Social value orientations and strategy choices in competitive negotiations

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 657-668

  Olekalns, Mara ^a   Smith, Philip L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033241995     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167299025006002     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley.
2. Alexander, J. F., Schul, P. L., & Babakus, E. (1991). Analyzing interpersonal communications in industrial marketing negotiations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 19, 129-139.
3. Bakeman, R., & Gottman,J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Camac, C. (1992). Information preferences in two-person social dilemmas. In W.B.G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H.A.M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 147-161). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
6. Carnevale, PJ.D, & Lawler, E. J. (1987). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 636-659.
7. Carnevale, P. J., & Pruitt, D. G. (1992). Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 531-582.
8. Carroll, J. S., & Payne, J. W. (1991) An information processing approach to two-party negotiations. Research on negotiation in organizations, 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9. De Dreu, C.K.W., & Boles, T. (1997). Social value orientations and the use of cognitive heuristics by negotiators. Paper presented at the International Association of Conflict Management Conference, Bonn, Germany.
10. De Dreu, C.K.W., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (1995). The impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.
11. Deutsch, M. (1982). Interdependence and psychological orientation. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 16-42). New York: Academic Press.
12. Donohue, W. A., Diez, M. E., & Hamilton, M. (1984). Coding naturalistic negotiation interaction. Human Communication Research, 10, 403-425.
13. England, J. L. (1973). Mathematical models of two-party negotiations. Behavioral Science, 18, 189-197.
14. Fienberg, S. E. (1980). The analysis of cross-classified, categorical data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
16. Greenhalgh, L., & Gilkey, R. W. (1993). The effect of relationship orientation on negotiators' cognitions and tactics [Special issue]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 167-183.
17. Grzelak, J. (1982). References and cognitive process in interdependence situations: A theoretical analysis of cooperation. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 97-122). New York: Academic Press.
18. Hawes, L. C., & Foley, J. R. (1973). A Markov analysis of interview communication. Speech Monographs, 40, 210-219.
19. Iacobucci, D., & Wasserman, S. (1988). A general framework for the statistical analysis of sequential dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 379-390.
20. Iedema, J., & Poppe, M. (1994). Effects of social value orientation on expecting and learning others' orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 565-579.
21. Iedema, J., & Poppe, M. (1995). Perceived consensus of one's social value orientation in different populations in public and private circumstances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 497-507.
22. Kelley, H. H. (1997). Expanding the analysis of social orientations by reference to the sequential-temporal structure of situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 373-404.
23. Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970a). Errors in perception of intentions in mixed-motive games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 379-400.
24. Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970b). Social interaction basis of cooperators and competitors beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 401-419.
25. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
26. Kuhlman, D. M., Brown, C., & Tetac, P. (1992) Judgments about cooperation and defection in social dilemmas: The moderating role of judge's social orientation. In W.B.G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H.A.M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 111-132). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
27. Kuhlman, D. M., & Wimberley, D. L. (1976). Expectations of choice behavior held by cooperators, competitors, and individualists across four classes of experimental games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 69-81.
28. Larrick, R., & Blount, S. (1995). Social context in tacit bargaining games: Consequences for perceptions of affinity and cooperative behavior. In R. M. Kramer & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Negotiation as a social process: New trends in theory and research (pp. 268-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Lewicki, R. J., & Litterer, J. A. (1985). Negotiation. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
30. Lewis, S. A., & Fry, W. R. (1977). Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 75-92.
31. Liebrand, W. B., Jansen, R. W., Rijken, V. M., & Suhre, C. J. (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.
32. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
33. Maki, J. E., & McClintock, C. G. (1983). The accuracy of social value prediction: Actor and observer influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 829-838.
34. McClintock, C. G. (1988). Evolution, systems of interdependence, and social values. Behavioral Science, 33, 59-76.
35. McClintock, C. G., & Debrand, W. B. (1988). Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 396-409.
36. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
37. Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1975). The role of situational restrictiveness on self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and empirical extension of Kelley and Stahelski's triangle hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 661-673.
38. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (1997). Understanding optimal outcomes: The role of strategic sequences in competitive negotiations (Working Paper No. 110). Melbourne, Australia: Department of Management & Industrial Relations, University of Melbourne.
39. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (1998, June). Mere frequency effects? Motivational orientation, strategic choice and optimal outcomes in negotiations. Paper presented at the International Association of Conflict Management Conference, Washington, DC.
40. Olekalns, M., Smith, P. L., & Kibby, R. (1996). Social value orientations, negotiator strategies and outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 299-313.
41. Pinkley, R. L. (1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 117-126.
42. Pinkley, R. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1994). Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute resolution and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 193-205.
43. Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621-630.
44. Putnam, L. L. (1990). Refraining integrative and distributive bargaining: A process perspective. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 2, 3-30.
45. Putnam, L. L., & Holmer, M. (1992). Framing and refraining in negotiations. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation (pp. 128-155). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Putnam, L. L., & Wilson, S. R. (1989). Argumentation and bargaining strategies as discriminators of integrative outcomes. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 121-141). New York: Praeger.
47. Roloff, M. E., Tutzauer, F. E., & Dailey, W. O. (1989). The role of argumentation in distributive and integrative bargaining contexts: Seeking relative advantage but at what cost? In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 109-120). New York: Praeger.
48. Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
49. Sattler, D. N., & Kerr, N. L. (1991). Might versus morality explored: Motivational and cognitive bases for social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 756-765.
50. Schlenker, B. R., & Goldman, H. J. (1978). Cooperators and competitors in conflict: A test of the "triangle model." Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 393-410.
51. Schulz, J. W., & Pruitt, D. G. (1978). The effects of mutual concern on joint welfare. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 480-492.
52. Thomas, A. (1985). Conversational routines: A Markov chain analysis. Language and Communication, 5, 287-296.
53. Thomas, A., Roger, D., & Bull, P. (1983). A sequential analysis of informal dyadic conversation using Markov chains. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 177-188.
54. Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515-532.
55. Ting-Toomey, S. (1983). An analysis of verbal communication patterns in high and low marital adjustment groups. Human Communication Research, 9, 306-319.
56. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
57. Van Lange, P.A.M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994) Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
58. Van Lange, P. A., & Liebrand, W. B. (1989). On perceiving morality and potency: Social values and the effects of person perception in a give-some dilemma. European Journal of Personality, 3, 209-225.
59. Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. Ithaca, NY: Industrial and Labor Relations Press.
60. Wasserman. S., & Iacobucci, D. (1986). Statistical analysis of discrete relational data British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 35, 41-64.
61. Wasserman. S., & Weaver, S. O. (1985). Statistical analysis of binary relational data: Parameter estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 406-427.
62. Weingart, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1996). Mixed motivational orientations in negotiating groups: Convergence and reaching agreement. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Cincinnati, OH, August.
63. Weingart, L. R., Hyder, E. B., & Prietula, M. J. (1996). Knowledge matters: The effect of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcome. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1205-1217.
64. Weingart, L. R., Prietula, M. J., Hyder, E. B., & Genovese, C. R. (1995). Tactical knowledge and the process of negotiation. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
65. Wilson, S. R., & Putnam, L. L. (1990). Interaction goals in negotiation. Communication Yearbook, 13, 374-406.