Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research

Human Performance

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 99-109

  Borman, Walter C ^a   Motowidlo, Stephan J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042970758     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
3. Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee "citizenship." Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.
4. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Borman, W. C., Motowidlo, S. J., Rose, S. R., & Hanser, L. M. (1985). Development of a model of soldier effectiveness (Institute Report #95). Minneapolis, MN: Personnel Decisions Research Institutes.
6. Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168-177.
7. Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710-725.
8. Campbell, J. P. (1990). An overview of the army selection and classification project (Project A). Personnel Psychology, 43, 231-239.
9. Conway, J. M. (1996). Additional construct validity evidence for the task-contextual performance distinction. Human Performance, 9, 309-329.
10. Ferris, G. R., Judge, T. A., Rowland, K. M., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (1994). Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: Test of a model. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 58, 101-135.
11. George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310-329.
12. Graham, J. W. (1986, August). Organizational citizenship informed by political theory. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago.
13. Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. T. (1989). How to measure employee reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 273-279.
14. Hogan, R. T., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychologist, 51, 469-477.
15. Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (in press). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity/bandwidth tradeoff. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17.
16. Kamp, J. O., & Hough, L. M. (1988). Utility of temperament for predicting job performance. In L. M. Hough (Ed.), Literature review: Utility of temperament, biodata, and interest assessment for predicting job performance (ARI Research Note 88-02). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
17. Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131-46.
18. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
19. Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1983). The measurement of work performance: Methods, theory, and applications. New York: Academic.
20. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991). Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 50, 123-150.
21. Midili, A. R., & Penner, L. A. (1995, August). Dispositional and environmental influences on organizational citizenship behavior. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
22. Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-80.
23. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1987). Whistle blowers in organizations: Dissidents or reformers? In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 321-368). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
24. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
25. Penner, L. A., Fritzsche, B. A., Craiger, J. P., & Friefield, T. R. (1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In J. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 147-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Schneider, R. J., Hough, L. M., & Dunnette, M. D. (in press). Broadsided by broad traits or how to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17.
27. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
28. Tett, R. P, Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
29. Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Evidence for two factors of contextual performance: Job dedication and interpersonal facilitation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 525-531.
30. Werner, J. M. (1994). Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extra-role behaviors on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 98-107.