More than meets the eye? Intuition and analysis revisited

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 342-346

  Hodgkinson, Gerard P ^a   Sadler Smith, Eugene ^b   Sinclair, Marta ^c   Ashkanasy, Neal M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cognitive style; Experientiality and rationality; Information processing; Intuition and analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349118185     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allinson C.W., and Hayes J. The Cognitive Style Index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies 33 (1996) 119-135
2. Armstrong S., Allinson C.W., and Hayes G. The effects of cognitive style on research supervision: A study of student-supervisor dyads in management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education 3 (2004) 41-63
3. Cacioppo J.T., and Petty R.E. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1982) 116-131
4. Comrey A.L. Common methodological problems in factor analytical studies. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology 46 (1978) 648-659
5. Dane E., and Pratt M.G. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision-making. Academy of Management Review 32 (2007) 33-54
6. Epstein S. Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In: Pervin L. (Ed). Handbook of personality theory and research (1990), Guilford Press, New York 165-192
7. Epstein S., Pacini R., Denes-Raj V., and Heier H. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1996) 390-405
8. Epstein S., Pacini R., and Norris P. The Rational-Experiential Inventory (1998), University of Massachusetts at Amherst (unpublished inventory)
9. Hair J.F., Black B., Babin B., Anderson R.E., and Tatham R.L. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. (2005), Prentice-Hall, New York
10. Hodgkinson G.P., and Healey M.P. Cognition in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology 59 (2008) 387-417
11. Hodgkinson G.P., Langan-Fox J., and Sadler-Smith E. Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology 99 (2008) 1-27
12. Hodgkinson G.P., and Sadler-Smith E. Complex or unitary? A critique and empirical reassessment of the Allinson-Hayes Cognitive Style Index. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 76 (2003) 243-268
13. Hodgkinson G.P., and Sadler-Smith E. Reflections on reflections...on the nature of intuition, analysis and the construct validity of the Cognitive Style Index. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 76 (2003) 279-281
14. Hurley A.E., Scanduar T., Schriesheim C.A., Brannick M.T., Seers A., Vendenberg R.J., et al. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior 18 (1997) 667-683
15. Kagan J., and Kogan N. Individual variation in cognitive processes. In: Mussen P.H. (Ed). Carmichael's manual of child psychology (1970), Wiley, New York 1273-1365
16. Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing (1993), Routledge, London
17. Lieberman M.D. Social cognitive neuroscience. A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology 58 (2007) 259-289
18. Pacini R., and Epstein S. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 972-987
19. Sadler-Smith E., Spicer D.P., and Tsang F. Validity of the Cognitive Style Index: Replication and extension. British Journal of Management 11 (2000) 175-181
20. Sinclair M., and Ashkanasy N.M. Intuition: Myth or a decision-making tool. Management Learning 36 (2005) 353-370
21. Zwick W.R., and Velicer W.F. Factors influencing four rules for determining the number of components to retain. Multivariate Behavioral Research 17 (1982) 253-269