Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners?

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 59-84

  Pica, Teresa ^a   Lincoln Porter, Felicia ^a   Paninos, Diana ^a   Linnell, Julian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002949384     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3587607     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Bruton, A., & Samuda, V. (1980). Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of oral error in group work. RELC Journal, 11, 49-63.
3. Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 9-19.
4. Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). Information gap tasks: An aid to second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305-325.
5. Futaba, T. (1993). Second language acquisition through negotiation: A case of non-native speakers who share the same first language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
6. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M. (1985). Task variation and non-native/non-native negotiation of meaning. In M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
7. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M. (1989). Incorporated repairs in NNS discourse. In M. Eisenstein (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage (pp. 71-86). New York: Plenum.
8. Hatch, E. (1978a). Acquisition of syntax in a second language. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Understanding second and foreign language learning: Issues and approaches (pp. 34-70). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
9. Hatch, E. (1978b). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401-435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
10. Hatch, E. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
11. Holliday, L. (1987). NS-NNS negotiations in spoken interaction to eliminate comprehension difficulties. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
12. Holliday, L. (1988). Let them talk: A study of native-non-native interaction in conversation. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 4, 89-100.
13. Holliday, L. (1993, March). Negotiations as a source of positive data for acquisition of L2 syntax. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Pittsburgh, PA.
14. Jacobs, G. (1989). Miscorrection in peer feedback in writing class. RELC Journal, 20, 68-76.
15. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language research. New York: Longman.
16. Lightbown, P. (1992). Can they do it themselves? A comprehension-based ESL course for young children. In R. Courchene, J. Glidden, J. St. John, & C. Therien (Eds.), Comprehension-based second language teaching (pp. 353-370). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.
17. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-48.
18. Long, M. (1980). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
19. Long, M. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-194.
20. Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21. Long, M. (1990). The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 9, 59-75.
22. (Also in TESOL Quarterly, 24, 649-666)
23. Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27-56.
24. Long, M., & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207-225.
25. Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative systems of foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 115-23.
26. Peters, A. M. (1977). Language learning strategies: Does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language, 53, 560-573.
27. Peters, A. M. (1980). The units of language acquisition. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics, 12, 1-72.
28. Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition (Cambridge Series of Monographs and Texts in Applied Psycholinguistics). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Peters, A. M. (1985). Language segmentation: Operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 1029-1064). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Pica, T. (1987). Interlanguage adjustments as an outcome of NS-NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning, 38, 45-73.
31. Pica, T. (1991, February). Accommodating language learners' needs through negotiation. Paper presented at the 1991 Second Language Research Forum, Los Angeles.
32. Pica, T. (1992a, July). Second language learning through interaction and the negotiation of conditions, processes, and outcomes. Paper presented at the First Pacific Second Language Research Forum, Sydney, Australia.
33. Pica, T. (1992b). The textural outcomes of native speaker-non-native speaker negotiation. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp. 198-237). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
34. Pica, T. (1993). Communication with second language learners: What does it reveal about the social and linguistic processes of second language acquisition? In J. Alatis (Ed.), Language, communication, and social meaning (pp. 434-464). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
35. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal, about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? [Review article]. Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
36. Pica, T. (in press). Do second language learners need negotiation? International Review of Applied Linguistics.
37. Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985a). Input and interaction in the communicative classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 115-132). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
38. Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985b). The role of classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 233-248.
39. Pica, T., Holliday, L., & Lewis, N. (1990, March). NS-NNS negotiation: An equal opportunity for speech modification? Paper presented at the 24th Annual TESOL Convention, San Francisco.
40. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., Berducci, D. & Newman, J. (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343-76.
41. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morganthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
42. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1992). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In S. Gass & G. Crookes (Eds.), Task-based learning in a second language (pp. 9-34). London: Multilingual Matters.
43. Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
44. Plann, S. (1977). Acquiring a second language in an immersion situation. In H. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '77 (pp. 213-223). Washington, DC: TESOL.
45. Porter, P. (1983) Variations in the conversations of adult learners of English as a function of the proficiency level of the participants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
46. Porter, P. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200-222). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
47. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Rodgers, T. (1988). Co-operative language learning: What's news? In B. K. Das (Ed.), Materials for language learning and teaching (pp. 1-15). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
49. Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice, texts and contexts in second language learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
50. Schachter, J. (1983). Nutritional needs of language learners. In M. A. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL '82: Pacific perspectives on language learning and teaching (pp. 175-189). Washington, DC: TESOL.
51. Schachter, J. (1984). A universal input condition. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Universals and second language acquisition (pp. 167-183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. Schachter, J. (1986). Three approaches to the study of input. Language Learning, 36, 211-226.
53. Schachter, J. (1991). Corrective feedback in historical perspective. Second Language Research, 7, 89-102.
54. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.
55. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-256). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
56. Tarone, E. (1982). Systematicity and attention in interlanguage. Language Learning, 32, 69-82.
57. Wong Fillmore, L. (1992). Learning a language from learners. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and context (pp. 46-66). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.