Introduction to haptics for neurosurgeons

Neurosurgery

Volumn 72, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2013, Pages

  L'Orsa, Rachael ^a   MacNab, Chris J B ^a   Tavakoli, Mahdi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Haptic interfaces; Haptics; Neurosurgical robots; Robot control; Teleoperation; Telerobotics; Telesurgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROL SYSTEM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HAPTIC INTERFACE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEURONAVIGATION; NEUROSURGEON; NEUROSURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; ROBOTICS; SENSOR; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TELESURGERY; TREATMENT PLANNING; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION; WORKLOAD;

COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; FEEDBACK; HAND; HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; NEUROSURGERY; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TELEMEDICINE; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84872071742     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318273a1a3     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn Psychol. 1987;19(3):342-368.
2. Hannaford B, Okamura A. Haptics. In: Siciliano B, Khatib O, eds. Handbook of Robotics. New York, NY: Springer; 2008.
3. Hokayem P, Spong M. Bilateral teleoperation: an historical survey. Automatica. 2006;42(12):2035-2057. (Pubitemid 44647199)
4. Malone HR, Syed ON, Downes MS, D'Ambrosio AL, Quest DO, Kaiser MG. Simulation in neurosurgery: a review of computer-based simulation environments and their surgical applications. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(4):1105-1116.
5. Zamorano L, Li Q, Jain S, Kaur G. Robotics in neurosurgery: state of the art and future technological challenges. Int J Med Robot. 2004;1(1):7-22.
6. Delorme S, Laroche D, Diraddo R, F Del Maestro R. NeuroTouch: a physicsbased virtual simulator for cranial microneurosurgery training. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(1 suppl operative):ons32-ons42.
7. Lang MJ, Greer AD, Sutherland GR. Intra-operative robotics: NeuroArm. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;109:231-236.
8. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg. 2002;235(4):487-492. (Pubitemid 34258346)
9. Challacombe B, Wheatstone S. Telementoring and telerobotics in urological surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2010;11(1):22-28.
10. Haidegger T, Benyó Z. Extreme telesurgery. In: Baik SH, ed. Robot Surgery. Vienna, Austria: InTech; 2010.
11. Anvari M, McKinley C, Stein H. Establishment of the world's first telerobotic remote surgical service: for provision of advanced laparoscopic surgery in a rural community. Ann Surg. 2005;241(3):460-464. (Pubitemid 40299722)
12. Mendez I, Hill R, Clarke D, Kolyvas G, Walling S. Robotic long-distance telementoring in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(3):434-440.
13. Tian ZM, Lu WS, Wang TM, et al. Clinical application of robotic telemanipulation system in stereotactic surgery [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007;45(24):1679-1681.
14. Mitsuishi M, Morita A, Sugita N, et al. Master-slave robotic platform and its feasibility study for micro-neurosurgery [published online ahead of print May 16, 2012]. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.1434.
15. Arata J, Tada Y, Kozuka H, et al. Neurosurgical robotic system for brain tumor removal. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2011;6(3):375-385.
16. Comparettei MD, Vaccarella A, De Lorenzo D, Ferrigno G, De Momi E. Multirobotic approach for keyhole neurosurgery: the ROBOCAST project. Paper presented at: Joint Workshop on New Technologies for Computer/Robot Assisted Surgery; July 11-13, 2011; Graz, Austria.
17. Hongo K, Goto T, Miyahara T, Kakizawa Y, Koyama J, Tanaka Y. Telecontrolled micromanipulator system (NeuRobot) for minimally invasive neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;98:63-66.
18. Goto T, Miyahara T, Toyoda K, et al. Telesurgery of microscopic micromanipulator system "NeuRobot" in neurosurgery: interhospital preliminary study. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2009;2009(1):45-53.
19. Biggs SJ, Srinivasan MA. Haptic interfaces. In: Stanney K, ed. Handbook of Virtual Environments. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc.; 2002.
20. Laycock SD, Day AM. A survey of haptic rendering techniques. Comput Graph Forum. 2007;26(1):50-65. (Pubitemid 46501661)
21. Salisbury K, Conti F, Barbagli F. Haptic rendering: introductory concepts. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2004;24(2):24-32.
22. Lum MJ, Rosen J, Hawkeye K, et al. Teleoperation in surgical robotics: network latency effects on surgical performance. Paper presented at: International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; September 3-6, 2009; Minneapolis, MN.
23. Anvari M, Broderick T, Stein H, et al. The impact of latency on surgical precision and task completion during robotic-assisted remote telepresence surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2005;10(2):93-99. (Pubitemid 41722074)
24. Tendick F, Sastry SS, Fearing RS, Cohn M. Applications of micromechatronics in minimally invasive surgery. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics. 1998;3(1):34-42. (Pubitemid 128750095)
25. Muller-Wittig W. Virtual reality in medicine. In: Kramme R, Hoffmann KP, Pozos RS, eds. Springer Handbook of Medical Technology. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2011.
26. Tavakoli M, Patel RV, Moallem M. Haptic interaction in robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a sensorized end-effector. Int J Med Robot. 2005;1(2):53-63.
27. Wagner C, Stylopoulos N, Howe R. The role of force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection. Paper presented at: 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems; March 24-25, 2002; Orlando, FL.
28. Tholey G, Desai JP, Castellanos AE. Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis. Ann Surg. 2005;241(1):102-109. (Pubitemid 40040998)
29. Tavakoli M, Aziminejad A, Patel RV, Moallem M. High-fidelity bilateral teleoperation systems and the effect of multimodal haptics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2007;37(6):1512-1528. (Pubitemid 350201159)
30. Ruurda JP, Broeders IA, Pulles B, Kappelhof FM, van der Werken C. Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(8):1249-1252. (Pubitemid 39014866)
31. Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery: a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon. 1998;29(6):409-414. (Pubitemid 28442061)
32. Harwell RC, Ferguson RL. Physiologic tremor and microsurgery. Microsurgery. 1983;4(3):187-192. (Pubitemid 14189730)
33. Ghorbanian A, Zareinejad M, Rezaei SM, Sheikhzadeh H, Baghestan K. A novel control architecture for physiological tremor compensation in teleoperated systems [published online ahead of print May 16, 2012]. Int J Med Robot. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1436.
34. Rossi A, Trevisani A, Zanotto V. A telerobotic haptic system for minimally invasive stereotactic neurosurgery. Int J Med Robot. 2005;1(2):64-75.
35. Abbott JJ, Marayong P, Okamura AM. Haptic virtual fixtures for robot-assisted manipulation. In: Thrun S, Brooks R, Durrant-Whyte H, eds. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Vol 28. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2007.
36. Hagn U, Nickl M, Jorg S, et al. The DLR MIRO: a versatile lightweight robot for surgical applications. Ind Robot. 2008;35(4):324-336.
37. Kim S, Chung J, Yi BJ, Kim YS. An assistive image-guided surgical robot system using O-arm fluoroscopy for pedicle screw insertion: preliminary and cadaveric study. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(6):1757-1767.
38. Liu D, Wang T. A virtual reality training system for robot assisted neurosurgery. Paper presented at: 16th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence; November 29-December 1, 2006; Hangzhou, China.
39. Westebring-van der Putten EP, Goossens RH, Jakimowics JJ, Dankelman J. Haptics in minimally invasive surgery: a review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(1):3-16. (Pubitemid 351250368)
40. van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(6):1180-1190.
41. Yip MC, Tavakoli M, Howe RD. Performance analysis of a haptic telemanipulation task under time delay. Adv Robot. 2011;25(5):651-673.
42. Althoefer K, Liu H, Puangmali P, Zbyszewski D, Noonan D, Seneviratne L. Force sensing in medical robotics. In: Bradley D, Russell D, eds. Mechatronics in Action. London, UK: Springer-Verlag; 2010.
43. Hayward V, Astley OR, Cruz-Hernandez M, Grant D, Robles-De-La-Torre G. Haptic interfaces and devices. Sensor Rev. 2004;24(1):16-29.
44. Sheridan TB, Ferrell WR. Remote manipulative control with transmission delay. IEEE Trans Hum Factors Electronics. 1963;4(1):25-29.
45. Dwivedi J, Mahgoub I. Robotic surgery: a review on recent advances in surgical robotic systems. Paper presented at: Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics; 2012; Boca Raton, FL.
46. Motooka W, Nozaki T, Mizoguchi T, et al. Development of a 16-DOF telesurgical forceps master/slave robot with haptics. Paper presented at: 36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2010; Phoenix, AZ.
47. Raoufi C, Goldenberg AA, Kucharcyzk W. A new hydraulically/pneumatically actuated MR-compatible robot for MRI-guided neurosurgery. Paper presented at: 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering; May 16-18, 2008; Shanghai, China.
48. De Lorenzo D, De Momi E, Dyagilev I, et al. Force feedback in a piezoelectric linear actuator for neurosurgery. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7(3):268-275.
49. Riener R, Harders M. VR for planning and intraoperative support. In: Virtual Reality in Medicine. Vol XII. London, UK: Springer-Verlag; 2012.
50. Lederman SJ, Jones LA. Tactile and haptic illusions. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2011;4(4):273-294.
51. Wagner C, Howe R. Force feedback benefit depends on experience in multiple degree of freedom robotic surgery task. IEEE Trans Robot. 2007;23(6):1235-1240.
52. Jazayeri A, Tavakoli M. A passivity criterion for sampled-data bilateral teleoperation systems. Paper presented at: World Haptics Conference; 2011; Istanbul, Turkey.
53. Beasley RA, Howe RD. Model-based error correction for flexible robotic surgical instruments. Paper presented at: Robotics: Science and Systems Conference; June 8-11, 2005; Cambridge, MA.
54. Semmoloni J, Manganelli R, Formaglio A, Prattichizzo D. Control design issues for microinvasive neurosurgery teleoperator system. Paper presented at: International Conference on Advanced Robotics; June 22-26, 2009; Munich, Germany.
55. Smith AC, Mobasser F, Hashtrudi-Zaad K. Neural-network-based contact force observers for haptic applications. IEEE Trans Robot. 2006;22(6):1163-1175. (Pubitemid 44921745)
56. Minh VT, Hashim FB. Time forward observer based adaptive controller for a teleoperation system. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2011;9(3):470-477.
57. Chopra N, Spong MW, Lozano R. Synchronization of bilateral teleoperators with time delay. Automatica. 2008;44(8):2142-2148.
58. Nuno E, Ortega R, Basanez L. An adaptive controller for nonlinear teleoperators. Automatica. 2010;46(1):155-159.
59. Forouzantabar A, Talebi HA, Sedigh AK. Adaptive neural network control of bilateral teleoperation with constant time delay. Nonlinear Dyn. 2012;67(2):1123-1134.
60. Zhu WH, Salcudean SE. Stability guaranteed teleoperation: an adaptive motion/force control approach. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2000;45(11):1951-1969. (Pubitemid 32085215)
61. Malysz P, Sirouspour S. Nonlinear and filtered force/position mappings in bilateral teleoperation with application to enhanced stiffness discrimination. IEEE Trans Robot. 2009;25(5):1134-1149.
62. Liu X, Tavakoli M, Huang Q. Nonlinear adaptive bilateral control of teleoperation systems with uncertain dynamics and kinematics. Paper presented at: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; October 18-22, 2010; Taipei, Taiwan.
63. Richert D, Macnab CJ, Pieper JK. Adaptive haptic control for telerobotics transitioning between free, soft, and hard environments. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum. 2012;42(3):558-570.
64. Mohammadi A, Tavakoli M, Marquez HJ. Disturbance observer-based control of non-linear haptic teleoperation systems. IET Control Theory Appl. 2011;5(18):2063-2074.