Culture in the context of intercultural negotiation: Individualism-collectivism and paths to integrative agreements

Human Communication Research

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 591-617

  Cai, Deborah A ^a   Wilson, Steven R ^b   Drake, Laura E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034287098     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00770.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adler, N. J., Brahm, R., & Graham, J. L. (1992). Strategy implementation: A comparison of face-to-face negotiations in the People's Republic of China and the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 449-466.
2. Adler, N. J., & Graham, J. L. (1989). Cross-cultural interaction: The international comparison fallacy? Journal of International Business Studies, 20, 515-537.
3. Adler, N. J., Graham, J. L., & Gehrke, T. S. (1987). Business negotiations in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Journal of Business Research, 15, 411-429.
4. Bazerman, M. H., Magliozzi, T., & Neale, M. A. (1985). The acquisition of an integrative response in a competitive market. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 294-313.
5. Brett, J. N., & Okumura, T. (1998) Inter- and intracultural negotiation: U.S. and Japanese negotiators. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 495-510.
6. Cai, D. A. (1998). Culture, plans, and the pursuit of negotiation goals. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 8, 103-123.
7. Cai, D. A., & Donohue, W. (1997). Determinants of facework in negotiation: An intercultural perspective. Asian Journal of Communication, 7, 85-110.
8. Cai, D. A., & Drake, L. E. (1998). The business of business negotiation. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 21 (pp. 153-189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Campbell, N. C. G., Graham, J. L., Jolibert, A., & Meissner, H. G. (1988). Marketing negotiations in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 52, 49-62.
10. Drake, L. E. (1995). To err is human: Cultural orientation as a source of judgment errors and integrative processes in international negotiation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 07A.
11. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 62,31-41.
12. nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Folger, J. P., Hewes, D. E., & Poole, M. S. (1984). Coding social interaction. In B. Dervin & M. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 115-161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Graham, J. L. (1983). Brazilian, Japanese, and American business negotiations. Journal of International Business Studies, 14, 47-61.
15. Graham, J. L. (1985). Cross-cultural marketing negotiations: A laboratory experiment. Marketing Science, 4, 130-146.
16. Graham, J. L. (1993). The Japanese negotiation style: Characteristics of a distinct approach. Negotiation Journal, 9, 123-140.
17. Graham, J. L., & Andrews, J. D. (1987). A holistic analysis of Japanese and American business negotiations. Journal of Business Communication, 24, 63-77.
18. Graham, J. L., Evenko, L. I., & Rajan, M. N. (1992). An empirical comparison of Soviet and American business negotiations. Journal of International Business Studies, 23, 387-415.
19. Graham, J. L., Kim, D. K., Lin, C. Y., & Robinson, M. (1988). Buyer-seller negotiations around the Pacific Rim: Differences in fundamental exchange processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 48-54.
20. Graham, J. L., Mintu, A. T., & Rodgers, W. (1994). Explorations of negotiation behaviors in ten foreign cultures using a model developed in the United States. Management Science, 40, 72-95.
21. Gudykunst, W. B. (1987). Cross-cultural comparisons. In C. Berger & S. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 847-891). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Huber, V. L., & Neale, M. A. (1986). Effects of cognitive heuristics and goals on negotiator performance and subsequent goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 342-365.
24. Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225-248.
25. Hui, C. H., & Yee, C. (1994). The shortened individualism-collectivism scale: Its relationship to demographic and work-related variables. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 409-424.
26. Hunter, J. E. (1980). Factor analysis. In P. R. Monge & J. N. Cappella (Eds.), Multivariate techniques in human communication research (pp. 229-257). New York: Academic Press.
27. Janosik, R. J. (1987). Rethinking the culture-negotiation link. Negotiation Journal, 3, 385-395.
28. Kelley, H. H. (1966). A classroom study of dilemmas in interpersonal negotiation. In K. Archibald (Ed.), Strategic interaction and conflict (pp. 49-73). Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
29. Kim, M. S., & Wilson, S. R. (1994). A cross-cultural comparison of implicit theories of requesting. Communication Monographs, 61, 210-235.
30. Kumagai, F., & Straus, M. A. (1983). Conflict resolution tactics in Japan, India, and the USA. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 377-392.
31. Lee, H. O., & Rogan, R. G. (1991). A cross-cultural comparison of organizational conflict management behavior. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 181-199.
32. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1985). The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 34-49.
33. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Cognition and rationality in organizations. New York: Free Press.
34. Neale, M. A., Huber, V. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 228-241.
35. Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. (1986). Experts, amateurs, and refrigerators: Comparing expert and amateur negotiators in a novel task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 305-317.
36. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
37. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
38. Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621-633.
39. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
40. Putnam, L. L., & Geist, P. (1985). Argument in bargaining: An analysis of the reasoning process. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 225-245.
41. Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. (1982). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 171-191.
42. Putnam, L. L., & Wilson, S. R. (1989). Argumentation and bargaining strategies as discriminators of integrative bargaining outcomes. In M. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 121-144). New York: Praeger.
43. Putnam, L. L., Wilson, S. R., & Turner, D. B. (1990). The evolution of policy arguments in teachers' negotiation. Argumentation, 4, 129-152.
44. Putnam, L. L., Wilson, S. R., Waltman, M. S., & Turner, D. B. (1986). The evolution of case arguments in teachers' bargaining. Journal of American Forensic Association, 23, 63-81.
45. Pye, L. W. (1982). Chinese commercial negotiating style. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
46. Roloff, M. E., Tutzauer, F. E., & Dailey, W. O. (1989). The role of argumentation in distributive and integrative bargaining contexts: Seeking relative advantage but at what cost? In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 109-119). New York: Praeger.
47. Salacuse, J. W. (1991). Making global deals. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48. Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139-157.
49. Thomas, K. W., & Pondy, L. R. (1977). Toward an "intent" model of conflict management among principal parties. Human Relations, 30, 1089-1102.
50. Thompson, L. L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 161-179.
51. Thompson, L. L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98-123.
52. Triandis, H., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self in-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
53. Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture. London: The Economist Books.
54. Tutzauer, F. (1990). Integrative potential and information exchange as antecedents of joint benefit in negotiation dyads. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 153-173.
55. Tutzauer, F., & Roloff, M. E. (1988). Communication processes leading to integrative agreements: Three paths to joint benefits. Communication Research, 15, 360-380.
56. Weingart, L. R., Thompson, L. L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 7-31.
57. Weiss, S. E. (1996). International negotiations: Bricks, mortar, and prospects. In B. J. Punnett & O. Shenkar (Eds.), Handbook for international management research (pp. 209-265). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
58. Wilson, S. R., Cai, D., Campbell, D., Donohue, W., & Drake, L. (1995). Cultural and communication processes in international business negotiation. In A. M. Nicotera (Ed.), Conflict in organizations: Communication processes (pp. 197-229). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
59. Wilson, S. R., & Putnam, L. L. (1990). Interaction goals in negotiation. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 13 (pp. 374-406). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. nd ed.). New York: McGraw -Hill.