A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 273-307

  LePine, Jeffery A ^a   Piccolo, Ronald F ^b   Jackson, Christine L ^c   Mathieu, John E ^d   Saul, Jessica R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43949112977     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: 17446570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x     Document Type: Article

References (182)

1. The asterisk (*) indicates studies that were included in the meta‐analyses.
2. * Agrell A, Gustafson R. (1994). The team climate inventory (TCI) and group innovation: A psychometric test on a Swedish sample of work groups. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 67, 143–151.
3. * Alge BJ, Wiethof C, Klein HJ. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge‐building experiences and opportunities in decision‐making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 26–37.
4. * Alper S, Tjosvold D, Law KS. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self‐managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33–52.
5. * Amason AC. (1996). Distinguising the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.
6. * Amason AC, Mooney AC. (1999). The effects of past performance on top management team conflict in strategic decision making. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 340–359.
7. * Amason AC, Sapienza HJ. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495–516.
8. * Ancona DG, Caldwell DF. (1992a). Bridging the boundary—External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–665.
9. * Ancona DG, Caldwell DF. (1992b). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321–341.
10. * Bachrach DG, Bendoly E, Podsakoff PM. (2001). Attributions of the “causes” of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1285–1293.
11. Baldwin TT, Bedell MD, Johnson JL. (1997). The social fabric of a team‐based MBA Program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369–1397.
12. * Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work‐team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377–391.
13. * Barry B, Stewart GL. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self‐managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62–78.
14. * Barsade SG, Ward AJ, Turner JDF, Sonnenfeld JA. (2000). To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802–836.
15. * Bayazit M, Mannix EA. (2003). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting team members' intent to remain in the team. Small Group Research, 34, 290–321.
16. Beal DJ, Cohen RR, Burke MJ, McLendon CL. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta‐analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989–1004.
17. Bettenhausen KL. (1991). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345–381.
18. * Bishop JW, Scott KD, Burroughs SM. (2000). Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment. Journal of Management, 26, 1113–1132.
19. * Brannick MT, Roach RM, Salas E. (1993). Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Human Performance, 6, 287–308.
20. * Brodbeck FC. (2001). Communication and performance in software development projects. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 73–94.
21. * Burningham C, West MA. (1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Research, 26, 106–117.
22. * Campion MA, Medsker GJ, Higgs AC. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness—Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–850.
23. * Campion MA, Papper EM, Medsker GJ. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429–452.
24. * Carmeli A, Schaubroeck J. (2006). Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 441–453.
25. * Chen G, Thomas B, Wallace JC. (2005). A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 827–841.
26. * Chen G, Tjosvold D, Liu C. (2006). Cooperative goals, leader people and productivity values: Their contribution to top management teams in China. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1177–1200.
27. * Cheng JLC. (1983). Interdependence and coordination in organizations: A role‐system analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 156–162.
28. * Chidambaram L. (1996). Relational development in computer‐supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20, 143–165.
29. * Cobb MG, Mathieu JE. (2003, April). The impact of training and environmental complexity on the effectiveness of multi‐team systems. In Mathieu JE. (Chair), Investigations of multi‐team systems. A symposium presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
30. * Cobb MG, Mathieu JE. Unpublished Data.
31. * Cogliser CC, Schriesheim CA. (2000). Exploring work unit context and leader‐member exchange: A multi‐level perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 487–511.
32. Cohen SG, Bailey DE. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.
33. * Cohen SG, Ledford GE, Spreitzer GM. (1996). A predictive model of self‐managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643–676.
34. * Colquitt JA. (2004). Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 633–646.
35. * Colquitt JA, Noe RA, Jackson CL. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83–109.
36. * DeChurch LA, Marks MA. (2006). Leadership in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 311–329.
37. * De Dreu CKW, Van Vianen AEM. (2001). Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 309–328.
38. De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.
39. * De Dreu CKW, West MA. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191–1201.
40. * DeShon RP, Kozlowski SWJ, Schmidt AM, Milner KR, Wiechmann D. (2004). A multiple‐goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1035–1056.
41. Devine DJ, Clayton LD, Philips JL, Dunford BB, Melner SB. (1999). Teams in organizations. Small Group Research, 30, 678–711.
42. Devine DJ, Philips JL. (2001). Do smarter teams do better?: A meta‐analysis of cognitive ability and team performance. Small Group Research, 32, 507–532.
43. * Dirks KT. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445–455.
44. * Drach‐Zahavy A, Somech A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics, 5, 111–123.
45. * Duffy MK, Stark EM. (2000). Performance and satisfaction in conflicted interdependent groups: When and how does self‐esteem make a difference Academy of Management Journal, 43, 772–782.
46. * Eby LT, Dobbins GH. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group‐level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275–295.
47. Edwards JR. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 144–192.
48. * Ehrhart MG, Bliese PD, Thomas JL. (2006). Unit‐level OCB and unit effectiveness: Examining the incremental effect of helping behavior. Human Performance, 19, 159–173.
49. * Ellis APJ. (2006). System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 576–589.
50. * Ellis APJ, Bell BS, Ployhart RE, Hollenbeck JR, Ilgen DR. (2005). An evaluation of generic teamwork skills training with action teams: Effects on cognitive and skill‐based outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58, 641–672.
51. * Elron E. (1997). Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 393–412.
52. * Ely RJ. (2004). A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 755–780.
53. * Emrich CG. (1999). Context effects in leadership perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 991–1006.
54. * Ensley MD, Pearce CL. (2001). Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 145–160.
55. * Erez A, LePine JA, Elms H. (2002). Effects of rotated leadership and peer evaluation on the functioning and effectiveness of self‐managed teams: A quasi‐experiment. Personnel Psychology, 55, 929–948.
56. Evans CR, Jarvis PA. (1980). Group cohesion: A review and re‐evaluation. Small Group Research, 11, 359–370.
57. * Faraj S, Sproull L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 1554–1568.
58. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59–74.
59. Fleishman J. (1980). Collective action as helping behavior: Effects of responsibility diffusion on contributions to a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 629–637.
60. Gersick CJG, Hackman JR. (1990). Habitual routines in task performance groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65–97.
61. * Gilson LL, Mathieu JE, Shalley CE, Ruddy TM. (2005). Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness Academy of Management Journal, 48, 521–531.
62. * González MG, Burke MJ, Santuzzi AM, Bradley JC. (2003). The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 629–648.
63. Goodman PS, Ravlin E, Schminke M. (1987). Understanding groups in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 121–173.
64. * Greene CN, Schriesheim CA. (1980). Leader‐group interactions: A longitudinal field investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 50–59.
65. Gully SM, Devine DJ, Whitney DJ. (1995). A meta‐analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26, 497–520.
66. Gully SM, Joshi A, Incalcaterra KA, Beaubien JM. (2002). A meta‐analysis of team‐efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819–832.
67. Guzzo RA, Shea GP. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In Dunnette MD, Hough LM (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 269–313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
68. Harrison DA, Newman DA, Roth PL. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta‐analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305–325.
69. * Hewett TT, O'Brien GE, Hornik J. (1974). The effects of work organization, leadership style, and member compatibility upon the productivity of small groups working on a manipulative task. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 283–301.
70. * Hiller NJ, Day DV, Vance RJ. (2006). Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 387–397.
71. * Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12, 435–449.
72. * Hoegl M, Preveen Parboteeah K. (2003). Goal setting and team performance in innovative projects: On the moderating role of teamwork quality. Small Group Research, 34, 3–19.
73. * Hoegl M, Weinkauf K. (2005). Managing task interdependencies in multi‐team projects: A longitudinal study. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1287–1308.
74. * Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15, 38–55.
75. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. (1990). Methods of meta‐analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
76. * Hyatt DE, Ruddy TM. (1997). An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breach. Personnel Psychology, 50, 553–385.
77. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input‐process‐output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.
78. * Isabella LA, Waddock SA. (1994). Top management team certainty—Environmental assessments, teamwork, and performance implications. Journal of Management, 20, 835–858.
79. * Janssen O, Van de Vliert E, Veenstra C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25, 117–141.
80. * Janz BD, Colquitt JA, Noe RA. (1997). Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology, 50, 877–904.
81. * Jehn KA. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value‐based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223–238.
82. * Jehn KA. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.
83. * Jehn KA, Mannix EA. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251.
84. * Jehn KA, Shah PP. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775–790.
85. * Jehn KA, Chadwick C, Thatcher SMB. (1997). To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287–305.
86. * Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.
87. * Jordan PJ, Troth AC. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving: Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Human Performance, 17, 195–218.
88. * Jordan MH, Field HS, Armenakis AA. (2002). The relationship of group process variables and team performance. Small Group Research, 33, 121–150.
89. * Kahai SS, Sosik JJ, Avolio BJ. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity‐relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 499–524.
90. * Katz R. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81–104.
91. * Keller RT. (1994). Technology‐information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 167–179.
92. * Kidwell RE, Jr, Mossholder KW. (1997). Cohesiveness and organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis of work groups and individuals. Journal of Management, 23, 775–793.
93. * Kirkman BL, Rosen B. (1999). Beyond self‐management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58–74.
94. * Kirkman BL, Tesluk PE, Rosen B. (2001). Assessing the incremental validity of team consensus ratings over aggregation of individual‐level data in predicting team effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 54, 645–667.
95. * Kirkman BL, Mathieu JE, Cordery JL, Rosen B. (2007). A contingency model of global virtual team leadership. Paper to be presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.
96. * Klein HJ, Mulvey PW. (1995). Two investigations of the relationships among group goals, goal commitment, cohesion, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 44–53.
97. * Klinger RL, Crawford E, LePine JA. (2007). Relationships among teamwork processes and team criteria. Manuscript in preparation, University of Florida.
98. Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 12, pp. 333–375). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
99. Kozlowski SWJ, Gully SM, Nason ER, Smith EM. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In Ilgen DR, Pulakos ED (Eds.), The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development (pp. 240–292). San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
100. * Kurtzberg TR. (2000). Creative styles and teamwork: Effects of coordination and conflict on group outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
101. Law KS, Wong CS, Mobley WH. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23, 741–755.
102. LePine JA. (2003). Team adaptation and post change performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 27–39.
103. * LePine JA. (2005). Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1153–1167.
104. LePine JA, Hanson M, Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. (2000). Contextual performance and teamwork: Implications for staffing. In Ferris GR, Rowland KM (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 19, pp. 53–90). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
105. * Lester SW, Meglino BM, Korsgaard MA. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352–368.
106. * Lovelace K, Shapiro DL, Weingart LR. (2001). Maximizing cross‐functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–793.
107. * Lurey JS, Raisinghani MS. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management, 38, 523–544.
108. * Marks M. (1999). A test of the impact of collective efficacy in routine and novel performance environments. Human Performance, 12, 295–309.
109. * Marks MA, Luvison D. (2006, April). Team leadership of strategic alliances. Presentation at the Annual Conference for the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
110. * Marks MA, Panzer FJ. (2004). The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Human Performance, 17, 25–41.
111. Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.
112. * Marks MA, DeChurch LA, Mathieu JE, Panzer FJ, Alonso A. (2005). Teamwork in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 964–971.
113. * Marsh WM, Mathieu JE, Ruddy TM. (2003). Cultural influences on team empowerment processes. In Mathieu JE (Chair), New Directions and Investigations of Team Empowerment. A symposium presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.
114. Martins LL, Gilson LL, Maynard MT. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here Journal of Management, 30, 805–835.
115. * Mathieu JE, Gilson LL, Ruddy TR. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 97–108.
116. * Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Cannon‐Bowers JA, Salas E. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 37–56.
117. Mathieu JE, Marks MA. (2006). Team process items. Unpublished.
118. * Mathieu JE, Ruddy TM. (2005, April). External leadership and statistical process control influences on team processes and performance: A quasi‐experiment. In Rentsch JR (Chair), Keys to high team performance on complex tasks. Symposium presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angles, CA.
119. * Mathieu JE, Rapp A, Ahearne M. (2007). Empowering leadership, member experience, and virtuality: Combined influences on sales team processes and effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.
120. * Mathieu JE, Schulze W. (2006). The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team process‐performance relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 605–619.
121. * Mathieu JE, Taylor SR. (2007). A framework for testing meso‐mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141–172.
122. * Maynard MT. (2007). The impact of experience and familiarity: An examination in project teams. University of Connecticut, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
123. McGrath JE. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
124. * Miller DL. (2001). Reexamining teamwork KSAs and team performance. Small Group Research, 32, 745–766.
125. * Mohammed S, Ringseis E. (2001). Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 310–335.
126. Mullen B, Copper C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227.
127. * Mulvey PW, Klein HJ. (1998). The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 62–87.
128. * Naumann SE, Bennett N. (2002). The effects of procedural justice climate on work group performance. Small Group Research, 33, 361–377.
129. * Neuman GA, Wright J. (1999). Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 376–389.
130. * Oetzel JG. (2001). Self‐construals, communication processes, and group outcomes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Small Group Research, 32, 19–54.
131. O'Leary‐Kelly AM, Martocchio JJ. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285–1301.
132. * Pearce CL, Ensley MD. (2004). A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 259–278.
133. * Pearce CL, Giacalone RA. (2003). Teams behaving badly: Factors associated with anti‐citizenship behavior in teams. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 58–75.
134. * Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1–28.
135. * Pinto MB, Pinto JK, Prescott JE. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of project team cross‐functional cooperation. Management Science, 39, 1281–1297.
136. * Podsakoff PM, Ahearne M, MacKenzie SB. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262–270.
137. * Polzer JT, Milton LP, Swann WB. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296–324.
138. * Porter C. (2005). Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 811–818.
139. * Porter TW, Lilly BS. (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 361–376.
140. * Priem RL, Lyon DW, Dess GD. (1999). Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25, 935–953.
141. * Prussia GE. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social‐cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187–198.
142. * Rapp TL, Mathieu JE. (2007). Evaluating an individually self‐administered generic teamwork skills training program across time and levels. Small Group Research, 38, 532–555.
143. * Raver JL, Gelfand MJ. (2005). Beyond the individual victim: Linking sexual harassment, team processes, and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 387–400.
144. * Rittman AL, Orvis KL, Zaccaro SJ. (2003, April). Growing skills for success in multi‐team systems: The effects of different forms of training feedback. In Mathieu JE (Chair), Investigations of multi‐team systems. A symposium presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
145. * Saavedra R, Earley PC, Van Dyne L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task‐performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61–72.
146. Salas E, Rozell D, Mullen B, Driskell JE. (1999). The effect of team building on performance. Small Group Research, 30, 309–329.
147. * Schippers MC, Den Hartog DN, Koopman PL, Wienk JA. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 779–802.
148. * Shah PP, Dirks KT, Chervany N. (2006). The multiple pathways of high performing groups: The interaction of social networks and group processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 299–317.
149. Shea GP, Guzzo RA. (1987). Groups as human resources. In Rowland KM, Ferris GR (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 5, pp. 323–356). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
150. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.
151. * Simons TL, Peterson RS. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102–111.
152. * Simons T, Pelled LH, Smith KA. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662–673.
153. * Simsek Z, Veiga JF, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN. (2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 69–84.
154. * Smith PB, Peterson MF, Misumi J. (1994). Event management and work team effectiveness in Japan, Britain, and USA. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 33–43.
155. * Somech A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32, 132–157.
156. Staw BM. (1975). Attribution of causes of performance—general alternative interpretations of cross‐sectional research in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414–432.
157. Steel PD, Kammeyer‐Mueller JD. (2002). Comparing meta‐analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 96–111.
158. Steiner ID. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
159. Stevens MJ, Campion MA. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20, 503–530.
160. * Stewart GL, Barrick MR. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135–148.
161. Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D. (1990). Work teams. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133.
162. Sundstrom E, McIntyre M, Halfhill T, Richards H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 44–67.
163. * Swann WB, Milton LP, Polzer JT. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 238–250.
164. * Sy T, Cote S, Saavedra R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 295–305.
165. * Tasa K, Whyte G. (2005). Collective efficacy and vigilant problem solving in group decision making: A non‐linear model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 119–129.
166. * Tesluk PE, Mathieu JE. (1999). Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 200–217.
167. Thompson JD. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw‐Hill.
168. Turner ME. (Ed.). (2001). Groups at work: Theory and research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
169. Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL, Koenig R, Jr. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322–338.
170. * Van der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547.
171. * Vera D, Crossan M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16, 203–224.
172. * Vinokur‐Kaplan D. (1995). Treatment teams that work (and those that don't): An application of Hackman's group effectiveness model to interdisciplinary teams in psychiatric hospitals. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31, 303–327.
173. * Volkema RJ, Gorman RH. (1998). The influence of cognitive‐based group composition on decision‐making process and outcome. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 105–121.
174. Wageman R, Baker G. (1997). Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 139–158.
175. * Watson WE, Michaelsen LK. (1988). Group interaction behaviors that affect group performance on an intellective task. Group & Organization Studies, 13, 495–516.
176. * Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelsen LK. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance—Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590–602.
177. * Weingart LR. (1992). Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 682–693.
178. * West MA, Anderson NR. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680–693.
179. * West MA, Borrill CS, Dawson JF, Brodbeck F, Shapiro DA, Haward B. (2003). Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 393–410.
180. Wittenbaum GM, Vaughan SI, Stasser GI. (2002). Coordination in task‐performing groups. In Tindale RS (Ed.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 177–204). New York: Kluwer Academic.
181. * Wong SS. (2004). Distal and local group learning: Performance trade‐offs and tensions. Organization Science, 15, 645–656.
182. * Zaccaro SJ. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group‐related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 387–399.