Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction

Language Learning

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 453-498

  Lyster, Roy ^a   Izquierdo, Jesús ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSIDAD JUÁREZ AUTÓNOMA DE TABASCO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Corrective feedback; Dyadic interaction; Focus on form; Form focused instruction; French as a second language; Grammatical gender; Prompts; Recasts

Indexed keywords

EID: 65649094088     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.x     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Ammar, A., Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543 574.
2. Ayoun, D. (2007). The second language acquisition of grammatical gender and agreement. In D. Ayoun (Ed. French applied linguistics (pp. 130 170). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
3. Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157 168.
4. Bosquart, M. (1998). Nouvelle grammaire. Montreal : Guérin.
5. Braidi, S. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning, 52, 1 42.
6. Carpenter, H., Jeon, K. S., MacGregor, D., Mackey, A. (2006). Learners' interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209 236.
7. Carroll, S. (1989). Second-language acquisition and the computational paradigm. Language Learning, 39, 535 594.
8. Carroll, S., Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357 386.
9. Clark, S. (1995). The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory. Memory & Cognition, 23, 442 455.
10. de Bot, K 1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529 555.
11. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42 63). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
12. DeKeyser, R. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed. Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125 51). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
13. DeKeyser, R. (Ed 2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
14. deWinstanley, P. A., Bjork, E.L. (2004). Processing strategies and the generation effect: Implications for making a better reader. Memory & Cognition, 32, 945 955.
15. Doughty, C. (1994). Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In J. Alatis (Ed. Georgetown University round table 1993: Strategic interaction and language acquisition (pp. 96 108). Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
16. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed. Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206 257). New York : Cambridge University Press.
17. Doughty, C., Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114 138). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
18. Egi, T. (2007). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511 538.
19. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed. Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 339 360). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
20. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281 318.
21. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339 368.
22. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575 600.
23. Filiatrault, D. (Director 2002). L'Odysée d'Alice Tremblay Motion picture Canada : Cinémaginaire Inc.
24. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1 23.
25. Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds. Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224 255). Oxford : Blackwell.
26. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 542 572.
27. Han, Z. (2008). On the role of meaning in focus on form. In Z. Han (Ed. Understanding second language process (pp. 45 79). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
28. Harley, B. (1998) The role of form-focused tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (p. 156 174). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
29. Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 255 270.
30. Havranek, G., Cesnik, H. (2001). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. EUROSLA Yearbook, 1, 99 122.
31. Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311 394.
32. Iwashita, N. (2001). The effect of learner proficiency on interactional moves and modified output in nonnative-nonnative interaction in Japanese as a foreign language. System, 29, 267 287.
33. Jacob, R., Laurin, J. (1994). Ma grammaire. Montreal : Les Éditions françaises.
34. Kowalchuk, R., Keselman, H., Algina, J., Wolfinger, R. (2004). The analysis of repeated measurements with mixed model adjusted F tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 224 242.
35. Lee, J. (2006). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in English immersion classrooms in Korea. Unpublished master's thesis, International Graduate School of English, Seoul, Korea.
36. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37 63.
37. Lightbown, P. M. (2000). Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 431 462.
38. ® for mixed models (2nd ed.). Cary, NC : SAS Institute.
39. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361 386.
40. Loewen, S., Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed. Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 361 378). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
41. Loewen, S., Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536 555.
42. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds. Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413 468). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
43. Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Long, M., Inagaki, S., Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative evidence in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357 371.
45. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51 81.
46. Lyster, R. (2001). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 51 (Suppl. 1 265 301.
47. Lyster, R. (2002). Negotiation in immersion teacher-student interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 237 253.
48. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399 432.
49. Lyster, R. (2006). Predictability in French gender attribution: A corpus analysis. Journal of French Language Studies, 16, 69 92.
50. Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
51. Lyster, R., Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269 300.
52. Lyster, R., Mori, H. (2008). Instructional counterbalance in immersion pedagogy. In T. Fortune & D. Tedick (Eds. Pathways to bilingualism and multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 131 151). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
53. Lyster, R., Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37 66.
54. Mackey, A. (Ed 2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
55. Mackey, A., Al-Khalil, M., Atanassova, G., Ham, M., Logan-Terry, A., Nakatsukasa, K. (2007). Teachers' intentions and learners' perceptions about corrective feedback in the L2 classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 129 152.
56. Mackey A., Gass S., McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471 497.
57. Mackey, A., Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338 356.
58. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79 103.
59. McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed. Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 323 338). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
60. McDonough, K., Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693 720.
61. McNulty, A. (2007). A study of corrective feedback and uptake patterns as observed in four foreign language classrooms at selected mid-western public schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
62. Mori, H. (2002). Error treatment sequences in Japanese immersion classroom interactions at different grade levels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
63. Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction: Communication at cross-purposes? Applied Linguistics, 17, 286 325.
64. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719 758.
65. Nobuyoshi, J., Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203 210.
66. Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. Verplaeste (Eds. The construction of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47 71). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Oliver, R., Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87, 519 533.
68. Panova, I., Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573 595.
69. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on "noticing the gap": Nonnative speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99 126.
70. Pouliot, J.-F. (Director) 2003). La grande séduction [Motion picture]. Canada : Canadian Film.
71. Ranta, L., Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students' oral language abilities: The Awareness-Practice-Feedback sequence. In R. DeKeyser (Ed. Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141 160). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
72. Roberts, M. (1995). Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In R. Schmidt (Ed. Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp. 162 182). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
73. Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263 300.
74. Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361 392.
75. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed. Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 301 322). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
76. Shiffrin, R.M., Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127 190.
77. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
78. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 29, 73 87.
79. Spada, N. (2005). Conditions and challenges in developing school-based SLA research programs. Modern Language Journal, 89, 328 338.
80. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds. Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235 253). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
81. Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 68 83.
82. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed. Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 171 196). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
83. Tsang, W. (2004). Feedback and uptake in teacher-student interaction: An analysis of 18 English lessons in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Regional Language Centre Journal, 35, 187 209.
84. Tucker, R., Lambert, W. E., Rigault, A. (1977). The French speaker's skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behaviour. Paris : Mouton.
85. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85 113). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
86. Zyzik, E., Polio, C. (2008). Incidental focus on form in university Spanish literature courses. Modern Language Journal, 92, 53 70.