Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 376-389

  Neuman, George A ^a   Wright, Julie ^b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COOPERATION; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION; PERSONALITY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; COGNITION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY;

EID: 0033137340     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
2. Arneson, S., Millikin-Davies, M., & Hogan, J. (1993). Validation of personality and cognitive measures for insurance claims examiners. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 459-473.
3. Aronoff, J., & Wilson, J. P. (1985). Personality in the social process. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Baker, D. P., & Salas, E. (1994, April). The importance of teamwork: In the eye of the beholder? Paper presented at the 9th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.
5. Barrick, M., & Mount, M. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
6. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationship between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
7. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
8. Bennet, R. P., & Carbonari, J. P. (1976). Personality patterns related to own-, joint-, and relative-gain maximizing behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1127-1134.
9. Berkowitz, L. (1956). Group norms among bomber crews: Patterns of perceived crew attitudes, "actual" crew attitudes, and crew liking related to air crew effectiveness in Far Eastern combat. Sociometry, 19, 141-153.
10. Buller, P. F., & Bell, C. H., Jr. (1986). Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 305-328.
11. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
12. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1990, April). Cognitive psychology and team training: Shared mental models in complex systems. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Miami, Florida.
13. Comrey, A. L. (1953). Group performance in a manual dexterity task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 207-210.
14. Cordery, J. L., Mueller, W. S., & Smith, L. M. (1991). Attitudinal and behavioral effects cf autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 464-476.
15. Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). Clinical use of the five-factor model: An introduction. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 393-398.
16. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989a). The NEO-PUNEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
17. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989b, November). What lies beneath the Big Five? Facet scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. In O. P. John (Chair), The Big Five: Historical perspective and current research. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Society for Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Honolulu, HI.
18. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and New Five-Factor Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
19. Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Holland, J. L. (1984). Personality and vocational interests in an adult sample. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 390-400.
20. Barley, J. G., Gross, N., & Martin, W. C. (1952). Studies of group behavior: Factors associated with the predictability of groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 36, 396-403.
21. Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42, 25-36.
22. Dickinson, T. L., & McIntyre, R. M. (1997). A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 19-43). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
24. Driskell, J. E., Hogan, R., & Salas, E. (1988). Personality and group performance. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 91-112.
25. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1963). Social pressures in informal groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26. Fiske, D. W. (1982). Convergent-discriminant validation in measurements and research strategies. In D. Brinberg & L. H. Kidder (Eds.), Forms of validity in research (pp. 77-92). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Gellatly, I. R., Paunonen, S. V., Meyer, J. P., Jackson, D. N., & Goffin, R. D. (1991). Personality, vocational interests, and cognitive predictors of managerial job performance and satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 221-231.
28. George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
29. George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 698-709.
30. Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: Wiley.
31. Golembiewski, R. T. (1962). The small group: An analysis of research concepts and operation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Greene, C. (1989). Cohesion and productivity in work groups. Small Group Behavior, 20, 70-86.
33. Gully, S. M., Whitney, D. J., & Devine, D. J. (1993, May). Bringing cohesion to group research: A literature review and meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco.
34. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
35. Hackman, J. R. (1986). The psychology of self-management in organizations. In M. S. Pallak & R. Perloff (Eds.), Psychology and work (pp. 89-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-97). New York: Academic Press.
38. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance. Are N+1 heads better than one? Psychological Reports, 91, 517-539.
39. Hughes, G. L., & Prien, E. P. (1989). Evaluation of task and job skill linkage judgments used to develop test specifications. Personnel Psychology, 42, 283-292.
40. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
41. Jackson, S. E. (1992). Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse workforce. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 138-173). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
43. Janis, I. L. (1982). Victims of groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
44. Kabanoff, B., & O'Brien, G. E. (1979). Cooperation structure and the relationship of leader and member ability to group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 526-532.
45. Kilmann, R. H., & Thomas, K. W. (1975). Interpersonal conflict handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions. Psychological Reports, 37, 971-980.
46. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
47. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: Dissenting issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 161-167.
48. LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803-811.
49. Levine, E. L., Ash, R. A., & Bennett, N. (1980). Exploratory comparative study of four job analysis methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 524-535.
50. Lopez, F. M., Kesselman, G. A., & Lopez, F. E. (1981). An empirical test of a trait-oriented technique. Personnel Psychology, 34, 479-502.
51. Magjuka, R. J., & Baldwin, T. T. (1991). Team-based employee involvement programs for continuous organizational improvement: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology, 44, 793-812.
52. McCrae, R. R. (1989). Why I advocate the five-factor model: Joint factor analyses of the NEO-PI with other instruments. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 237-245). New York: Springer-Verlag.
53. McGrath, J. E. (1986). Studying groups at work: Ten critical needs. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 362-391). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J. L., Hanson, M. A., & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335-354.
55. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). The composition of small groups. Advances in Group Processes, 9, 237-280.
56. Morgan, B. B., Jr., & Lassiter, D. L. (1992). Team composition and staffing. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 31-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
57. Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. In Ferris, G. R. (Ed.) Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 13, pp. 153-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
58. Neuman, G. A., Edwards, J. E., & Raju, N. S. (1989). Organizational development interventions: A meta-analysis of their effects on satisfaction and other attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 42, 461-489.
59. Ostroff, C. (1993). Comparing correlations based on individuallevel and aggregated data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 569-582.
60. Pearlman, K. (1980). Job families: A review and discussion of their implications for personnel selection. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 1-28.
61. Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 373-406.
62. Peters, T. J. (1988). Thriving on chaos. New York: Knopf.
63. Piedmont, R. L., & Weinstein, H. P. (1993). Predicting supervisor ratings of job performance using the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Psychology, 128, 255-265.
64. Ree, M. J., Earles, J. A., & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 518-524.
65. Rose, R. M., Fogg, L. F., Helmreich, R. L., & McFadden, T. J. (1994). Psychological predictors of astronaut effectiveness. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, 910-915.
66. Rosse, J. G., Miller, H. E., & Barnes, L. K. (1991). Combining personality and cognitive ability predictors for hiring service-oriented employees. Journal of Business and Psychology, 5, 431-445.
67. Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 1-37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
68. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 2-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
69. Schmidt, F. L., Gast-Rosenberg, I., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for computer programmers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 643-661.
70. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Caplan, J. (1981). Validity generalization results for two job groups in the petroleum industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 261-273.
71. Schmidt, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 966-974.
72. Schneider, F. W., & Delaney, J. G. (1972). Effect of individual achievement motivation on group problem solving efficiency. Journal of Social Psychology, 86, 291-298.
73. Science Research Associates. (1984). Office Skills Tests examiner's manual. Chicago: Author.
74. Science Research Associates. (1988). Thurstone Test of Mental Alertness examiner's manual. Chicago: Author.
75. Shaw, M. E., & Harkey, B. (1976). Some effects of congruency of member characteristics and group structure upon group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 412-418.
76. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
77. Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20, 503-530.
78. Stogdill, R. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 26-43.
79. Sundstrom, E., de Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
80. Terborg, J. R., Castore, C., & DiNinno, J. A. (1976). A longitudinal field investigation of the impact of group composition on group performance and cohesion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 782-790.
81. Tett, R., Jackson, D., & Rathstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
82. Tornatsky, L. G. (1986). Technological change and the structure of work. In M. S. Pallak & R. Perloff (Eds.), Psychology and work (pp. 89-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
83. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
84. Tziner, A., & Eden, D. (1985). Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? Journal of Applied Psychology, 2, 85-93.
85. Wall, T. D., Kemp, N. J., Jackson, P. R., & Clegg, C. W. (1986). Outcomes of autonomous, workgroups: A long-term field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 281-304.
86. Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C., & Dixon, G. R. (1994). Inside teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87. Zander, A., & Forward, J. (1968). Position in group, achievement orientation, and group aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 282-288.