Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 779-793

  Lovelace, Kay ^a   Shapiro, Debra L ^b   Weingart, Laurie R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035536276     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3069415     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Amason, A. C. 1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 123-148.
2. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992a. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3: 321-341.
3. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992b. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 634-665.
4. Baron, R. M., & Kenney, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182.
5. Bettenhausen, K. L. 1991. Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17: 345-381.
6. Brett, J. M., Shapiro, D. L., & Lytle, A. L. 1998. Breaking the bonds of reciprocity in negotiations. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 410-424.
7. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. 1983. Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
9. Dahlin, K., & Weingart, L. R. 1996. Absorptive capacity - A link between group diversity and group performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati.
10. D'Aveni, R. A. 1995. Hypercompetitive rivalries: Competing in highly dynamic environments. New York: Free Press.
11. DeDreu, C. K. W., Harinck, F., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. 1999. Conflict and performance in groups and organizations. C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 14: 369-414. Chichester, England: Wiley.
12. DeDreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. 2000. Influence of social motives in integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78: 889-905.
13. Denison, D. R., Hart, S. L., & Kahn, J. A. 1996. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1005-1024.
14. DeVellis, R. 1991. Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: CA: Sage.
15. Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
16. Dougherty, D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3: 179-202.
17. Eveland, J. D. 1987. Institutional arrangements for multidisciplinary research. Technical report, Division of Policy Research and Analysis, National Science Foundation and CONSAD Research Corporation.
18. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. 1991. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.
19. Galbraith, J. R. 1977. Organization design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L. M., & Cooper, W. H. 1991. Unlocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 137-142.
21. Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. F. 1992. Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 350-369.
22. Garten, J. E. 1998. Why the global economy is here to stay. Business Week, March 23: 21.
23. George, J. 1990. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 107-116.
24. Griffin, A. 1997. The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. Journal of Marketing Research, 34: 24-35.
25. Hilty, J. A., & Carnevale, P. J. 1993. Black-hat/white-hat strategy in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55: 444-469.
26. Innami, I. 1994. The quality of group decisions, group verbal behavior, and intervention, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60: 409-430.
27. James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 219-229.
28. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85-98.
29. Janis, I., & Mann, L. 1977. Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
30. Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256-282.
31. Jehn, K. A. 1997. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 530-557.
32. Kanter, R. M. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 10: 97-102. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
33. Katz, R. 1982. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 81-104.
34. Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. 1985a. Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D project groups. R & D Management, 12: 7-19.
35. Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. 1985b. Project performance and the locus of influence in the R & D matrix. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 67-87.
36. Keller, R. T. 1986. Predictors of the performance of project groups in R & D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 715-726.
37. Keller, R. T. 1992. Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18: 489-501.
38. Kimmel, M., Pruitt, D. G., Magenau, J., Konar-Goldband, E., & Carnevale, P. J. 1980. The effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38: 9-23.
39. Kramer, R. 1991. The more the merrier? Social psychological aspects of multiparty negotiations in organizations. In B. Sheppard, R. Lewicki, & R. Bies (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations, vol. 3: 307-332. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40. Manz, C. C., Barstein, D. T., Hostager, T. J., & Shapiro, G. L. 1989. Leadership and innovation: A longitudinal process view. In A. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota Studies: 613-636. New York: Harper & Row.
41. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
42. Mintzberg, H., Dougherty, D., Jorgensen, J., & Westley, F. 1996. Some surprising things about collaboration - Knowing how people connect makes it work better. Organizational Dynamics, 25(4): 60-71.
43. Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. 1991. Negotiator cognition and rationality. New York: Free Press.
44. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12: 531-544.
45. Rousseau, D. M. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 7: 1-37. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
46. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 662-673.
47. Simons, T., & Peterson, R. 2000. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 102-111.
48. Teachman, J. D. 1980. Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods and Research, 8: 341-362.
49. Thompson, L. L., & Hastie, R. 1990. Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47: 98-123.
50. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. 1990. The processes of technological innovation. New York: Lexington.
51. Van de Ven, A. H., & Chu, Y. 1989. A psychometric assessment of the Minnesota Innovation Survey. In A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota Studies: 55-103. New York: Harper & Row.
52. Weingart, L. R., Bennett, R. J., & Brett, J. M. 1993. The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 504-517.
53. Weingart, L. R., Hyder, E. B., & Prietula, M. J. 1996. Knowledge matters: The effect of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcome. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 1205-1217.
54. Weingart, L. R., Thompson, L. L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. 1990. Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1: 7-31.
55. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293-321.
56. Wreden, N., 1998. Internet opens markets abroad. Informationweek, November 16: 2SS-4SS.