Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition?

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 239-278

  Izumi, Shinichi ^a   Bigelow, Martha ^b  

^a SOPHIA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001535659     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3587952     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Technical Report No. 9, pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i.
2. Ayoun, D. (1999, March). The effectiveness of implicit negative feedback in teaching the distinction between passé composé and imparfait. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics conference, Stamford, CT.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The use of adverbials and natural order in the development of temporal expression. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 299-320.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tenseaspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 341-382.
5. Bygate, M. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27, 33-48.
6. Carroll, S., Roberge, Y., & Swain, M. (1992). The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalization. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 173-189.
7. Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
8. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
9. Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367-383.
10. Crookes, G., & Gass, S. (Eds.). (1993a). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
11. Crookes, G., & Gass, S. (Eds.). (1993b). Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
12. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
13. Doughty, C., Izumi, S., Maciukaite, S., & Zapata, G. (1999, September). Recasts, focused recasts, and models: Effects on L2 Spanish word order. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Twin Cities, MN.
14. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998a). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998b). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Ellis, N., & Laporte, N. (1995). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. In A. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 53-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-324.
19. Fotos, S. (1993). Consciousness raising and noticing through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction. Applied Linguistics, 14, 385-407.
20. Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605-628.
21. Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549-582.
22. Gordon, C., & Hanauer, D. (1995). The interaction between task and meaning construction in EFL reading comprehension tests. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 299-324.
23. Harley, B. (1986). Age in second language acquisition. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
24. Harley, B. (1992). Patterns of second language development in French immersion. Journal of French Language Studies, 2, 159-183.
25. Harley, B., & Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 291-311). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
26. Izumi, S. (1999, March). A text reconstruction task that promotes noticing. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics conference, Stamford, CT.
27. Izumi, S. (2000). Promoting noticing and SLA: An empirical study of the effects of output and input enhancement on ESL relativization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
28. Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421-452.
29. Izumi, S., & Lakshmanan, U. (1998). Learnability, negative evidence, and the L2 acquisition of the English passive. Second Language Research, 14, 62-101.
30. Jourdenais, R. (1998, March). Attending to enhanced input. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics conference, Seattle, WA.
31. Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Technical Report No. 9, pp. 183-216). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i.
32. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73-93.
33. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
34. LaPierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
35. Leow, R. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify: A look at intake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 333-355.
36. Leow, R. (1995). Modality and intake in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 79-89.
37. Leow, R. (1997a). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47, 467-505.
38. Leow, R. (1997b). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
39. Leow, R. (1998a). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners' L2 development in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 82, 49-68.
40. Leow, R. (1998b). Toward operationalizing the process of attention: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa's (1994) model of input processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 133-159.
41. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
42. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. deBot, C. Kramsch, & R. Ginsberg (Eds.), Foreign language research in crosscultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Long, M. (in press). Task-based language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
45. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
46. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (in press). Do learners recognize implicit negative feedback as feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22.
47. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
48. Meisel, J. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural language acquisition. In C. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 206-224). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
49. Muranoi, H. (1996). Effects of interaction enhancement on restructuring of interlanguage grammar: A cognitive approach to foreign language instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
50. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203-210.
51. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.
52. Pica, T. (1988). Interlanguage adjustments as an outcome of NS-NNS negotiated interaction. Language Learning, 38, 45-73.
53. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
54. Raines, A. (1992). Exploring through writing: A process approach to ESL composition. New York: St. Martin's Press.
55. Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
56. Rosa, E., & O'Neil, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-556.
57. Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness-raising and Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6, 274-282.
58. Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 23-45). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
59. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 206-226.
60. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
61. Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
62. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Technical Report No. 9, pp. 1-63). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i.
63. Schmidt, R. (in press). The centrality of attention in SLA. In P. J. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
65. Schumann, J. (1987). The expression of temporality in Basilang speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 21-41.
66. Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159-169.
67. Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118-132.
68. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
69. Shook, D. J. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57-93.
70. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1996). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 229-323.
71. Skehan, R. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
72. Skehan, R. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.
74. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-224.
75. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
76. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
77. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
78. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
79. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
80. Thornbury, S. (1997). Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote "noticing." ELT Journal, 5, 326-335.
81. Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1988). Down the garden path: Inducing and correcting overgeneralization errors in the foreign language classroom. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 237-246.
82. Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 384-395.
83. Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
84. Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181-203.
85. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
86. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. Modern Language Journal, 77, 45-57.
87. VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
88. VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition: Theory and pedagogy (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
91. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-161.
92. White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416-432.