Too Much of a Good Thing: Curvilinear Relationships Between Personality Traits and Job Performance

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 113-133

  Le, Huy ^a   Oh, In Sue ^b   Robbins, Steven B ^c   Ilies, Remus ^d   Holland, Ed ^e   Westrick, Paul ^f  

^a TUI University   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c American College Testing Incorporated   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Iowa Department of Education   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Curvilinear relationship; Faking; Performance; Personality; Selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMOTION; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

EMOTIONS; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79251507617     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021016     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Talent Assessment user and technical guide 2008, ACT, Inc., Author, Iowa City, IA, Retrieved from http://act.org/workkeys/assess/pdf/TalentUserGuide.pdf.
2. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
3. Barrick M.R., Mount M.K. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 1991, 44:1-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.
4. Barrick M.R., Mount M.K. Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance 2005, 18:359-372. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1804_3.
5. Barrick M.R., Mount M.K., Judge T.A. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2001, 9:9-30. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00160.
6. Barrick M.R., Mount M.K., Strauss J.P. Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993, 78:715-722. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.715.
7. Benson M.J., Campbell J.P. To be, or not to be, linear: An expanded representation of personality and its relationship to leadership performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2007, 15:232-249. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00384.x.
8. Berry C.M., Ones D.S., Sackett P.R. Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92:410-424. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410.
9. Berry C.M., Sackett P.R. Faking in personnel selection: Tradeoffs in performance versus fairness resulting from two cut-score strategies. Personnel Psychology 2009, 62:833-863. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01159.x.
10. Birkeland S.A., Manson T.M., Kisamore J.L., Brannick M.T., Smith M.A. A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2006, 14:317-335.
11. Bliese P.D., Hanges P.J. Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods 2004, 7:400-417. doi: 10.1177/1094428104268542.
12. Borman W.C., Motowidlo S.J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel selection in organizations 1993, 71-98. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.).
13. Boudreau J.W. Utility analysis for decisions in human resource management. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 1991, 2:621-745. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA. M.D. Dunnette, L.M. Hough (Eds.).
14. Burch G.St.J., Anderson N. Personality as a predictor of work-related behavior and performance: Recent advances and directions for future research. International review of industrial and organizational psychology 2008, 23:261-305. Wiley, Chichester, England. G.P. Hodgkinson, J.K. Ford (Eds.).
15. Cain P.S., Treiman D.J. The Dictionary of occupational titles as a source of occupational data. American Sociological Review 1981, 46:253-278. doi: 10.2307/2095059.
16. Campbell J.P., McCloy R.A., Oppler S.H., Sager C.E. A theory of performance. Personnel selection in organizations 1993, 35-70. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.).
17. Conard M., Matthews R. Modeling the stress process: Personality eclipses dysfunctional cognitions and workload in predicting stress. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 44:171-181. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.023.
18. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences 1992, 13:653-665. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I.
19. Costa P.T., Widiger T.A. Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality 2002, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, doi: 10.1037/10423-000. 2nd ed.
20. Coward W.M., Sackett P.R. Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. Journal of Applied Psychology 1990, 75:297-300. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.297.
21. Cropanzano R., Rupp D.E., Byrne Z.S. The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:160-169. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.160.
22. Cucina J.M., Vasilopoulos N.L. Nonlinear personality-performance relationships and the spurious moderating effects of traitedness. Journal of Personality 2005, 73:227-260. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00309.x.
23. Dalal R.S. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:1241-1255. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241.
24. Day D.V., Silverman S.B. Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology 1989, 42:25-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb01549.x.
25. Dudley N.M., Orvis K.A., Lebiecki J.E., Cortina J.M. A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006, 91:40-57. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.40.
26. Easterbrook J.A. Emotion, cue utilization, and organization of behavior. Psychological Review 1959, 66:183-201. doi: 10.1037/h0047707.
27. Eisenberg N., Fabes R.A., Guthrie I.K., Reiser M. Dispositional emotionality and regulation: Their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 78:136-157. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.136.
28. Ellingson J.E., Sackett P.R., Hough L.M. Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 1999, 84:155-166. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.155.
29. Ellingson J.E., Smith D.B., Sackett P.R. Investigating the influence of social desirability on personality factor structure. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:122-133. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.122.
30. Endler N.S., Magnusson D. Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin 1976, 83:956-974. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.956.
31. Eysenck M.W. Anxiety and cognition: Theory and research. Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety 1989, 437-465. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. T. Archer, L.G. Nilsson (Eds.).
32. Fox S., Spector P.E., Miles D. Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational injustice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2001, 59:291-309. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1803.
33. Gallagher D.J. Extraversion, neuroticism, and appraisal of stressful academic events. Personality and Individual Differences 1990, 11:1053-1057. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(90)90133-C.
34. Gellatly I.R. Conscientiousness and task performance: Test of a cognitive process model. Journal of Applied Psychology 1996, 81:474-482. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.474.
35. George J.M. Personality, affect, and behaviors in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 1990, 75:107-116. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.107.
36. Gottfredson L.S. Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence 1997, 24:79-132. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90014-3.
37. Grebner S., Semmer K.K., Lo Faso L., Gut S., Kalin W., Elfering A. Working conditions, well-being, and job-related attitudes among call centre agents. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 2003, 12:341-365. doi: 10.1080/13594320344000192.
38. Guion R.M., Gottier R.F. Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology 1965, 18:135-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1965.tb00273.x.
39. Hancock P.A., Ganey H.C. From the inverted-U to the extended-U: The evolution of a law of psychology. Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments 2003, 7:5-14.
40. Hawk J. Linearity of criterion-GATB aptitude relationships. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 1970, 2:249-251.
41. Hofmann D.A., Griffin M.A., Gavin M.B. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations 2000, 467-511. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.).
42. Hogan J., Barrett P., Hogan R. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92:1270-1285. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1270.
43. Hogan R. In defense of personality measurement: New wine for old whiners. Human Performance 2005, 18:331-341. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1804_1.
44. Hogan R., Hogan J. Assessing leadership: A view of the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2001, 9:40-51. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00162.
45. Hough L.M. Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance 1998, 11:209-244. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1102&3_6.
46. Hunter J.E. Test validation for 12,000 jobs: An application of job classification and validity generalization analysis to the General Aptitude Test Battery (USES Test Research Report No. 45) 1983, U.S. Employment Service, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.
47. Hunter J.E., Schmidt F.L., Le H. Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006, 91:594-612. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594.
48. Hurtz G.M., Donovan J.J. Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 2000, 85:869-879. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.869.
49. Ilies R., Fulmer I.S., Spitzmuller M., Johnson M.D. Personality and citizenship behavior: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:945-959. doi: 10.1037/a0013329.
50. John O.P., Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality 1999, 102-138. Guilford Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. L.A. Pervin, O.P. John (Eds.).
51. Judge T.A., Ilies R. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002, 87:797-807. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.797.
52. Judge T.A., LePine J.A. The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection and team configuration. Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms 2007, 332-355. Elgar, Cheltenham, England. J. Langan-Fox, C. Cooper, R. Klimoski (Eds.).
53. Kanfer R., Ackerman P.L. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74:657-690. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.657.
54. Kanfer R., Heggestad E.D. Motivational traits and skills: A person-centered approach to work motivation. Research in organizational behavior 1997, 19:1-57. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. L.L. Cummings, B.M. Staw (Eds.).
55. Kuhl J., Koch B. Motivational determinants of motor performance: The hidden second task. Psychological Research 1984, 46:143-153. doi: 10.1007/BF00308599.
56. LaHuis D.M., Martin N.R., Avis J.M. Investigating nonlinear conscientiousness-job performance relations for clerical employees. Human Performance 2005, 18:199-212. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1803_1.
57. Lei M., Lomax R.G. The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 2005, 12:1-27. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1201_1.
58. LePine J.A., Colquitt J.A., Erez A. Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology 2000, 53:563-593. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x.
59. Martocchio J.J., Judge T.A. Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:764-773. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.764.
60. Michielsen H.J., Croon M.A., Willemsen T.M., De Vries J., Van Heck G.L. Which constructs can predict emotional exhaustion in a working population? A study into its determinants. Stress and Health 2007, 23:121-130. doi: 10.1002/smi.1129.
61. Mischel W., Shoda Y. Toward a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the cognitive-affective processing system. Handbook of personality: Theory and research 2008, 208-241. Guilford Press, New York, NY. 3rd ed. O.P. John, R.W. Robins, L.A. Pervin (Eds.).
62. Morgeson F.P., Campion M.A., Dipboye R.L., Hollenbeck J.R., Murphy K., Schmitt N. Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology 2007, 60:683-729. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.x.
63. Moscoso S., Salgado J.F. " Dark Side" personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2004, 12:356-362. doi: 10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00290.x.
64. Mount M.K., Barrick M.R., Scullen S.M., Rounds J. Higher-order dimensions of the Big Five personality traits and the Big Six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology 2005, 58:447-478. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00468.x.
65. Mount M.K., Oh I., Burns M. Incremental validity of perceptual speed and accuracy over general mental ability. Personnel Psychology 2008, 61:113-139. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00107.x.
66. Murphy K.R. Individual differences and behavior in organizations: Much more than g. Individual differences and behavior in organizations 1996, 3-30. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. K. Murphy (Ed.).
67. Murphy K.R., Dzieweczynski J.L. Why don't measures of broad dimensions of personality perform better as predictors of job performance?. Human Performance 2005, 18:343-357. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1804_2.
68. Nettle D. The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist 2006, 61:622-631. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622.
69. Oh I.-S., Berry C.M. The five-factor model of personality and managerial performance: Validity gains through the use of 360 degree performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:1498-1513. doi: 10.1037/a0017221.
70. Ones, D. S. (1993). The construct of integrity tests (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa.
71. Ones D.S., Viswesvaran C. Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for personality scales: Implications for range-restriction corrections in validation research. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:570-577. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.570.
72. Ones D.S., Viswesvaran C., Dilchert S. Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions. Human Performance 2005, 18:389-404. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1804_5.
73. Ones D.S., Viswesvaran C., Dilchert S., Judge T.A. In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology 2007, 60:995-1027. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00099.x.
74. Ones D.S., Viswesvaran C., Reiss A.D. Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology 1996, 81:660-679. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.660.
75. Ones D.S., Viswesvaran C., Schmidt F.L. Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993, 78:679-703. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.679.
76. Organ D.W., Ryan K. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology 1995, 48:775-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x.
77. Oswald F., Campbell J., McCloy R., Rivkin D., Lewis P. Stratifying occupational units by specific vocational preparation 1999, National Center for O*NET Development, Raleigh, NC.
78. Pearlman K. Job families: A review and discussion of their implication for personnel selection. Psychological Bulletin 1980, 87:1-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.1.
79. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models applications and data analysis methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
80. Robbins S.B., Allen J., Casillas A., Peterson C.H., Le H. Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social, and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 98:598-616. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.598.
81. Robbins S.B., Oh I., Le H., Button C. Intervention effects on college performance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: Integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology 2009, 94:1163-1184. doi: 10.1037/a0015738.
82. Robie C., Ryan A.M. Effects of nonlinearity and heteroscedasticity on the validity of conscientiousness in predicting overall job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 1999, 7:157-169. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00115.
83. Roos P.A., Treiman D.J. Worker functions and worker traits for the 1970 U.S. Census classification. Work, job, and occupations: A critical review of the Dictionary of occupational titles 1980, 336-389. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. A.R. Miller, D.J. Treiman, P.S. Cain, P.A. Roos (Eds.).
84. Rotundo M., Sackett P.R. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002, 87:66-80. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66.
85. Sackett P.R. The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2002, 10:5-11. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00189.
86. Sackett P.R., Lievens F. Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:419-450. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093716.
87. Sackett P.R., Wanek J.E. New development in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology 1996, 49:787-829. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02450.x.
88. Salgado J.F. The five-factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:30-43. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.30.
89. Salgado J.F. The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2002, 10:117-125. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00198.
90. Schmidt F., Hunter J. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:262-274. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262.
91. Schmidt F.L., Shaffer J.A., Oh I.-S. Increased accuracy of range restriction corrections: Implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance. Personnel Psychology 2008, 61:827-868. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00132.x.
92. Schmit M.J., Ryan A.M. The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993, 78:966-974. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.966.
93. Sturman M.C., Cheramie R.A., Cashen L.H. The impact of job complexity and performance measurement on the temporal consistency, stability, and test-retest reliability of employee job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:269-283. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.269.
94. Teigen K.H. Yerkes-Dodson: A law for all seasons. Theory & Psychology 1994, 4:525-547. doi: 10.1177/0959354394044004.
95. Tett R.P. Is Conscientiousness always positively related to job performance?. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 1998, 36:24-29.
96. Tett R.P., Christiansen N.D. Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). Personnel Psychology 2007, 60:967-993. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00098.x.
97. Tett R.P., Jackson D.N., Rothstein M. Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology 1991, 44:703-742.
98. Vasilopoulos N.L., Cucina J.M., Dyomina N.V., Morewitz C.L., Reilly R.R. Forced-choice personality tests: A measure of personality and cognitive ability?. Human Performance 2006, 19:175-199. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1903_1.
99. Vasilopoulos N.L., Cucina J.M., Hunter A.E. Personality and training proficiency: Issues of bandwidth-fidelity and curvilinearity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 2007, 80:109-131. doi: 10.1348/096317906X102114.
100. Viswesvaran C., Ones D.S. Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2000, 8:216-226. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00151.
101. Viswesvaran C., Schmidt F.L., Ones D.S. The moderating influence of job performance dimensions on convergence of supervisory and peer ratings of job performance: Unconfounding construct-level convergence and rating difficulty. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002, 87:345-354. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.345.
102. Viswesvaran C., Schmidt F.L., Ones D.S. Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:108-131. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108.
103. Weisberg S. Applied linear regression 2005, Wiley, New York, NY, doi: 10.1002/0471704091. 3rd ed.
104. Yang J., Diefendorff J.M. The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A diary study in Hong Kong. Personnel Psychology 2009, 62:259-295. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01138.x.
105. Yerkes R.M., Dodson J.D. The relation of strengths of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology 1908, 18:459-482. doi: 10.1002/cne.920180503.