Contextual specificity in peptide-mediated protein interactions

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 7, 2008, Pages

  Stein, Amelie ^a   Aloy, Patrick ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; ANIMAL; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; THERMODYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 49749117432     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002524     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Dricot A, et al. (2005) Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437: 1173-1178.
2. Stelzl U, Worm U, Lalowski M, Haenig C, Brembeck FH, et al. (2005) A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122: 957-968.
3. Aloy P, Russell RB (2006) Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 188-197.
4. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
5. Chakrabarti P, Janin J (2002) Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins 47: 331-343.
6. Pawson T, Nash P (2003) Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 300: 445 452.
7. Romero PR, Zaidi S, Fang YY, Uversky VN, Radivojac P, et al. (2006) Alternative splicing in concert with protein intrinsic disorder enables increased functional diversity in multicellular organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 8390-8395.
8. Tompa P (2002) Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 27: 527-533.
9. Li SS (2005) Specificity and versatility of SH3 and other proline-recognition domains: structural basis and implications for cellular signal transduction. Biochem J 390: 641-653.
10. Landgraf C, Panni S, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Castagnoli L, Schneider-Mergener J, et al. (2004) Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLoS Biol 2: E14.
11. Barrios-Rodiles M, Brown KR, Ozdamar B, Bose R, Liu Z, et al. (2005) High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science 307: 1621-1625.
12. Pawson T, Linding R (2005) Synthetic modular systems-reverse engineering of signal transduction. FEBS Lett 579: 1808-1814.
13. Puntervoll P, Linding R, Gemund C, Chabanis-Davidson S, Mattingsdal M, et al. (2003) ELM server: A new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3625-3630.
14. Zarrinpar A, Park SH, Lim WA (2003) Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection. Nature 426: 676-680.
15. Stiffler MA, Chen JR, Grantcharova VP, Lei Y, Fuchs D, et al. (2007) PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science 317: 364-369.
16. Linding R, Jensen LJ, Ostheimer GJ, van Vugt MA, Jorgensen C, et al. (2007) Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 129: 1415-1426.
17. Freund C, Kuhne R, Yang H, Park S, Reinherz EL, et al. (2002) Dynamic interaction of CD2 with the GYF and the SH3 domain of compartmentalized effector molecules. Embo J 21: 5985-5995.
18. Kim HY, Ahn BY, Cho Y (2001) Structural basis for the inactivation of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by SV40 large T antigen. Embo J 20: 295-304.
19. Ball LJ, Kuhne R, Hoffmann B, Hafner A, Schmieder P, et al. (2000) Dual epitope recognition by the VASP EVH1 domain modulates polyproline ligand specificity and binding affinity. Embo J 19: 4903-4914.
20. Darimont BD, Wagner RL, Apriletti JW, Stallcup MR, Kushner PJ, et al. (1998) Structure and specificity of nuclear receptor-coactivator interactions. Genes Dev 12: 3343-3356.
21. Durocher D, Taylor IA, Sarbassova D, Haire LF, Westcott SL, et al. (2000) The molecular basis of FHA domain:phosphopeptide binding specificity and implications for phospho-dependent signaling mechanisms. Mol Cell 6: 1169-1182.
22. Byeon IJ, Li H, Song H, Gronenborn AM, Tsai MD (2005) Sequential phosphorylation and multisite interactions characterize specific target recognition by the FHA domain of Ki67. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12: 987-993.
23. Mahajan A, Yuan C, Pike BL, Heierhorst J, Chang CF, et al. (2005) FHA domain-ligand interactions: importance of integrating chemical and biological approaches. J Am Chem Soc 127: 14572-14573.
24. Terrak M, Kerff F, Langsetmo K, Tao T, Dominguez R (2004) Structural basis of protein phosphatase 1 regulation. Nature 429: 780-784.
25. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247: 536-540.
26. Ye H, Park YC, Kreishman M, Kieff E, Wu H (1999) The structural basis for the recognition of diverse receptor sequences by TRAF2. Mol Cell 4: 321-330.
27. Kelley R, Ideker T (2005) Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nat Biotechnol 23: 561-566.
28. Ulitsky I, Shamir R (2007) Pathway redundancy and protein essentiality revealed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae interaction networks. Mol Syst Biol 3: 104.
29. Egea PF, Klaholz BP, Moras D (2000) Ligand-protein interactions in nuclear receptors of hormones. FEBS Lett 476: 62 67.
30. Moras D, Gronemeyer H (1998) The nuclear receptor ligand-binding domain: structure and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10: 384-391.
31. Folkertsma S, van Noort PI, de Heer A, Carati P, Brandt R, el al. (2007) The use of in vitro peptide binding profiles and in silico ligand-receptor interaction profiles to describe ligand-induced conformations of the retinoid X receptor alpha ligand-binding domain. Mol Endocrinol 21: 30-48.
32. Aloy P, Russell RB (2002) Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 5896-5901.
33. Kiel C, Wohlgemuth S, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, et al. (2005) Recognizing and defining true Ras binding domains H: in silico prediction based on homology modelling and energy calculations. J Mol Biol 34: 759-775.
34. McClean MN, Mody A, Broach JR, Ramanathan S (2007) Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways. Nat Genet 39: 409-414.
35. Neduva V, Russell RB (2006) Peptides mediating interaction networks: new leads at last. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17: 465 471.
36. Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Bockler B, Griffiths-Jones S, Hollich V, et al. (2006) Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D247-251.
37. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L (2002) Predicting changes in de stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J Mol Biol 320: 369-387.
38. Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, et al. (2005) The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W382-388.
39. Kiel C, Foglierini M, Kuemmerer N, Beltrao P, Serrano L (2007) A genomewide Ras-effector interaction network. J Mol Biol 370: 1020-1032.
40. Tokuriki N, Stricher F, Schymkowitz J, Serrano L, Tawlik DS (2007) The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed. J Mol Biol 369: 1318 1332.
41. Pei J, Grishin NV (2001) AL2CO: calculation of positional conservation in a protein sequence alignment Bioinformatics 17: 700-712.
42. Russell RB, Barton GJ (1992) Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels. Proteins 14: 309-323.
43. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 48: 44-453.
44. Felsenstein J (1996) Inferring phylogenies from protein sequences by parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. Methods Enzymol 266: 418-427.