Uptake in Incidental Focus on Form in Meaning-Focused ESL Lessons

Language Learning

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 153-188

  Loewen, Shawn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642618197     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00251.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allwright, B. (1984). Why don't learners learn what teachers teach? The interaction hypothesis. In D. Singleton & D. Little (Eds.), Language learning in formal and informal contexts (pp. 3-18). Dublin: Irish Association for Applied Linguistics.
2. Austin, J. L. (1976). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3. Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2002). Metalanguage in focus on form in the communicative classroom. Language Awareness, 11(1), 1-13.
4. Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A., & Price, B. (2000). Regression analysis by example (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
5. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 27(1), 29-46.
6. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1996). Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 169-206). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T., & McNamara, T. (1999). Dictionary of language testing. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
8. de Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46(3), 529-555.
9. de Courcy, M. (2002). Learners' experiences of immersion education: Case studies of French and Chinese. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
10. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Ellis, R. (1994). Uptake as language awareness. Language Awareness, 4, 147-160.
12. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 1-46.
13. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001a). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51(2), 281-318.
14. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001b). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 407-432.
15. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Basturkmen, H. (1999). Focussing on form in the classroom (Occasional Papers No. 13). Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland, Institute of Language Teaching and Learning.
16. Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (1991). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. St. Paul, MN: West.
17. Greenhouse, J., Bromberg, J., & Fromm, D. (1995). An introduction to logistic regression with an application to the analysis of language recovery following a stroke. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 229-246.
18. Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House.
19. Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
20. Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Loewen, S. (2002). The occurrence and effectiveness of incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
22. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
23. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
26. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
27. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses and red herrings. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338-356.
28. McCafferty, S., & Ahmed, M. (2000). The appropriation of gestures of the abstract by L2 learners. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 199-218). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
29. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47(3), 203-210.
30. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459-481.
31. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50(1), 119-151.
32. Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? Modern Language Journal, 86, 1-19.
33. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
34. Saito, H. (1999). Dependence and interaction in frequency data analysis in SLA research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 453-475.
35. Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
36. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
37. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
38. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in a second language (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
40. Siegel, S., & Castellan, J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Slimani, A. (1989). The role of topicalization in classroom language learning. System, 17, 223-234.
42. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
43. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in the study of language (pp. 125-144). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
45. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner: Ethnography and second-language classroom research. London: Longman.
46. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Learning, 12, 287-301.
47. Young, R., & Yandell, B. (1999). Top-down versus bottom-up analyses of interlanguage data: A reply to Saito. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 477-490.