Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 591-626

  Sato, M ^a   Lyster, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD ANDRÉS BELLO   (Chile)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869997712     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263112000356     Document Type: Article

References (171)

1. Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 29-51). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
2. Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax . Language Teaching Research, 12, 183-210.
3. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
4. Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
5. Anderson, J. (1995). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York : Wiley.
6. Anderson, J. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York : Worth.
7. Anderson, J., & Schunn, C. (2000). Implications of the ACT-R learning theory: No magic bullets. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1-33). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
8. Aston, G. (1986). Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128-143.
9. Bajarano, Y., Levine, T., Olshtain, E., & Steiner, J. (1997). The skilled use of interaction strategies: Creating a framework for improved small-group communicative interaction in the language classroom. System, 25, 203-214.
10. Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25, 243-272.
11. Bigelow, M., delMas, R., Hansen, K., & Tarone, E. (2006). Literacy and the processing of oral recasts in SLA. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 665-689.
12. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
13. Bruton, A., & Samuda, V. (1980). Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of oral error in group work. RELC Journal, 11, 49-63.
14. Buckwalter, P. (2001). Repair sequences in Spanish L2 dyadic discourse: A descriptive study. Modern Language Journal, 85, 380-397.
15. Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In D. Willis & J. Willis (Eds.), Challenge: Change in language teaching (pp. 136-146). London : Heinemann.
16. Chamot, A., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. London : Longman.
17. Cohen, A. (1998). Second language learning and language use strategies: Defining terms. In A. Cohen (Ed.), Strategies in learning and using a second language (pp. 3-23). London : Longman.
18. Cohen, A., Weaver, S., & Li, T.-Y. (1998). The impact of strategies-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. In A. Cohen (Ed.), Strategies in learning and using a second language (pp. 107-156). London : Longman.
19. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
20. Crookes, G. (1991). Second language speech production research: A methodologically oriented review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 113-132.
21. Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners' fl uency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2862-2873.
22. de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt's "speaking" model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1-24.
23. de Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529-555.
24. de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fl uency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533-568.
25. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York : Cambridge University Press.
26. DeKeyser, R. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125-151). New York : Cambridge University Press.
27. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Oxford : Blackwell.
28. DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York : Cambridge University Press.
29. DeKeyser, R. (2010). Practice for second language learning: Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 155-165.
30. Derwing, T., Munro, M., & Thomson, R. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners' fl uency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29, 359-380.
31. Dörnyei, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 55-85.
32. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). New York : Cambridge University Press.
33. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 1-11). New York : Cambridge University Press.
34. Douglas, D. (2001). Performance consistency in second language acquisition and language testing research: A conceptual gap. Second Language Research, 17, 442-456.
35. Egi, T. (2007). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The role of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511-537.
36. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
37. Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
38. Ellis, R. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 79-114). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
39. Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141-172.
40. Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19, 18-41.
41. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures . In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339-360). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
42. Ellis, R. (2009 a). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3-18.
43. Ellis, R. (2009 b). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3-25). Bristol, UK : Multilingual Matters.
44. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
45. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
46. Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575-600.
47. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 14, 1-23.
48. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The infl uence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 293-323.
49. Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communication about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605-628.
50. Freed, B. (1995). What makes us think that students who study abroad become fl uent? In B. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 123-148). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
51. Freed, B., Dewey, D., Segalowitz, N., & Randall, H. (2004). The language contact profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 349-356.
52. García Mayo, M., & Pica, T. (2000). Interaction among proficient learners: Are input, feedback and output needs addressed in a foreign language context? Studia Linguistica, 54, 272-279.
53. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
54. Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224-255). Oxford : Blackwell.
55. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1989). Incorporated repairs in nonnative discourse. In M. Eisenstein (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage: Empirical studies in second language variation (pp. 71-86). New York : Plenum Press.
56. Green, P., & Hecht, K. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: An empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13, 168-184.
57. Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English: An introduction to the practice of English language teaching. London : Longman.
58. Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
59. Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193-223.
60. Hulstijn, J. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129-140.
61. Hulstijn, J., & de Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, 97-113.
62. Hulstijn, J., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34, 23-43.
63. Iñárritu, A. G. (Director), & Arriaga, G. (Writer). (2006). Babel [Motion picture]. United States : Central Films.
64. Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.
65. Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O'Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29, 24-49.
66. Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 168-196.
67. Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239-278.
68. Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford : Blackwell.
69. Kappel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
70. Keselman, H., Huberty, C., Lix, L., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R., Donahue, B., et al. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68, 350-386.
71. Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49, 303-342.
72. Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
73. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote metalinguistic awareness in the French immersion classroom? In R. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 284-309). New York : Cambridge University Press.
74. Lai, Y.-C. (2009). Language learning strategy use and English proficiency of university freshmen in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 255-280.
75. Lam, W. (2009). Examining the effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on ESL group discussions: A synthesis of approaches. Language Teaching Research, 13, 129-150.
76. Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
77. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. London : Routledge.
78. Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fl uency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387-417.
79. Levelt, W. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
80. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
81. Levelt, W. (1999). Language production: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83-122). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
82. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
83. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
84. Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54, 153-187.
85. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.
86. Loewen, S. (2011). Focus on form. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 576-592). London : Routledge.
87. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
88. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
89. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York : Cambridge University Press.
90. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp. 123-167). Bristol, UK : Multilingual Matters.
91. Lyster, R. (1994). La négociation de la forme: stratégie analytique en classe d'immersion [Negotiation of form: An analytic strategy in immersion classrooms]. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 446-465.
92. Lyster, R. (1998). The ambiguity of recasts and repetition in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
93. Lyster, R. (2002). The importance of differentiating negotiation of form and meaning in classroom interaction. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 381-397). Trier, Germany : Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
94. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
95. Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453-498.
96. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269-300.
97. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
98. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.
99. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405-430.
100. Mackey, A. (2007). Introduction: The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 1-26). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
101. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407-452). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
102. Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.
103. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
104. MacWhinney, B. (2009). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk: Vol. 2: Transcription format and programs. Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University.
105. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103.
106. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2000). Communicative tasks, conversational interaction, and linguistic form: An empirical study of Thai. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 82-91.
107. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720.
108. Miyagi, K., Sato, M., & Crump, A. (2009). To challenge the unchallenged: Potential of non-"standard" Englishes for Japanese EFL learners. JALT Journal, 31, 261-273.
109. Morris, C., Bransford, J., & Franks, J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Bahavior, 16, 519-533.
110. Morrison, D., & Low, G. (1983). Monitoring and the second language learner. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 228-250). London : Longman.
111. Muranoi, H. (2007). Output practice in the L2 classroom. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 51-84). New York : Cambridge University Press.
112. Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43-63.
113. Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising instruction on oral communication strategy use. Modern Language Journal, 89, 76-91.
114. Nation, P. (1989). Improving speaking fl uency. System, 17, 377-384.
115. Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 90, 169-184.
116. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1-55). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
117. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
118. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203-210.
119. O'Donnell, K. (2005). Japanese secondary English teachers: Negotiation of educational roles in the face of curricular reform. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 18, 300-315.
120. Olejnik, S., Li, J., Supattathum, S., & Huberty, C. (1997). Multiple testing and statistical power with modified Bonferroni procedures. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 389-406.
121. Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London : Hodder Education.
122. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
123. Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573-595.
124. Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
125. Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
126. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
127. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Bristol, UK : Multilingual Matters.
128. Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59-84.
129. Porter, P. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200-222). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
130. Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students' oral language abilities: The Awareness-Practice-Feedback sequence. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspective from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141-160). New York : Cambridge University Press.
131. Ridder, I., Vangehuchten, L., & Gómez, M. (2007). Enhancing automaticity through taskbased language learning. Applied Linguistics, 28, 309-315.
132. Riggenbach, H. (1991). Toward an understanding of fl uency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14, 423-441.
133. Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
134. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-162). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
135. Sato, M. (2007). Social relationships in conversational interaction: A comparison between learner-learner and learner-NS dyads. JALT Journal, 29, 183-208.
136. Sato, M. (2011). Constitution of form-orientation: Contributions of context and explicit knowledge to learning from recasts. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 1-28.
137. Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2007). Modified output of Japanese EFL learners: Variable effects of interlocutor vs. feedback types. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 123-142). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
138. Sato, M., & Perry, B. (2011). How to transform second language learners into interactive corrective feedback providers. In M. Skier & M. Walsh (Eds.), Pan-SIG 2010 conference proceedings (pp. 188-205). Kyoto, Japan : JALT.
139. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
140. Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
141. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York : Cambridge University Press.
142. Seedhouse, P. (1997). Combining form and meaning. ELT Journal, 51, 337-344.
143. Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fl uent performance. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fl uency (pp. 200-219). Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
144. Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382-408). Oxford : Blackwell.
145. Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fl uency. London : Routledge.
146. Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fl uency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 173-199.
147. Segalowitz, N., & Lightbown, P. (1999). Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 43-63.
148. Segalowitz, N., & Segalowitz, S. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition . Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369-385.
149. Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 8, 361-392.
150. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301-322). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
151. Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 593-610). London : Routledge.
152. Shehadeh, A. (2001). Self-and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 433-457.
153. Soler, E. (2002). Relationship between teacher-led versus learners' interaction and the development of pragmatics in the EFL classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 359-377.
154. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.
155. Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Refl ections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225-236.
156. Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
157. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
158. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
159. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-483). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
160. Toth, P. (2008). Teacher-and learner-led discourse in task-based grammar instruction: Providing procedural assistance for L2 morphosyntactic development. Language Learning, 58, 237-283.
161. Towell, R., & Dewaele, J. (2005). The role of psycholinguistic factors in the development of fl uency amongst advanced learners of French. In J. Dewaele (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 210-239). Bristol, UK : Multilingual Matters.
162. Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fl uency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84-119.
163. Ullman, M. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105-122.
164. Ullman, M. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231-270.
165. Ullman, M. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition (pp. 141-178). Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
166. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
167. VanPatten, B. (2000). Processing instruction as form-meaning connections: Issues in theory and research. In A. Valdman & J. Lee (Eds.), Form and meaning: Multiple perspectives (pp. 43-68). Boston : Heinle & Heinle.
168. Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
169. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583-625.
170. Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners' acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235-263.
171. Yoshida, R. (2008). Learners' perception of corrective feedback in pair work. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 525-541.