Effects of pictographs and quoting on flaming in electronic mail

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 225-243

  Thompsen, Philip A ^a   Foulger, Davis A ^b  

^a WILLIAM JEWELL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION; DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONIC MAIL; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

FLAMING; HYPOTHESIS; PICTOGRAPHS; QUOTING;

PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

EID: 0030173639     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0747-5632(96)00004-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson, J. A., & Meyer, T. P. (1988). Mediated communication: A social action perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Anderson, J. F., & Walther, J. B. (1992, May). Relational tone in computer-mediated communication: A meta-analysis of past research. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Miami, FL.
3. Aronson, E., Brewer, M., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1985). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 441-485). New York: Random House.
4. Asteroff, J. F. (1987) Paralanguage in electronic mail: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, NY.
5. Bales, R. F. (1950). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociology Review, 15, 257-263.
6. Blackman, B. I., & Clevenger, T., Jr. (1990a, November). Computer mediated interpersonal communication: Differences in nonverbal surrogates in three messaging modes. Paper presented to the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
7. Blackman, B. I., & Clevenger, T., Jr. (1990b, November). The promises, possibilities and pragmatics of using pictograph surrogates in on-line messaging: Implications for managing the adoption of computer-mediated communication technology. Paper presented to the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
8. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
9. Digital Equipment Corporation (1988). VMS DCL concepts manual. Maynard, MA: Author.
10. Foulger, D. A. (1990) Medium as process: The structure, use, and practice of computer conferencing on IBM's IBMPC computer conferencing facility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia.
11. Goode, J., & Johnson, M. (1991, November). Putting out the flames: The etiquette and law of e-mail. Online, pp. 61-65.
12. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Agle, G. (1978), Replicating Bales' problem solving experiments on a computerized conference: A pilot study (No. 8). Newark, NJ: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Computerized Conferencing and Communications Center.
13. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
14. Holmes, M. E. (1987, November). A conversational analysis of computer-mediated discourse. Paper presented to the Speech Communication Association, Boston.
15. Holmes, M. E., & Berquist, C. (1990, November). Gender display in synchronous computer-mediated discourse: A case of channel constraints and opportunities. Paper presented to the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
16. Huff, C., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1989). Computer communication and organizational commitment: Tracing the relationship in a city government. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1371-1391.
17. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
18. Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104.
19. Komsky, S. H. (1991). A profile of users of electronic mail in a university: Frequent versus occasional users. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 310-340.
20. Lea, M., O'Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). 'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89-112). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
21. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
22. Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1992). Social approaches to interpersonal communication. Communication Theory, 2, 131-139.
23. Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
24. Rice, R. E., & Shook, D. E. (1990). Relationships of job categories and organizational levels to use of communication channels, including electronic mail: A meta-analysis and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 27, 195-229.
25. Robinson-Stavely K., & Cooper, J. (1990). Mere presence, gender, and reactions to computers: Studying human-computer interaction in the social context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 168-183.
26. Rubinyi, R. M. (1989). Computer and community: The organizational impact. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 110-123.
27. Shamp, S. (1989) Mechanomorphism and Perceptions of Computer Communication Partners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
28. Sherblom, J. (1988). Direction, function and signature in electronic mail. Journal of Business Communication, 25(4), 39-54.
29. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
30. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121-134.
31. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
32. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Thompsen, P. A. (1993, February). A social influence model of flaming in computer-mediated communication. Paper presented to the Western States Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM.
34. Thompsen, P. A. (1994). An episode of flaming: A creative narrative. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 51, 51-72.
35. Thompsen, P. A. (1996). What's fueling the flames in Cyberspace: A social influence model. In L. Strate, R. Jacobson, & S. Gibson (Eds.), Communication and Cyberspace: Social interaction in an electronic environment (pp. 293-311). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
36. Thompsen, P. A., & Ahn, D.-K. (1992). To be or not to be: An exploration of E-Prime, copula deletion and flaming in electronic mail. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 49, 146-164.
37. Turner, J. (1988, April 13). 'E-Mail' technology has boomed, but manners of its users fall short of perfection. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A1, A16.
38. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
39. Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
40. Zancanella, D. (1994). Winking across the wires. English Journal, 83, 11.