The multiple pathways of high performing groups: The interaction of social networks and group processes

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 299-317

  Shah, Priti Pradhan ^a   Dirks, Kurt T ^b   Chervany, Norman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750999095     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.368     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aboud, F. E. (1989). Disagreements between friends. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 495-508.
2. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40.
3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33-52.
5. Ancona, D. (1987). Groups in organizations: extending laboratory models. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Annual Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Group and intergroup processes (Vol. 9, pp. 207-231). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6. Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1992). Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341.
7. Argyle, M, & Henderson, M. (1985). The rules of relationships. In S. Duck, & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L.L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: personal strategies of creating Information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370-398
9. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (1992). UCINET. Columbia, SC: Analytic Technologies.
11. Boyd, B. K., Dess, G. G., & Rasheed, A. M. A. (1993). Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: causes and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 18, 204-226.
12. Bramel, D., & Friend, R. (1987). The work group and its vicissitudes in social and industrial psychology. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 233-253.
13. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Choi, J. N. (2002). External activities and team effectiveness: review and theoretical development. Small Group Research, 33, 181-208.
15. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. R. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
16. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
17. Cosier, R., & Schwenk, C. (1990). Agreement and thinking alike: ingredients for poor decisions. Academy of Management Executive, 4, 81-92.
18. Dailey, R. C. (1977). The effects of cohesiveness and collaboration on work groups: a theoretical model. Group and Organization Studies, 2, 461-469.
19. Davis, K. E., & Todd, M. J. (1982). Friendship and love relationships. Advances in Descriptive Psychology, 2, 79-122.
20. Davidson, L. R., & Duberman, L. (1982). Friendship: communication and Interactional Patterns in Same-Sex Dyads. Sex Roles, 8, 809-882.
21. DeDreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
22. Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445-455.
23. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
24. Ellis, A. P. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Porter, C. O. L. H., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Team learning: collectively connecting the dots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 821-835.
25. Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance a meta-analysis. Small group research, 22, 175-186.
26. Farris, G. (1969). Organizational factors and individuals performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 86-92.
27. Freeman, L. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40, 35-41.
28. Fry, W. R., Firestone, I., & Williams, D. (1983). Negotiation process and outcome of stranger dyads and dating couples: do lovers lose? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 1-16.
29. Gargiulo, M., & Bernassi, M. (1999). The dark side of social capital. In R. Leenders, & S. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 298-322). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
30. Georgopoulos, B. S. (1986). Organizational structure, problem solving, and effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
31. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
32. Gottman, M. T., & Parkhurst, J. T. (1980). A developmental theory of friendship and acquaintanceship processes. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (pp. 197-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
34. Guzzo, R. A, & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 262-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
35. James, L., Demaree, R., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within group inter-rater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
36. Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
37. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
38. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-557.
39. Jehn, K. A., & Shah, P. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: an examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.
40. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1979). Interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
41. Klein, D. (2001). Out of the cubicle. Newsweek, (4/16/2001), p.g 61.
42. Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43. Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123-140.
44. Morrison, E. W., & Bies, R. J. (1991). Impression management in the feedback-seeking process: a literature review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 16, 522-541.
45. Nelson, J., & Aboud, F. E. (1985). The resolution of social conflict between friends. Child Development, 56, 1009-1017.
46. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kunter, M. 1990. Applied linear statistical models (3rd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
47. Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children's friendship relations: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306-347.
48. Newcomb, A. F., & Brady, J. E. (1982). Mutuality in boys' friendship relations. Child Development, 53, 392-395.
49. Newcomb, T. M., Koenig, K. E., Flacks, R., & Warwick, D. (1967). Persistence and change: Bennington college and its students after twenty five years. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
50. Powell, W. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1994). Networks and economic life. In N. J. Smeleser, & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 368-402). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Rawlins, W. K. (1983). Negotiating close friendship: the dialectic of conjunctive freedoms. Human Communication Research, 9, 255-266.
52. Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-244.
53. Roloff, M. E. (1987). Communication and reciprocity within intimate relationships. In M. E. Roloff, & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes (pp. 1-46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Rulke, D. L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distributions of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Science, 46, 612-625.
55. Salas, E., Rozell, D., Mullen, B., & Driskell, J. E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: an integration. Small Group Research, 30, 309-329.
56. Shah, P. P. (1998). Who are employees' social referents?: using a network perspective to determine referent others. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 249-268.
57. Shah, P. P. (2002). Network destruction: the structural implications of downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 101-112.
58. Shah, P., & Jehn, K. A. (1993). Do friends perform better than acquaintances?: the interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 149-165.
59. Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102-111.
60. Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Brodt, S. E. (1996). Team negotiation: an examination of integrative and distributive bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 66-78.
61. Tjosvold, D. (1985). Implications of controversy research for management. Journal of Management, 11, 21-37.
62. Wall, J. A., & Callister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21, 515-558.
63. Vinzant, C. (2000). At least no one got third degree burns. Fortune (6/26/00), p. 328.