment, Measurement, and Prediction for Personnel Decisions (2nd edn). London: Taylor & Francis.
43. Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 8, 135-64.
44. Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R.W. (2002). Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive performance: An investigation of the knowledgeis-power hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 339-87.
45. Hatch, N. E., & Dyer, J. H. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1115-78.
46. Hausknecht, J. P. (2010). Candidate persistence and personality test practice effects: Implications for staffing system management. Personnel Psychology, 63, 299-324.
47. Hausknecht, J. P., Halpert, J. A., Di Paolo, N.T., & Moriarty Gerrard, M.O. (2007). Retesting in selection: A meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 373-85.
48. Heggestad, E.D., Morrison, M., Reeve, C. L., & McCloy, R. A. (2006). Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: Evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 9-24.
49. Helfat, C.E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010.
50. Highhouse, S. (2008), Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 333-42.
51. Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 13-28.
52. Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The psychology of strategic management: Diversity and cognition revisited. In C. L. Cooper and I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (volume 16, pp. 65-119). Chichester: Wiley.
53. Hodgkinson, G. P. (in press). The politics of evidence-based decision making. In D. M. Rousseau, (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2011). Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), Special Issue, 1500-1516.
55. Hodgkinson, G. P., Herriot, P., & Anderson, N. (2001). Re-aligning the stakeholders in management research: Lessons from industrial, work and organizational psychology. British Journal of Management, 12, S41-8.
56. Hodgkinson, G. P., Langan-Fox, J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 1-27.
57. Hodgkinson, G. P., Sadler-Smith, E., Sinclair, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2009). More than meets the eye? Intuition and analysis revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 342-6.
58. Hodgkinson,G. P., & Sparrow, P. R. (2002). The Competent Organization:APsychological Analysis of the Strategic Management Process. Buckingham: Open University Press.
59. Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1270-85.
60. Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Stone, N. J. (2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 897-913.
61. Hunter, J. E. (1983). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisory ratings. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance Measurement and Theory (pp. 257-266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-95.
63. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-43.
64. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g Factor. Westport, CN: Praeger
65. Johnson, J.W., & Carter, G.W. (2010). Validating synthetic validation: Comparing traditional and synthetic validity coefficients. Personnel Psychology, 63, 755-95.
66. Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative metaanalysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 54-78.
67. Kim, B. H. (2011). Deception and applicant faking: Putting the pieces together. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. In G.P. Hodgkinson & J.K. Ford (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (volume 26, pp. 239-92). Chichester: Wiley.
68. Klehe, U. C., König, C. J., Richter, G. M., Kleinmann, M., & Melchers, K.G. (2008). Transparency in structured interviews. Human Performance, 21, 107-37.
69. Kleinmann, M., & Klehe, U. C. (in press). Selling oneself: Construct and criterion validity of impression management in structured interviews. Human Performance.
70. Klimoski, R., & Brickner, M. (1987). Why do assessment centers work? The puzzle of assessment center validity. Personnel Psychology, 40, 243-60.
71. Komar, S., Brown, D. J., Komar, J. A., & Robie, C. (2008). Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: A Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 140-54.
72. Kozlowski, S.W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Sciences in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.
73. Kozlowski, S.W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S.W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
74. Kuncel, N. R., & Klieger, D. M. (2007). Application patterns when applicants know the odds: Implications for selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 586-93.
75. Lance, C. E. (2008). Why assessment centers do not work the way they are supposed to. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 84-97.
76. Lance, C. E., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., & Gentry, W. A. (2008). Rater source factors represent important subcomponents of the criterion construct space, not rater bias. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 223-32.
77. Landers, R.N., Sackett, P. R., & Tuzinski, K. A. (2011). Retesting after initial failure, coaching rumors, and warnings against faking in online personality measures for selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 202-10.
78. Le, H., Oh, I., Robbins, S.B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much thing of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 113-33.
79. Le, H., Oh, I., Shaffer, J., & Schmidt, F. (2007). Implications of methodological advances for the practice of personnel selection: How practitioners benefit from metaanalysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 6-15.
80. Lievens F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company's attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56, 75-102.
81. Lievens, F., & Patterson, F. (2011). The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5): 927-40.
82. Lievens, F., Peeters, H., & Schollaert, E. (2008). Situational judgment tests: A review of recent research. Personnel Review, 37, 426-41.
83. Lievens, F., Reeve, C. L., & Heggestad, E.D. (2007). An examination of psychometric bias due to retesting on cognitive ability tests in selection settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1672-82.
84. Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2006). Video-based versus written situational judgment tests: A comparison in terms of predictive validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1181-8.
85. Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Situational judgment tests in high stakes settings: Issues and strategies with generating alternate forms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1043-55.
86. Lievens, F., Sackett, P. R., & Buyse, T. (2009). The effects of response instructions on situational judgment test performance and validity in a high-stakes context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1095-101.
87. Lievens, F., Tett, R. P., & Schleicher,D. J. (2009). Assessment centers at the crossroads: Toward a reconceptualization of assessment center exercises. In J. J. Martocchio & H. Liao (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (pp. 99-152). Bingley, UK: JAI Press.
88. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-76.
89. McCarthy, J., Hrabluik, C., & Jelley, R.B. (2009). Progression through the ranks: Assessing employee reactions to high-stakes employment testing. Personnel Psychology, 62(4), 793-832.
90. McCarthy, J. M., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Campion, M. A. (2010). Are highly structured job interviews resistant to demographic similarity effects?. Personnel Psychology, 63, 325-59.
91. McDaniel, M. A., Hartman, N. S., Whetzel, D. L., & Grubb, W. L., III (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 63-91.
92. Molloy, J., Chadwick, C., Ployhart, R. E., & Golden, S. (2011). Making "intangibles" tangible: A cross-disciplinary review and multilevel framework for future research. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1496-518.
93. Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R.L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007a). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683-729.
94. Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R.L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007b). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 1029-49.
95. Morgeson, F. P., & Dierdorff, E. C. (2011). Work analysis: From technique to theory. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (volume 2, pp. 3-41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
96. Morgeson, F. P., Dierdorff, E. C., & Hmurovic, J. L. (2010). Work design in situ: Understanding the role of occupational and organizational context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 351-60.
97. Motowidlo, S. J., & Beier, M. E. (2010). The effects of implicit trait policies and relevant job experience on scoring keys for a situational judgment test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 321-33.
98. Motowidlo, S. J., Hooper, A. C., & Jackson, H. L. (2006a). Implicit policies about relations between personality traits and behavioral effectiveness in situational judgment items. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 749-61.
99. Motowidlo, S. J., Hooper, A. C., & Jackson, H. L. (2006b). A theoretical basis for situational judgment tests. In J. Weekley & R. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational Judgment Tests (pp. 57-81). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
100. Mumford, T.V., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Campion, M. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (2008). The team role test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 250-67.
101. Murphy, K. A. (1986). When your top choice turns you down: Effect of rejected job offers on the utility of selection tests. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 133-8.
102. Murphy, K. R. (1996). Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
103. Murphy, K. R., Dzieweczynksi, J. L., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1018-31.
104. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
105. Newman, D. A., Jacobs, R. R., & Bartram, D. (2007). Choosing the best method for local validity estimation: Relative accuracy of meta-analysis versus a local study versus Bayes analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1394-13.
106. Newman, D. A., & Lyon, J. S. (2009). Recruitment efforts to reduce adverse impact: Targeted recruiting for personality, cognitive ability, and diversity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 298-317.
107. Oh, I. S., & Berry, C. M. (2009). The Five-Factor Model of personality and managerial performance: Validity gains through the use of 360 degree performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1498-513.
108. Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C, & Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995-1027.
109. Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Salgado, J. F. (2010). Cognitive abilities. In J. L. Farr & N.T. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 255-67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
110. Outtz, J. L. (2010). Adverse Impact: Implications for Organizational Staffing and High Stakes Selection. New York: Taylor & Francis.
111. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (3rd edn). New York: Oxford University Press.
112. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-91.
113. Ployhart, R. E. (2006). Staffing in the 21st century: New challenges and strategic opportunities. Journal of Management, 32, 868-97.
114. Ployhart, R. E. (in press). Ensuring sustainable organizational effectiveness through the acquisition of human capital. In S.W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Industrial/Organizational Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
115. Ployhart, R. E., & Holtz, B. C. (2008). The diversity-validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racio-ethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Personnel Psychology, 61, 153-72.
116. Ployhart, R. E., & MacKenzie, W. I. (2010). Situational judgment tests. In S. Zedeck (Eds.), The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 237-52).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
117. Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36, 127-50.
118. Ployhart, R. E.,&Schneider, B. (2002). A multilevel perspective on personnel selection: Implications for selection system design, assessment, and construct validation. In F. J. Dansereau & F. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in Multi-level Issues: The Many Faces of Multi-level Issues (volume 1, pp. 95-140). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
119. Ployhart, R. E., Schneider, B., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Staffing Organizations: Contemporary Practice and Theory (3rd edn). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
120. Ployhart, R. E., Van Iddekinge, C., & MacKenzie, W. (2011). Acquiring and developing human capital in service contexts: The interconnectedness of human capital resources. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 353-68.
121. Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., & Baughman, K. (2006). The structure and function of human capital emergence: A multilevel examination of the ASA model. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 661-77.
122. Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., & Ramsey, J. (2009). The consequences of human resource stocks and flows: A longitudinal examination of unit service orientation and unit effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 996-1015.
123. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.
124. Potosky, D. (2008). A conceptual framework for the role of the administration medium in the personnel assessment process. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 629-48.
125. Pulakos, E.D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612-24.
126. Roth, P. L., Bevier, C. A., Bobko, P., Switzer, F. S., III, & Tyler, P. (2001). Ethnic group differences in cognitive ability in employment and educational settings: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 54, 297-330.
127. Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., McFarland, L.A, & Buster, M. (2008). Work sample tests in personnel selection: A meta-analysis of black-white differences in overall and exercise scores. Personnel Psychology, 61, 637-62.
128. Rousseau, D. (1985) Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and crosslevel perspectives. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (volume 7, pp. 1-37). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
129. Rynes, S. L., Brown, K.G., & Colbert, A. E. (2002). Seven misconceptions about human resource practices: Research findings versus practitioner beliefs. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 92-103.
130. Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2008). High-stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. American Psychologist, 63, 215-27.
131. Sackett, P. R., De Corte, W., & Lievens, F. (2010). Decision-aids for addressing the validity-adverse impact trade-off. In J. Outtz (Eds.), Adverse Impact: Implications for Organizational Staffing and High Stakes Selection (pp. 323-46). New York: Taylor & Francis.
132. Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 419-50.
133. Sackett, P. R., Lievens, F., Berry, C. M., & Landers, R.N. (2007). A cautionary note on range restriction and predictor intercorrelations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 538-44.
134. Sackett, P. R., & Wilk, S. L. (1994). Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in pre-employment testing. American Psychologist, 49(11), 929-54.
135. Schleicher, D. J., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2010). If at first you don't succeed, try, try again: Understanding race, gender, and age differences in retesting score improvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 603-17.
136. Schleicher, D. J., Venkataramani, C. H., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2006). So you didn't get the job. Now what are you thinking? Examining opportunity-toperform fairness perceptions. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 559-90.
137. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-74.
138. Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., Oh, I., & Shaffer, J. (2007). General mental ability, job performance, and red herrings: Responses to Osterman, Hauser, and Schmitt. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 64-76.
139. Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I. S., & Le, H. (2006). Increasing the accuracy of corrections for range restriction: Implications for selection procedure validities and other research results. Personnel Psychology, 59, 281-305.
140. Schmidt, F. L., Shaffer, J. A., & Oh, I. (2008). Increased accuracy for range restriction corrections: Implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 827-68.
141. Schmitt, D., & Chan, N. (1998). Personnel Selection. Berkeley, CA: Sage.
142. Schmitt, N. (2004). Beyond the Big Five: Increases in understanding and practical utility. Human Performance, 17, 347-57.
143. Schmitt, N. (2007). The value of personnel selection: Reflections on some remarkable claims. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 19-23.
144. Schmitt, N., Arnold, J.D., & Nieminen, L. R.G. (2010). Validation strategies for primary studies. In J.L. Farr & N.T. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 51-71). New York: Psychology Press.
145. Schmitt, N., Cortina, J. M., Ingerick, M. J., & Wiechmann, D. (2003). Personnel selection and employee performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (volume 12, pp. 77-105). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
146. Schmitt, N., Keeney, J., Oswald, F. L., Pleskac, T. J., Billington, A. Q., Sinha, R., & Zorzie, M. (2009). Prediction of four-year college student performance using cognitive and noncognitive predictors and the impact on demographic status of admitted students. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1479-97.
147. Schmitt, N., & Oswald, F. L. (2006). The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 613-21.
148. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-53.
149. Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R.D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273-91.
150. Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Drasgow, F., & Williams, B. A. (2006). Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 25-39.
151. Stewart, G. L., Dustin, S. L., Barrick, M., & Darnold, T. C. (2008). Exploring the handshake in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1139-46.
152. Tett, R. P., & Christiansen, N.D. (2007). Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). Personnel Psychology, 60, 967-93.
153. Tippins, N.T. (2009). Internet alternatives to traditional proctored testing: Where are we now? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(1), 2-10.
154. Tippins, N.T., Beaty, J., Drasgow, F., Gibson, W. M., Pearlman, K., Segall, D.O., & Shepherd,W. (2006). Unproctored Internet testing in employment settings. Personnel Psychology, 59, 189-225.
155. Tippins, N., & Farr, J. (2010). The Handbook of Employee Selection. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
156. Turban, D.B., Stevens, C. K., & Lee, F. K. (2009). Effects of conscientiousness and extraversion on new labor market entrants' job search: The mediating role of metacognitive activities and positive emotions. Personnel Psychology, 62, 553-73.
157. Van Iddekinge C. H., Ferris G. R., Perrewe P.L., Perryman A. A., Blass F. R., & Heetderks T.D. (2009). Effects of selection and training on unit-level performance over time: A latent growth modelling approach, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 829-43.
158. Van Iddekinge, C. H., McFarland, L. A., & Raymark, P. H. (2007). Antecedents of impression management use and effectiveness in a structured interview. Journal of Management, 5, 752-73.
159. Van Iddekinge, C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2008). Developments in the criterion-related validation of selection procedures: A critical review and recommendations for practice. Personnel Psychology, 61, 871-925.
160. Van Iddekinge, C. H., Putka, D. J., & Campbell, J. P. (2010). Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: The validity of an Internet-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 13-33.
161. Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Raymark, P. H., & Odle-Dusseau, H.N. (in press). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology (e-publication).
162. Vasilopoulos, N. L., Cucina, J. M., Dyomina, N.V., Morewitz, C. L., & Reilly, R. R. (2006). Forced-choice personality tests: A measure of personality or cognitive ability? Human Performance, 19, 175-99.
163. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2010). Employee selection in times of change. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25(e-publication).
164. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-80.
165. Wilson, M. A., Harvey, R. J., Alliger, G., & Bennett, W. Jr. (in press). The Handbook of Work Analysis: The Methods, Systems, Applications and Science of Work Measurement in Organizations. New York: Routledge.