Teacher- and learner-led discourse in task-based grammar instruction: Providing procedural assistance for L2 morphosyntactic development

Language Learning

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 237-283

  Toth, Paul D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Anticausativity; Classroom research; Instructed SLA; L2 Spanish; Learner discourse; Proceduralization; Pushed output; Scaffolding; Task based instruction; Teacher led discourse

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149160297     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00441.x     Document Type: Article

References (126)

1. Adair-Hauck, B., & Donato, R. (1994). Foreign language explanations within the Zone of Proximal Development. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 532 557.
2. Antón, M. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second-language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 83, 303 318.
3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
4. Bley-Vroman, R., & Yoshinaga, N. (2000). The acquisition of multiple wh-questions by non-native speakers of English. Second Language Research, 16, 3 26.
5. Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89 112.
6. Brooks, F. B. (1993). Some problems and caveats in " communicative" discourse: Toward a conceptualization of the foreign language classroom. Foreign Langu 26, 231 242.
7. Brooks, F. B., Donato, R., & McGlone, J. V. (1997). When are they going to say "it" right? Understanding learner talk during pair-work activity. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 524 541.
8. Bruhn de Garavito, J. (1999). Adult SLA of SE constructions in Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3, 247 296.
9. Buckwalter, P. (2001). Repair sequences in Spanish L2 dyadic discourse: A descriptive study. Modern Language Journal, 85, 380 397.
10. Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Philadelphia : Benjamins.
11. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann.
12. Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT Journal, 52, 179 187.
13. deBot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529 555.
14. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds. The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 311 348). Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Dobrobie-Sorin, C. (1998). Impersonal se constructions in Romance and passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 399 437.
16. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds. Vygotskian approaches to second language learning. Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
17. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed. Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206 257). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
18. Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986 Information gap" tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305 325.
19. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998a). Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 1 12). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
20. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds. 1998b). Focus on form in classroom language acquisition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
21. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
22. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based learning and teaching. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
23. Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402 430.
24. Fotos, S. (1993). Consciousness raising and noticing through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction. Applied Linguistics, 14, 385 403.
25. Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 323 351.
26. Fotos, S. (2002). Structure-based interactive tasks for the EFL grammar learner. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds. New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 135 154). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds. The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224 256). Malden, MA : Blackwell.
28. Hall, J. K. (1995 Aw man, where you goin'?": Interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 37 62.
29. Hall, J. K. (2004 Practicing speaking" in Spanish: Lessons from a high school foreign language classroom. In D. Boxer & A. D. Cohen (Eds. Studying speaking to inform second language learning (pp. 68 87). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
30. Harrington, M. (2001). Sentence processing. In P. Robinson (Ed. Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 91 124). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
31. Hilton, A., & Armstrong, R. (2006, September). Stat note 6: Post hoc ANOVA tests. Microbiologist, 7, 34 36.
32. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds. Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth, UK : Penguin Books.
33. Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 168 196.
34. Jacobs, G. M. (1998). Cooperative learning or just grouping students: The difference makes a difference. In W. A. Renandya & G. M. Jacobs (Eds. Learners and language learning (pp. 145 171). Singapore : SEAMEO.
35. Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford : Blackwell.
36. Johnson, K. E. (1995). Understanding communication in second language classrooms. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
37. Juffs, A. (1998). Main verb vs. reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 48, 107 147.
38. Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing, and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199 225.
39. Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in Wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483 516.
40. Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49, 303 342.
41. Krashen, S., Sferlazza, V., Feldman, L., & Fathman, A. (1976). Adult performance on the SLOPE test: More evidence for a natural sequence in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 26, 145 151.
42. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1975). The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 409 430.
43. Lee, J. F. (2000). Tasks and communicating in language classrooms. New York : McGraw-Hill.
44. Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen (2nd ed.). New York : McGraw-Hill.
45. Lee, S., & Caracciolo, J. M. (Producers D. Koepp (Writer & S. Raimi (Director 2002). Spider-Man Motion picture United States : Columbia Pictures.
46. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37 64.
47. Leemann-Guthrie, E. (1984). Intake, communication, and second-language teaching. In S. Savignon & M. Berns (Eds Initiatives in communicative language teaching: A book of readings. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
48. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
49. Levin, B., & Rappaport-Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
50. Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed. Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences : Vol. 379 (pp. 259 278). New York : New York Academy of Sciences.
51. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds. Modeling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77 99). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
52. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. deBot, D. Coste, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 39 52). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
53. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds. Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413 468). New York : Academic Press.
54. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds. Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9 54). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
55. Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207 228.
56. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds. Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123 163). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
57. Lyster, R. (2001). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. In R. Ellis (Ed. Form-focused instruction and second language learning (Vol. 51, pp. 265 301). Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers.
58. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557 587.
59. McCormick, D. E., & Donato, R. (2000). Teacher questions as scaffolded assistance in an ESL classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds. Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 183 202). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
61. Montrul, S. (1999). Causative errors with unaccusative verbs in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 15, 191 219.
62. Montrul, S. (2000). Causative psych verbs in Spanish L2 acquisition. In R. Leow & C. Sanz (Eds. Spanish applied linguistics at the turn of the millennium (pp. 97 118). Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Press.
63. Montrul, S. (2004). The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. Philadelphia : Benjamins.
64. Morris, F. A. (2002). Negotiation moves and recasts in relation to error types and learner repair in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 395 404.
65. Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction: Communication at cross-purposes? Applied Linguistics, 17, 286 325.
66. Myles, F., Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (1999). Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 49 80.
67. National Standards in Foreign Language Learning Project 1999). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century including Chinese, Classical Languages, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Russian, and Spanish. Lawrence, KS : Allen Press.
68. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417 528.
69. Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41, 136 145.
70. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
71. Nunan, D. (1990). The questions teachers ask. JALT Journal, 12, 187 202.
72. Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds. Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47 72). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Paulston, C. B. (1972). The sequencing of structural pattern drills. TESOL Quarterly, 5, 197 208.
75. Pica, T. (1987). Second-language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3 21.
76. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning, processes and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493 527.
77. Pica, T. (2005). Classroom learning, teaching, and research: A task-based perspective. Modern Language Journal, 89, 339 352.
78. Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds. Input in second language acquisition (pp. 115 132). Cambridge, MA : Newbury House.
79. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63 90.
80. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language acquisition. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9 34). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
81. Pica, T., Kang, H.-S., & Sauro, S. (2006). Information gap tasks: Their multiple roles and contributions to interaction research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 301 338.
82. Porter, P. A. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In R. R. Day (Ed Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200 222). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
83. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
84. Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
85. Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
86. Raposo, E., & Uriagereka, J. (1996). Indefinite SE. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, 749 810.
87. Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds. Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 119 140). Harlow, UK : Longman.
88. Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed. Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3 32). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
89. Scovel, T. (1998). Psycholinguistics. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
90. Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
91. Seedhouse, P. (1999). Task-based interaction. ELT Journal, 53, 149 156.
92. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA : Blackwell.
93. Sharwood-Smith, M. (2004). In two minds about grammar: On the interaction of linguistic and metalinguistic knowledge in performance. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 255 280.
94. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London : Oxford University Press.
95. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38 62.
96. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
97. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93 120.
98. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds. Input in second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA : Newbury House.
99. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125 144). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
100. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64 82). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
101. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed. Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97 114). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
102. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371 391.
103. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320 337.
104. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 99 118). Harlow, UK : Longman.
105. Terrell, T. (1991). The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. Modern Language Journal, 75, 52 63.
106. Terrell, T., Andrade, M., Egasse, J., & Muñoz, E. M. (1994). Dos Mundos (3rd ed.). New York : McGraw-Hill.
107. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
108. Toth, P. D. (1997). Linguistic and pedagogical perspectives on acquiring second-language morpho-syntax: A look at Spanish se. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
109. Toth, P. D. (2000). The interaction of instruction and learner-internal factors in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 169 208.
110. Toth, P. D. (2003). Psych verbs and morphosyntactic development in instructed L2 Spanish. In S. Montrul & F. Ordóñez (Eds. Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages: Papers from the 5th Hispanic linguistics symposium and the 4th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 468 497). Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Press.
111. Toth, P. D. (2004). When grammar instruction undermines cohesion in L2 Spanish classroom discourse. Modern Language Journal, 88, 14 30.
112. Toth, P. D. (2006). Processing Instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 56, 319 385.
113. Van Den Branden, K. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners' output. Language Learning, 47, 589 636.
114. Van Den Branden, K. (2000). Does negotiation of meaning promote reading comprehension? A study of multilingual primary school classes. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 426 443.
115. Van Den Branden, K Ed. 2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
116. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London : Longman.
117. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287 301.
118. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ : Ablex.
119. VanPatten, B. (2004a). Input and output in establishing form-meaning connections. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds. Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 29 47). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
120. VanPatten, B. (Ed. 2004b). Processing Instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
121. Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71 90.
122. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1 37.
123. Wells, G. (1998). Some questions about direct instruction: Why? To whom? How? and When? Language Arts, 76 (1 27 35.
124. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
125. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583 625.
126. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89 100.