Phases, transitions and interruptions: Modeling processes in multi-party negotiations

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 14, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 191-211

  Olekalns, Mara ^a,d,h   Brett, Jeanne M ^b,e,f,g   Weingart, Laurie R ^c,f,i,j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^e Department of Dispute Resolution ^*

^f NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

ⁱ CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j Intl Assoc for Conflict Management

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6344278677     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022898     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adair, W., & Brett, I. (2002). Time, culture and behavioral sequences in negotiations. Northwestern University Dispute Resolution Research Center Wroking Paper #268.
2. Adair, W., Okumura, T., & Brett, J. (2001). Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The U.S. and Japan, Journal of Applied Psychology.
3. Baxter, L. A. (1982). Conflict management: An episodic approach. Small Group Behavior, 13, 23-42.
4. Beggs, R., Brett, J. M, & Weingart, L. (1993). Tower Market. In Negotiation: Cases, Readings, and Exercises, Lewicki RJ, Litterer JA, Saunders DM, Minton, JW. (Eds.) Homewood, IL: Irwin.
5. Ben-Yoav, O., & Pruitt, D.G. (1984). Resistance to yielding and expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 323-335.
6. Brett, J., Shapiro, D., & Lythe, A. (1998). Refocusing rights- and power-oriented negotiators toward integrative negotiations: Outcome and process effect. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 410-424.
7. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiations: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889-905.
8. Donohue, W. A., Ramesh, C., & Borgrevink, C. (1991). Crisis bargaining: Tracking relational paradox in hostage negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 257-273.
9. Donohue, W. A., & Roberto, A. J. (1993). Relational development as negotiated order in hostage negotiation, Human Communication Research, 20, 175-198.
10. Donohue, W. A., & Roberto, A. J. (1996). An empirical examination of three models of integrative and distributive bargaining, The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 209-229.
11. Drake, L. E., & Donohue, W. A. (1996). Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution. Communication Research, 23, 297-322.
12. Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 3, 9-41.
13. Gersick, C. J. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274-309.
14. Greenacre, M. J. (1993). Correspondence analysis in practice. San Diego: Academic Press.
15. Holmes, M. E. (1997). Optimal matching analysis of negotiation phase sequences in simulated and authentic hostage negotiations. Communication Reports, 10, 1-8.
16. Holmes, M. E. (1992). Phase structures in negotiation, In L. L. Putnam, & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation (pp 83-105). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
17. Holmes, M. E., & Sykes, R. E. (1993). A test of the fit of Gulliver's phase model to hostage negotiations. Communication Studies, 44, 38-55.
18. Iedema, J., & Poppe, M. (1994). Effects of social value orientation on expecting and learning others' orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 565-579.
19. Iedema, J., & Poppe, M. (1995). Perceived consensus of one's social value orientation in different populations in public and private circumstances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 497-507.
20. Jett, Q. R., & George, J. M. (2003). Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 28, 494-489.
21. Kolb, D., & Williams, J. (2002). Navigating the hidden agendas in bargaining. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Lytle, A. L., Brett, J. M., & Shapiro, D. L. (1999). The strategic use of interests, rights, and power to resolve disputes. Negotiation Journal, 15, 31-51.
23. Maki, J. E., & McClintock, C. G. (1983). The accuracy of social value prediction: Actor and observer influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 829-838
24. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Morley, I. E., & Stephenson, J. M. (1977). The social psychology of bargaining. London: Allen & Unwin.
26. Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring and adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84-97.
27. O'Connor, K. M., & Adams, A. A. (1999). What novices think about negotiation: A content analysis of scripts. Negotiation Journal, 15, 135-147.
28. Okhuysen, G. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, 13, 370-386.
29. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2000). Negotiating optimal outcomes: The role of strategic sequences in competitive negotiations. Human Communications Research, 24, 528-560.
30. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2003). Testing a three-way relationship among negotiators' motivational orientations, strategy choices and outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 101-117.
31. Olekalns, M., Smith, P. L., & Walsh, T. (1996). The process of negotiating: Tactics, phases and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 68-77.
32. Olekalns, M. & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Think globally, act locally: Towards an adaptive model of organizational negotiations. Paper presented at the 16th International Association of Conflict Management Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Melbourne Business School Working Paper 2003-02.
33. Pelz, D. C. (1985). Innovation and complexity and the sequence of innovating stages. Knowledge: Creation, diffusion, utilization, 6, 261-291.
34. Pinkley, R. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1994). Conflict frames of reference: Implications for dispute processes and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 193-205.
35. Poole, M. S. (1981). Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models. Communication Monographs, 48, 1-24.
36. Poole, M. S. (1983a). Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision-making. Communication Monographs, 50, 206-232.
37. Poole, M. S. (1983b). Decision development in small groups III: A multiple sequence model of group decision development. Communication Monographs, 50, 2321-341
38. Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989a). Decision development in small groups IV: A typology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323-356.
39. Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989b). Decision development in small groups V: Test of a contingency model. Human Communication Research, 15, 549-589.
40. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation Behavior, New York: Academic Press.
41. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1982). The development of integrative agreements in social conflict. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Living with other people. New York: Academic Press.
42. Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621-633.
43. Putnam, L. L. (1990). Reframing integrative and distributive bargaining: A process perspective. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 2, 3-30.
44. Putnam, L. L., Wilson, S. R., & Turner, D. B. (1990). The evolution of policy arguments in teachers' negotiations. Argumentation, 4, 129-152.
45. Roloff, M. E., Tutzauer, F. E., & Dailey, W. O. (1989). The role of argumentation in distributive and integrative bargaining contexts: Seeking relative advantage but at what cost? In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 109-120). New York: Praeger.
46. Weingart, L. R., Bennett, R. J., & Brett, J. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504-517.
47. Weingart, L. R., Brett, J. M., & Olekalns, M. (2002). Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. Paper presented at Academy of Management, Denver, Colorado.
48. Weingart, L. R., Hyder, E. B., & Prietula, M. J. (1996). Knowledge matters: The effect of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcome. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1205-1217.
49. Weingart, L. R., Prietula, M. J., Hyder, E., & Genovese, C. (1999). Knowledge and the aequential processes of negotiation: A Markov chain analysis of response-in-kind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 366-393.
50. Weingart, L. R., Thompson, L. L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 7-31.