Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 408-422

  De Dreu, Carsten K W ^a   Giebels, Ellen ^b   Van De Vliert, Evert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032357666     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.408     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley.
2. Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1981). Bargaining. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Ben-Yoav, O., & Pruitt, D. (1984). Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 323-335.
4. Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422-447.
5. Blount, S., Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1995). Alternative models of negotiated outcomes and the nontraditional utility concerns that limit their predictability. In R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 5, pp. 95-118). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6. Boon, S. D., & Holmes, J. G. (1991). The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In R. A. Hinde & J. Groebel (Eds.), Cooperation and prosocial behavior (pp. 190-211). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Carnevale, P. J., & Isen, A. (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1-13.
8. Carnevale, P. J., & Lawler, E. J. (1986). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 636-659.
9. Carnevale, P. J., Pruitt, D. G., & Seilheimer, S. (1981). Looking and competing: Accountability and visual access in integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 111-120.
10. Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1993). Gender differences in marital conflict: The demand/withdraw interaction pattern. In S. Okamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.). Gender in contemporary society (pp. 113-141). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Clyman, D. (1995). Measures of joint performance in dyadic mixed-motive negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 38-18.
12. Cohen, J. (1968). Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 426-443.
13. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
14. De Dreu, C. K. W. (1995). Coercive power and concession making in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 646-670.
15. De Dreu, C. K. W., & McCusker, C. (1997). Gain-loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1093-1106.
16. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). Impact of social value orientation on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.
17. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21, 619-654.
18. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Deutsch, M. (1982). Interdependence and psychological orientation. In V. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior (pp. 15-42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Druckman, D. (1994). Determinants of compromising behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 507-556.
21. Franzosi, R. (1995). The puzzle of strikes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Gayle, B. M., Preiss, R. W., & Allen, M. (1994). Gender differences and the use of conflict strategies. In L. H. Turner & H. M. Sterk (Eds.), Differences that make a difference: Examining the assumptions in gender research (pp. 13-26). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
23. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures in organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
24. Ippolito, C. A., & Pruitt, D. G. (1990). Power balancing in mediation: Outcomes and implications of mediator intervention. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 341-356.
25. Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66-91.
26. Kenny, D. A., & LaVoie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-348.
27. Kimmel, M. J., Pruitt, D. G., Magenau, J. M., Konar-Goldband, E., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1980). Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 9-22.
28. Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M., & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). The marital dynamics of conflict about the division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 635-653.
29. Komorita, S. S., Sheposh, J. P., & Braver, S. L. (1968). Power, the use of power, and cooperative choice in a two-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8, 134-142.
30. Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. (Eds.). (1996). Trust in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Kressel, K., & Pruitt, D. G. (1985). Themes in the mediation of social conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 179-198.
32. Krone, K. J., Allen, M., & Ludlum, J. (1994). A meta-analysis of gender research in managerial influence. In L. H. Turner & H. M. Sterk (Eds.), Differences that make a difference: Examining the assumption in gender research (pp. 73-84). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
33. Larrick, R. P., & Blount, S. (1995). Social context in tacit bargaining games: Consequences for perceptions of affinity and cooperative behavior. In R. M. Kramer & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Negotiation as a social process (pp. 268-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Laskewitz, P., Van de Vliert, E., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (1994). Organizational mediators siding with or against the powerful party? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 176-188.
35. Lawler, E. J., & Bacharach, S. B. (1987). Comparison of dependence and punitive forms of power. Social Forces, 66, 446-462.
36. Lawler, E. J., Ford, R. S., & Blegen, M. A. (1988). Coercive capability in conflict: A test of bilateral deterrence versus conflict spiral. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 93-107.
37. Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). The manager as negotiator. New York: Free Press.
38. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In B. B. Bunker, J. Z. Rubin, & Associates (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch (pp. 133-174). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. Mannix, E. A. (1994). When will we meet again? The effects of power, distribution norms, and the scope of future interaction in small group negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 343-368.
40. McClintock, C. (1976). Social motives in settings of outcome interdependence. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations: Social psychological perspective (pp. 49-77). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41. Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1975). The role of situational restrictiveness on self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and empirical expansion of Kelley and Stahelski's triangle hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 661-673.
42. Mogy, R. B., & Pruitt, D. G. (1974). Effects of threatener's enforcement costs on threat credibility and compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 173-180.
43. Neale, M., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York: Free Press.
44. Orbell, J., Dawes, R., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (1994). Trust, social categories, and individuals: The case of gender. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 109-128.
45. Parks, C. D., Henager, R. F., & Scamahorn, S. D. (1996). Trust and messages of intent in social dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40, 134-151.
46. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
47. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1993). Negotiation and Mediation. London: Open University Press.
48. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363-392.
49. Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621-630.
50. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
51. Ross, W., & LaCroix, J. (1996). Multiple meanings of trust in negotiation theory and research: A literature review and integrative model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 314-360.
52. Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
53. Rutte, C., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1987). The effects of framing social dilemmas as give-some or take-some games. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 103-108.
54. Sattler, N. D., & Kerr, N. L. (1991). Might versus morality: Motivational and cognitive bases for social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 756-765.
55. Schein, E. (1988). Organizational Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. Shapiro, D. L., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L. (1992). Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8, 365-378.
57. Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Minton, J. (1992). Organizational justice. New York: Lexington Books.
58. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Tjosvold, D. (1997). Conflict within interdependence: Value for performance and individuality. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 23-37). London: Sage.
60. Tripp, T., & Sondak, H. (1992). An evaluation of dependent variables in experimental negotiation: Effects of decision rule, agenda, and aspiration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 273-295.
61. Valley, K. L., Neale, M. A., & Mannix, E. A. (1995). Friends, lovers, colleagues, strangers: The effects of relationships on the process and outcomes of negotiations. In R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 5, pp. 65-94). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
62. Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Complex interpersonal conflict behavior: Theoretical frontiers. London: Psychology Press.
63. Watson, C. (1994). Gender differences in negotiation behavior and outcomes: Fact or artifact? In A. Taylor & J. Beinstein Miller (Eds.), Conflict and gender (pp. 191-210). Cresshill, NJ: Hampton Press.
64. Weingart, L. R., Bennet, R. J., & Brett, J. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504-517.
65. Weingart, L. R., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (1996, June). Social motives in integrative negotiation: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 9th conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Ithaca, NY.
66. Weingart, L. R., Hyder, E., & Prietula, M. J. (1996). Knowledge matters: The effects of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcome. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1205-1217.
67. Winer, B. J. (1981). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
68. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 110-116.
69. Yamagishi, T. (1992). Group size and the provision of a sanctioning system in a social dilemma. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 243-261). London: Pergamon Press.