Derivation and implications of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 561-589

  Bobko, Philip ^a   Roth, Philip L ^b   Potosky, Denise ^b  

^a GETTYSBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033196662     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00172.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. American Psychological Association, (1994). Publication manual (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Barrick M, Mount M. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis, PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 44, 1-26.
3. BeVier C, Roth P, Bobko P, Switzer F, Tyler P. (1998). Racial differences in cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Clemson University.
4. Bobko P, Stone-Romero. (1998). Meta-analysis is another useful tool but it is not a panacea. In Ferris J (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 16 (pp. 359-397). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Borman W, Motowidlo S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt N, Borman W (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Brown B, Campion M. (1994). Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters' perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 897-908.
7. Childs A, Klimoski R. (1986). Successfully predicting career success: An application of the biographical inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 3-8.
8. Conway J, Peneno G. (in press). Comparing structured interview question types: Construct validity and applicant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology.
9. Dalessio A, Silverhart T. (1994). Combining biodata test and interview information: Predicting decisions and performance criteria. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 47, 303-315.
10. Dreher G, Maurer S. (1982). Assessing the employment interview: Deficiencies associated with the existing domain of validity coefficients. In Eder R, Ferris G (Eds.), The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 247-268). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Ford J, Kraiger K, Schechtman S. (1986). Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 330-337.
12. Gandy J, Dye D, MacLane C. (1994). Federal government selection: The individual achievement record. In Stokes G, Mumford M, Owens W (Eds.), Biodata handbook Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (pp. 275-310). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
13. Gottfredson L. (1988). Reconsidering fairness: A matter of social and ethical priorities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 293-319.
14. Hattrup K, Rock J, Scalia C. (1997), The effects of varying conceptualizations of job performance on adverse impact, minority hiring, and predicted performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 656-664.
15. Hoffman C, Thornton G. (1997). Examining selection utility where competing predictors differ in adverse impact PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 50, 455-470.
16. Hough L. (1998). Personality at work: Issues and evidence. In Hakel M (Ed.), Beyond multiple choice: Evaluating alternatives to traditional testing for selection (pp. 131-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Huffcutt A, Arthur W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184-190.
18. Huffcutt A, Roth P. (1996, April). A meta-analysis of adverse impact in the employment interview. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
19. Huffcutt A, Roth P. (1998). Racial group differences in interview evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 179-189.
20. Huffcutt A, Roth P, McDaniel M. (1996). A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 459-473.
21. Hunter J, Hunter R. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
22. Hunter J, Schmidt F. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting for error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Mael F. (1991). A conceptual rationale for the domain and attributes of biodata items. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 44, 763-791.
24. McDaniel M, Whetzel D, Schmidt F, Maurer S. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599-616.
25. McHenry J, Hough L, Toquam J, Hanson M, Ashworth S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 43, 335-354.
26. Mount M, Barrick M. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 153-200.
27. Murphy K, Shiarella H. (1997). Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests: Multivariate frameworks for studying test validity. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 50, 823-854.
28. Ones D, Viswesvaran C. (1998). Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests: Results across four large-scale job applicant data sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35-42.
29. Pulakos E, Schmitt N. (1995). Experience based and situational interview questions: Studies of validity. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 48, 289-308.
30. Pulakos E, Schmitt N. (1996). An evaluation of two strategies for reducing adverse impact and their effects on criterion-related validity. Human Performance, 9, 241-258.
31. Reilly R, Chao G. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 35, 1-62.
32. Roth P, Bobko P. (1997). A research agenda for multi-attribute utility analysis in human resource management Human Resource Management Review, 7, 341-368.
33. Rothstein H, Schmidt F, Erwin F, Owens W, Sparks P. (1990). Biographical data in employment selection: Can validities be made generalizable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 175-184.
34. Ryan A, Ployhart R, Friedel L. (1998). Using personality testing to reduce adverse impact: A cautionary note. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 298-307.
35. Sackett P, DuBois C, Noe A. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 263-267.
36. Sackett P, Ellingson J. (1997). The effects of forming multi-predictor compostes on group differences and adverse impact. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOOY, 50, 707-721.
37. Sackett P, Roth L. (1996). Multi-stage selection strategies: A Monte Carlo investigation of effects on performance and minority hiring. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 49, 1-18.
38. Schmidt F, Hunter J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
39. Schmitt N, Clause C, Pulakos E. (1996). Subgroup differences associated with different measures of some common job relevant constructs. In Cooper C, Robertson I (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 115-140). New York: Wiley.
40. Schmitt N, Gooding R, Noe R, Kirsch M. (1984). Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 37, 407-422.
41. Schmitt N, Rogers W, Chan D, Sheppard L, Jennings D. (1997). Adverse impact and predictive efficiency of various predictor combinations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 717-730.
42. Smith C, Organ D, Near J. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
43. Tett R, Jackson D, Rothstein M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 44, 703-742.
44. Viswesvaran C, Ones D. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analyses and structural equation modeling. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 48, 865-886.
45. Waldman D, Avolio B. (1991). Race effects in performance evaluations: Controlling for ability, education, and experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 897-901.
46. Wanous J, Sullivan S, Malinak J. (1989). The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 259-264.
47. Wiesner W, Cronshaw S. (1988). The moderating impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 275-290.
48. Wright P, Lichtenfels P, Pursell E. (1989). The structured interview: Additional studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 191-199.