Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research

Language Teaching

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 225-236

  Spada, Nina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455227831     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444810000224     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Ammar, A. & P. M. Lightbown (2005). Teaching marked linguistic structure more about the acquisition of relative clauses by Arab learners of English. In Housen & Pierrard (eds.), 167-198.
2. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, 657-668.
3. Day, E. & S. Shapson (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning 41, 25-58.
4. de Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 249-297.
5. DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17, 379-410.
6. DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning 55 S1 [Special Issue], 1-25. (Pubitemid 40758913)
7. Doughty C. & J. Williams (eds.) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Eckman, F., L. Bell & D. Nelson (1988). On the generalization of relative clause construction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics 9, 1-20.
9. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning 51, 1-46. (Pubitemid 33281953)
10. Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 141-172. (Pubitemid 43308393)
11. Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research 9.2, 147-171. (Pubitemid 40473589)
12. Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical study. Applied Linguistics 27, 464-491. (Pubitemid 44290358)
13. Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (eds.), On TESOL '81. Washington, DC: TESOL, 129-139.
14. Gass, S. & M. J. Alvarez Torres (2005). Attention when? An investigation of the ordering effect of input and interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 1-31. (Pubitemid 43298386)
15. Hamilton, R. (1994). Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language. Language Learning 44, 123-157.
16. Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics 10, 331-359.
17. Harley, B. & D. Hart (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19.3, 379-400.
18. Hondo, J. (2009). Constructing knowledge in SLA: The impact of timing in FF intervention. Ph.D. dissertation, Lancaster University, UK.
19. Housen A. & M. Pierrard (eds.) (2005). Investigation in instructed second language acquisition. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Housen, A., M. Pierrard & S. Van Daele (2005). Rule complexity and the efficacy of explicit grammar instruction. In Housen & Pierrard (eds.), 235-269.
21. Hulstijn, J. H. & R. de Graaff (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review 11, 97-112.
22. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
23. Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press, 45-77.
24. Leow, R.P. (1997). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning 47, 467-506.
25. Leow, R. P. (1998). Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin & Willa's (1994) fine-grained analysis of attention. Applied Psycholinguistics 19, 133-159. (Pubitemid 128183059)
26. Lightbown, P. M. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In Doughty & Williams, 177-196.
27. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, D. Coste, R. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39-52.
28. Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students' sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics 15, 263-287.
29. Lyster, R. & K. Saito (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32.2, 265-302.
30. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics 27, 405-430.
31. Mackey, A. & J. Philp (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82, 338-356. (Pubitemid 128770153)
32. Meara, P. (2009). Connected words: Word associations and second language vocabulary acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Morris, D. D., J. D. Bransford & J. J. Franks (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 519-533.
34. Nicholas, H., P. M. Lightbown & N. Spada (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning 51, 719-758.
35. Norris, J. & L. Ortega (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50, 417-528.
36. Norris, J. & L. Ortega (2006a). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning. In Norris & Ortega (eds.), 3-52.
37. Norris, J. & L. Ortega (eds.) (2006b). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Applied Linguistics 10, 52-79.
39. Ranta, L. (2002). The role of learners' language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. In P. Robinson (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 159-180.
40. Raudenbush, S. W. & A. S. Bryk (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd edn.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118, 219-235.
42. Robinson, P. (1995). Aptitude, awareness, and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning. In R. Schmidt (ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, 303-358.
43. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 27-67.
44. Russell, J. & N. Spada (2006). Corrective feedback makes a difference: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris & Ortega (eds.), 133-164.
45. Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 147-162.
46. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41, 255-283.
47. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching 30, 73-87.
48. Spada, N. & P. M. Lightbown (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in the L2 classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 205-221.
49. Spada, N. & P. M. Lightbown (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 83, 1-22.
50. Spada, N. & P. M. Lightbown (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly 42, 181-207.
51. Spada, N. & Y. Tomita (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60.2, 1-46.
52. Spada, N., Y. Tomita, L. Shiu & S. Yalcin (2010). The timing of form-focused instruction: Learner differences and learning outcomes. Presented at the Second Language Research Forum (SLRF), Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, October 2010.
53. Trahey, M. (1996). Positive evidence in second language acquisition: Some long term effects. Second Language Research 12, 111-139.
54. Trahey, M. & L. White (1993). Positive evidence and pre-emption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 181-204.
55. Wesche, M. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In K. C. Diller (ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 119-154.
56. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7, 133-161.
57. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In Doughty & Williams (eds.), 85-113.
58. White, L., N. Spada, P. M. Lightbown & L. Ranta (1991). Input enhancement and L1 question formation. Applied Linguistics 12, 416-432.
59. Williams, J. & J. Evans (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In Doughty & Williams (eds.), 139-155.