The relationship of group process variables and team performance: A team-level analysis in a field setting

Small Group Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 121-150

  Jordan, Mark H ^a   Feild, Hubert S ^b   Armenakis, Achilles A ^b  

^a Maxwell Gunter AFB   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036114834     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649640203300104     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
2. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
3. Benton, J. C. (1999). Air Force officer's guide (32nd ed.). Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole.
4. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
5. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429-452.
6. Carless, S. A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 71-88.
7. Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
8. Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161-182.
9. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
11. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-284.
12. George, J. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
13. George, J., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 698-709.
14. Gibson, C. B., Randel, A. E., & Earley, P. C. (2000). Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods. Group & Organization Management, 21, 67-97.
15. Guzzo, R. A. (1986). Group decision making and group effectiveness in organizations. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 34-71). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Guzzo, R. A., & Salas, E. (1995). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
18. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 376-389). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
21. Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1997). Multivariate data analysis. (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Hecht, T. D., Allen, N. J., Klammer, J., & Kelly, E. C. (2000, April). Group beliefs, capability, and performance: The potency of group potency. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
23. Ilgen, D. R., Major, D. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Sego, D. J. (1993). Team research in the 1990s. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 245-270). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Izraeli, D. F. (1985). Sex differences in self-reported influence among union officers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 148-156.
25. Johnson, R. A., & Schulman, G. I. (1989). Gender-role composition and role entrapment in decision making groups. Gender & Society, 3, 355-372.
26. LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 803-811.
27. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868.
28. Lester, S. W. (1991). The evolution of group potency: A longitudinal model of antecedents and consequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Richmond, VA.
29. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
30. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relations, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407-416.
31. Lonergan, J. M., Long, H. J., Bolin, A., & Neuman, G. A. (2000, April). The Big Five, task type and group performance: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 15th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
32. Major, D. A., Kozlowski, S.W.J., Chao, G. T., & Gardner, P. D. (1995). A longitudinal investigation of newcomer expectations, early socialization outcomes, and the moderating effects of role development factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 418-431.
33. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
34. Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 118-135.
35. Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman, J. F. (1995). Team-member exchange under team and traditional management. Group & Organization Management, 20, 18-38.
36. Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Group effectiveness: What really matters? Sloan Management Review, 28, 25-31.
37. Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89-103.
38. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
39. Stewart, G. L., Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1999). Team work and group dynamics. New York: Wiley.
40. Tesluk, P., Mathieu, J. E., Zaccaro, S. J., & Marks, M. (1997). Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 107-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 41-57.
42. Williams, H. M., & Parker, S. K. (2000, April). Understanding why self-managing teams can have positive consequences: The importance of considering mediators and moderators. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.