High-throughput analysis of peptide-binding modules

Proteomics

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1527-1546

  Liu, Bernard A ^a   Engelmann, Brett W ^b   Nash, Piers D ^c  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell signaling; Interaction profiling; Peptide array libraries; Post translational modifications; Protein interaction domains; Protein microarrays; Specificity; Technology

Indexed keywords

PDZ PROTEIN; PROTEIN SH3; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE SHP;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PDZ DOMAIN; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS; PHAGE DISPLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAIN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN METHYLATION; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEINS;

EID: 84862642911     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100599     Document Type: Review

References (153)

1. Scott, J. D., Pawson, T., Cell signaling in space and time: where proteins come together and when they're apart. Science 2009, 326, 1220-1224.
2. Pawson, T., Nash, P., Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 2003, 300, 445-452.
3. Sadowski, I., Stone, J. C., Pawson, T., A noncatalytic domain conserved among cytoplasmic protein-tyrosine kinases modifies the kinase function and transforming activity of Fujinami sarcoma virus P130gag-fps. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1986, 6, 4396-4408.
4. Sadowski, I., Pawson, T., Catalytic and non-catalytic domains of the Fujinami sarcoma virus P130gag-fps protein-tyrosine kinase distinguished by the expression of v-fps polypeptides in Escherichia coli. Oncogene 1987, 1, 181-191.
5. Mayer, B. J., Hamaguchi, M., Hanafusa, H., A novel viral oncogene with structural similarity to phospholipase C. Nature 1988, 332, 272-275.
6. Sammut, S. J., Finn, R. D., Bateman, A., Pfam 10 years on: 10, 000 families and still growing. Brief Bioinform 2008, 9, 210-219.
7. Schultz, J., Milpetz, F., Bork, P., Ponting, C. P., SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998, 95, 5857-5864.
8. Marchler-Bauer, A., Panchenko, A. R., Shoemaker, B. A., Thiessen, P. A. et al., CDD: a database of conserved domain alignments with links to domain three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 281-283.
9. Bhattacharyya, R. P., Remenyi, A., Yeh, B. J., Lim, W. A., Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75, 655-680.
10. Seet, B. T., Dikic, I., Zhou, M. M., Pawson, T., Reading protein modifications with interaction domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 473-483.
11. Kuriyan, J., Cowburn, D., Modular peptide recognition domains in eukaryotic signaling. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1997, 26, 259-288.
12. DeClue, J. E., Sadowski, I., Martin, G. S., Pawson, T., A conserved domain regulates interactions of the v-fps protein-tyrosine kinase with the host cell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1987, 84, 9064-9068.
13. Anderson, D., Koch, C. A., Grey, L., Ellis, C. et al., Binding of SH2 domains of phospholipase C gamma 1, GAP, and Src to activated growth factor receptors. Science 1990, 250, 979-982.
14. Moran, M. F., Koch, C. A., Anderson, D., Ellis, C. et al., Src homology region 2 domains direct protein-protein interactions in signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87, 8622-8626.
15. Liu, B. A., Jablonowski, K., Raina, M., Arce, M. et al., The human and mouse complement of SH2 domain proteins-establishing the boundaries of phosphotyrosine signaling. Mol. Cell 2006, 22, 851-868.
16. Liu, B. A., Shah, E., Jablonowski, K., Stergachis, A. et al., The SH2 domain-containing proteins in 21 species establish the provenance and scope of phosphotyrosine signaling in eukaryotes. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4, ra83.
17. Lappalainen, I., Thusberg, J., Shen, B., Vihinen, M., Genome wide analysis of pathogenic SH2 domain mutations. Proteins 2008, 72, 779-792.
18. Machida, K., Eschrich, S., Li, J., Bai, Y. et al., Characterizing tyrosine phosphorylation signaling in lung cancer using SH2 profiling. PLoS One 2010, 5, e13470.
19. Machida, K., Thompson, C. M., Dierck, K., Jablonowski, K. et al., High-throughput phosphotyrosine profiling using SH2 domains. Mol. Cell 2007, 26, 899-915.
20. Pawson, T., Warner, N., Oncogenic re-wiring of cellular signaling pathways. Oncogene 2007, 26, 1268-1275.
21. Jin, J., Xie, X., Chen, C., Park, J. G. et al., Eukaryotic protein domains as functional units of cellular evolution. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra76.
22. Pawson, T., Specificity in signal transduction: from phosphotyrosine-SH2 domain interactions to complex cellular systems. Cell 2004, 116, 191-203.
23. Pawson, T., Nash, P., Protein-protein interactions define specificity in signal transduction. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 1027-1047.
24. Chothia, C., Gough, J., Genomic and structural aspects of protein evolution. Biochem. J. 2009, 419, 15-28.
25. Vogel, C., Chothia, C., Protein family expansions and biological complexity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2006, 2, e48.
26. Mohammad, D. H., Yaffe, M. B., 14-3-3 proteins, FHA domains and BRCT domains in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009, 8, 1009-1017.
27. Chen, C., Nott, T. J., Jin, J., Pawson, T., Deciphering arginine methylation: tudor tells the tale. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 12, 629-642.
28. Dikic, I., Wakatsuki, S., Walters, K. J., Ubiquitin-binding domains-from structures to functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 10, 659-671.
29. Gareau, J. R., Lima, C. D., The SUMO pathway: emerging mechanisms that shape specificity, conjugation and recognition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 11, 861-871.
30. Peng, C., Lu, Z., Xie, Z., Cheng, Z. et al., The first identification of lysine malonylation substrates and its regulatory enzyme. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, M111.012658.
31. Tan, M., Luo, H., Lee, S., Jin, F. et al., Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell 2011, 146, 1016-1028.
32. Zhang, Z., Tan, M., Xie, Z., Dai, L. et al., Identification of lysine succinylation as a new post-translational modification. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 58-63.
33. Linding, R., Russell, R. B., Neduva, V., Gibson, T. J., GlobPlot: exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3701-3708.
34. Zarrinpar, A., Bhattacharyya, R. P., Lim, W. A., The structure and function of proline recognition domains. Sci STKE 2003, 2003, RE8.
35. Berry, D. M., Nash, P., Liu, S. K., Pawson, T. et al., A high-affinity Arg-X-X-Lys SH3 binding motif confers specificity for the interaction between Gads and SLP-76 in T cell signaling. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 1336-1341.
36. Stamenova, S. D., French, M. E., He, Y., Francis, S. A. et al., Ubiquitin binds to and regulates a subset of SH3 domains. Mol. Cell. 2007, 25, 273-284.
37. Harris, B. Z., Lim, W. A., Mechanism and role of PDZ domains in signaling complex assembly. J. Cell. Sci. 2001, 114, 3219-3231.
38. Zimmermann, P., Meerschaert, K., Reekmans, G., Leenaerts, I. et al., PIP(2)-PDZ domain binding controls the association of syntenin with the plasma membrane. Mol. Cell. 2002, 9, 1215-1225.
39. Wu, H., Feng, W., Chen, J., Chan, L. N. et al., PDZ domains of Par-3 as potential phosphoinositide signaling integrators. Mol. Cell. 2007, 28, 886-898.
40. Mongiovi, A. M., Romano, P. R., Panni, S., Mendoza, M. et al., A novel peptide-SH3 interaction. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 5300-5309.
41. Jia, C. Y., Nie, J., Wu, C., Li, C. et al., Novel Src homology 3 domain-binding motifs identified from proteomic screen of a Pro-rich region. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1155-1166.
42. Sparks, A. B., Rider, J. E., Hoffman, N. G., Fowlkes, D. M. et al., Distinct ligand preferences of Src homology 3 domains from Src, Yes, Abl, Cortactin, p53bp2, PLCgamma, Crk, and Grb2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 1540-1544.
43. Liu, B. A., Jablonowski, K., Shah, E. E., Engelmann, B. W., et al., SH2 domains recognize contextual peptide sequence information to determine selectivity. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 2391-2404.
44. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chaudhuri, M., Gish, G. et al., SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences. Cell 1993, 72, 767-778.
45. Muslin, A. J., Tanner, J. W., Allen, P. M., Shaw, A. S., Interaction of 14-3-3 with signaling proteins is mediated by the recognition of phosphoserine. Cell 1996, 84, 889-897.
46. Lu, P. J., Zhou, X. Z., Shen, M., Lu, K. P., Function of WW domains as phosphoserine- or phosphothreonine-binding modules. Science 1999, 283, 1325-1328.
47. Durocher, D., Henckel, J., Fersht, A. R., Jackson, S. P., The FHA domain is a modular phosphopeptide recognition motif. Mol. Cell 1999, 4, 387-394.
48. Kavanaugh, W. M., Turck, C. W., Williams, L. T., PTB domain binding to signaling proteins through a sequence motif containing phosphotyrosine. Science 1995, 268, 1177-1179.
49. Chung, H. J., Huang, Y. H., Lau, L. F., Huganir, R. L., Regulation of the NMDA receptor complex and trafficking by activity-dependent phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit PDZ ligand. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 10248-10259.
50. Gardoni, F., Mauceri, D., Fiorentini, C., Bellone, C. et al., CaMKII-dependent phosphorylation regulates SAP97/NR2A interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 44745-44752.
51. Lee, J. Y., Chiu, Y. H., Asara, J., Cantley, L. C., Inhibition of PI3K binding to activators by serine phosphorylation of PI3K regulatory subunit p85{alpha} Src homology-2 domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011, 108, 14157-14162.
52. Nash, P., Tang, X., Orlicky, S., Chen, Q. et al., Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication. Nature 2001, 414, 514-521.
53. Dueber, J. E., Mirsky, E. A., Lim, W. A., Engineering synthetic signaling proteins with ultrasensitive input/output control. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 660-662.
54. Mittag, T., Marsh, J., Grishaev, A., Orlicky, S. et al., Structure/function implications in a dynamic complex of the intrinsically disordered Sic1 with the Cdc4 subunit of an SCF ubiquitin ligase. Structure 2010, 18, 494-506.
55. London, N., Movshovitz-Attias, D., Schueler-Furman, O., The structural basis of peptide-protein binding strategies. Structure 2010, 18, 188-199.
56. Bogan, A. A., Thorn, K. S., Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 280, 1-9.
57. Finkelstein, A. V., Janin, J., The price of lost freedom: entropy of bimolecular complex formation. Protein Eng. 1989, 3, 1-3.
58. Ward, J. M., Gorenstein, N. M., Tian, J., Martin, S. F. et al. Constraining Binding Hot Spots: NMR and MD Simulations Provide a Structural Explanation for Enthalp-Entropy Compensation in SH2-Ligand Binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11058-11070.
59. Bradshaw, J. M., Mitaxov, V., Waksman, G., Investigation of phosphotyrosine recognition by the SH2 domain of the Src kinase. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293, 971-985.
60. Gan, W., Roux, B., Binding specificity of SH2 domains: insight from free energy simulations. Proteins 2009, 74, 996-1007.
61. Fuxreiter, M., Tompa, P., Simon, I., Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 950-956.
62. Marengere, L. E., Songyang, Z., Gish, G. D., Schaller, M. D. et al., SH2 domain specificity and activity modified by a single residue. Nature 1994, 369, 502-505.
63. Gorelik, M., Stanger, K., Davidson, A. R., A conserved residue in the yeast Bem1p SH3 domain maintains the high level of binding specificity required for function. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 19470-19477.
64. Alexander, J., Lim, D., Joughin, B. A., Hegemann, B. et al., Spatial exclusivity combined with positive and negative selection of phosphorylation motifs is the basis for context-dependent mitotic signaling. Sci. signal., 4, ra42.
65. Bradbury, A. R., Sidhu, S., Dubel, S., McCafferty, J., Beyond natural antibodies: the power of in vitro display technologies. Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 245-254.
66. Friesen, W. J., Darby, M. K., Specific RNA binding proteins constructed from zinc fingers. Nat. Struct. Boil. 1998, 5, 543-546.
67. Huang, H., Li, L., Wu, C., Schibli, D. et al., Defining the specificity space of the human SRC homology 2 domain. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 768-784.
68. Stiffler, M. A., Chen, J. R., Grantcharova, V. P., Lei, Y. et al., PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science 2007, 317, 364-369.
69. Kaneko, T., Huang, H., Zhao, B., Li, L. et al., Loops govern SH2 domain specificity by controlling access to binding pockets. Sci. Signal., 3, ra34.
70. Stein, A., Aloy, P., Contextual specificity in peptide-mediated protein interactions. PLoS One 2008, 3, e2524.
71. Bae, J. H., Lew, E. D., Yuzawa, S., Tome, F. et al., The selectivity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling is controlled by a secondary SH2 domain binding site. Cell 2009, 138, 514-524.
72. Tanaka, M., Gupta, R., Mayer, B. J., Differential inhibition of signaling pathways by dominant-negative SH2/SH3 adapter proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 6829-6837.
73. Bashor, C. J., Helman, N. C., Yan, S., Lim, W. A., Using engineered scaffold interactions to reshape MAP kinase pathway signaling dynamics. Science (New York, N.Y) 2008, 319, 1539-1543.
74. Pawson, T., Dynamic control of signaling by modular adaptor proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2007, 19, 112-116.
75. Gruenheid, S., DeVinney, R., Bladt, F., Goosney, D. et al., Enteropathogenic E. coli Tir binds Nck to initiate actin pedestal formation in host cells. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2001, 3, 856-859.
76. Howard, P. L., Chia, M. C., Del Rizzo, S., Liu, F. F., et al., Redirecting tyrosine kinase signaling to an apoptotic caspase pathway through chimeric adaptor proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003, 100, 11267-11272.
77. Gureasko, J., Galush, W. J., Boykevisch, S., Sondermann, H. et al., Membrane-dependent signal integration by the Ras activator Son of sevenless. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biolo. 2008, 15, 452-461.
78. Klein, P., Pawson, T., Tyers, M., Mathematical modeling suggests cooperative interactions between a disordered polyvalent ligand and a single receptor site. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 1669-1678.
79. Borg, M., Mittag, T., Pawson, T., Tyers, M. et al., Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 9650-9655.
80. Kholodenko, B. N., Four-dimensional organization of protein kinase signaling cascades: the roles of diffusion, endocytosis and molecular motors. J. Exp. Biol. 2003, 206, 2073-2082.
81. Kholodenko, B. N., Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space. Nat. Rev. 2006, 7, 165-176.
82. Kholodenko, B. N., Hoek, J. B., Westerhoff, H. V., Why cytoplasmic signalling proteins should be recruited to cell membranes. Trend Cell Biol. 2000, 10, 173-178.
83. Groves, J. T., Kuriyan, J., Molecular mechanisms in signal transduction at the membrane. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 659-665.
84. Li, J., Nayak, S., Mrksich, M., Rate enhancement of an interfacial biochemical reaction through localization of substrate and enzyme by an adaptor domain. J. Phys. Chem. 2010, 114, 15113-15118.
85. Amit, I., Wides, R., Yarden, Y., Evolvable signaling networks of receptor tyrosine kinases: relevance of robustness to malignancy and to cancer therapy. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3, 151.
86. Barabasi, A. L., Albert, R., Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (New York, N.Y 1999, 286, 509-512.
87. Hlavacek, W. S., Faeder, J. R., Blinov, M. L., Perelson, A. S. et al., The complexity of complexes in signal transduction. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 84, 783-794.
88. Brown, C. J., Takayama, S., Campen, A. M., Vise, P. et al., Evolutionary rate heterogeneity in proteins with long disordered regions. J. Mol. Evol. 2002, 55, 104-110.
89. Neduva, V., Russell, R. B., Linear motifs: evolutionary interaction switches. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 3342-3345.
90. Haynes, C., Oldfield, C. J., Ji, F., Klitgord, N. et al., Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2006, 2, e100.
91. Xie, H., Vucetic, S., Iakoucheva, L. M., Oldfield, C. J. et al., Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 3. Ligands, post-translational modifications, and diseases associated with intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 1917-1932.
92. Lehar, J., Krueger, A., Zimmermann, G., Borisy, A., High-order combination effects and biological robustness. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4, 10.1038/msb.2008.51.
93. Frank, R., Heikens, W., Heisterberg-Moutsis, G., Blocker, H., A new general approach for the simultaneous chemical synthesis of large numbers of oligonucleotides: segmental solid supports. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983, 11, 4365-4377.
94. Geysen, H. M., Meloen, R. H., Barteling, S. J., Use of peptide synthesis to probe viral antigens for epitopes to a resolution of a single amino acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1984, 81, 3998-4002.
95. Frank, R., The SPOT-synthesis technique. Synthetic peptide arrays on membrane supports-principles and applications. J. Immunol. Methods 2002, 267, 13-26.
96. Boisguerin, P., Leben, R., Ay, B., Radziwill, G. et al., An improved method for the synthesis of cellulose membrane-bound peptides with free C termini is useful for PDZ domain binding studies. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 449-459.
97. Rodriguez, M., Li, S. S., Harper, J. W., Songyang, Z., An oriented peptide array library (OPAL) strategy to study protein-protein interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 8802-8807.
98. Weiser, A. A., Or-Guil, M., Tapia, V., Leichsenring, A. et al., SPOT synthesis: reliability of array-based measurement of peptide binding affinity. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 342, 300-311.
99. Wolf-Yadlin, A., Sevecka, M., MacBeath, G., Dissecting protein function and signaling using protein microarrays. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 398-405.
100. MacBeath, G., Protein microarrays and proteomics. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32(Suppl), 526-532.
101. Austin, J., Holway, A. H., Contact printing of protein microarrays. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 785, 379-394.
102. Kim, J., Daniel, J., Espejo, A., Lake, A. et al., Tudor, MBT and chromo domains gauge the degree of lysine methylation. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7, 397-403.
103. Espejo, A., Cote, J., Bednarek, A., Richard, S. et al., A protein-domain microarray identifies novel protein-protein interactions. Biochem. J. 2002, 367, 697-702.
104. Smith, G. P., Petrenko, V. A., Phage display. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 391-410.
105. Sidhu, S. S., Fairbrother, W. J., Deshayes, K., Exploring protein-protein interactions with phage display. Chembiochem 2003, 4, 14-25.
106. Tonikian, R., Zhang, Y., Sazinsky, S. L., Currell, B. et al., A specificity map for the PDZ domain family. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, e239.
107. Ernst, A., Sazinsky, S. L., Hui, S., Currell, B. et al., Rapid evolution of functional complexity in a domain family. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra50.
108. Fowler, D. M., Araya, C. L., Fleishman, S. J., Kellogg, E. H. et al., High-resolution mapping of protein sequence-function relationships. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 741-746.
109. Mann, M., Jensen, O. N., Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 255-261.
110. Gingras, A. C., Gstaiger, M., Raught, B., Aebersold, R., Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 8, 645-654.
111. Ahrens, C. H., Brunner, E., Qeli, E., Basler, K. et al., Generating and navigating proteome maps using mass spectrometry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 11, 789-801.
112. Ingham, R. J., Colwill, K., Howard, C., Dettwiler, S. et al., WW domains provide a platform for the assembly of multiprotein networks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 7092-7106.
113. Lowery, D. M., Clauser, K. R., Hjerrild, M., Lim, D. et al., Proteomic screen defines the Polo-box domain interactome and identifies Rock2 as a Plk1 substrate. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 2262-2273.
114. Christofk, H. R., Wu, N., Cantley, L. C., Asara, J. M., Proteomic screening method for phosphopeptide motif binding proteins using peptide libraries. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 4158-4164.
115. Weng, Z., Rickles, R. J., Feng, S., Richard, S. et al., Structure-function analysis of SH3 domains: SH3 binding specificity altered by single amino acid substitutions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 5627-5634.
116. Song, E., Gao, S., Tian, R., Ma, S. et al., A high efficiency strategy for binding property characterization of peptide-binding domains. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 1368-1381.
117. Tong, A. H., Drees, B., Nardelli, G., Bader, G. D. et al., A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 2002, 295, 321-324.
118. Lievens, S., Lemmens, I., Tavernier, J., Mammalian two-hybrids come of age. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2009, 34, 579-588.
119. Lievens, S., Vanderroost, N., Van der Heyden, J., Gesellchen, V. et al., Array MAPPIT: high-throughput interactome analysis in mammalian cells. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 877-886.
120. Barrios-Rodiles, M., Brown, K. R., Ozdamar, B., Bose, R. et al., High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science 2005, 307, 1621-1625.
121. Obenauer, J. C., Cantley, L. C., Yaffe, M. B., Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3635-3641.
122. Liu, B. A., Jablonowski, K., Engelmann, B. W., Higginbotham, K. et al., Src homology 2 domain binding sites in insulin, IGF-1 and FGF receptor mediated signaling networks reveal an extensive potential interactome. Publication in preparation 2012.
123. Choi, H., Larsen, B., Lin, Z. Y., Breitkreutz, A. et al., SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 70-73.
124. Sardiu, M. E., Cai, Y., Jin, J., Swanson, S. K. et al., Probabilistic assembly of human protein interaction networks from label-free quantitative proteomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 1454-1459.
125. Sowa, M. E., Bennett, E. J., Gygi, S. P., Harper, J. W., Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell 2009, 138, 389-403.
126. Sylvester, J. E., Bray, T. S., Kron, S. J., Annotator: post-processing software for generating function-based signatures from quantitative mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2012 11, 1521-1536.
127. Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M. et al., A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 4569-4574.
128. Huang, H., Jedynak, B. M., Bader, J. S., Where have all the interactions gone? Estimating the coverage of two-hybrid protein interaction maps. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3, e214.
129. Hart, G. T., Ramani, A. K., Marcotte, E. M., How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biol. 2006, 7, 120.
130. Prasad, T. S., Kandasamy, K., Pandey, A., Human protein reference database and human proteinpedia as discovery tools for systems biology. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 577, 67-79.
131. Stark, C., Breitkreutz, B. J., Reguly, T., Boucher, L. et al., BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D535-D539.
132. Zanzoni, A., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Quondam, M., Ausiello, G. et al., MINT: a molecular INTeraction database. FEBS Lett. 2002, 513, 135-140.
133. Jones, R. B., Gordus, A., Krall, J. A., MacBeath, G., A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays. Nature 2006, 439, 168-174.
134. Bisson, N., James, D. A., Ivosev, G., Tate, S. A. et al., Selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry reveals the dynamics of signaling through the GRB2 adaptor. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 653-658.
135. Olsen, J. V., Vermeulen, M., Santamaria, A., Kumar, C. et al., Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, ra3.
136. Huttlin, E. L., Jedrychowski, M. P., Elias, J. E., Goswami, T. et al., A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 2010, 143, 1174-1189.
137. Borisov, N., Aksamitiene, E., Kiyatkin, A., Legewie, S. et al., Systems-level interactions between insulin-EGF networks amplify mitogenic signaling. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5, 256.
138. Vetter, S. W., Zhang, Z. Y., Probing the phosphopeptide specificities of protein tyrosine phosphatases, SH2 and PTB domains with combinatorial library methods. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2002, 3, 365-397.
139. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., McGlade, J., Olivier, P. et al., Specific motifs recognized by the SH2 domains of Csk, 3BP2, fps/fes, GRB-2, HCP, SHC, Syk, and Vav. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 2777-2785.
140. Tonikian, R., Zhang, Y., Boone, C., Sidhu, S. S., Identifying specificity profiles for peptide recognition modules from phage-displayed peptide libraries. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1368-1386.
141. Baldi, P., Chauvin, Y., Hunkapiller, T., McClure, M. A., Hidden Markov models of biological primary sequence information. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 1059-1063.
142. Krogh, A., Brown, M., Mian, I. S., Sjolander, K. et al., Hidden Markov models in computational biology. Applications to protein modeling. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 235, 1501-1531.
143. Sonnhammer, E. L., Eddy, S. R., Birney, E., Bateman, A. et al., Pfam: multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 320-322.
144. Horan, K., Shelton, C. R., Girke, T., Predicting conserved protein motifs with sub-HMMs. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11, 205.
145. Puntervoll, P., Linding, R., Gemund, C., Chabanis-Davidson, S. et al., ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3625-3630.
146. Panni, S., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Kiemer, L., Cabibbo, A. et al., Combining peptide recognition specificity and context information for the prediction of the 14-3-3-mediated interactome in S. cerevisiae and H. sapiens. Proteomics 2011, 11, 128-143.
147. Kaustov, L., Ouyang, H., Amaya, M., Lemak, A. et al., Recognition and specificity determinants of the human cbx chromodomains. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 521-529.
148. Mishra, P., Socolich, M., Wall, M. A., Graves, J. et al., Dynamic scaffolding in a G protein-coupled signaling system. Cell 2007, 131, 80-92.
149. Carducci, M., Perfetto, L., Briganti, L., Paoluzi, S. et al., The protein interaction network mediated by human SH3 domains. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012 30, 4-15.
150. Tonikian, R., Xin, X., Toret, C. P., Gfeller, D. et al., Bayesian modeling of the yeast SH3 domain interactome predicts spatiotemporal dynamics of endocytosis proteins. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000218.
151. Lenfant, N., Polanowska, J., Bamps, S., Omi, S. et al., A genome-wide study of PDZ-domain interactions in C. elegans reveals a high frequency of non-canonical binding. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 671.
152. Smith, M. J., Hardy, W. R., Murphy, J. M., Jones, N. et al., Screening for PTB domain binding partners and ligand specificity using proteome-derived NPXY peptide arrays. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 8461-8474.
153. Hu, H., Columbus, J., Zhang, Y., Wu, D. et al., A map of WW domain family interactions. Proteomics 2004, 4, 643-655.