Communication processes and conflict management

The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 81-114

  Olekalns, Mara ^a   Putnam, Linda L ^b   Weingart, Laurie R ^c   Metcalf, Laurie ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81155145559     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203810125     Document Type: Chapter

References (177)

1. Adair, W. L. (2003). Integrative sequences and negotiation outcome in same- and mixed-culture negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14 (3-4), 273-296.
2. Adair, W., Brett, J., Lempereur, A., Okumura, T., Shikhirev, P., Tinsley, C., et al. (2004). Culture and negotiation strategy. Negotiation Journal, 20, 87–111.
3. Adair, W., & Brett, J. M. (2005). The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organizational Science, 16(1), 33–51.
4. Adair, W., Okumura, T., & Brett, J. (2001). Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The U.S. and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 371–385.
5. Adler, N. J., Graham, J. L., & Gehrke, T. S. (1987). Business negotiations in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Journal of Business Research, 15, 411–429.
6. Allred, K. G. (1999). Anger and retaliation: Toward an understanding of impassioned conflict in organizations. In R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations(Vol. 7, pp. 27–58). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7. Allred, K. G., Mallozzi, J. S., Matsui, F., & Raia, C. P. (1997). The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 175–187.
8. Arunachalam, V., & Dilla, W. N. (1995). Judgment accuracy and outcomes in negotiations: A causal modeling analysis of decision-aiding effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 289–304.
9. Baron, R. A. (1990). Environmentally induced positive affect: Its impact on self-efficacy, task performance, negotiation, and conflict. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 368–384.
10. Baron, R. A., Fortin, S. P., Frei, R. L., Hauver, L. A., & Shack, M. L. (1990). Reducing organizational conflict: The role of socially-induced positive affect. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 133–152.
11. Barry, B. (1999). The tactical use of emotion in negotiation. In R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations(Vol. 7, pp. 93–121). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Barry, B., Fulmer, I. S., & Van Kleef, G. (2004). I laughed, I cried, I settled: The role of emotion in negotiation. In M. J. Gelfand & J. M. Brett (Eds.), The handbook of negotiation and culture: Theoretical advances and cross-cultural perspectives(pp. 71–94). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Baxter, L. A. (1982). Conflict management: An episodic approach. Small Group Behavior, 13, 23–42.
14. Betancourt, H. (1990). An attributional approach to intergroup and international conflict. In S. Graham & V. Folkes (Eds.), Attribution theory: Application to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict(pp. 205–220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The new managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company.
16. Bodtker, A. M., & Jameson, J. K. (2001). Emotion in conflict formation and its transformation: application to organizational conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 259–275.
17. Brett, J., Olekalns, M., Friedman, R., Goates, N., Anderson, C., & Lisco, C. (2007). Sticks and stones: Language, structure and on-line dispute resolution. Academy of Management Review, 50, 85–100
18. Brett, J. M., Shapiro, D. L., & Lytle, A. L. (1998). Refocusing rights- and power oriented negotiators toward integrative negotiations: Process and outcome effects. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 410–424.
19. Brett, J. M., Weingart, L. R., & Olekalns, M. (2004). Baubles, bangles and beads: Modeling the evolution of negotiating groups over time. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & S. Blount (Eds.), Research in managing groups and teams: Time in groups(Vol. 6, pp. 39–64). New York: Elsevier Science.
20. Brew, F. P., & Cairns, D. R. (2004). Styles of managing interpersonal workplace conflict in relation to status and face concern: A study with Anglos and Chinese. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 27–56.
21. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
22. Cai, D. A., Wilson, S. R., & Drake, L. E. (2000). Culture in the context of intercultural negotiation: Individualism-collectivism and paths to integrative agreements. Human Communication Research, 26, 591–671.
23. Carnevale, P. (2006). The structure of integrative agreement: The agreement circumplex. Paper presented at the International Association of Conflict Management Conference, Montreal, Canada.
24. Carnevale, P. J., & Isen, A. M. (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1–13.
25. Carnevale, P. J. D., & Lawler, E. J. (1987). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 636–659.
26. Coleman, P. T. (2000). Fostering ripeness in seemingly intractable conflict: An experimental study. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 300–317.
27. Conrad, C. (1991). Communication in conflict: Style-strategy relationships. Communication Monographs, 58, 135–155.
28. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.
29. Davidson, M. N., & Greenhalgh, L. (1999). The role of emotion in negotiation: The impact of anger and race. In R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations(Vol. 7, pp. 3–26). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
30. De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S., & Nauta, A. (2001). A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 645–668.
31. De Dreu, C. K. W., Giebels E., & Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 408–422.
32. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiations: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889–905.
33. Desanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organizational Science, 5, 121–147.
34. Diez, M. A. (1986). Negotiation competence: A conceptualization of the rules of negotiation interaction. In D. G. Ellis & W. A. Donohue (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Donohue, W. A. (1981). Development of a model of rule use in negotiation. Communication Monographs, 48, 106–120.
36. Dorado, M. A., Medina, F. J., Munduate, L., Cisneros, I. F. J., & Euwema, M. (2002). Computer-mediated negotiation of an escalated conflict. Small Group Research, 33, 509–524.
37. Drake, B. H., & Moberg, D. J. (1986). Communicating influence attempts in dyads: Linguistic sedatives and palliatives. Academy of Management Review, 11, 567–584.
38. Drake, L. E. (2001). The culture-negotiation link: Integrative and distributive bargaining through an intercultural communication lens. Human Communication Research, 27, 317–349.
39. Druckman, D. (1986). Stages, turning-points, and crises: Negotiating military base rights, Spain and the United-States. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30,327–360.
40. Druckman, D. (2001). Turning points in international negotiation—A comparative analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 519–544.
41. Druckman, D., & Broome, B. J. (1991). Value differences and conflict resolution: Familiarity or liking? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 571–593.
42. Druckman, D., Husbands, J. L., & Johnston, K. (1991). Turning-points in the INF negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 7, 55–67.
43. Elsayed-Ekhouly, S. M., & Buda, R. (1996). Organizational conflict: A comparative analysis of conflict styles across cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 71–81.
44. Feng, J. J., Lazar, J., & Preece, J. (2004). Empathy and online interpersonal trust: A fragile relationship. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23, 97–106.
45. Filley, A. (1975). Interpersonal conflict resolution. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
46. Firth, A. (1995). Talking for change: Commodity negotiating by telephone. In A. Firth (Ed.), The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace(pp. 183–222). Kidlington, U.K.: Pergamon Elsevier Science Ltd.
47. Fischer-Lokou, J., & Guéguen, N. (2001). Impact of a mediator, mutual representation of the negotiators and decision making in a dyad: Evaluation in the case of computer-mediated communication. Studia Psychologica, 43, 13–21.
48. Fischer-Lokou, J., Guéguen, N., & Lépy, N. (2004). Effects of communication on information networks versus face-to-face on the reciprocal representation of negotiators/Effets de la communication par réseaux informatiques versus en face-à-face sur la representation réciproque des négociateurs. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57, 525–533.
49. Forgas, J. P. (1998). On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 565–577.
50. Friedman, R., Anderson, C., Brett, J., Olekalns, M., Goates, N., & Lisco, C. C. (2004). The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: Evidence from electronically mediated disputes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 369–376.
51. Friedman, R. A., & Currall, S. C. (2003). Conflict escalation: Dispute exacerbating elements of e-mail communication. Human Relations, 56, 1325–1347.
52. Gayle, B. M. (1991). Sex equity in workplace conflict management. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 152–169.
53. Gersick, C. J. G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274–309.
54. Giebels, E., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2000). Interdependence in negotiation: Effects of exit options and social motive on distributive and integrative negotiation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 255–272.
55. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
56. Graham, J. L. (1985). The influence of culture on the process of business negotiations: An exploratory study. Journal of International Business Studies, 16, 81–96.
57. Graham, J. L., Kim, D. K., Lin, C., & Robinson, M. (1988). Buyer-seller negotiations around the Pacific Rim: Differences in fundamental exchange processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 48–54.
58. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Press.
59. Harinck, F., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2004). Negotiating interests or values and reaching integrative agreements: The importance of time pressure and temporary impasses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 595–611.
60. Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., Irmer, B., & Chang, A. (2002). The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 33, 439–465.
61. Hollingshead, A. B., & Carnevale, P. (1990). Positive affect and decision frame in integrative bargaining: A reversal of the frame effect. Academy of Management Proceedings, 385–389.
62. Holmes, M. E. (1992). Phase structures in negotiation. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation(pp. 83–105). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63. Holt, J. L., & DeVore, C. J. (2005). Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolution: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 165–196.
64. Hyder, E. B., Prietula, M. J., & Weingart, L. R. (2000). Getting to best: Efficiency versus optimality in negotiation. Cognitive Science, 24, 169–204.
65. Isen, A. M., & Patrick, R. (1983). The effect of positive feelings on risk-taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 194–202.
66. Jett, Q. R., & George, J. M. (2003). Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 28, 494–507.
67. Kersten, G., Michalowski, W., Szpakowicz, S., & Koperczak, Z. (1991). Restructurable representations of negotiation. Management Science, 37, 1269–1290.
68. Kiesler, S. (1997). Preface. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Kiesler, S., Seigel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.
70. Kirkbride, P. S., Tang, S. F. Y., & Westwood, R. I. (1991). Chinese conflict preferences and negotiating behavior: Cultural and psychological influences. Organizational Studies, 12, 365–386.
71. Kolodner, J. L., & Simpson, R. L. (1989). The MEDIATOR: Analysis of an early casebased problem solver. Cognitive Science, 13, 507–549.
72. Kozan, M. K., & Ergin, C. (1999). The influence of intra-cultural value differences on conflict management practices. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 249–267.
73. Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., & Ng, Z. W. (2005) Egocentrism over e-mail: Can we communicate as well as we think? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 925–936.
74. Lax, D., & Sebenius, J. (1986). The manager as negotiator. New York: Free Press.
75. Lewis, S. A., & Fry, W. R. (1977). Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 75–92.
76. Lim, S. G. S., & Murnighan, K. (1994). Phases, deadlines and the bargaining process, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 153–171.
77. McCready, V., & Roberts, J. E. (1996). A comparison of conflict tactics in the supervisory process. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 39, 191–199.
78. McGinn, K. L., Lingo, E. L., & Ciano, K. (2004). Transitions through out-of-keeping acts. Negotiation Journal, 20, 171–184.
79. Miranda, S. M., & Bostrom, R. P. (1993–1994). The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 63–95.
80. Moberg, P. J. (2001). Linking conflict strategy to the five-factor model: Theoretical and empirical foundations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 47–68.
81. Moore, D. A., Kurtzberg, T. R., Thompson, L. L., & Morris, M. (1999). Long and short routes to success in electronically-mediated negotiations: Group affiliations and good vibrations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 22–43.
82. Morrill, C., & Thomas, C. K. (1992). Organizational conflict management as disputing process: The problem of social escalation. Human Communication Research, 18, 400–428.
83. Morris, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2000). How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 1–50.
84. Murnighan, J. K., Babcock, L., Thompson, L., & Pillutla, M. (1999). The information dilemma in negotiations: Effects of experience, incentives, and integrative potential. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 313–339.
85. Nagel, S. S., & Mills, M. K. (1990). Multi-criteria methods for alternative dispute resolution: With microcomputer software applications. New York: Quorum Books.
86. Natlandsmyr, J. H., & Rognes, J. (1995). Culture, behavior, and negotiation outcomes: A comparative and cross-cultural study of Mexican and Norwegian negotiators. International Journal of Conflict Management, 6, 5–29.
87. Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665–675.
88. Nicotera, A. M. (1993). Beyond two dimensions: A grounded theory model of conflict-handling behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 6, 282–306.
89. Nicotera, A. M. (1994). The use of multiple approaches to conflict: A study of sequences. Human Communication Research, 20, 592–621.
90. Nyhart, J. D., & Samarasan, D. K. (1989). The elements of negotiation management: Using computers to help resolve conflict. Negotiation Journal, 5, 43–62.
91. O’Connor, K. (1997). Motives and cognitions in negotiation: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 114–131.
92. Oetzel, J., Myers, K. K., Meares, M., & Lara, E. (2003). Interpersonal conflict in organizations: Explaining conflict styles via face-negotiation theory. Communication Research Reports, 20, 106–115.
93. Oetzel, J. G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory. Communication Research, 30, 599–624.
94. Okhuysen, G. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, 13, 370–386
95. Olekalns, M., Brett, J. M., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Phases, transitions and interruptions: Modeling processes in multi-party negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14, 191–211.
96. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (1999). Social value orientations and strategy choices in competitive negotiations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 657– 668.
97. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2000). Negotiating optimal outcomes: The role of strategic sequences in competitive negotiations. Human Communication Research, 24, 528–560.
98. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2003a). Social motives in negotiation: The relationship between dyad composition, negotiation processes and outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14, 233–254.
99. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2003b). Testing the relationships among negotiators’ motivational orientations, strategy choices, and outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 101–117.
100. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2005). Moments in time: Meta-cognition, trust, and outcomes in dyadic negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1696–1707.
101. Olekalns, M., Smith, P. L., & Walsh, T. (1996). The process of negotiating: Strategies, timing and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 61–77.
102. Olekalns, M., & Weingart, L. R. (2003, June). Think globally, act locally: Towards an adaptive model of dyadic negotiations in organizations. Paper presented at the 16th annual meeting of the International Association for Conflict Management, Melbourne, Australia.
103. Orcutt, J. D., & Anderson, R. E. (1977). Social interaction, dehumanization, and the “computerized other.” Sociology and Social Research, 61, 380–396.
104. Papa, M. J., & Natalle, E. J. (1989). Gender, strategy selection, and discussion satisfaction in interpersonal conflict. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 260–272.
105. Park, H. S., Lee, H. E., & Song, J. A. (2005). “I am sorry to send you SPAM”: Cross cultural differences in use of apologies in e-mail advertising in Korea and the U.S. Human Communication Research, 31, 365–398.
106. Phillips, E., & Cheston, R. (1979). Conflict resolution: What works? California Management Review, 21, 76–83.
107. Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 208–224.
108. Pinkley, R. L., Brittain, J., Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. (1995). Managerial third-party dispute intervention: An inductive analysis of intervener strategy selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 386–402.
109. Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & Desanctis, G. (1991). Conflict management in a computer- supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37, 926–953.
110. Powell, L., & Hickson, M. (2000). Power imbalance and anticipation of conflict resolution: Positive and negative attributes of perceptual recall. Communication Research Reports, 17, 181–190.
111. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
112. Pruitt, D. G. (1983). Strategic choice in negotiation. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 167–194.
113. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
114. Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621–630.
115. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
116. Purdy, J. M., Nye, P., & Balakrishnan, P. V. (2000). The impact of communication media on negotiated outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 162–187.
117. Putnam, L. L. (1990). Reframing integrative and distributive bargaining: A process perspective. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 2, 3–30.
118. Putnam, L. L. (1994). Challenging the assumptions of traditional approaches to negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 10, 337–346.
119. Putnam, L. L. (2004). Transforming moves as critical moments in negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 20, 275–295.
120. Putnam, L. L., & Folger, J. P. (1988). Communication, conflict and dispute resolution: The study of interaction and the development of conflict theory. Communication Research, 15, 349–359.
121. Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. (1982a). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 171–191.
122. Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. (1982b). The role of communication in bargaining. Communication Monographs, 49, 262–282.
123. Putnam, L. L., & Poole, M. S. (1987). Conflict and negotiation. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication(pp. 549–599). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
124. Putnam, L. L., & Wilson, C. E. (1982). Communicative strategies in organizational conflicts: Reliability and validity of a measurement scale. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook6(pp. 629–652). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
125. Putnam, L. L., & Wilson, S. R. (1989). Argumentation and bargaining strategies as discriminators of integrative outcomes. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach(pp. 549–599). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
126. Putnam, L. L., Wilson, S. R., & Turner, D. B. (1990). The evolution of policy arguments in distributive and integrative bargaining contexts. Argumentation, 4, 129–152.
127. Rahim, A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368–376.
128. Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: Model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44, 1323–1344.
129. Rahim, M. A. (1986). Referent role and styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 79–86.
130. Ramirez, A., Jr., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28, 213–228.
131. Rangaswamy, A., Eliashberg, J., Burke, R., & Wind, J. (1989). Developing marketing expert systems: An application to international negotiations. Journal of Marketing, 53, 24–49.
132. Rangaswamy, A., & Shell, G. R. (1997). Using computers to realize joint gains in negotiations: Toward an “electronic bargaining table.” Management Science, 43, 1147–1163.
133. Reinig, B. A., & Mejias, R. J. (2004). The effects of national culture and anonymity on flaming and criticalness in GSS-supported discussions. Small Group Research, 35, 698–723.
134. Richmond, V. P., Wagner, J. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1983). The impact of perceptions of leadership style, use of power, and conflict management style on organizational outcomes. Communication Quarterly, 31, 27–36.
135. Roloff, M. E., Tutzauer, F. E., & Dailey, W. O. (1989). The role of argumentation in distributive and integrative bargaining contexts: Seeking relative advantage but at what cost? In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach(pp. 109–120). New York: Praeger.
136. Schulz, J. W., & Pruitt, D. G. (1978). The effects of mutual concern on joint welfare. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 480–492.
137. Sheffield, J. (1995). The effect of communication medium on negotiation performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, 159–179.
138. Shell, G. R. (1995). Computer-assisted negotiation and mediation: Where are we and where are we going? Negotiation Journal, 11, 117–121.
139. Short, J. A. (1974). Effects of medium of communication on experimental negotiation. Human Relations, 27, 225–234.
140. Smith, P. L., Olekalns, M., & Weingart, L. R. (2005). Markov chain models of communication processes in negotiation. International Negotiation, 10, 97–113.
141. Sternberg, R. L., & Soriano, L. J. (1984). Styles of conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 115–126.
142. Sycara, K. P. (1991). Problem restructuring in negotiation. Management Science, 37, 1248–1268.
143. Taylor, P. J., & Donald, I. (2003). Foundations and evidence for an interaction-based approach to conflict negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14, 213–232.
144. Thomas, K. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology(pp. 889–935). Chicago: Rand McNally.
145. Thompsen, P. A., & Foulger, D. A. (1996). Effects of pictographs and quoting on flaming in electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 225–243.
146. Thompson, L., Medvec, V. H., Seiden, V., & Kopelman, S. (2001). Poker face, smiley face, and rant ‘n’ rave: Myths and realities about emotion in negotiation. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tinsdale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes(pp. 139–163). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
147. Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002) Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348.
148. Ting-Toomey, S., Gao, G., Trubisky, P., Yang, Z., Kim, H. S., Liu, S., et al. (1991). Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study of five cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 275–296.
149. Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 187–225.
150. Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. F. (2002). Understanding conflict avoidance: Relationship, motivations, actions, and consequences. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 142–164.
151. Turnbull, A. A., Strickland, L., & Shaver, K. G. (1976). Medium of communication, differential power, and phrasing of concessions: Negotiating success and attributions to the opponent. Human Communication Research, 2, 262–270.
152. Valley, K. L., Moag, J., & Bazerman, M. H. (1998). A matter of trust: Effects of communication on the efficiency and distribution of outcomes. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 34, 211–238.
153. Van de Vliert, E., Huismans, S. E., & Euwema, M. C. (1995). Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 271–281.
154. Van de Vliert, E., Nauta, A., Giebels, E. & Janssen, O. (1999). Constructive conflict at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 475–491.
155. Van de Vliert, E., Ohbuchi, K., Van Rossum, B., Hayashi, Y., & Van der Vegt, G. S. (2004). Conglomerated contending by Japanese subordinates. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 192–207.
156. Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K., & Manstead, A. S. (2004a). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 57–76.
157. Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K., & Manstead, A. S. (2004b). The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: A motivated information processing approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 510–528.
158. Vishwanath, A. (2003). Comparing online information effects: A cross-cultural comparison of online information and uncertainty avoidance. Communication Research, 30, 579–598.
159. Volkema, R. J. (1998). A comparison of perceptions of ethical negotiation behavior in Mexico and the United States. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 218–233.
160. Walthier, J. B., & D’Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 324–347.
161. Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
162. Weingart, L. R. (1997). How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group processes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior(Vol. 19, pp. 189–239). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
163. Weingart, L. R., Bennett, R. J., & Brett, J. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation in group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504–517.
164. Weingart, L. R., Hyder, E., & Prietula, M. J. (1996). Knowledge matters: The effect of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1205–1217.
165. Weingart, L., Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2004). Quantitative coding of negotiation processes. International Negotiation, 9, 441–456.
166. Weingart, L. R., Prietula, M. J., Hyder, E., & Genovese, C. (1999). Knowledge and the sequential processes of negotiation: A Markov chain analysis of response-in-kind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 366–393.
167. Weingart, L. R., Thompson, L. L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 7–31.
168. Wheeler, M. (1995). Computers and negotiation: Backing into the future. Negotiation Journal, 11, 169–175.
169. Wichman, H. (1970). Effects of isolation and communication on cooperation in a two-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 114–120.
170. Wilson, J. M., Straus, S. G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 16–33.
171. Wilson, S. R., & Putnam, L. L. (1990). Interaction goals in negotiation. Communication Yearbook, 13, 374–406.
172. Zartman, I. W. (1992). International environmental negotiation: Challenges for analysis and practice. Negotiation Journal, 8, 113–123.
173. Zhang, V. B., Harwood, J., & Hummert, M. L. (2005). Perceptions of conflict management styles in Chinese intergenerational dyads. Communication Monographs, 72, 71–91.
174. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K, Nunamaker, J. F., & Twitchell, D. (2004). Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 81–106.
175. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. Z., Zhang, D., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2004). Language dominance in interpersonal deception in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 381–402.
176. Zigurs, I., Reitsma, R., Lewis, C., Hubscher, R., & Hayes, C. (1999). Accessibility of computer-based simulation models in inherently conflict-laden negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 511–533.
177. Zornoza, A., Ripoll, P., & Peiró, J. M. (2002). Conflict management in groups that work in two different communication contexts: Face-to-face and computer-mediated. Communication Small Group Research, 33, 481–508.