Implicit policies about relations between personality traits and behavioral effectiveness in situational judgment items

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 749-761

  Motowidlo, Stephan J ^a,b   Hooper, Amy C ^a   Jackson, Hannah L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accentuation effect; Implicit trait policy; Personality; Situational judgment test

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ATTITUDE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33746409631     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.749     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bornstein, R. F. (2002). A process dissociation approach to objective-projective test score interrelationships. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 47-68.
2. Costa, P. T., & McRae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual Supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
3. Dunning, D., & Hayes, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 213-229.
4. Eiser, J. R. (Ed.). (1984). Attitudinal judgment. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Eiser, J. R., & van der Pligt, J. (1984). Accentuation theory, polarization, and the judgment of attitude statements. In J. R. Eiser (Ed.), Attitudinal judgment (pp. 43-63). New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
7. Gosling, S. D., Renlfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
8. Hamilton. D. L. (1968). Personality attributes associated with extreme response style. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 192-203.
9. Hovland, C. I., & Sherif, M. (1952). Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: Item displacement in Thurstone scales. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 822-832.
10. James, L. R. (1998). Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 131-163.
11. James, L. R., McIntyre, M. D., Glisson, C. A., Bowler, J. L., & Mitchell. T. R. (2004). The conditional reasoning measurement system for aggression: An overview. Human Performance, 17, 271-295.
12. Lambert, A. J., & Wedell, D. H. (1991). The self and social judgment effects of affective reaction and "own position" on judgments of unambiguous and ambiguous information about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 884-897.
13. LePine, J. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2005). The dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of rater's personality and self-perceptions. Unpublished manuscript.
14. Lewicki, P. (1983). Self-image bias in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 384-393.
15. Markus. H., Smith. J., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494-1512.
16. McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
17. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality. New York: Guilford Press.
18. McDaniel, M. A., Morgeson, F. P., Finnegan, E. D., Campion, M. A., & Braverman. E. P. (2001). Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 730-740.
19. McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2001). Situational judgment tests: A review of practice and constructs assessed. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 103-113.
20. Motowidlo, S. J. (2003). Job performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley.
21. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.
22. Motowidlo, S. J., Hooper, A. C., & Jackson, H. L. (2006). A theoretical basis for situational judgment tests. In J. A. Weekley & R. E. Ployhart (Eds.), Situational judgment tests. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Sherman, S. J., Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., & Agostinelli, G. (1984). The role of evaluation and similarity principles in the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1244-1262.
24. Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgment of magnitude. Psychological Review, 64, 192-204.
25. Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230-250.